+ Follow
Photo by KATRIN BOLOVTSOVA: Pexels

Introduction:

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a proposal that seeks to establish a common set of laws for all citizens of India, irrespective of their religion, gender, or sexual orientation. The UCC would cover personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, and maintenance, and would ensure that all citizens are subject to the same laws, regardless of their religious beliefs. The idea of UCC is based on Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, which states that the state shall endeavor to secure a UCC for its citizens. The aim of this provision is to promote national integration and social harmony by removing the disparities that exist in personal laws based on religion. However, the implementation of UCC is a complex and controversial issue, as it involves balancing the religious freedom and diversity of different communities with the principles of equality and justice. The proponents of UCC argue that it would promote gender equality, as it would eliminate discriminatory practices that exist in personal laws, such as polygamy and unilateral divorce. It would also ensure that all citizens have equal access to legal remedies and protections.On the other hand, opponents of UCC argue that it would infringe upon the religious freedom of minority communities, as personal laws are deeply rooted in religious beliefs and practices. They also argue that UCC would homogenize the diverse cultural and religious practices of India, and that it would be difficult to implement in a country as diverse as India. Despite the controversy surrounding UCC, there is a growing demand for its implementation, particularly among women's rights activists and progressive thinkers. They argue that UCC is necessary to ensure that all citizens are treated equally under the law, and that it is a step towards a more just and equitable society.

The History of Uniform Civil Code: Balancing Tradition and Progress in India

During the colonial era, the concept of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) emerged in India as British rulers sought to reform local social and religious customs by introducing Western ideologies. However, their efforts were met with staunch resistance from community leaders who sought to preserve their own personal laws rooted in religious scriptures. The debate surrounding the UCC persisted even after India gained independence, as the Constituent Assembly embarked on drafting the Constitution of India. Article 44 of the Constitution expressed the state's commitment to strive for a UCC for its citizens, positioning it as a directive principle of state policy. However, the framers of the Constitution refrained from making it mandatory or enforceable, recognizing the sensitivity and controversy surrounding the issue, which had the potential to impact religious freedom and the diverse fabric of Indian society.

Some of the historical cases that brought up the demand for UCC are:

The Shah Bano case was a landmark case in India that sparked a debate on the rights of Muslim women and the role of personal laws in a secular country. Here is a brief summary of the case:

  1. Shah Bano was a 62-year-old Muslim woman who was divorced by her husband, Mohammed Ahmad Khan, a wealthy lawyer, in 1978. He gave her a meager amount of money as maintenance for the iddat period (three months after divorce).
  2. Shah Bano filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India, seeking maintenance from her ex-husband under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which applies to all citizens regardless of their religion. She argued that she was unable to support herself and her five children after the divorce.
  3. Khan opposed her claim, saying that he had fulfilled his obligations under the Muslim personal law, which does not require him to pay maintenance beyond the iddat period. He also claimed that the court had no jurisdiction to interfere in matters of Muslim personal law, which are governed by the Shariat Act of 1937.
  4. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Shah Bano in 1985, holding that she had the right to claim maintenance from her ex-husband under Section 125 of the CrPC, as it was a secular law that aimed to prevent destitution and vagrancy. The court also suggested that the government should enact a uniform civil code for all citizens, as envisaged by Article 44 of the Constitution of India.
  5. The judgment provoked a strong reaction from some sections of the Muslim community, who felt that it violated their religious autonomy and identity. They demanded that the government should overturn the verdict and protect the Muslim personal law from judicial interference.
  6. The Congress government, led by Rajiv Gandhi, succumbed to the pressure and passed the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act in 1986, which effectively nullified the Shah Bano judgment and restricted the right of Muslim women to claim maintenance from their ex-husbands to the iddat period only. The act also shifted the responsibility of maintaining the divorced women to their relatives or the waqf boards (Islamic trusts).
  7. The act was widely criticized by women's rights activists, secularists, and legal experts, who saw it as a regressive and discriminatory move that undermined the secular fabric of the country and the constitutional rights of Muslim women. They challenged the validity of the act in the Supreme Court, which upheld it but interpreted it in a way that ensured that Muslim women would not be left destitute after divorce.
  8. The Shah Bano case and its aftermath had a lasting impact on the politics and society of India, as it exposed the tensions between the principles of secularism and pluralism, the demands of minority rights and gender justice, and the challenges of legal reform and social change.

