Introduction

This historical entanglement of caste and education has far-reaching implications, not only for the individuals directly affected but also for the broader societal dynamics of social mobility, inequality, and discrimination. Understanding the intricate relationship between caste and education in India requires a nuanced examination of historical legacies, policy interventions, and the contemporary challenges that persist in creating an inclusive and equitable educational system for all. The caste system, a social hierarchy that categorizes individuals into distinct groups based on birth, has significantly influenced who receives an education, the quality of that education, and the subsequent socio-economic prospects available to them.

About 80% of India’s population belongs to the historically disadvantaged castes and tribes of religious minorities (The Wire). The promise of education faced significant challenges when many Dalit children began to access the centers of knowledge traditionally controlled by the privileged upper castes. Even in contemporary urban settings, Dalits encountered various obstacles. To illustrate, cities were often divided along caste lines, further reinforcing the social and educational subjugation of Dalits through these spatial divisions.

The fossilization of the notions of caste-based hierarchy has perpetuated an impaired mindset detrimental to the upliftment of society. While some have been used to justify caste-based discrimination in certain societies, some brainwash people into believing that Dalits and lower-caste individuals should be excluded from the sphere of education. These biases are often mirrored in the education system, leading to the systemic exclusion of Dalits and lower caste individuals.

The Caste Problem in the Indian Education System

India now ranks as the world's seventh-largest economy, a testament to its impressive economic growth. Simultaneously, the nation has been experiencing a consistent upward trajectory in the gross enrolment ratio for both men and women, indicating significant strides in fortifying its educational system. What is particularly crucial is to thoroughly examine how formal education can disrupt the established mechanisms of caste and class perpetuation, with a specific focus on the perspectives of young, educated members of the Dalit community.

The Dalit community, traditionally situated outside the conventional four-tier caste system, has historically been engaged in occupations often considered 'polluting,' such as manual scavenging or waste collection. Throughout history, Dalits faced ostracism, both in rural villages and urban centers, resulting in limited or no access to formal education and minimal interactions with other communities.

In response to this challenge, parents of young Dalit men are increasingly hesitant to invest in their children's higher education, a trend notably on the rise in the Uttar Pradesh region of India. Among scholars, there exists a divergence of opinions regarding the potential of formal education to uplift historically marginalized populations in the global South. On one hand, advocates like Sen (2000) contend that formal education possesses the transformative ability to equip the previously excluded with vital skills and self-assurance. On the other hand, scholars like Levinson and Holland (1996) argue that formal education can be a 'contradictory resource,' as it may create opportunities for disadvantaged groups while simultaneously tethering them more tightly to systems of social inequality.

Beyond the economic factors that influence enrollment in formal education, Chamar youth grapple with pervasive caste discrimination, not only from their fellow students but also from teachers, as observed in the study by Craig Jeffrey and his colleagues in 2004. In contrast, Jats, leveraging their social connections with local government officials and offering bribes, often manage to secure positions in government offices. However, well-educated Chamar youth lack the economic and social capital necessary to secure employment, resulting in a troubling situation where they find themselves returning to the stigmatized, low-caste jobs typically performed by marginalized communities.

In regions like Uttar Pradesh, where more privileged castes hold sway over numerous employment opportunities, Dalit communities face a twofold challenge: recognizing the value of education while also acknowledging the pivotal role played by financial resources and social networks in accessing respectable employment. This perpetuates a distressing cycle where young Chamar individuals revert to daily wage labor, inadvertently reinforcing the societal stigma attached to occupations such as manual scavenging, butchering, and waste picking.

In the context of India, a nation marked by the prominence of the caste system and class hierarchies, educational initiatives are expected to yield only partial success in elevating the socio-economic status of marginalized groups without significant redistributions of material wealth. Drawing from empirical evidence collected in Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, Jeffrey et al. contend that in profoundly unequal societies with limited employment prospects, the educational pursuits of marginalized groups may not consistently follow an upward trajectory, leading to increased participation in formal schooling. Several factors contribute to this phenomenon, including discrimination within educational institutions by teachers and the absence of economic and social resources that would enable young men from marginalized communities to pursue formal education to its full extent.

