The Myth of the Lightning Bolt

We all know that person.

You know the one. They didn't just find a job; they bumped into an old college roommate at a coffee shop who happened to be looking for a Marketing Director at exactly the moment they were looking for a change. They didn't just go on vacation; they got upgraded to business class because the flight attendant liked their sweater, and ended up sitting next to an investor who funded their startup before the plane touched down in London.

It’s infuriating, isn’t it?

From the outside, it looks like magic. We call it luck. We call it fate. We tell ourselves that the universe just has favorites, and we aren’t one of them. It’s a comforting lie, mostly because it absolves us of responsibility. If luck is lightning—random, violent, and entirely out of our control—then there is nothing we can do but wait for the storm.

But what if we’re wrong?

What if luck isn’t lightning? What if it’s wind? You can’t create the wind, obviously. That’s nature’s domain. But you can build a sail. You can read the weather. You can position your boat where the gusts are strongest.

The most successful people in the world—the ones we envy for their "lucky breaks"—aren't magicians. They are simply excellent sailors. They have built what I call a Serendipity Engine: a mindset and a set of behaviors that transform random chaos into predictable opportunity.

And the best part? You can build one too.

The Surface Area of Luck

To understand how to manufacture luck, we have to stop looking at it as a mystical force and start looking at it as a math problem.

Years ago, an entrepreneur named Jason Roberts coined a concept called the "Surface Area of Luck." His formula was simple: Luck = (Doing) x (Telling).

Most of us are pretty good at the "Doing" part. We keep our heads down. We work hard. We refine our craft in the dark, waiting for someone to notice. We subscribe to the old industrial age meritocracy that says if you build a better mousetrap, the world will beat a path to your door.

Spoiler alert: The world is busy. The world doesn't care about your mousetrap because the world doesn't know it exists.

The people who seem preternaturally lucky have expanded their surface area. They don't just do the work; they create a wake. They talk to strangers. They publish their half-finished thoughts. They send the cold email that feels a little too ambitious. By increasing the number of touchpoints they have with the world, they statistically increase the probability of a "lucky" collision.

Think of it like a spiderweb.

If you are a spider with a web the size of a dinner plate, you might catch a fly if you wait long enough. But the "lucky" person is the spider who has spun a web across the entire garden path. They catch more prey not because they are hungrier, or more deserving, or because the flies like them better. They catch more because they have constructed a massive surface area where opportunities can get tangled up.

The Reviewer’s Dilemma: Why Talent Isn’t Enough

Let’s pause for a second and look at this from a skeptical perspective. You might be thinking, “That sounds great, but I’m an introvert. Or I’m busy. I don't have time to spin webs.”

Fair point. But let's look at the alternative.

Consider two writers. Writer A is a genius. They write beautiful, heartbreaking prose, but they keep it in a drawer because it’s "not ready yet." They attend no workshops. They have no Twitter account. They wait for discovery.

Writer B is average. Their prose is decent, but their flow is clunky. However, Writer B goes to every open mic night. Writer B comments on other writers’ blogs. Writer B submits their messy drafts to magazines, gets rejected, and submits them again.

Three years later, Writer B has a book deal. Writer A is still polishing the first chapter.

Is Writer B lucky? Did they just "happen" to meet an editor at a mixer? Sure. But that meeting was a statistical inevitability, not a miracle. Writer B created a scenario where it was harder not to get lucky than to get lucky.

This is the uncomfortable truth about the Serendipity Engine: Motion creates friction, and friction creates sparks.

If you are standing still, you are safe. You are also invisible. The universe cannot help you if it cannot find you. To turn the engine on, you have to accept a fundamental risk: the risk of being seen, the risk of looking foolish, and the risk of asking for things you haven't perfectly earned yet.

The Psychology of "The Open Door"

Richard Wiseman, a psychologist who spent ten years studying luck, ran a fascinating experiment. He gave people a newspaper and asked them to count how many photographs were inside.

The people who identified as "unlucky" took about two minutes to count them all. The people who identified as "lucky" took mere seconds.

Why?

Because on the second page of the newspaper, Wiseman had placed a massive message in huge font: “Stop counting. There are 43 photographs in this newspaper.”

The "unlucky" people were so hyper-focused on the specific task (counting) that they missed the massive opportunity staring them in the face. They were wearing blinders. The "lucky" people were more relaxed. Their attention was softer, wider. They were open to data that didn't strictly fit the parameters of the assignment.

This creates the first rule of our Serendipity Engine: Cultivate a soft focus.

When we are too rigid about our goals—I need this specific job, at this specific salary, by this specific date—we inadvertently filter out the side doors. We miss the internship that leads to the CEO’s office. We miss the freelance gig that pays less but connects us with a mentor.

Lucky people are notoriously bad at following the script. They are easily distracted, but in a productive way. They see the headline on page two. They notice the anomalies.

