The Taj Mahal, built in Agra between 1631 and 1648 by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan, is world-renowned as an eternal symbol of love. According to UNESCO and historical tradition, Shah Jahan was deeply devoted to his wife Mumtaz Mahal (the “Jewel of the Palace”), who died in childbirth in 1631. Legend holds that on her deathbed, she extracted a promise from Shah Jahan to erect a grand monument to their unique love. Fulfilling this vow took 22 years and 20,000 artisans of the finest skill. The result was the white-marble mausoleum flanked by twin mosques that we know today. Mumtaz Mahal’s cenotaph lies at its centre (later joined by Shah Jahan’s), and the site has since become an urs (pilgrimage) marking the anniversary of her death. As the Indian media notes, the Taj Mahal has become “a symbol of India itself”, and UNESCO calls it “the jewel of Muslim art in India and one of the universally admired masterpieces of the world’s heritage”. Its origin as a Mughal imperial mausoleum in memory of Mumtaz is firmly documented by contemporary chronicles and inscriptions, and it embodies the human story of love and loss central to its identity.
Architectural and Cultural Significance
Perched on the right bank of the Yamuna River, the Taj Mahal is set in a 17-hectare Persian-style charbagh (four-part) garden. It epitomises Indo-Islamic architecture at its zenith. UNESCO calls it “the greatest architectural achievement in the whole range of Indo-Islamic architecture,” praising its “rhythmic combination of solids and voids” in arches and domes, its delicate marble relief and pietra dura inlay, and the changing play of light on its white surfaces. The complex’s balanced design – for example, the octagonal tomb chamber at one end of the garden (an innovative departure from a central placement) – creates stunning visual harmony. The four towering minarets, the grand gateway, and the flanking red-sandstone mosque and guesthouse all contribute to a masterpiece of architectural style with unique aesthetic qualities of symmetry, balance and ornamentation. The monument’s multilingual epitaphs (Qur’anic inscriptions in Arabic) and delicate calligraphy also link it to Islamic religious tradition.
Beyond its architectural mastery, the Taj Mahal is a potent cultural emblem. It is celebrated in art, literature, and education around the world as a testament to Mughal-era creativity and as India’s signature heritage site. The UNESCO World Heritage inscription notes that it is “the jewel of Muslim art in India” and a globally admired legacy. Millions of children learn of Shah Jahan’s love for Mumtaz, and textbooks often highlight the Taj Mahal as a symbol of India’s rich, syncretic past. Its iconic image graces calendars, currency, travel media, and tourist memorabilia, reinforcing its cultural role. In sum, the Taj Mahal stands as both a historical tomb and a universal cultural icon of romance, beauty, and cross-cultural heritage.
The Taj Story (2025) Film and Public Debate
In 2025, a new Bollywood film, The Taj Story (directed by Tushar Amrish Goel and starring Paresh Rawal), sparked controversy by dramatising fringe claims about the monument. The trailer depicts Rawal as a local guide who becomes convinced that the Taj Mahal’s “real” history has been suppressed. He even suggests conducting a “DNA test” on the stones to determine whether the structure is a tomb or a temple. The film is framed as a courtroom drama debating belief versus documented history. It explicitly asks if the Taj might have been a “repurposed Shiva temple,” echoing a long-discredited theory.
Reactions to the film have been sharply divided. Supporters say it “uncovers suppressed truths,” while critics decry it as ideological propaganda. Some lobbyists and hardline groups have amplified the claim that the Taj was originally a Hindu shrine (the so-called “Tejo Mahalaya” theory first put forward by P.N. Oak in the 1960s). The Taj Story’s poster even shows Shiva’s idol emerging from the dome. Film scholar Rasheed Ali warns that such cinematic narratives, “when they question established history, should encourage debate, not fuel division,” and that this film “risks the latter”.
