On the midnight of July 1st, 2017, the lights of Parliament burned bright. Leaders called it historic. They called it bold. They called it the dawn of a new economic freedom. The Goods and Services Tax—GST—was born with the grand slogan of “One Nation, One Tax.” We were told this was the masterstroke that would sweep away the chaos of multiple levies, end corruption, and bring clarity and justice to every citizen.

But let us ask honestly: what did we truly receive? Did the poor breathe easier? Did the small shopkeeper feel relief? Did the common household see fairness in the price of their daily bread? No. What was promised as simplicity quickly became a labyrinth of slabs and compliance. Four rates, cess on top, endless returns to file, and a credit system so complex it strangled small businesses before they could even grow. For the wealthy corporates, GST 1.0 was an adjustment. For the ordinary Indian, it was survival.

And so, eight years later, on the stage of Independence Day 2025, comes the announcement of GST 2.0— “The Next Generation GST.” But let us be clear: this was not born out of generosity. It was not born out of vision. It was born out of necessity. It was born because the people of India refused to stay silent. Because protests, anger, and disappointment had grown too loud to ignore. Because global investors demanded predictability. Because inflation and discontent had begun to bite the very hands that promised prosperity.

GST 2.0 is introduced with corrections: two slabs instead of four, zero tax on life-saving medicines, relief on essentials, and a sharper bite on luxuries and waste. On paper, it looks cleaner. On the surface, it looks fairer. And yes, it brings hope. Hope that perhaps the mistakes of GST 1.0 can be mended. Hope that small businesses can finally breathe. Hope that the ordinary citizen will feel relief in their pockets, not just promises in their ears.

But, my friends, we must ask: is this truly freedom, or is it just another chapter in the politics of survival? Because policies do not live in slogans—they live in the lives of people. The success of GST 2.0 will not be measured by speeches on Independence Day, but by whether the shopkeeper reopens his shutter, whether the family can afford its medicines, and whether fairness truly flows through the veins of this new system.

This is where the battle of GST stands today—between promise and performance, between power and people. And that is the story I will take you through: not just of taxes and slabs, but of survival, politics, and the unyielding demand for justice in the economic life of this nation.

GST 1.0: A Masterstroke or a Misstep?

When GST 1.0 was launched, it was sold to the nation as liberation from chaos. Four slabs—5%, 12%, 18%, 28%—plus cess. A grand design, a neat framework. Food grains were placed in the lowest bracket, while electronics, appliances, and luxury cars were pushed to the higher end. On paper, it looked balanced. On stage, it looked revolutionary.

But then came the lived reality.

The so-called “simplification” turned into a nightmare of compliance. The Input-Output Credit system—hailed as a genius mechanism—was nothing less than a maze. Small shopkeepers, street-corner traders, and startups found themselves crushed under paperwork and digital filings. Instead of spending their energy on business, they spent their nights wrestling with returns and portals.

And what about the people—the very backbone of this nation? Families found basic items like sanitary products, school supplies, and even everyday goods falling into slabs that pinched their already thin budgets. For the poor and the middle class, “one nation, one tax” became “one nation, one struggle.”

Yes, GST 1.0 unified India’s market—on paper. But in practice, it split the country into two realities:

• The corporates, who had the resources to navigate the system and even profit from it.
• And the small businesses, who buckled, broke, and in many cases, shut their doors.

Consumers, meanwhile, waited for relief in prices—but relief never came. Instead, they carried the burden of a tax regime that promised freedom but delivered complexity dressed up in new clothes.

So, I ask, was GST 1.0 truly a masterstroke? Or was it merely a repackaging of old burdens, dressed up with new slogans, sold to us as reform while ordinary Indians paid the price?

GST 2.0: The Next-Gen Shift

On the 15th of August, 2025—our Independence Day—the government stood before the nation and unveiled what it proudly called “Next Generation GST.” But notice this: unlike GST 1.0, which was introduced with the noise of fireworks and the glow of midnight lights, GST 2.0 was not presented as a revolution. It was presented as a correction.

Yes—after eight years of struggle, protest, and economic backlash, the government finally admitted what every trader, every small business, and every household had long known: GST 1.0 had failed to deliver. And so, GST 2.0 was born—not out of triumph, but out of necessity.

What changed?

• Simplification of slabs: The four complicated rates of 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28% were cut down to just two. At last, clarity over confusion, simplicity over suffocation. Compliance—once a nightmare—was promised to become manageable.
• Zero tax on essentials: Life-saving medicines, critical healthcare items—goods that no family should be punished for needing—were shifted to 0%. For millions crushed by medical costs, this was not just reform. This was survival.
• A stimulus for consumption: Essential household goods were pushed into the lower slab, aiming to put more money into the hands of citizens. The government boasted of stimulating nearly ₹2 lakh crores in extra consumption. But beyond numbers, it was a promise to ordinary Indians: that the system would finally serve them, not suffocate them.
• A focus on fairness: The government pressed corporates to pass on benefits to consumers instead of pocketing margins. A noble demand—but will it be enforced? Or will the powerful once again find ways to turn public policy into private profit?

And why was it called Next Gen GST? Not because it was futuristic. Not because it was innovative. But because it directly responded to the failures of the past, to the anger of citizens, to the relentless pressure from businesses. Unlike GST 1.0, which was wrapped in slogans and celebration, GST 2.0 carries an air of reluctant realism. It is not the chest-thumping of a “masterstroke.” It is the quiet confession of a mistake.

So let us be clear: GST 2.0 is not a gift. It is not a miracle. It is an admission. An admission that behind the slogans of “one nation, one tax,” there were flaws, fractures, and frustrations that could no longer be hidden.

