The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is defined as a uniform law for all, irrespective of religion. It is the codification of laws wherein personal laws will be replaced with a common set of civil laws applicable to all citizens regardless of religion. Presently, in India, different communities are governed by their own personal laws based on their religious and tribal beliefs. The Indian legal system is burdened with complex and overlapping personal laws, leading to confusion and legal disputes. A UCC would simplify the legal framework by consolidating and harmonizing various laws into a single code. However, there is no consensus on this issue in the country. The Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP), which is currently the ruling party in India, has always been in favour of implementing the UCC, and it was one of its campaign pledges in the last Lok Sabha elections.

Historical Background

During the colonial era, criminal laws were codified in order to administer justice, but personal laws were not touched upon as Britishers followed the policy of non-interference in religious matters. After India gained independence in 1947, there was a demand for UCC in the country. The framers of the Indian Constitution were also in favour of having a UCC, but since the country was just recovering from the trauma of partition, they did not want to create further divisions in society by trying to impose UCC on a diverse nation like India with various religious and cultural groups. That is why the concept of UCC was included in Article 44 of the Indian Constitution as part of the Directive Principles of State Policy (to be incorporated at a suitable time in the future).

After independence, the issue of a UCC has always been in discussion at different levels, but no consensus has emerged on this matter. Our high courts and the Supreme Court in particular, in their judgments, have articulated the need for a UCC in the country. The Shah Bano case (1985) was one of the landmark judgments that ignited the debate on UCC. Shah Bano, a Muslim woman who was divorced by her husband, sought maintenance from him, citing the provisions of the Indian Constitution. The Chief Justice at that time, YV Chandrachud, gave judgment in favour of Shah Bano and recommended the lawmakers make provisions for the Uniform Civil Code. But this decision was reversed by the Rajiv Gandhi government, citing that it violated the rights of the Muslim community. This decision by the then government has been cited as a historic blunder by experts.

The Shayara Bano case (2017), or the Triple Talaq case, is also one of the landmark judgments in light of personal laws and gender equality. Shayara Bano, a Muslim woman, challenged the constitutional validity of Triple Talaq in the Supreme Court, citing that it violated the right to equality and dignity. Triple Talaq is a practice among the Muslim community wherein a husband can divorce his wife by pronouncing the word "talaq" three times, whether orally or in written form, but not vice versa. Shayara Bano argued that the practice was arbitrary and discriminatory. In 2017, the Supreme Court held in its judgment that the practice of Triple Talaq is unconstitutional and violates the fundamental principles of the Constitution. This case again opened the gateway for a broader discussion surrounding the Uniform Civil Code and the need for reforms in personal laws.

Arguments

There are two different perspectives on the debate over a Uniform Civil code: one in favour and the other against it. Those who are in favour of UCC argue the irrelevance of different personal laws in a united India. The UCC will provide uniformity (in law) to all religious communities and preserve the culture of India. Implementing the UCC will ensure equal treatment for all individuals, irrespective of religion. Further, it will ensure gender equality, a basic feature enshrined in the Indian Constitution that will enable equal rights and protection for women across all religious communities. Personal laws are discriminatory for women with respect to marriage, divorce, maintenance, guardianship, adoption, inheritance, and succession. Moreover, it is also argued that the majority of liberal democracies have a single personal law, and India, being one of them, should also continue the same.

Critics of the Uniform Civil Code term the code "anti-minority." They believe that implementing UCC will undermine the unique cultural and religious identities of the minority communities as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. When a uniform set of laws is implemented all across India that does not align with their customs and traditions, their identities will be in danger. National Democratic Party (NDP) partners from the north-east are also opposing the BJP’s push for a Uniform Civil Code, citing that the customs and traditions of the north-east should not be disregarded and force the states to follow a new rule. Another argument against the implementation of UCC is the violation of the fundamental right to religion as enshrined in Article 25 of the Indian Constitution. Critics argue that individuals have the right to follow their religious practices without any interference from the state. The opposition to UCC is not limited to Muslims but comes from all religious groups, i.e., Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, and others like tribal groups in the northeast and other parts of India.

Conclusion

The implementation of UCC will lead to significant changes in various aspects of personal laws. The age of marriage for girls will be standardized across all religions. There will be mandatory marriage registrations, ensuring that all marriages are legally recognized. UCC will prohibit polygamy and promote monogamous marriages, regardless of religious and cultural practices. It will grant women equal rights to adoption, removing any existing disparities based on religious and personal laws. UCC will strive for equal rights to property inheritance for boys and girls. The Succession Act of 1925 gives Christian mothers no right to the property of their deceased children. All such property is to be inherited by the father. This provision would also be abolished if UCC comes in.

To conclude, the Uniform Civil Code is a positive step towards a united India but requires debate and discussion. The UCC will have significant implications for the legal and social fabric of the nation. It is essential to engage in extensive discussions and debates to ensure that the code is fair, just, and respects the diverse religious, cultural, and personal beliefs of the people.

.    .    .