They walk among us like shadows at noon, visible enough to be judged, yet invisible where rights, dignity, and citizenship should matter. India’s prostituted women occupy a paradoxical space where society consumes their existence while simultaneously denying their humanity. Their history is layered: from the celebrated courtesans, devadāsīs, and tawaifs, custodians of art, poetry, and classical culture, to the colonial criminalisation that recast them as deviant bodies. The Criminal Tribes Act and Victorian morality produced a legacy of stigma that independent India never fully dismantled. In modern times, the brothel worker, the inter-state trafficked girl, the street-based sex worker, and the migrant mother selling survival each stand on the fault line between agency and coercion, visibility and erasure.
The Indian Constitution promises equality, dignity, and personal liberty under Articles 14, 15, and 21. Yet, for millions of women in prostitution, these guarantees remain constitutional poetry, not lived truth. They are neither fully criminalised nor fully protected, caught in the limbo created by the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (ITPA), a statute that targets brothel-keepers and traffickers but often ends up policing the sex worker herself. This legal ambiguity fuels everyday persecution: police raids that strip dignity, municipal bodies that evict without rehabilitation, and welfare schemes that bypass them due to lack of valid documents or “acceptable” occupations.
Their lives unfold in a country that debates morality louder than justice. As India advances economically and publicly champions women’s empowerment, its prostituted women remain a silenced constituency, citizens on paper, but ghosts in policy. Their existence at the intersection of gender, poverty, caste, migration, and violence reveals not deviance, but the state’s failure to see them as full humans deserving rights, not rescue alone, but recognition.
India’s legal architecture surrounding sex work resembles a house built without a blueprint, walls stand where doors should be, windows open into brick, and the inhabitants are expected to navigate its absurdity with dignity. Sex work, by itself, is not a crime; yet, every activity that makes sex work possible brothels, solicitation, living on earnings, and public presence, is criminalised under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (ITPA). This paradox ensures that the woman stands accused even when the law claims to protect her. The ITPA, born out of a colonial moral project rather than a rights-based vision, has become a tool of containment rather than liberation. Police raids conducted without warrants often descend upon poor neighbourhoods like storms: women are dragged out, beaten, shamed, and taken to so-called “rescue homes” that operate more like detention centres than shelters. These “protective” institutions confine adult women without trial, restrict mobility, and deny them the right to legal counsel. The brothel-keeper and the trafficker often escape through bribes and political patronage, while the woman who might be working voluntarily, or simply surviving, finds herself criminalised for her own vulnerability.
Alongside this punitive framework lies a constitution that promises expansive rights. Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21 safeguard equality, the freedom to practice a profession, dignity, and bodily autonomy. Courts have occasionally risen to affirm these guarantees: the Supreme Court’s 2022 directive recognised the dignity of sex workers and obligated the police to treat them as citizens rather than offenders; several High Courts have reiterated that consensual adult sex work is not a crime. Yet these judgments rarely penetrate the lower rungs of bureaucracy. Police stations, welfare departments, and municipal bodies continue to operate on moral assumptions rather than constitutional ethics. Courtrooms speak the language of dignity; the streets speak the language of punishment.
Indian law’s most telling silence lies in its refusal to address male demand. Women are criminalised for “soliciting,” but the clients who create the market escape scrutiny. This legal blindness reflects a structural misogyny: society prevents women from selling sex while simultaneously protecting men’s right to buy it. Unlike Nordic countries, where the buyer is penalised, Indian law refuses to confront patriarchy’s role in sustaining the sex trade.
When placed against global models, India’s contradictions stand out even more sharply. New Zealand’s decriminalization model treats sex work as legitimate labour, expands access to health and justice, and reduces violence. Germany and the Netherlands regulate sex work through licensed brothels, though critics warn of the exploitation of migrant women under bureaucratic control. The Nordic model, idealistic in its feminist ambition, penalises buyers but has pushed sex work underground, exposing women to more danger. India mirrors none of these fully; instead, it clings to a colonial-era hybrid that neither protects nor prohibits. Its laws function not as shields but as cages preserving patriarchal sensibilities while abandoning women to police brutality, legal ambiguity, and social scorn.
Beyond the legal papers, the realities of India’s prostituted women unfold in alleys soaked with poverty, discrimination, and institutional betrayal. The entry into sex work is rarely an act of unburdened choice; it is a negotiation with survival. Women arrive here after being deserted by husbands, uprooted by migration, displaced by communal riots, pushed by domestic violence, or lured by traffickers disguised as lovers. Many are minors, tricked or coerced by relatives or agents. Yet the law collapses all these distinctions and reads every woman through the same moral lens. Instead of understanding differential vulnerabilities, it criminalises poverty itself.
The violence that sex workers face is not only from clients it is often from the state. Police brutality forms the backbone of the sex trade’s oppression. Human Rights Watch and Indian community organisations like Sangram and NNSW document chilling testimonies: custodial rape presented as “discipline,” weekly extortion payments demanded as “fees,” and condoms seized as “evidence,” thereby sabotaging the very health initiatives the government claims to promote. One sex worker famously called the police “clients with uniforms”, a phrase that encapsulates how institutions meant to ensure safety end up being perpetrators.
Social stigma forms the third pillar of oppression, an invisible noose that strangles slowly, generation after generation. Society treats sex workers as if they occupy a lower rung of human existence: landlords refuse them housing, schools deny entry to their children, banks reject their applications, and ration shops ask for “respectable occupations.” Stigma becomes a shadow that follows them everywhere, creating a social death long before physical death arrives.
Healthcare, which should be universal, becomes a moral battlefield. Doctors turn away sex workers or treat them with contempt, assuming they are vectors of disease rather than victims of structural violence. Women navigate pregnancies, abortions, HIV, mental stress, and trauma without medical support. The denial of care is not accidental; it is institutional discrimination dressed as professional discretion.
Intersectionality deepens these wounds. Dalit girls in Karnataka and Maharashtra are trapped in the remnants of the Devadasi system, forced into generational prostitution. Migrant Bengali women in Delhi’s brothels lack identity papers and thus access to welfare. Muslim sex workers endure communal profiling, especially during police raids. Women from the Northeast face fetishisation based on stereotypes of exoticism. In this layered oppression, sex work becomes not a single phenomenon but a complex hierarchy of caste, religion, region, and class.
The children of sex workers inherit stigma like an unwanted surname. They are bullied, denied documents, and often pressured to join the trade. In India, stigma is hereditary, passed from mother to child, reinforced by the silence of institutions that claim to uplift but refuse to listen.
To reimagine India’s path, global models offer both inspiration and caution. New Zealand stands as a beacon of decriminalisation, recognising sex work as legitimate labour and emphasising autonomy, contracts, healthcare access, and violence reduction. There, community-led organisations collaborate with the government, creating a framework that respects rights while addressing exploitation.
Germany and the Netherlands take a regulatory approach, where brothels operate under licenses and workers undergo mandatory health checks. Although safer than criminalisation, this model often disadvantages undocumented migrant women who cannot navigate complex bureaucratic systems. Regulation risks recreating class hierarchies within the sex trade, privileged workers in legal brothels and marginalised women in illegal, dangerous spaces.
The abolitionist Nordic model, often celebrated in Western feminist circles, criminalises the buyer rather than the seller. While well-intentioned, it pushes the trade underground and heightens risks for women who must rush interactions to evade police scrutiny. Stigma intensifies rather than fades.
India must draw from all these models without copying any blindly. It needs a uniquely Indian approach, one that recognises caste oppression, informal economies, interstate migration, family abandonment, and patriarchal policing. A rights-based framework must be blended with anti-trafficking vigilance, social welfare, and labour protections. The solution lies not in mimicry but in contextual creativity.
Even where the judiciary articulates progressive visions, implementation collapses under the weight of India’s social prejudices. Institutional inertia remains the greatest barrier; police officers, municipal authorities, and local bureaucrats continue to act according to patriarchal instincts rather than constitutional morality. Legal reforms become symbolic gestures when street-level officials hold more power over sex workers’ lives than judges.
The politics of respectability also plays a key role. Society differentiates between “deserving” and “undeserving” victims, placing sex workers firmly in the latter category. Policies, therefore, emphasise “rescue and rehabilitation,” not rights or empowerment. Rehabilitation homes reproduce the very violence they claim to cure: locked rooms, no vocational training, poor sanitation, lack of psychological support, and no pathways to economic independence. Many women escape or voluntarily return to sex work not out of desire, but because the state offers no real alternatives.
Feminist schisms further complicate policy-making. Radical feminists view sex work as violence and demand abolition; sex-positive feminists defend bodily autonomy and labour rights. Between these ideological poles, real women slip through the cracks. It is the oldest story of feminism’s elite battles overshadowing marginalised voices.
Ultimately, the greatest failure is the state’s refusal to acknowledge sex workers as citizens. Citizenship in India requires identity documents, mobility, inclusion in welfare schemes, and freedom from harassment, all of which sex workers lack. Constitutional optimism collapses in the face of structural realities shaped by caste, class, religion, and patriarchy.
A transformative future must begin with full decriminalisation, not the legalisation that subjects women to new layers of control, but the removal of punitive laws that criminalise survival. Police reforms must dismantle extortion networks and custodial violence, accompanied by gender-sensitive training and independent complaint mechanisms. Confiscating condoms must be outlawed as a practice that endangers women’s health.
Protection must focus on traffickers, not workers. Anti-trafficking units should collaborate with community groups to identify real coercion, rather than presuming that every woman in sex work is a helpless victim. Healthcare access must become stigma-free: dedicated clinics, mental health services, HIV treatment, reproductive care, and insurance inclusion are essential steps.
Social inclusion demands that sex workers and their children be granted housing rights, scholarships, and access to welfare schemes. Economic empowerment through skill development, microfinance, and the formation of cooperatives must provide real alternatives. Identity documents like Aadhaar, ration cards, and voter IDs must be guaranteed; without them, dignity remains theoretical.
Most crucially, sex workers must participate directly in policymaking. Their voices, often excluded in the name of “protection,” must guide welfare boards, legislative committees, and NGO programs. The principle must be clear: nothing about them without them.
India now stands before a moral mirror. It can continue hiding behind colonial laws and societal shame, or it can recognise prostituted women as workers, citizens, and humans with inviolable dignity. The Constitution envisions a republic where justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity extend to all, especially those whom society has deliberately pushed to the margins. The question is whether India will allow morality to overshadow justice, or whether constitutional morality will finally triumph over inherited prejudice.
Sex work exists, regardless of our comfort or denial. The real question is whether the women within it will continue to live in shadows, or whether the law and society will finally illuminate their lives with dignity, protection, and recognition. The journey from tolerance to equality is long, but it begins with one fundamental shift: seeing sex workers not as fallen figures in need of rescue, but as full citizens whose humanity is non-negotiable.