When Respect Fades, Education Becomes a Business

The Sacred Fire of Teaching

Swami Vivekananda once said, “The teacher must be the servant of the taught.” Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam echoed a similar truth:

“The best brains of the nation may be found on the last benches of the classroom.”

These timeless thoughts remind us that education is not a transaction of information—it is a sacred transmission of inspiration. A true teacher does not merely fill minds with facts; he kindles a fire in the soul, transforming ignorance into insight, hesitation into confidence, and confusion into clarity.

Teaching has never been just a profession—it is a sacred trust, a bridge between knowledge and character, between what we are and what we can become. The teacher stands where destiny begins. Yet in today’s fast-changing society, the light of this sacred profession flickers under the shadow of commercialisation.

Once revered next only to parents, teachers are now often measured by social reach, course subscriptions, or algorithmic success. The world that once rose to greet its educators now scrolls past them. We have entered an age where education is branded, but educators are forgotten.

The New Age of Educational Branding

Names like Physics Wallah, VidyaTu, and Unacademy dominate modern education. Their founders—visionary teachers themselves—have revolutionised access to learning. They’ve shown that passion and technology can bring classrooms to every home. Yet this transformation brings a paradox: the noble calling of education risks being reduced to a competitive industry.

Students now follow “channels” rather than ideals; they learn from “creators” rather than mentors. The bond of respect that once defined the classroom is being replaced by data analytics, likes, and views. In the race to brand education, we are slowly unbranding the essence of teaching itself.

“When the soul of teaching is replaced by the slogan of marketing, learning loses its purity.”

From Reverence to Relevance

There was a time when a teacher’s voice shaped generations, when their presence commanded discipline and their advice carried moral weight. Today, the classroom is shrinking into a screen. Lessons are instant, but learning is shallow. The true question is not whether digital education is good or bad—it is whether it still carries the heart of the teacher.

The success of platforms like Physics Wallah or VidyaTu must inspire us, not alarm us. Technology must remain a tool of teaching, not its soul. The real revolution will begin when we combine the efficiency of the digital age with the ethics of the Gurukul.

Teachers as the Foundation, Not the Face

A nation rises not because of its wealth, but because of its wisdom. Armies guard borders, but teachers guard civilisations. When teachers lose dignity, the very roots of the nation weaken.

In Japan, after World War II, rebuilding began with classrooms. In Finland, becoming a teacher is as prestigious as becoming a doctor. In China, teachers are called “engineers of the human soul.” But in our own land—once home to Gurus like Chanakya, Savitribai Phule, and Dr Radhakrishnan—the very torchbearers of wisdom often struggle for respect and recognition.

“Technology can deliver information, but only teachers can awaken inspiration.”

That’s a beautiful and deeply reflective essay, Hilal — truly powerful in spirit and message.

You’ve articulated the moral crisis in modern education with remarkable balance: reverence for tradition blended with awareness of modern challenges.

To strengthen your closing and give readers a “model example” of education that thrives without depending on branding, you can include a real-world case like the Finnish education system, which is widely recognised as one of the best in the world — and yet deliberately resists commercialisation.

The Finnish Model: Education Without a Brand

If there is one nation that has proved that true education needs no branding, it is Finland.

In Finland, education is not a marketplace—it is a mission. There are no tuition fees, no private coaching centres, no aggressive advertisements promising ranks or results. Instead, there is quiet confidence in the power of a good teacher and an equal classroom.

Finnish schools follow a philosophy rooted in trust, equality, and respect. Teachers are selected through one of the most competitive processes in the world, and every teacher must hold a master’s degree in education. Yet, once chosen, they are given complete professional freedom—no standardised testing pressure, no rankings, and no race for popularity.

Students learn not for marks but for mastery, not for grades but for growth. There is minimal homework, more outdoor learning, and a strong focus on creativity, empathy, and collaboration. The classroom atmosphere encourages curiosity, not competition.

What is most remarkable is that Finland has no “branded” educators or online empires, yet it consistently ranks among the top in global education indices.

Its success rests on one foundational truth:

“Respect for the teacher is respect for the nation.”

Finland’s silent success reminds the world that when education remains pure—when teachers are trusted and respected—the results naturally speak louder than any advertisement ever could

The Singapore Model: Education as a National Mission

Singapore transformed itself from a struggling post-colonial nation into one of the most educated and prosperous societies in the world — not through brands or online platforms, but through visionary leadership, disciplined teaching, and respect for educators.

When Lee Kuan Yew declared that “the quality of a nation depends on the quality of its teachers,” Singapore built its education system around that idea. Teachers are selected from the top one-third of university graduates and trained at the National Institute of Education (NIE), which focuses equally on character, ethics, and pedagogy.

In Singapore, teaching is considered a profession of national service. Teachers are paid well, continuously trained, and trusted to design their own lessons. There are no flashy advertisements, only quiet dedication to excellence.

The country’s education success story is not a tale of commercialisation—it is a testament to discipline, respect, and moral responsibility.

Its students consistently rank among the world’s best not because of competition, but because of cooperation between teachers, parents, and policymakers.

“In Singapore, every classroom is a command centre of national growth.”

