+ Follow
image by pixabay.com

My personality changes based on my GPS location. This is not a metaphor. It is a lived, daily reality for millions of young Indians who migrate to cities for education or work and return home carrying a version of themselves that must be carefully edited. I call this phenomenon the Sanskari Split, a silent survival strategy shaped by family expectations, social surveillance, and the unspoken rules of belonging.

In the city, identity feels expansive. You live alone or with friends. You make decisions without consulting elders. You date, drink, argue about politics, choose your clothes, curate your opinions, and slowly begin to understand who you are outside the framework of obedience. You are not perfect, but you are real. You are allowed to contradict yourself, to evolve, to be visibly confused. Autonomy becomes normal, not rebellious.

Then you land at the airport.

Somewhere between baggage claim and the arrival gate, something switches off the posture changes. The tone softens. Opinions retreat into the background. Clothes are reassessed. Language becomes careful. You touch feet, smile politely, laugh at jokes that aren’t funny, and pretend that the city version of you is either temporary or exaggerated. You suddenly “don’t know much” about the world. You let decisions be made for you again.

This transformation is so seamless that it feels automatic. It is not dishonesty. It is an adaptation.

Psychologists describe this process as code-switching, the act of shifting behavior, language, or identity to align with social expectations. In India, code-switching goes far beyond accents or vocabulary. It is a complete restructuring of the self. The same person occupies radically different moral, emotional, and social positions depending on where they are physically located.

What makes this especially exhausting is that it creates a double life. Not the dramatic kind people imagine, but a quiet, constant performance. In the city, you are the protagonist of your own story. Your choices have consequences. Your mistakes are yours to make. At home, you become a supporting character whose job is to maintain peace. You follow a script written long before you were born. Eat on time. Come home early. Don’t ask difficult questions. Don’t challenge narratives. Don’t disrupt the emotional ecosystem.

This split produces a strange emotional cost. In the city, guilt creeps in. You feel like you’re betraying your upbringing, your parents’ sacrifices, the values you were taught to respect. At home, resentment builds. You feel invisible, misunderstood, and infantilized. You are loved deeply, but only as a version of yourself that no longer exists.

That is the quiet tragedy of the Sanskari Split. Your parents don’t actually know you. They love a curated identity designed to keep them comfortable. Meanwhile, the real you exists elsewhere, fragmented across locations, never fully present in one place.

This tension is intensified by India’s collectivist family structure, where obedience is often equated with morality. Independence, especially emotional or sexual independence, is viewed not as growth but as deviation. Sociological studies consistently show that Indian families prioritize social harmony and family reputation over individual expression. For young adults, especially women, this means constant self-monitoring. Freedom is permitted only when it is invisible.

Technology makes this paradox sharper. Your parents can video call you daily, monitor your location, ask for photos, and still not know you. Digital proximity creates an illusion of intimacy while preserving emotional distance. You can live an entirely different life five hundred kilometers away and still perform compliance through a phone screen.

Over time, the psychological toll accumulates. Studies on identity fragmentation show that sustained role conflict leads to anxiety, emotional exhaustion, and a weakened sense of self. When you are required to suppress core parts of your identity to be loved, you begin to internalize the belief that authenticity is unsafe. You learn that truth must be negotiated, not spoken.

And yet, most young Indians do not rebel openly. They don’t storm out or cut ties. They adapt. They compartmentalize. They perfect the art of being many people at once. This is not cowardice. It is resilience shaped by constraint.

The Sanskari Split is not about rejecting family or tradition. It is about navigating a world where generational change is happening faster than emotional understanding. Parents grew up in a time when conformity ensured survival. Children are growing up in a world where self-expression ensures sanity. Both are trying to love each other across that gap, often failing silently.

Perhaps the solution is not a dramatic confrontation but a slow widening of truth. Small admissions. Partial honesty. Conversations that begin awkwardly and end unfinished. Not every family will change, but some will. And even when they don’t, naming the split matters. It validates the exhaustion. It reminds you that the fracture is structural, not personal.

Your personality does not change because you are fake.

It changes because you are navigating incompatible worlds.

And until those worlds learn to coexist, the Sanskari Split will remain one of the most common, unspoken experiences of young Indians—quietly boarding flights, rebooting identities, and hoping that one day, being yourself won’t feel like an act of rebellion.

References 

.    .    .

Discus