Once, luxury meant marble floors, imported cars, and sea-facing balconies. Today, it means something far rarer — the ability to close a door and know that no one is watching.

In the digital age, privacy is no longer a default setting. It is a privilege.

We live in a time when our phones know more about us than our closest friends. They track our steps, our sleep, our spending, our searches at 2 a.m., and even our silences between messages. Every swipe leaves a fingerprint. Every click writes a confession. And yet, we call it convenience.

The truth is uncomfortable: what we call “free” platforms are not free at all. Social media, email services, navigation apps — they cost us something invisible but invaluable. They cost us data. And data is not just numbers. It is behaviour. It isa  preference. It is identity.

There is a famous line in technology circles: If you are not paying for the product, you are the product. In India, where digital access has expanded at breathtaking speed, this statement hits harder than ever.

The government’s push toward digital governance — from Aadhaar-linked services to online banking to UPI transactions — has transformed accessibility. Initiatives under Digital India have connected millions. But digitisation has also centralised data at an unprecedented scale. Aadhaar, the world’s largest biometric identification system, holds fingerprints and iris scans of over a billion citizens. While it has streamlined welfare distribution, it has also sparked ongoing debates about surveillance, data protection, and the vulnerability of centralised databases to leaks.

India has witnessed multiple high-profile data breaches in recent years — from banking details to vaccination records. Each breach raises the same question: Who safeguards the guardians of our information?

In 2023, India enacted the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, a long-awaited step toward regulating how companies collect and process personal information. It promises consent-based frameworks and penalties for misuse. Yet, critics argue that enforcement clarity, exemptions for government agencies, and institutional oversight remain areas of concern. Laws on paper do not automatically translate into protection in practice.

Meanwhile, private corporations harvest behavioural data with remarkable precision. Targeted advertisements appear seconds after we speak about a product. Algorithms curate our news feeds, shape our opinions, and subtly influence our political leanings. During elections, digital campaigns analyse demographics and emotional triggers to tailor messaging at a granular level. Democracy itself is being micro-targeted.

This is not dystopian fiction. It is a data-driven reality.

The wealthy understand this transformation differently. They hire cybersecurity experts. They use encrypted communication channels. They build gated communities not only in physical spaces but in digital ones. They can afford anonymity. The middle class, on the other hand, trades privacy for discounts, faster delivery, and “personalised experiences.” We click “Accept All Cookies” because reading terms and conditions feels exhausting.

Over time, the trade becomes normalised.

But privacy is not just about data theft or surveillance. It is about psychological freedom. When every moment can be recorded, posted, or scrutinised, life becomes a performance. Young people grow up curating identities instead of discovering them. Success is measured in engagement metrics. Even grief is filtered through aesthetics.

In such an environment, authenticity becomes risky. Silence becomes suspicious. Solitude becomes rare.

For many Indians, particularly in urban centres like Mumbai, Delhi, or Bengaluru, life is already crowded — physically and socially. Add digital exposure to that, and the idea of being unobserved begins to feel revolutionary. Imagine spending a day without notifications. Without algorithmic nudges. Without being tracked, measured, or categorised.

That experience now feels luxurious.

Historically, privacy was associated with dignity. The right to be left alone was seen as fundamental to liberty. The Supreme Court of India, in its landmark 2017 judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India, declared privacy a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. It was a powerful affirmation that privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty.

Yet rights declared must be rights defended.

Technology evolves faster than regulation. Artificial intelligence systems now analyse facial expressions, voice patterns, and behavioural data to predict consumer habits and even mental states. CCTV networks expand across cities in the name of safety. Biometric attendance systems track workers. Digital footprints follow us into job interviews, credit scoring, and insurance approvals.

Surveillance today is subtle. It does not always come with visible cameras or obvious monitoring. It arrives disguised as convenience, security, personalisation, and efficiency.

And we willingly participate.

The tragedy is not only that privacy is eroding. It is that we are slowly forgetting what it felt like to have it.

There was a time when a mistake faded with memory. Today, it lives permanently online. There was a time when opinions evolved privately. Now, old tweets resurface years later. There was a time when identity was shaped through introspection. Now, it is shaped through analytics.

In this environment, privacy becomes a form of power. The ability to choose what to reveal and what to protect becomes an act of resistance. The ability to exist unmonitored becomes a symbol of autonomy.

The future may divide society not just by income, but by invisibility. The privileged will purchase digital discretion. The rest will barter their data for participation.

But this trajectory is not inevitable.

India stands at a critical intersection. As one of the world’s largest digital markets, it has the opportunity to create a framework where innovation coexists with accountability. Stronger enforcement of data protection laws, transparent oversight mechanisms, corporate responsibility, and digital literacy education can shift the balance. Citizens must demand clarity about how their information is stored, processed, and shared. Privacy cannot remain an afterthought.

Because privacy is not about hiding wrongdoing. It is about preserving humanity.

It is about having conversations that are not monetised. About making choices that are not predicted. About existing beyond algorithms.

Luxury was once defined by what we could show. In the digital era, it may be defined by what we can keep to ourselves.

The most valuable possession of the future will not be property, gold, or followers. It will be the quiet certainty that some parts of our lives belong only to us.

And in a world where everything is watched, measured, and sold, that certainty may be the greatest wealth of all.

.    .    .