Many historians and archaeologists, however, criticise the film’s premise. They note that the Taj’s origins are extensively documented: Mughal court records, inscriptions on the monument itself, and contemporary accounts all credit Shah Jahan. The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) – India’s official custodian of historical sites – has repeatedly affirmed in court that the Taj Mahal is indeed a Muslim mausoleum built by Shah Jahan for Mumtaz. Archaeologist K.K. Muhammed (a former ASI director) points out that the 22 sealed rooms above the mausoleum are simply storage spaces common in Mughal tombs, not a hidden temple, and contain no pagan religious motifs. Fact-checkers and scholars emphasise that the film’s central questions (about locked rooms or hidden idols) echo past political campaigns rather than evidence-based research.
Upholding the established history has received backing even from the courts. In 2022, the Allahabad High Court dismissed a public-interest petition demanding the opening of the Taj’s 22 closed chambers. The judges scolded the petitioners for treating the judiciary as a forum for sensational myths and noted that “historical research ought to involve a proper methodology” and should be left to academics, not litigants. Scholars like historian Ankita Das warn that such controversies “turn complex historical processes into simplistic binaries of victim and aggressor,” undermining informed understanding. As UCA News reports, critics say these debates “undermine India’s image as a diverse and inclusive society” by injecting sectarian conflict into cultural heritage.
Defending the Historical Narrative
The widely accepted history of the Taj Mahal is backed by multiple lines of evidence. Inscriptions carved on the mausoleum’s walls include verses of the Qur’an that allude to the Taj’s function as a tomb and record Shah Jahan as its patron. Contemporary Mughal chronicles and European travellers’ accounts from the 17th century unanimously describe its construction as a memorial to Mumtaz. No credible historical source from Shah Jahan’s era suggests any alternative origin. As UNESCO notes, the monument’s genesis is well anchored in “historical and Quranic inscriptions” that fix its chronology. Its architecture follows the lineage of Mughal tomb-building (a long tradition dating from Humayun’s Tomb and Akbar’s Tomb in Sikandra), not Hindu temple design.
Experts emphasise that claims of a concealed Shiva temple are fueled by nationalist revisionism, not archaeology. For instance, The Taj Story revives the “Tejo Mahalaya” thesis of P.N. Oak (a controversial writer), but Oak’s assertions lack credible support. Archaeologists point out that temple-like features (pillars or idols) were examined long ago and found to be modern intrusions or benign decorative elements. Even the locked chambers were opened and inspected by ASI staff decades back, revealing nothing unusual. The film’s provocative tagline calling the Taj “a monument of atrocity” has been denounced by scholars as an ideological slur.
In sum, the scholarly consensus is clear: the Taj Mahal is a Mughal Muslim tomb, not a Hindu temple. This conclusion is supported by rigorous research, peer-reviewed scholarship, and official records. As ThePrint notes, efforts to use the courts or commissions to redefine the Taj’s history are seen as a “mockery of the PIL system” and outside judicial remit. Responsible historians urge that any reassessment of history should follow academic standards, not sensational media drama.
Taj Mahal in India’s Global Image and Tourism
The Taj Mahal is a linchpin of India’s global identity and tourism economy. As a UNESCO World Heritage Site, it attracts millions of visitors from around the world each year. In 2024 alone, nearly ₹985 million (about US$12 million) in revenue came from Taj Mahal ticket sales. Its iconic silhouette is instantly recognised worldwide as an emblem of India, appearing on travel brochures, banknotes, and even space-travel mission insignia. The “symbol of eternal love” narrative resonates with international audiences, and the monument routinely tops global tourist destination lists. Domestically, students often study the Taj Mahal as a key chapter in Mughal history and Indo-Persian culture, further cementing its educational role.