The Sarla Mudgal case (1995), where a Hindu man converted to Islam and married another woman, without divorcing his first wife, as per the Hindu personal law. The Supreme Court held that such conversions and marriages were illegal and again recommended that a UCC should be implemented to prevent such frauds.

The Shayara Bano case (2017), where a Muslim woman challenged the practice of triple talaq (instant divorce) by her husband, as per the Muslim personal law. The Supreme Court declared triple talaq as unconstitutional and asked the government to frame a law to regulate the practice of divorce among Muslims.

Personal Laws in India: A Closer Look at Religious Communities' Civil Matters:

India has different personal laws for different religious communities, which govern their civil matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, etc. These personal laws are based on the scriptures or customs of each religion, and are recognized by the state. Some of the major personal laws in India are:

  • Hindu law: 

This applies to Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs. It is derived from ancient texts such as the Vedas, the Smritis, and the Dharmashastras, as well as modern statutes such as the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Succession Act, the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act. Hindu law covers aspects such as monogamous marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, adoption, guardianship, and joint family.

  • Muslim law: 

This applies to Muslims, who follow the Islamic faith. It is derived from the Quran, the Hadith, the Ijma, and the Qiyas, as well as the interpretations of various schools of jurisprudence such as the Hanafi, the Shafi, the Maliki, and the Hanbali. Muslim law covers aspects such as polygamous marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, adoption, guardianship, and waqf.

  • Christian law: 

This applies to Christians, who follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. It is derived from the Bible, the ecclesiastical laws of various churches, and the Indian statutes such as the Indian Christian Marriage Act, the Indian Divorce Act, the Indian Succession Act, and the Guardians and Wards Act. Christian law covers aspects such as monogamous marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, adoption, and guardianship.

  • Parsi law: 

This applies to Parsis, who follow the Zoroastrian faith. It is derived from the Avesta, the Dinkard, the Rivayats, and the Indian statutes such as the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, the Parsi Succession Act, and the Guardians and Wards Act. Parsi law covers aspects such as monogamous marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, adoption, and guardianship.

Before UCC, the government would give divorce and other civil rights to various communities according to their respective personal laws. However, this often led to conflicts and discrimination, especially for women and minorities, who faced unequal treatment and injustice under some personal laws. Therefore, some people have advocated for a UCC, which would replace the personal laws with a common law for all citizens, regardless of their religion, gender, or sexual orientation.

Already Prevalent?

Goa is the only state in India that has a UCC for all religions. It has retained its common family law known as the Goa Civil Code, which has been in place since its liberation from Portuguese rule in 1961. The Goa Civil Code covers aspects such as monogamous marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, and maintenance. However, the Goa Civil Code is not uniform as it has special provisions for different communities, for example, it allows bigamy to Hindu men if the wife does not deliver a child before the age of 25 or a male child before the age of 30.

The Introduction and Impact of The UCC Bill in Uttarakhand:

Uttarakhand is the first state in India to pass the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) bill in its assembly on February 7, 2024. The bill aims to establish a common law for all citizens of Uttarakhand, regardless of their religion, gender, or sexual orientation, on matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, and maintenance. The bill also proposes to regulate live-in relationships and prohibit bigamy or marriages with more than one person. The bill does not apply to tribal communities.