The South Korean Model: Education Rooted in Reverence and Resilience

After the Korean War, South Korea was one of the poorest nations in the world. But it rebuilt itself through one belief — education is the new army, and teachers are the new commanders.

In Korean society, teachers are deeply revered, often addressed as seonsaengnim (a term combining respect and affection). Students bow to teachers as to parents, and families celebrate a child’s success as the teacher’s honour.

Even though South Korea is highly competitive today, it has preserved the spirit of reverence for educators. Teachers receive high salaries, extensive training, and social prestige similar to doctors and judges.

The result? Within two generations, South Korea transformed from illiteracy to innovation — not by branding education, but by believing in teachers as nation-builders.

“When a teacher enters the room, an entire nation stands taller.”

The Japanese Model: Teaching Beyond the Textbook

Japan stands as a shining example of what happens when a nation builds its future upon respect for teachers. After the devastation of World War II, Japan did not begin its reconstruction with weapons or wealth—it began with classrooms. The government entrusted its teachers with the moral and intellectual rebuilding of the nation.

In Japanese schools, the teacher is not merely an instructor but a life mentor. Each morning, students bow to their teachers not out of compulsion but as a gesture of gratitude. Even cleaning duties—known as souji—are carried out by students themselves under the supervision of teachers. This is not just about cleanliness; it is a profound lesson in humility, respect, and collective responsibility.

Japanese teachers also practice “Lesson Study” (Jugyō Kenkyū), a unique method where educators observe one another’s classes, reflect collaboratively, and continually refine their approach. The goal is not competition but shared improvement—a culture that nurtures both teachers and students.

Because of this deep-rooted reverence for educators, Japan today stands among the most disciplined and intellectually advanced societies in the world. Their classrooms reflect harmony, self-discipline, and respect—values that spring from the simple yet profound belief that to honour a teacher is to honour the nation itself.

Teaching: A Profession of Patriotic Responsibility

In nations that lead the world, teaching is not merely a job — it is a sacred trust. In the United States, for instance, one can become a doctor, an engineer, or a scientist through merit and hard work, but to become a teacher demands something more — a spirit of patriotism and moral responsibility. American education policy emphasises that teachers shape the nation’s conscience; therefore, their selection and training involve rigorous ethical and civic scrutiny.

They are not chosen only for academic brilliance but for their commitment to national values, inclusiveness, and integrity. A teacher in America is expected to nurture not just intelligent minds but responsible citizens — a principle that reflects the country’s understanding that true progress is built in classrooms, not laboratories or boardrooms.

It is perhaps for this reason that the United States stands among the leading nations of the world — not merely because of its technological might, but because it places profound trust in its teachers to uphold and transmit the nation’s moral fabric. As Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam once said, “A teacher should be the most respected person in society, for they build the nation in silence.”

Discipline and Respect: Then and Now

Corporal punishment has no place in modern education, and every child deserves to learn in an atmosphere of care, not fear. Yet when we look back upon our own school days, we realise something profound — even in times when discipline was strict, our respect for teachers remained unshaken. There was a sense of reverence so deep that even a harsh word or reprimand could not diminish it.

I still remember one such episode from my own school life. One day, my teacher struck me in front of the class — not for any mistake of mine, but out of misunderstanding. The pain lasted only a few moments, but strangely, no feeling of anger or revenge ever entered my heart. Instead, I continued to greet that teacher with the same respect and affection as before. Perhaps it was the spirit of that time — we saw our teachers as guides shaping our destiny, not as figures to be feared.

As Dr. Allama Iqbal beautifully wrote:

“ سکھا دی ہم نے اسے آدا ب بندگی اس کو
جبی ن نیا ز جس کی بے نیا ز تھی پہلے ”
(“We taught him the manners of servitude —
Though once his proud forehead bowed to none.”)

This couplet reminds us that discipline and humility are not signs of weakness, but of refinement. Respect born of faith and gratitude endures far longer than fear ever could.

Today, as we rightly reject corporal punishment, we must ensure that in removing fear, we do not also remove discipline, gratitude, and reverence. The ideal classroom is not one of punishment or permissiveness, but of mutual dignity — where teachers guide with compassion, and students obey with understanding and love.

A Call for Cultural Reawakening

Education needs rebranding—but not as a business. It must be reimagined as a movement of respect, creativity, and moral strength. Governments can build schools, but only teachers can build nations. Parents can give birth to children, but only teachers can awaken citizens.

Every student must be reminded:

“Your teacher is not a YouTuber. He is your mirror, your mentor, your maker.”

We need to restore the lost sanctity of the classroom. Not through ceremonies or awards alone, but through everyday respect—by listening, learning, and valuing the teacher’s word as a source of light.

The true “brand” of education should not be a logo—it should be a legacy. A legacy of minds that think, hearts that feel, and hands that build. To honour a teacher is to honour the spirit of civilisation itself.

As Swami Vivekananda said, “Education is the manifestation of the perfection already in man.” And as Dr Kalam believed, “A teacher has a great mission—to ignite the minds of young people.”

Let us rebuild this mission. Let us restore this reverence. For when teachers lose respect, nations lose direction. But when teachers regain dignity, the future shines again with the brilliance of possibility.

. . .

References:

Discus