So, how do we operationalize this? How do we stop counting photos and start seeing the bigger picture? We have to change our relationship with the unknown. We have to stop viewing the unexpected as a disruption to our plans and start viewing it as the plan itself.

The Stranger on the Train (and Why Your Friends Can’t Save You)

If you want to understand the true mechanics of luck, you have to look at your phone. Scroll through your last ten text messages.

Chances are, these people are your "strong ties." Your partner, your best friend, your mom, your colleague who sits three feet away from you. These people are your safety net. They are your emotional anchor. But here is the hard truth we discussed earlier: These people are unlikely to change your life.

It’s not because they don't love you. It’s because they inhabit the same world you do. They know the same people, hear the same gossip, and swim in the same information pool. If there was a life-altering opportunity in their circle, you would already know about it.

In 1973, a sociologist named Mark Granovetter published a paper titled The Strength of Weak Ties. It shattered our understanding of social success. Granovetter found that people rarely got jobs through close friends. They got them through acquaintances—the guy you play tennis with once a month, the woman you sat next to at a conference, the "friend of a friend."

These "weak ties" act as bridges. They connect your isolated island to other islands—other industries, other social circles, other ways of thinking.

Building a Serendipity Engine requires you to leave the comfort of the village and walk out onto the bridge. It means talking to people who don’t owe you anything.

The “Interesting Person” Tax

This brings us to a practical problem. Talking to strangers is terrifying. Cold emailing is awkward. Trying to build "weak ties" can feel slimy, like you’re networking just to use people.

So, how do we do this without losing our souls?

We flip the script. We stop asking, “What can this person do for me?” and start asking, “How can I be the most interesting part of this person’s day?”

Luck tends to stick to people who generate energy. If you are a black hole—absorbing attention, asking for favors, complaining about your bad luck—people will instinctively shield themselves from you. But if you are a sun—radiating ideas, curiosity, and genuine enthusiasm—people will orbit you.

You don't need to be an extrovert to do this. You just need to pay what I call the "Interesting Person Tax."

Here is the strategy: Every week, reach out to one person who is doing something you admire. Not to ask for a job. Not to "pick their brain" (a phrase that should be banned from the English language). Just to send a signal.

"Hey, I read that article you wrote about underwater basket weaving. The point you made about tension was fascinating. It changed how I thought about my own work in software design. Just wanted to say thanks."

That’s it. No ask. No link to your resume.

Do you know what happens when you send a note like that? You stand out. Most successful people are bombarded with requests. They are rarely bombarded with genuine, no-strings-attached gratitude.

You have now created a weak tie. You are no longer a stranger; you are "that thoughtful person who liked my article." You have planted a seed. Maybe it grows, maybe it doesn't. But if you plant 50 of those seeds a year, you are walking through a forest of potential opportunity rather than a barren desert.

Optimizing for Curiosity (The Rabbit Hole Method)

Let’s go back to the idea of the "sail." If weak ties are the wind, your curiosity is the rudder.

In a hyper-optimized world, we are taught to be efficient. We are told to focus only on things that have a clear ROI (Return on Investment). Why read that history book? It doesn’t help your coding career. Why learn pottery? You can’t sell the bowls.

This efficiency is the enemy of serendipity.

Luck lives in the margins. It hides in the intersections between unrelated fields. Steve Jobs famously took a calligraphy class in college that had no practical application to his life. Ten years later, that "useless" class became the foundation for the beautiful typography of the Macintosh.

If Jobs had been obsessed with efficiency, he would have skipped the class. He would have missed the luck.

To build your engine, you must permit yourself to waste time intelligently. This is the Rabbit Hole Method.

When something piqued your interest—a weird footnote in a book, a strange building in your city, a random Wikipedia article—pull the thread. Follow it. Not because it’s useful, but because it’s interesting.

This creates a unique "knowledge stack" that no one else has.

There are a million graphic designers.

There are very few graphic designers who are also obsessed with 14th-century Japanese architecture and behavioral economics.

When you combine disparate interests, you become a magnet for specific, high-value luck. You become the only person capable of solving a specific type of problem. You stop competing with the masses and start creating your own category.

The Art of "Being Seen"

All of this internal work—the mindset, the curiosity, the knowledge—is useless if you remain invisible.

We have a cultural hangover that tells us humility is silence. We think that if we are good, people will notice. But in the noise of the digital age, silence is indistinguishable from incompetence.

To get lucky, you must leave a trail.

This doesn't mean you need to become an influencer. It doesn't mean you need to film yourself dancing on TikTok. It means you need to Work Out Loud.

Are you learning to code? Post your broken code and ask for help. Are you building a garden shed? Share the photo of the crooked frame and what you learned about leveling. Are you reading a dense philosophy book? Write a 100-word summary of the chapter that confused you.

When you work out loud, you turn your passive journey into an active beacon. You give the weak ties something to latch onto.

I recently spoke to a young woman who landed a dream job at a top architectural firm. She didn't apply. She didn't know anyone there. But for two years, she had been running an obscure Instagram account where she sketched terrible, ugly buildings she saw in her city and redesigned them to look better.

