Terrorism has become a pervasive global concern, transcending regional and national boundaries. While globally less than 1% of the population engages in terrorism, in certain conflict-ridden and poorly governed countries, the involvement can reach 10% to 20% of inhabitants. Terrorist activities have permeated all spaces—land, water, and air—leaving no area immune.

The Global Terrorism Index (GTI) ranks nations based on terrorist activity. Data from 162 countries indicate that terrorism has caused deaths in 67 countries, with a significant shift in 2014 that saw a 172% increase in the deaths of ordinary citizens. India, for instance, ranks fourth on the GTI. Regions such as Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and parts of South America, which are plagued by political conflicts, experience heightened vulnerability to terrorism.

The advent of internet and mobile technologies has provided terrorists and militant groups with powerful tools to spread hatred, propagate extremist beliefs, recruit new members, and conduct cyber-attacks. Consequently, even developed countries in Europe are increasingly drawn into these conflicts, experiencing regular terrorist attacks in major cities. This global reach and the multifaceted nature of modern terrorism underscore the complexity and urgency of addressing this persistent threat.

In the wake of a terrorist attack, symbols of mourning such as tears, candles, flowers, and prayers become commonplace. However, the profound impact of terrorism on mental and physical health, particularly for those directly affected, remains an under-researched area. While intelligence, security, and counter-terrorism are prioritized by governments and public institutions, the health system's response is typically limited to treating the immediate injuries and fatalities.

Healthcare professionals are generally not tasked with engaging in the broader aftermath of terrorism. Consequently, the health system has not adequately addressed the need for training, skill development, and research in "terrorism and health." This gap is partly due to the perception of such studies as "dangerous research" by funding bodies and publishing agencies, which often drive medical research priorities both nationally and globally.

This lack of focus on the health dimensions of terrorism neglects the long-term psychological and physical consequences faced by survivors and communities. Therefore, integrating healthcare systems into the broader framework of terrorism response could significantly enhance the overall resilience and recovery of affected populations.

Terror medicine is a recently developed field aimed at addressing significant gaps in global and national healthcare systems, particularly in relation to the impact of terrorism. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), health encompasses complete physical, mental, and social well-being, beyond just the absence of disease or infirmity. WHO underscores that achieving peace and security is fundamentally linked to the health of all people and requires comprehensive cooperation among individuals and states.

In regions afflicted by strife and terrorism, the health of the population is notably compromised. Addressing this, Cole and colleagues from the USA, in a 2014 article, advocate that medical management principles should be oriented toward handling terror events as a whole rather than focusing solely on individual patients. This holistic approach aims to enhance the preparedness and response of healthcare systems to the complex challenges posed by terrorism, ultimately supporting the well-being and resilience of affected communities.

The concept of terror medicine was initially proposed in 2006 and has since evolved over the past decade to encompass a broad range of health issues specific to terrorist attacks. While it is related to emergency and disaster management, terror medicine is distinct in its focus on medical preparedness, immediate response, and the psychological impacts associated with terrorism.

Leonard Cole, a pioneer in this field, has emphasized the need to improve the response capabilities of medical personnel in the face of terror incidents. He posed the critical question: “Can we improve the response of our medical personnel in the future in order to save lives when they treat victims of terror attacks?” This question underscores the importance of enhancing training, developing specialized skills, and conducting targeted research to equip healthcare professionals with the tools necessary to effectively manage and mitigate the consequences of terrorist activities. By doing so, the field of terror medicine aims to bolster the resilience and recovery of individuals and communities affected by terrorism.

Health System Requirements

Terrorist activities are characterized by organized groups employing a variety of weapons designed to cause significant harm and fatalities. These weapons include arms, bombs, chemical and biological agents, radiation, and drugs, making it challenging for police, intelligence, and crime agencies to anticipate and identify threats. Terrorists often target densely populated public places—such as hotels, public squares, malls, cinemas, air terminals, trains, bus stations, places of worship, and schools—executing attacks within a brief timeframe.

Such attacks create chaotic scenarios where law enforcement struggles to distinguish between the injured and the deceased. In the aftermath, victims are typically rushed to nearby medical facilities, yet there is often a lack of understanding regarding the health profiles, age demographics, and biomedical impacts of the various weapons used. Health workers attending to the injured frequently find themselves unprepared, unable to effectively apply emergency triage principles to maximize the number of survivors.

Recent terrorist attacks have highlighted the insufficiency of disaster drills and simulation-based training compared to the demands of real-world situations. While medicine is fundamentally a science where knowledge and intervention are deeply intertwined, the gap between theoretical preparedness and practical response becomes starkly evident in the context of terrorism.

Enhancing Preparedness and Response

Training and Skill Development:

• Comprehensive Training: Healthcare professionals need training that encompasses a broad range of scenarios involving different types of terrorist attacks.
• Simulation-Based Training: While current drills may be inadequate, enhanced simulation-based training that closely mimics real-world conditions can improve preparedness.

