+ Follow
Image by pexels.com

Hope arrives at the shooting range alongside talent, carried by a young athlete who believes her coach has her back. Power shifts quietly when that faith gets misused by someone wearing authority like armour. A name now known - Ankush Bharadwaj - reveals how quickly respect can sour into manipulation. Behind medals and practice logs lies a truth few discuss: heroes in tracksuits sometimes cross lines. Blind loyalty crumbles once silence breaks, exposing cracks in structures meant to safeguard. Questions linger longer than answers when oversight pretends not to see.

This much is clear. Called to a luxury hotel in Surajkund, supposedly to talk about results - a teen athlete says her mentor crossed lines. She spoke up once home, words spilling out to relatives who acted fast. Police stepped in afterwards, registering charges under the child protection law meant for moments like this. Oversight groups moved quietly but swiftly: his name stripped from official rosters, badge gone.

This case hits hard, yet it's not only about the accusation. What stands out lies deeper - coaches wielding heavy influence over young careers, closed-door chats masked as feedback sessions, plus systems that silence those hurt along the way. Pain lives here, true, still there’s room to question whether sports truly guard their rising stars or leave them exposed.

The person being charged is who we’re looking at here.

Once a young champion with a pistol, Ankush Bharadwaj shifted to teaching the sport years later. Though now training top-level shooters, his past includes an old doping penalty brought up recently. A personal tie links him to another well-known marksman through family bonds. His own academy operates privately, separate from official programs. Following accusations, the governing committee paused his role suddenly. They sent a letter demanding reasons for actions tied to his name. Competitions just concluded when details surfaced about prior violations. Since then, questions have grown around his involvement behind the scenes.

A pattern stands out when those linked to sports hold onto influence long after disputes surface. Honours and awards tend to reshape perception, letting some avoid typical accountability by being labelled simply as trainers. Trust follows fame, sometimes skipping deeper questions altogether.

What happened - the timeline in plain words

Around noon that day, the young athlete wrapped up competition at the Dr. Karni Singh Shooting Range. Afterward, she stayed put, hanging around the venue. A phone call came through - her coach wanted to see her in the hotel lobby, said something about documenting her performance. Out of routine, not suspicion, she walked over. From there, he shifted plans, suggesting they move to the elevator space first, then mentioned his room upstairs, on the third floor. As she started writing, he pushed her in ways she found unacceptable before reportedly assaulting her sexually. Afterward they moved close to her car where he let her leave alone. Days passed without a word from her, held back by fear after hearing him say he could destroy her future if she talked. Only on January 1 did she speak to her mother about it, leading to the police report being made five days later.

A child showed up in a closed space after being told it was about work stuff - what happened next hurts to hear. Court papers mention it, local stories confirm bits, too. She says things went wrong once the door shut. Official records hold these claims, written plainly, reported straight. No drama needed when facts speak loudly enough. A grown person used their role like permission. What followed wasn’t care - it was a violation masked by authority.

How power and fear work in these cases

It starts with closeness. Private sessions meant for fixing form become openings where boundaries blur. One after another, these moments pile up without anyone watching. Power sits in the hands of the coach - time on the field, spots in competitions, even what comes next in life depend on them. Silent corners take shape late at night or down long hallways far from eyes. Fear slips in quietly. The message lands soft but sharp - talk, and everything fades.

Facing such pressure, the coach warned he would destroy her career, then shifted blame by telling her parents about supposed issues during practice - a tactic muddying the truth while shielding his actions. When someone twists events like this, hesitation creeps in, self-trust slips away, silence stretches on.

Failing is what some groups did - yet others moved anyway

When something goes wrong, organizations must act. Here, after news broke about the FIR, the NRAI acted fast - halting the coach’s duties without delay. Police in Faridabad stepped in, logging charges under POCSO while gathering proof: video clips from cameras, records showing where phones travelled, and words from workers at the hotel. Once it turned out the man could not be found right away, groups spread out searching. Judges got involved too, especially once requests for release began appearing. Each move matters.

Yet fixing things fast once trouble hits does not stop it happening. When coaches meet young athletes without others around, risk grows, especially since many training centres face little outside review. Meetings behind closed doors slip through the cracks too easily. Organizations need rules that limit solo time with children, swap isolation for open settings or documented talks, while insisting on screened staff and behaviour boundaries spelt out plainly.

What should athletes, parents, and systems do?

  • Basic rules: never attend a private meeting alone with an adult coach in a closed room. If a one-on-one is needed, ask for a parent, team official, or other coach to be present.
  • Safe reporting: federations and academies should have clear, confidential ways for minor athletes to report concerns without fear. This includes a trusted person outside the immediate coaching circle.
  • Training and background checks: every coach working with minors should have police verification, a code of conduct, and mandatory training on boundaries and child protection.
  • Educate athletes and parents: explain how grooming works, small favours, private chats, offers to fast-track careers and encourage early reporting.
  • A fresh look at who runs things: groups such as the Sports Authority of India and sport councils need to share updated registers of certified trainers while checking training centres on a set schedule. Trust grows when people see what happens behind the scenes, not just from victory counts. Proof exists elsewhere that these moves help stop harm before it spreads

Ending blind faith

Truth is, coaches aren’t flawless mentors by default. Skill earns respect, yet that doesn’t remove doubt when sessions happen out of sight. Safety matters just as much as strong drills for younger competitors. Behind every solid program, protection fits naturally inside standards - never tagged on afterthought.

Right now, officials and judges are handling this matter. Still, one thing stands out - without boundaries on authority, risk grows. Protection needs structure, not just trust. Swap blind loyalty to coaches for transparent rules, safety improves across sports. Believing someone completely? That changes when accountability steps in.

Should something like this happen to you or someone close, get in touch with officers nearby or groups that help children stay safe. Talking helps - reach out to coaches, teachers, or others who’ve been around long enough to know what matters. Laws guard young people only when voices rise. Silence keeps harm hidden.

References:

.   .   .

Discus