Monopolizing Education: Provenance of the Dalit Exclusion

“LIKE AN OCTOPUS, CASTE HAS ITS TENACLES IN EVERY ASPECT OF INDIAN LIFE. IT BEDEVILS CAREFULLY DRAWN PLANS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IT DEFEATS LEGISLATIVE EFFORT TO BRING ABOUT SOCIAL REFORM…EVEN THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND ACADEMIC ELITES ARE NOT FREE FROM ITS OVERPOWERING INFLUENCE.” 
-THE CHANGING FRONTIERS OF CASTE

It is a well-known fact that the heinous employment of caste-based prejudicial apparatus goes beyond the basic structures of a social system including one’s personal and public life. One of the areas in which the proliferation of caste-based biases is evident is that of the contemporary education system. Declining equal opportunity to children of lower strata of society is a vicious practice propagated by the Brahminical authority to vindicate their domination. The growing monopolization of knowledge by the upper castes at times faces resistance in the form of characters who do not conform to the codified language of caste injustice.

In rural areas, discriminatory attitudes, and practices towards students of the oppressed caste groups are seen as an impediment to achieving an equal society. Many textbooks still portray Dalits and lower castes negatively, reinforcing age-old stereotypes and hierarchies. For instance, mythological biases contribute to cultural hegemony within the education system. The dominant upper castes control the narrative, influencing what gets taught and how it is taught. Mainstream historical accounts have often treated Dalits as passive subjects, marginalizing their experiences and contributions to history. This marginalization has resulted in a lack of representation and recognition of the Dalit cultural past in historical and mythological writings. The historiographical silence refers to the absence or neglect of Dalit history and culture in mainstream historical narratives. This creates an environment where Dalit and lower caste perspectives are systematically silenced, and their contributions to history, culture, and literature are marginalized, reinforcing a biased, one-sided view of society.

Representation matters, and the absence of Dalit and lower caste voices in educational materials perpetuate their invisibility. Myths, legends, and historical accounts predominantly focus on the achievements and contributions of the higher castes, ignoring the rich cultural heritage and struggles of the marginalized groups. This lack of representation sends a message to Dalit and lower caste students that their experiences and identities are inconsequential.

Caste and class biases in education can lead to discrimination and bullying. Dalit and lower caste students often face humiliation and prejudice from their peers based on deeply ingrained biases they encounter in textbooks. These experiences can have a profound psychological impact, hindering their educational progress and overall well-being. Self-esteem, confidence, and personal and professional growth of Dalit and lower caste children and youth can get fettered by the propagation of such invidious notions.

Social dynamics often come into play, as Dalit students, lacking the means for sartorial elegance and proficiency in refined discourse, encounter exclusion during social gatherings like birthday celebrations and cultural festivals. Furthermore, due to their underprivileged educational backgrounds, Dalit students faced language barriers, notably struggling with English language skills, which further compounded their feelings of isolation within the academic environment.

The education system itself can perpetuate institutional discrimination. Discriminatory practices in schools and colleges can range from separate seating arrangements to unequal treatment by teachers. The viciously prejudiced viewpoints that underpin the caste system are sometimes used to justify such practices, further excluding Dalits and lower castes from the educational sphere. The impact of affirmative action policies, such as reservations in educational institutions, on Dalit students has been crucial in increasing Dalit enrollment, but they have also faced resistance and challenges, including stigmatization and inadequate support systems within universities.

Some Case Studies

There have been several instances that shed light on the exclusion of Dalits from education in India. These case studies exemplify the deep-rooted challenges faced by the Dalit community in accessing quality education. Here are a few noteworthy examples:

• In Tamil Nadu, the Koothur massacre was a tragic incident where a Dalit community was brutally attacked while attempting to send their children to school. This incident exposed the extent of caste-based discrimination and violence that can be directed towards Dalits seeking education.
• Another horrifying episode occurred in Tsunduru, Andhra Pradesh, where a Dalit community faced a violent attack when they tried to assert their right to education. The Tsunduru massacre highlighted the persistent resistance to Dalit education and the severe consequences faced by those who dared to challenge the status quo.
• The story of Ekalavya, a pseudonym for a young Dalit boy from rural India, exemplifies the ongoing struggles faced by Dalit students in the present day. Ekalavya's journey to acquire quality education was fraught with discrimination, inadequate resources, and social stigma. His story underscores the persistence of barriers to education for Dalit youth.
• Tragically, on January 17, 2016, Rohit Vemula, a promising Dalit research scholar enrolled at Hyderabad Central University, took his own life by hanging in a friend's hostel room. His haunting suicide note bears witness to the deep turmoil he experienced, where he lamented, "My birth is my fatal accident... I always was rushing. Desperate to start a life... I am not sad. I am just empty. Unconcerned about myself. That's pathetic. And that's why I am doing this" (Biswas, 2016, para.1). This deeply unsettling suicide note forcefully brought to light the harsh and distressing reality of caste-based discrimination, exclusion, and the profound humiliation endured by Dalit students within India's prestigious educational institutions.
• Sukumar (2013), an academic hailing from the Dalit community, who currently teaches in the Department of Political Science at the University of Delhi, penned an autoethnography recounting his own experiences as a Dalit student at Hyderabad Central University. In his narrative, he illuminated the challenges faced by first-generation Dalit learners, who embarked on their educational journey in an environment marked by a curriculum that often felt foreign and deeply ingrained biases within teaching methods. They grappled with the intricacies of admission procedures, fee structures, course choices, hostel arrangements, and other critical aspects, relying heavily on university administrators who, regrettably, often exhibited an apathetic attitude towards their concerns.