The UCC bill is expected to have a significant impact on the lives of the people of Uttarakhand, as it would bring some changes in their personal and social affairs. Some of the possible effects are:

  1. The UCC bill would provide equal rights and status to all citizens, especially women and minorities, who often face discrimination and injustice under some personal laws. The bill would grant them equal rights in matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, and maintenance, and empower them to participate in the social and economic development of the state.
  2. The UCC bill would reflect the changing needs and preferences of the young and modern population, who are more open to inter-religious and inter-caste marriages, live-in relationships, and other forms of cohabitation. The bill would provide them with a legal framework that supports their choices and respects their autonomy. The bill would also require the registration of live-in relationships, which would ensure the safety and welfare of the partners and the children born out of such relationships.
  3. The UCC bill would foster a sense of unity and solidarity among the diverse and pluralistic communities of Uttarakhand, by reducing the scope for communal conflicts and tensions arising from the differences in personal laws. The bill would also promote a common national identity and culture, while respecting the diversity and uniqueness of each community.
  4. The UCC bill would bypass the contentious issue of reforming the existing personal laws of different communities, which are often seen as sacred and inviolable by their followers. The bill would also prevent the interference of the state or the judiciary in the religious affairs of the communities, and respect their freedom of conscience and belief.

However, the UCC bill also faces some challenges and criticisms, such as:

  1. The UCC bill may face legal hurdles, as some experts argue that the state does not have the power to enact a UCC, which is a subject under the concurrent list of the Constitution. The bill may also be challenged in the Supreme Court, which has the final authority to interpret the Constitution and the fundamental rights of the citizens.
  2. The UCC bill may face opposition from some sections of the society, especially the Muslim community, who may feel that the bill violates their religious autonomy and identity. They may also fear that the bill is an attempt to impose the majority's culture and values on the minorities.
  3. The UCC bill may face implementation issues, as it would require a massive awareness and sensitization campaign among the people, as well as the training and capacity building of the officials and the judiciary, to ensure the smooth and effective enforcement of the bill.

The French Civil Code: A Cornerstone of Legal System and Equality:

France is one of the countries that has a UCC, which is based on the French Civil Code or the Code Napoleon. The French Civil Code was enacted in 1804 and has been revised and amended several times since then. The French Civil Code applies to all citizens regardless of their religion, ethnicity, or nationality. It covers aspects such as civil rights, property rights, family law, contract law, and tort law. The French Civil Code is considered to be one of the most influential and successful civil codes in the world.

The Future of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Bill in India: Challenges and Prospects:

The future of the UCC bill in India is uncertain, as it faces legal, political, and social challenges. Some of the factors that may affect the fate of the bill are:

  • The legal validity of the bill: Some experts argue that the state does not have the power to enact a UCC, which is a subject under the concurrent list of the Constitution. The bill may also be challenged in the Supreme Court, which has the final authority to interpret the Constitution and the fundamental rights of the citizens.
  • The political will of the government: The BJP, which is the ruling party at the Centre and in several states, has been advocating for a UCC for a long time, as part of its Hindu-nationalist agenda. However, the BJP may face opposition from its allies and other parties, who may see the bill as a threat to the religious freedom and diversity of the country. The BJP may also have to consider the electoral implications of the bill, as it may alienate some of its voters, especially the minorities.
  • The social acceptance of the bill: The bill may face resistance from some sections of the society, especially the Muslim community, who may feel that the bill violates their religious autonomy and identity. They may also fear that the bill is an attempt to impose the majority's culture and values on the minorities. The bill may also face implementation issues, as it would require a massive awareness and sensitization campaign among the people, as well as the training and capacity building of the officials and the judiciary, to ensure the smooth and effective enforcement of the bill.

Therefore, the UCC bill in India is a complex and controversial issue, that may take a long time to be resolved. It may require a lot of dialogue and consultation among the stakeholders, as well as a consensus on the principles and provisions of the bill, to make it acceptable and beneficial for all citizens.

Conclusion:

UCC is a desirable but difficult goal to achieve in India, and that it requires a lot of dialogue and consultation among the stakeholders, as well as a consensus on the principles and provisions of UCC, to make it acceptable and beneficial for all citizens. A UCC should not be imposed by force or coercion but should be adopted by choice and consent, with due regard to the rights and interests of all communities. A UCC should also be flexible and adaptable, to accommodate the diversity and dynamism of the Indian society. A UCC should not be seen as a threat or a challenge but as an opportunity and a promise, for a better and brighter future for India.

.    .    .

References:

Discus