And now, the real question: will this correction finally bring justice? Or will it too become another chapter of promises written on paper but erased from the lives of the people?

Winners and Losers in GST 2.0

Every reform creates its share of winners and losers—and GST 2.0 is no exception. The restructured slabs brought both relief and strain, hope and hesitation.

On the one hand, households finally felt a breath of relief. Daily essentials—groceries, cooking gas, medicines, educational materials—were either pushed into the reduced slab or made entirely tax-free. For families that had struggled under GST 1.0, this was not just a technical adjustment. This was a lifeline. When a mother buys her child’s schoolbooks, when a patient buys life-saving medicines, they now carry a little less weight in their wallets. That is the promise of GST 2.0 at its best.

But on the other hand, aspirational goods became costlier. Luxury cars, high-end electronics, tobacco products, and even items harmful to the environment were pushed into higher brackets. In principle, this is equity—those who can afford more, or those who consume what harms society, should pay more. Yet, for industries built on aspiration—automobiles, smartphones, consumer tech—the higher rates may dampen demand. Growth in these sectors may slow, and with it, jobs and investments.

And what about businesses? Here lies perhaps the most important impact.

For small businesses and micro-enterprises, GST 1.0 had been nothing short of punishing. Complex filings, heavy compliance, and constant cash-flow blockages drove many to the brink of closure. GST 2.0 promises breathing space: simplified slabs, reduced paperwork, and exemptions designed to ease their survival. For the first time, the system seems to acknowledge that a nation cannot prosper if its smallest players are crushed at the base.

For large businesses, the story is different. They had already adapted to GST 1.0 and even benefited from the idea of a unified national market. GST 2.0 continues to support them but adds stricter oversight—an attempt to ensure that when tax cuts are given, the benefit flows to consumers, not just to corporate balance sheets. Whether this oversight will succeed is a question still unanswered.

So yes, GST 2.0 tilts the scales towards fairness. But fairness always comes with trade-offs. Relief for households may mean restraint for industries. Support for small businesses may mean stricter scrutiny for large ones. The challenge before India is to ensure that these trade-offs do not turn into fresh fractures.

The Politics Behind Reform

Let us be clear—GST 2.0 did not arrive out of generosity. It did not fall from the sky as an act of goodwill. It was carved out of pressure—political, economic, and global.

For years, small traders, entrepreneurs, and the middle class raised their voices against GST 1.0. They called it unfair, unmanageable, and unlivable. Strikes were staged, protests erupted, and chambers of commerce demanded change. Opposition leaders seized every opportunity to attack the government, and public frustration grew louder with every passing year. Silence became politically dangerous. In the face of such anger, the government had no choice but to bend.

But it was not just the streets of India that pushed reform. The winds of global politics played their role too. Trade wars and tariffs during the Trump era rattled India’s investment climate. International companies, eyeing India’s vast market, hesitated. They wanted certainty, predictability, and a system they could trust. Without reform, India risked being sidelined. Simplifying GST was not just an internal decision—it was a diplomatic signal to the world: India is open for business.

And yes, there was another layer—the political calendar. With elections looming in Bihar and West Bengal, the pressure to offer visible relief to ordinary households and small traders could not be ignored. Announcing GST 2.0, with cheaper essentials and promises of fairness, served not only as economic reform but also as political outreach in these crucial battlegrounds.

At home, inflation was another fire. Prices of essentials had eroded household savings, sparked unrest, and fuelled resentment. To regain control, the government used GST 2.0 as a shield—cutting taxes on essentials like medicines, food items, and energy alternatives. This was more than economics; it was politics dressed as compassion, a move to rebuild trust before discontent turned into revolt.

And let us not forget the small businesses—the very backbone of this nation, employing nearly half the workforce. Under GST 1.0, they had suffered the most, crushed by compliance and paperwork. Their united pushback, their lobbying, their relentless appeals could no longer be ignored. To ignore them would have been political suicide.

Finally, there was the question of optics. India, rising on the global stage, could not afford to look indecisive or divided in its economic vision. At international forums, the government needed to project GST as a success story, not a cautionary tale. By announcing GST 2.0 on Independence Day itself, the message was clear: India is not stumbling, India is correcting, India is moving forward.

So, let us understand: GST 2.0 is not just about tax slabs and compliance. It is about politics, survival, and image. It is about calming anger at home, restoring credibility abroad, and protecting the government’s legitimacy in the eyes of its people. This was not merely a reform. This was a shield. This was survival politics wrapped in the language of progress.

Conclusion: Correction or Transformation?

So here we stand, at the crossroads of promise and performance. GST 1.0 was hailed as a masterstroke, yet it left the small trader gasping, the middle class struggling, and the dream of “one nation, one tax” buried under paperwork and pain. GST 2.0 arrives eight years later, not as a revolution, but as a correction. It promises simplicity, it promises fairness, it promises relief. But promises, as we know, are not proof.

The real test of GST 2.0 will not be in speeches from the Red Fort, nor in headlines splashed across newspapers. It will be in the streets and shops of India. Whether the shutter of a small business rises again with hope. Whether a patient can afford their medicine without despair. Whether a family feels lighter when they buy their groceries. That is where this reform will either stand tall—or fall like its predecessor.

Yes, GST 2.0 acknowledges the failures of the past. Yes, it brings hope of a fairer tomorrow. But let us never forget: true freedom is not found in slabs or percentages—it is found in justice, in equality, in policies that serve the people before they serve power.

And so, I leave you with this question: Is GST 2.0 the dawn of a new economic freedom, or is it merely the patchwork of survival politics? The answer will not be written by governments alone. It will be written by the lives of 1.4 billion Indians.

And when that answer comes, it will not whisper—it will thunder.

.    .    .