The Way Forward: Role of Teachers and Educators

A teacher plays a pivotal role in eradicating mythological brainwashing and fostering an inclusive classroom environment. In a world where myths and stereotypes can endorse discrimination, educators have the unique opportunity to challenge these misconceptions and create an atmosphere where all students, regardless of their background, feel valued and respected. Teachers can encourage students to think critically about the stories and narratives they encounter. By examining myths and legends through a critical lens, students can better understand the cultural and historical context in which these narratives were created and recognize how they may have been used to reinforce biases. This critical analysis helps students see beyond the stereotypes and fosters a more inclusive worldview.

Teachers should strive to include a diverse range of perspectives and voices in their curriculum. This means not just teaching the dominant myths of one culture but also exploring the stories, histories, and achievements of marginalized communities. By exposing students to a rich tapestry of cultures and narratives, teachers can break down stereotypes and create a more inclusive classroom.

Creating a safe space for open and honest discussions about stereotypes and bias is crucial. Teachers can initiate dialogues about the impact of myths and stereotypes on individuals and communities. These discussions allow students to share their experiences and perspectives, fostering empathy and understanding among peers.

Language plays a powerful role in shaping attitudes. Teachers can model inclusive language by avoiding derogatory terms or phrases and by addressing students using respectful language that recognizes their identities and backgrounds.

Integrating anti-bias education into the curriculum can be an effective way to counteract mythological brainwashing. These programs provide students with tools to recognize and challenge prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination in all its forms.

Teachers serve as role models for their students. By embodying inclusive attitudes and behaviors, educators can inspire their students to do the same. Teachers can demonstrate respect for diversity through their actions, such as celebrating cultural festivals or acknowledging significant historical events related to various communities.

Recognizing that each student is unique and may have different experiences and challenges related to myths and stereotypes is essential. Teachers can offer individualized support to students who may be particularly affected by these issues, helping them build resilience and self-confidence.

Engaging with the broader community, including parents and community leaders, can strengthen the efforts to create an inclusive classroom environment. Collaboration with stakeholders can help promote a collective commitment to combating bias and stereotypes.

Conclusion

As per the research of scholars like Craig Jeffrey and his colleagues in 2004, it is evident that even when young Dalit men attain education and develop a sense of self-worth and confidence within their villages, they often struggle to translate this accrued "cultural capital" into stable employment opportunities. This predicament has given rise to what can be described as a "reproductive crisis," leading to the emergence of a shifting cultural landscape characterized by growing resentment among Dalit men.

The dominant castes viewed Dalits as both potential resources and potential threats, fearing that they might disrupt the established hegemony of the upper castes at any moment. Dalits struggled for their rights in the past, and with the advent of modernity, they have been recognized as 'potential equals', yet they are still often seen as ‘different’. Besides the educational ostracization, mental health and generational trauma are the denouements of hierarchical indoctrination in our society.

Securing a high-quality education serves as the cornerstone for fostering development. Beyond enhancing one’s standard of living, ensuring inclusive access to education empowers Dalit individuals with the skills needed to devise inventive solutions to the most pressing problems of Indian society. By establishing precise benchmarks for identifying and rectifying instances of bias within educational institutions, accompanied by suitable punitive actions, the situation can be improved to some extent. Providing educators with specialized training to devise techniques fostering increased interaction among students hailing from diverse socio-economic backgrounds and various castes would act as an instrument to decimate the age-old hierarchical pattern of thought, behavior, ratification, and expulsion.

.    .    .