Emergency Triage and Management:

• Triage Systems: Developing robust triage systems specifically designed for mass casualty incidents caused by terrorism.
• Rapid Response Teams: Establishing specialized rapid response medical teams trained to deal with the immediate aftermath of terrorist attacks.

Understanding Terrorism-Specific Health Impacts:

• Research and Data Collection: Conducting research on the biomedical effects of various weapons used in terrorist attacks to inform treatment protocols.
• Health Profiling: Developing a comprehensive understanding of the health profiles and age demographics of potential victims to tailor medical responses accordingly.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

• Law Enforcement and Health Sector Collaboration: Enhancing cooperation between law enforcement and healthcare sectors to improve the overall response to terrorist incidents.
• Public Health and Safety Agencies: Integrating efforts between public health and safety agencies to address both the immediate and long-term health impacts of terrorism.

Resource Allocation:

• Adequate Resources: Ensuring that medical facilities are equipped with the necessary resources, including medical supplies and personnel, to handle large-scale emergencies.
• Funding for Terror Medicine: Securing funding specifically for research and training in terror medicine to build a resilient healthcare system capable of effectively responding to terrorist attacks.

By addressing these key areas, the health system can be better prepared to manage and mitigate the devastating effects of terrorism, ultimately saving more lives and enhancing the resilience of affected communities.

The process of integrating terror medicine into the healthcare system should start by embedding its principles into the education of graduate and postgraduate medical students. This integration can be approached through three key components: exposure, demonstration, and competence. Exposure involves incorporating terror medicine topics into existing medical school curricula, ensuring that students are familiar with the unique challenges and scenarios associated with terrorist attacks. Real-life case studies and historical examples of terrorist attacks can provide practical insights and contextual understanding.

Demonstration can be achieved through simulation-based training sessions that mimic real-world terrorist attack scenarios, allowing students to observe and participate in controlled environments. Interdisciplinary workshops involving experts from law enforcement, emergency services, and healthcare can also demonstrate coordinated responses to terrorism, providing students with a comprehensive view of how different sectors work together during such crises.

To ensure competence, it is essential to develop assessment methods to evaluate the ability of medical students and professionals to handle terror-related medical emergencies. Continuous education and certification programs in terror medicine should be offered to healthcare professionals, helping them maintain and enhance their skills. This approach ensures that medical personnel are not only theoretically prepared but also practically skilled in managing the aftermath of terrorist incidents.

In the United States, institutions like Rutgers University and New York University have made significant strides in incorporating terror medicine into their medical schools. These institutions have developed curricula that address the specific needs and challenges of responding to terrorist incidents, providing a model for other schools to follow. The successful implementation of these programs demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of such integration.

Given the frequency and impact of terrorist attacks in India, it is crucial to recognize and address the visible health impacts of such events. Indian physicians and healthcare professionals must be prepared to deal with the aftermath of terrorism without fear or hesitation. To achieve this, medical schools in India should integrate terror medicine into the emergency medicine curriculum, drawing from successful models in the United States.

Encouraging and funding research on the health impacts of terrorism is also essential. Focused research should explore the effects of various weapons and agents used in terrorist attacks, and findings should be published in medical journals to build a comprehensive body of knowledge on terror medicine. Enhanced disaster drill programs, including realistic simulations of terrorist attacks, should ensure that healthcare personnel are well-prepared for actual events.

Fostering collaboration between healthcare professionals, law enforcement, and emergency responders through joint training programs and exercises is another key step. Government policies and funding that support the institutionalization of terror medicine within the healthcare system are crucial. Integrating terror medicine into broader public health initiatives aimed at improving disaster preparedness and response will further enhance the resilience of the healthcare system and ensure better outcomes for victims of terrorism. By taking these steps, India can build a robust framework for terror medicine, equipping healthcare professionals with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively respond to and mitigate the health impacts of terrorist attacks.

Biomedical experts have outlined four critical components for a comprehensive health action plan to address global terrorism: medical preparedness, incident management, care of injuries and body functions, and intervention for psychological consequences. Each of these components is vital for any community or nation to effectively care for individuals affected by terrorist acts. This holistic approach ensures that the health system is equipped to manage the complex and multifaceted impacts of terrorism.

Efforts to prepare for such scenarios must include several key initiatives. Firstly, it is essential to train the healthcare workforce as a specialized "terror medicine" team. This involves equipping medical professionals with the skills and knowledge necessary to respond to terrorist incidents effectively. Secondly, understanding the different dimensions of response and competence for incident management is crucial. This includes recognizing the various roles and responsibilities within the healthcare system during a terror incident.

Additionally, healthcare providers must be adept at implementing a triage approach to identify the seriously injured from those who can be treated on the spot. This triage system is vital in maximizing the number of survivors by ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and effectively. Managing the mental health of victims and even those in the vicinity of an attack is another critical component. Psychological support and interventions are necessary to address the trauma and mental health consequences that often follow terrorist incidents.