The Taj’s popularity has tangible benefits. Local businesses, artisans, hotels, and guides in Agra and across Uttar Pradesh depend on the steady flow of domestic and foreign tourists. Government initiatives – such as the Mausam and heritage circuits – often spotlight the Taj to promote cultural tourism. Its prestige also gives weight to India’s soft power: as UCA News observes, attacks on the Taj’s heritage (cinematic or political) are seen as damaging “India’s image as a diverse and inclusive society” to the world. Thus, preserving the monument’s accepted history and dignity is in India’s national interest both culturally and economically.
Legal Protections and Conservation
India and UNESCO have put in place robust frameworks to safeguard the Taj Mahal for future generations. The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), under the Ministry of Culture, manages the site and enforces strict conservation rules. The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act (1958) and its rules provide the statutory basis for the Taj’s protection. Under this law, the entire complex – and a legally defined buffer zone – is protected from alterations or encroachment. In practice, the ASI governs everything from routine maintenance to major restorations, and issues guidelines (for example, prohibiting photography inside the mausoleum) to minimise wear and tear.
Legislative measures also control the monument’s surroundings. In 1996, the Supreme Court of India created the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ), a 10,400 km² industrial zone around Agra, and banned coal pollution in it. This landmark ruling drastically improved air quality, preventing excessive marble discolouration and decay. In addition, courts have intervened to regulate activities: for instance, ASI advised (and was supported by a PIB order) that photography is generally allowed on monument grounds but banned inside the Taj’s main tomb.
UNESCO obligations further bolster protection. As a State Party to the World Heritage Convention, India must ensure the “outstanding universal value” of the site is maintained. In practice, this means submitting periodic Conservation reports and an Integrated Management Plan. UNESCO guidance emphasises maintaining the Taj’s authenticity and integrity (criteria for its inscription) and managing tourism sustainably. Funds are allocated by the central government for the Taj’s upkeep, buffer-zone management, and science-based preservation (for example, installing air-quality monitoring stations). In short, a network of national laws (ASI and AMASR Act) and international commitments (UNESCO World Heritage status) provides a strong legal framework to protect the monument against damage, encroachment or willful alteration.
- Archaeological Sites Act (1958) and Rules (1959) – the core law covering the Taj Mahal.
- ASI Custodianship – the Archaeological Survey of India must preserve the site’s integrity and supervise any conservation work.
- Taj Trapezium Zone (1996) – Supreme Court–mandated pollution control around Agra to protect the monument’s fabric.
- UNESCO Obligations – India must maintain the site’s Outstanding Universal Value and report on its state periodically, ensuring authenticity and appropriate use.
Each layer of protection – from ASI policies to international conventions – is designed to keep the Taj Mahal’s story intact and its structure intact. Violations or neglect can be challenged in court, as has already happened when misuse of heritage sites has been contested.
Conclusion: Preserving a Universal Legacy
The Taj Mahal is more than a disputed relic; it is a shared human treasure. Its legacy as a symbol of love is not limited to any one community or ideology, but resonates across cultures and eras. Revisionist claims about its origins – whether in film or politics – distract from the values the Taj actually embodies: the confluence of Islamic and Indian art, the historical narrative of the Mughal era, and the universal story of devotion. Ethically, preserving the Taj Mahal means honouring truth and scholarship above conjecture. It means continuing India’s commitment (under UNESCO and its own heritage laws) to protect a site that belongs to “world heritage” and to future generations of all faiths.
In practical terms, this means maintaining the Taj as an educational and cultural resource: in schools, it should be taught based on evidence and context; in tourism, it should be promoted for its authenticity and beauty, not polemics. As scholars quoted in the press warn, turning the Taj into a battleground of identities risks erasing the very plurality it once represented. Instead, the Taj Mahal should be embraced as a universal symbol of love, one that transcends contemporary controversies. Legally and morally, all stakeholders – government, civil society, educators, and artists – have a duty to keep their true story alive. In defending the authentic history of the Taj Mahal and its cultural meaning, we preserve not only India’s heritage, but a piece of humanity’s shared legacy of artistic achievement and human affection.
. . .
References: