Suppose that we took a thin invisible veil, or shell, around our planet, a clothing that brings the rays of the sun of the most hostile kind. This is the ozone layer commonly referred to as the built-in sunscreen of the earth, as it has been thinned over decades by man-made chemicals to the point where the dangers to human life on the planet have become all too real. However, today, a new chapter is being written in this world narrative, one of hope and a strong message of doing it together.
Recently, the WMO Ozone Bulletin 2024 presented a remarkable update: the protective ozone layer of the Earth is expected to be restored to its size in the 1980s by the middle of the 21st century, which is a positive change indeed. This is no mere fortuitous coincidence or a law of nature; it is a direct consequence of a concerted, worldwide action that can be clearly seen as one of the most successful environmental interventions ever in human history. This is not only possible but inevitable when countries listen to the warnings of science.
In order to fully enjoy this recovery, we should have the knowledge of the crisis that brought it about. The ozone layer refers to a zone of high ozone concentration in the stratosphere, 15 to 35 kilometers above the surface of the Earth. It performs the most benign activity of absorbing and blocking the harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation of the sun, a task that the lower ozone layer, called bad ozone, accomplishes much lower in altitude, a part of urban smog.
This shield has long been maintained as a given fact, until a shocking realization in the mid-1980s. Scientists of the British Antarctic Survey, headed by Joseph Charles Farman, declared that they had discovered a dramatic depletion of ozone in the Antarctic setting.7 This was promptly named the ozone hole, a powerful metaphor that, though not a physical open region, reported a catastrophic waste of the ozone layer beneath a historic level of 220 Dobson Units.6 Satellite and balloon measurements showed that a large region of the Antarctic stratosphere was literally like being undermined by ozone annually in the springtime.
The villains of this environmental disaster were obscure and insidious: a group of engineered chemicals called Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS). The most notorious of them was Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which were highly stable and inflammable, which is why they were so popular in refrigerants, aerosols, and solvents. They were stable to the extent that they did not disintegrate in the lower atmosphere and drifted gradually into the stratosphere. These ODS molecules disintegrated there, in the UV light they were designed to prevent, and produced chlorine and bromine atoms. The ensuing chemical reaction proved to be no less than devastatingly effective. With one chlorine atom, which was a catalyst, each one could react and destroy up to 100,000 ozone molecules before being expelled out of the stratosphere.
The aftermath of this shearing veil was grave, and it was a major danger to life on our planet. The effects were especially worrying for human health. The health of the skin was also reported to be at risk through increased exposure to UV-B radiation, with an estimated 0.3 to 0.6 percent higher risk of cataracts with each 1 percent reduction in the ozone level.13, and also with the eye, where the exposure level has been estimated to cause the human immune system to weaken and the DNA to be damaged and the possibility of genetic mutation. Aquatic ecosystems were under threat from phytoplankton, and crop productivity may be disrupted, resulting in an international food crisis. The world had to take action, and it had to take action quickly.
The world responded to this existential menace by doing the unheard of. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer was modestly signed in 1987 and a global agreement to reduce the production and consumption of ODS in the world, but its success was due to an unprecedented process of scientific and technological study, negotiations among communities, and international diplomacy.
One of the reasons why the protocol was successful was its inherent flexibility. It was not a fixed text; it had an adjustment provision which allowed parties to make rapid adjustments in response to new scientific information and to make the necessary reductions of chemicals which were already the subject of the treaty expeditiously.
Year | Key Action |
1987 | The original Montreal Protocol was signed. It requires developed countries to begin phasing out CFCs and halons. |
1992 | The Copenhagen Amendment accelerates the phaseout, mandating the complete end of CFCs and other substances by 1996 for developed countries. |
2016 | The Kigali Amendment was adopted, targeting hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) for a global phasedown. |
The Montreal Protocol has an impressive history. As an example, the 2016 Kigali Amendment dealt with a new challenge that came about due to the success of the protocol in the first place; industries that were going to phase out of ODS, like CFCs, started to use HFCs as their replacement. HFCs never destroyed the ozone layer, but they were found to be effective greenhouse gases contributing to climate change to a large extent, which is a strong synergy between the ozone layer protection and the climate action, which the amendment incorporated.
This action indicated the versatility of the protocol to go beyond its inception and emerge as a flexible system to solve global-scale multi-hazard problems that will serve as a guide to further operations in global governance.
WMO Ozone Bulletin 2024 gives the current evidence that this concerted effort is paying off. The report indicates that the 2024 Antarctic ozone hole was not as large as the comparatively large holes observed between 2020 and 2023. It was ranked the seventh smallest hole in the history of the recovery with a monthly mean area of nearly 8 million square miles (22.4 million square kilometers). The hole also reached its largest one-day size of 8.5 million square miles (22.4 million square kilometers) on September 28.
The road to recovery is not, however, a straight one. This natural variability can lead to the fact that the year-to-year size of the ozone hole can vary in response to natural atmospheric factors, including air currents, which may transport ozone in the north into the Antarctic region, or due to such events as the late onset of ozone depletion, which was witnessed in September 2024. This natural variability may make differentiating the signal of actual recovery and the noise of atmospheric weather difficult. However, an extensive research study carried out by scientists at MIT has proven with a 95 percent statistical confidence that the observed recovery is not occasioned exclusively by natural forces but rather as a result of the worldwide ODS reduction. This scientific confirmation gives the optimistic forecasts solid ground.
The whole recovery is not fast, even though there has been improvement in the recent past. The atmospheric lifetime of ODS molecules, particularly those that have been emitted decades ago, is hard to believe, as some of these substances may take as long as 100 years to decompose. This is one of the important lessons about the massive time lag between the actions taken by people and the resultant emissions in the atmosphere. This gradual rate emphasizes the necessity of further orderly observation of the ozone layer and chemicals that have an impact on it, which will guarantee long-term vigilance and adherence to the procedure.
Montreal Protocol is not merely a tale of how to put a hole in the sky. It is a strong demonstration of the concept of how the global community can come together to address enormous, complicated issues. The final success of the protocol can be most explained by considering the tragedy that it averted. New modeling experiments demonstrate a world-avoided scenario, in
In the absence of the treaty, the world would have continued to heat up under the average global surface temperature by up to 2.3 °C, and the polar vortices would have warmed by up to 12 °C by the end of the 21st century.
The Montreal Protocol has averted this nightmare scenario and also saved people from harmful UV radiation and more than 63 million cases of cataracts and 443 million cases of skin cancer by the close of this century, only by saving the local population born between 1890 and 2100. This success story is a reminder that the same principles, global cooperation, shared scientific realization, and a flexible and evolving framework can be used in other urgent situations, such as the current climate crisis.
The ozone healing is a very meaningful and very optimistic narrative. It starts with an act of bravery in scientific discovery, passes through a stage of unprecedented worldwide cooperation, and finally comes to the current time, when we can perceive a feasible road to recovery. The fact that it is a potent statement of what man can achieve when he decides to pay attention to his scientists and collaborate with his fellow man in the community to the benefit of all is a strong testament.
It is not so much a report, but a blueprint of the future. The identical spirit of collective responsibility and trust in the strength of collective action that patched our planet’s sunscreen can be used to address the climate crisis and thousands of other problems of the planet. As we rejoice with this milestone, let us bring its message with us.
Tell this success story, keep in touch with the current initiatives of environmental conservation, and never doubt that we can make our future a better and healthier place.