Introduction

India, a beacon of democracy and diversity, has consistently evolved to meet the aspirations of its people. As it completes 75 years of independence, the nation is now deliberating a transformative proposal—“One Nation, One Election.” This concept, if implemented, could fundamentally change India’s electoral and governance systems. The idea, championed by President Droupadi Murmu in her address on the eve of the 76th Republic Day, has been lauded for its potential to prevent policy paralysis, ensure resource efficiency, and enhance democratic stability.

President Murmu described the “One Nation, One Election” proposal as a reform that could redefine good governance, bolster India’s democratic institutions, and promote the nation’s economic and social development. This article explores the historical context, potential benefits, challenges, and broader implications of this initiative while highlighting its alignment with India’s democratic ideals and constitutional ethos.

The Core Idea: What is “One Nation, One Election”?

The term “One Nation, One Election” refers to the synchronization of elections for the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and all State Assemblies. Currently, elections are held separately for these entities, leading to frequent electoral processes in different parts of the country. For instance, in the past decade, elections were held nearly every year in some state or region, creating a constant state of electoral mobilization.

This fragmented electoral cycle often disrupts governance, diverts resources, and imposes a significant financial burden on the exchequer. By consolidating elections into a single event, the proposal aims to address these inefficiencies while ensuring smoother governance.

Historical Context: The Evolution of Electoral Cycles in India

India’s first general elections in 1951-52 marked the beginning of a synchronized electoral schedule, with the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies going to polls simultaneously. This system continued until the late 1960s when the premature dissolution of certain State Assemblies and the Lok Sabha disrupted this alignment. Since then, elections have been held in a staggered manner, creating challenges for governance and resource allocation.

In 1983, the Election Commission of India (ECI) first proposed the idea of returning to simultaneous elections. The Law Commission of India, in its 170th report in 1999, also recommended synchronized elections to enhance governance and reduce electoral costs. Despite these proposals, the complexity of implementing such a reform has delayed its realization.

Benefits of “One Nation, One Election”

The “One Nation, One Election” proposal offers a wide range of benefits that could transform India’s political, economic, and administrative landscape.

1. Improved Governance and Policy Stability

Frequent elections often lead to policy paralysis, as governments prioritize populist measures over long-term developmental policies to secure votes. Synchronizing elections would provide governments with a fixed tenure to implement their vision without the distraction of constant electoral pressures.

2. Significant Financial Savings

Elections in India are an expensive affair. According to estimates, the 2019 general elections cost approximately ₹60,000 crores, including both government and political party expenses. By consolidating elections, the financial burden on the exchequer and political parties could be significantly reduced, freeing up resources for developmental initiatives.

3. Efficient Resource Management

Elections require extensive deployment of administrative and security personnel. In the 2019 elections, over 10 million polling personnel and security forces were mobilized. Synchronized elections would reduce the frequency of such deployments, allowing these resources to focus on governance and national security.

4. Increased Voter Participation

Staggered elections often lead to voter fatigue, resulting in lower turnout. A single, consolidated election schedule could encourage higher voter participation by simplifying the electoral process and reducing the burden on citizens.

5. Minimized Disruptions to Public Life

Frequent elections disrupt public life, with schools and government offices often being used as polling stations. Synchronizing elections would minimize such disruptions, ensuring continuity in education and public services.

Economic and Social Implications

President Murmu, in her address, highlighted India’s remarkable economic growth in recent years, noting its persistently high GDP growth rate and efforts to uplift marginalized communities. The “One Nation, One Election” proposal aligns with this growth narrative by reducing the financial and administrative costs of frequent elections.

According to a study by the Observer Research Foundation, synchronized elections could save the government over ₹10,000 crores in direct expenses alone. Additionally, the reduction in political uncertainty associated with frequent elections could create a stable environment for foreign investments and long-term economic planning.

On the social front, the proposal could strengthen India’s democratic fabric by fostering greater political accountability and reducing the influence of divisive rhetoric often associated with election campaigns.

Challenges and Criticisms

Despite its potential benefits, the “One Nation, One Election” proposal faces significant challenges, both constitutional and logistical.

1. Constitutional Hurdles

India’s federal structure grants autonomy to states, including the right to hold elections independently. Implementing synchronized elections would require amendments to multiple constitutional provisions, including Articles 83, 85, 172, 174, and 356. Achieving consensus among states and political parties on these amendments would be a formidable task.

2. Logistical Complexity

Conducting simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and all State Assemblies would require an unprecedented scale of planning and resource mobilization. The Election Commission would need to ensure the availability of electronic voting machines (EVMs) and voter-verifiable paper audit trails (VVPATs) for over 900 million voters.

3. Disruption to Existing Legislative Terms

Aligning the terms of existing legislatures with a unified election schedule would require either curtailing or extending their durations. This could face resistance from political stakeholders and raise questions about democratic fairness.

4. Impact on Regional Parties

Regional parties, which often thrive on localized issues, fear that simultaneous elections could dilute their influence and shift the focus to national issues. This could impact the diversity and pluralism of India’s political landscape.

Technological Advancements and Electoral Reforms

India’s advancements in technology and digital infrastructure could play a crucial role in implementing synchronized elections. The Election Commission has already demonstrated its capability to conduct large-scale elections using EVMs and VVPATs. Additionally, initiatives such as digital voter rolls and blockchain-based voting systems could enhance transparency and efficiency.

A Step Towards Inclusive Democracy

President Murmu underscored the importance of inclusive growth and social equity in her address, highlighting initiatives such as pre-matric and post-matric scholarships, national fellowships, and flagship schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Anusuchit Jaati Abhyuday Yojana. The “One Nation, One Election” proposal complements these efforts by fostering political stability, enabling governments to focus on long-term policies that uplift marginalized communities.

Conclusion

The “One Nation, One Election” proposal is a bold and visionary reform that has the potential to transform India’s democratic and governance systems. By synchronizing electoral cycles, the nation can enhance governance, reduce financial and administrative costs, and promote political stability. However, its implementation requires careful consideration of constitutional, logistical, and political challenges.

As President Droupadi Murmu aptly noted, India’s journey over the past 75 years has been a testament to its democratic resilience and commitment to progress. The “One Nation, One Election” proposal, if realized, could mark a new chapter in this journey, creating a more efficient, inclusive, and vibrant democracy for future generations.

References

1. Republic Day Address by President Droupadi Murmu, January 25, 2025.

2. Election Commission of India Reports and Proposals.

3. Law Commission of India, 170th Report on Electoral Reforms.

4. Observer Research Foundation Studies on Electoral Costs.

5. Ministry of Finance Reports on Election Expenditure.

.    .    .