We can all agree that periods are a subjective experience in themselves, not all women experience periods alike. Some women may have shorter or longer cycles, while others may have irregular or more predictable cycles. Additionally, the symptoms experienced during menstruation, such as cramps, mood changes, and menstrual flow, can also vary from woman to woman. There is no one-size-fits-all philosophy for menstruation. Building on that, the period leave debate was triggered by Zomato’s new policy to provide 10 days of annual period leaves to each woman.

Many countries like Taiwan, Zambia, Spain, Indonesia, and South Korea already provide their female employees with paid period leave.

In January 2023, a significant public interest litigation (PIL) was filed before the esteemed Supreme Court of India (SC). The PIL aimed to request the issuance of a directive to all states, instructing them to formulate a comprehensive policy regarding menstrual pain leave for female students and working women, in accordance with the provisions outlined in the Maternity Benefit Act of 1961.

However, the Supreme Court disposed of the PIL through an order dated 24-2-202310, proposing an alternative course of action. This alternative suggested that it would be more appropriate for the petitioner to submit a representation to the esteemed Union Ministry of Women and Child Development. The Ministry, being entrusted with the responsibility of making informed decisions in such matters, could then discern an appropriate course of action regarding this issue.

The controversy gained momentum in India when Smriti Irani, the Union Minister for Women and Child Development, addressed Congress MP Shashi Tharoor’s query in the Lok Sabha. Irani clarified that the government does not currently plan to make paid menstrual leave compulsory across all workplaces.

Further stirring the pot, Irani responded to MP Manoj Kumar Jha in the Rajya Sabha, asserting that menstruation should not be viewed as a disability that justifies special leave. She stated, “As a menstruating woman, menstruation and the menstruation cycle is not a handicap, it’s a natural part of women’s life journey…We should not propose issues where women are denied equal opportunities just because somebody who does not menstruate has a particular viewpoint towards menstruation”.

In a written response submitted in the upper house on Wednesday, Smriti Irani said that “A small proportion of women/ girls suffer from severe dysmenorrhea or similar complaints; and most of these cases are manageable by medication.”

“However, the issue of menstruation and its associated activities are surrounded by silence, often treated with shame and associated with social taboos that restrict mobility, freedom, and access to normal activities for menstruating persons, and many a time leads to their harassment and social exclusion. It becomes even more sensitive when a girl/ menstruating person is unaware of the changes that she undergoes emotionally and physically while facing her menstrual cycle for the first time," Smriti Irani responded.

In the midst of the debate on menstrual leave in India, Ghazal Alagh, co-founder of the beauty brand Mama Earth and a Shark Tank India judge, has proposed an alternative to paid period leave. Her suggestion comes in response to Union Minister Smriti Irani’s comments in Parliament, which have sparked widespread discussion on the topic.

“We have fought for centuries for equal opportunities & women’s rights and now, fighting for period leave might set back the hard-earned equality. A better solution? Supporting work from home for those in pain,” she wrote.

While the debate to implement paid menstrual leave is subjective, there are several arguments against its introduction:

1. Equality in the workplace: Some argue that providing paid menstrual leave may inadvertently perpetuate gender discrimination by reinforcing gender stereotypes. It may give the impression that women are less capable or reliable workers, potentially affecting opportunities for career advancement and equal treatment.
2. Impact on productivity: Critics suggest that implementing a paid menstrual leave policy could lead to decreased productivity in the workplace. Frequent absences or shorter workweeks could disrupt work schedules, affect team dynamics, and ultimately impair overall productivity.
3. Legal and financial implications: Introducing paid menstrual leave policies could pose legal and financial challenges for employers. It may require changes to existing labor laws, increase administrative burdens, and impose additional costs on businesses.
4. Potential for abuse: Concerns are raised about the potential for abuse or misuse of a paid menstrual leave policy. Some argue that employees might falsely claim menstrual health issues to take time off, which could lead to issues of accountability and fairness.
5. Implications for gender equity: Critics contend that focusing solely on women’s health needs, without similar accommodations for other health conditions experienced by all genders, may perpetuate gendered debates and inadvertently disadvantage men.
6. Alternative solutions: Instead of enforcing specific paid menstrual leave policies, workplace flexibility and support for general health and well-being can be encouraged. This may include implementing flexible work hours, remote work options, or wellness programs that cater to various health needs, including menstruation.

It is important to note that these arguments against paid menstrual leave are not absolute, and different perspectives and solutions can be explored to ensure the well-being and fair treatment of all employees.

.    .    .