When considering the timely interventions required to maximize survivors from physical injuries after events such as a bomb explosion in a religious monument or a lorry mowing down people in a crowded shopping area, a wide range of medical expertise is needed. This includes specialties such as surgery, orthopedics, neurosurgery, internal medicine, anesthesia, burns care, laboratory medicine, medical jurisprudence, infection control, and human nutrition. These experts must be ready to provide prompt attention or make timely referrals.

In the long term, biochemists, microbiologists, geneticists, and psychiatrists will play prominent roles in assessing and intervening in the aftermath of terrorist attacks. Research has documented that health service utilization after terror acts extends across both primary and secondary health system levels and is required for much longer periods compared to those affected by non-terror-related road traffic accidents. This highlights the need for sustained medical and psychological support.

The attention required for terror-related survivors also varies according to the age profile of the victims. Different age groups may require tailored medical and psychological interventions to address their specific needs. By incorporating these comprehensive strategies, healthcare systems can better prepare for and respond to the health impacts of terrorism, ultimately improving outcomes for affected individuals and communities.

Our health system has evolved significantly over the centuries, addressing a wide range of challenges from infectious diseases like tuberculosis to nuclear accidents. This evolution has brought substantial benefits to large segments of the population. For instance, in the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, Japan rapidly assembled a nuclear disaster health team in Rokkasho village, dedicated to both clinical and research tasks. This quick response underscores the potential for organized, specialized health teams to manage specific disaster scenarios effectively.

In the contemporary era, large-scale wars are considered unlikely, but the threat from terrorism remains persistent. Since the 1970s, the pattern of terrorism has shifted, with terrorists no longer acting in isolation but as part of coordinated groups or networks aimed at creating geopolitical instability. Their regular targets are often non-combative, innocent, and vulnerable citizens. This evolving threat landscape calls for new learning and adaptations in medical science.

To address this, developing a curriculum for "terror medicine" is essential. Training specialist health workers to deal with victims of terror acts at the field, hospital, and community levels will require a concerted effort from regulatory bodies, health workers, and policymakers. This curriculum should cover comprehensive emergency response strategies, including medical preparedness, incident management, care for injuries and body functions, and psychological interventions.

India's National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) has recognized the need for medical preparedness, issuing guidelines since 2007. However, the academic medical community must take the initiative to develop and implement curricula for learning and skill development in terror medicine. This includes integrating terror medicine into the education of medical students and professionals, ensuring they are equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to respond effectively to terrorist incidents.

Drawing from successful models, such as those implemented in the United States at institutions like Rutgers University and New York University, Indian medical schools can develop robust programs tailored to the unique challenges posed by terrorism. These programs should include simulation-based training, interdisciplinary workshops, and ongoing education and certification for healthcare professionals.

Furthermore, the health system's response must be age-sensitive, recognizing that different age groups may require tailored medical and psychological interventions. This nuanced approach ensures that all victims receive appropriate and effective care.

The notion that terror medicine constitutes "dangerous research" is a topic of debate. As Hagmann articulates, any research valuable to terrorists is equally valuable in countering terrorism. This dual-use nature of research reflects a broader historical context where conflicts and crises have propelled advancements in medical science. For instance, the surgical techniques, wound healing practices, anesthetic drugs, and even cancer treatments that emerged from the two world wars have had profound and lasting benefits. Mustard gas, originally a chemical warfare agent, was repurposed into nitrogen mustard chemotherapy for treating lymphomas, illustrating how war-time innovations can be transformed into therapeutic tools.

Medicine has always drawn strength from empiricism and observational studies. Exploring the properties of substances like RDX or TATP explosives, while initially alarming, could yield significant medical and scientific insights. The focus of such research, though tied to terror, extends far beyond immediate security concerns, offering societal benefits that are crucial for broader public health. For example, understanding and managing mass food poisoning or noxious gas disasters—events that share similarities with the consequences of terrorist attacks—have significantly improved due to the expertise and experience gained by medical professionals in handling such crises.

The challenge lies in balancing the ethical and practical considerations of conducting research that might inadvertently aid terrorists while striving to enhance our capacity to respond to and mitigate the impacts of terrorism. Government and society must collaborate to address the invisible side of terrorism, ensuring that medical research and training continue to evolve to meet these threats.

Institutionalizing terror medicine requires a concerted global effort. Developing comprehensive curricula, fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, and ensuring ongoing education for healthcare professionals are vital steps. This global initiative aims to improve the healthcare of citizens who fall victim to terror attacks, making societies more resilient and capable of effectively managing the complex and multifaceted impacts of terrorism.

In conclusion, while terror medicine research may seem "dangerous," its potential to save lives and enhance medical knowledge far outweigh the risks. By learning from past conflicts and crises, the medical community can continue to develop innovative solutions that not only address the immediate needs of terror attack victims but also contribute to broader public health and safety.

.    .    .