One of the firm's partners saw a sketch. He laughed. He looked at her other work. He sent her a DM.

Was she lucky? Yes. But she had built a sail. She had created a surface area. She had worked out loud. If those sketches had stayed in her notebook, she would still be waiting for lightning to strike.

The Pivot Point

So, we have the network (weak ties). We have the fuel (curiosity). We have the beacon (working out loud).

But there is a dark side to this engine.

What happens when the luck is bad? What happens when you put yourself out there, you send the email, you post the work, and the result isn't a job offer, but a public failure? What happens when the wind tears the sail?

This is where the Serendipity Engine faces its hardest test: Resilience.

Because if you open yourself up to the good randomness of the universe, you are legally required to open yourself up to the bad randomness, too. You cannot filter the wind. You can only learn how to stay upright when the gale starts blowing.

The Alchemy of the Fall

There is a story about a farmer that has been told for thousands of years. It’s a cliché, but clichés are often just truths that have lost their novelty.

The farmer’s horse runs away. The neighbors say, “Such bad luck.” The farmer says, “Maybe.” The next day, the horse returns with three wild stallions. The neighbors say, “Such good luck.” The farmer says, “Maybe.” The farmer’s son tries to ride one of the wild horses, falls, and breaks his leg. The neighbors cry, “Such bad luck.” The farmer says, “Maybe.” The next week, the army comes to draft young men for a violent war. They pass over the son because of his broken leg. The neighbors say… well, you get the point.

This story usually gets interpreted as a lesson in detachment. Don't get too high, don't get too low. But for our Serendipity Engine, it teaches a more aggressive lesson: Bad luck is often just raw material.

The people who seem endlessly lucky don't escape failure. They actually fail more often than the rest of us because, as we discussed, they have a larger surface area. They are exposed to more wind.

But they are alchemists.

When the "unlucky" person gets fired, they retreat. They internalize the shame. They shrink their world to protect themselves from further pain. When the "lucky" person gets fired, they grieve—they are human, after all—but then they engage the engine. They sent the email: “Well, that didn't work out. But I learned X, Y, and Z. Who do you know that needs a guy who knows X, Y, and Z?”

I have seen careers built entirely on the wreckage of failed startups. I have seen marriages born from the ashes of disastrous blind dates. The difference was never the event itself; it was the refusal to let the event be the end of the sentence.

To be truly lucky, you have to be anti-fragile. You have to decide, right now, that no matter what piece of chaotic data the universe throws at you, you will find a way to weave it into the plot. You have to treat your life like a documentary, not a script. In a script, a flat tire is a mistake. In a documentary, a flat tire is a plot twist.

The Lag Time of Luck

There is one final component to this machine, and it is the one that breaks most people.

It is the Time Lag.

We live in an instant-feedback world. You post a photo; you get a like. You order a pizza; it arrives in 30 minutes. You send a text; you see the three little dots of the reply.

But serendipity operates on agricultural time, not digital time.

When you start building your engine—when you start sending those gratitude emails, when you start working out loud, when you start exploring rabbit holes—nothing will happen.

Day 1: Nothing. Day 10: Nothing. Day 30: Still nothing.

This is the "Valley of Death." This is where the skeptics turn back. They say, “I tried talking to strangers. It didn’t work. Luck is a lie.”

But they are confusing silence with inactivity. Beneath the soil, the roots are spreading. The "weak ties" are marinating. That person you emailed three months ago didn't have an opening then, but today, in a board meeting, someone mentioned a problem, and your name popped into their head.

“Actually, I got a note from a guy who is obsessed with this exact thing.”

Real luck has a gestation period. The huge break you get three years from now will be the direct result of a conversation you have tomorrow. You cannot force the harvest, but you must trust the planting.

If you stop the engine because you don't see immediate results, you kill the crop just before it breaks the surface. You have to be willing to look foolish for a long time. You have to be willing to be the person "wasting time" on curiosity and connection, right up until the moment you become the person who "came out of nowhere."

The Captain of the Ship

So, where does this leave us?

It leaves us with a choice.

We can continue to view luck as lightning—a rare, terrifying, divine intervention that strikes the chosen few while the rest of us huddle in the dark. We can continue to be bitter about the people who get the breaks. We can continue to wait.

Or, we can build the sail.

We can accept that while we cannot control the wind, we can control the surface area. We can choose to be curious when it is more efficient to be bored. We can choose to speak when it is safer to be silent. We can choose to reach out when it is easier to hold back.

The next time you see someone who seems to have the world on a string—the person who always lands on their feet, the person who meets the right people, the person who gets the breaks—don't envy them.

Study them.

Look for the engine humming beneath the surface. Look for the weeks, months, and years of small, "useless" interactions that built the web. Look for the failures they recycled into stepping stones.

Then, start building your own.

Open a new tab. Send the email. Say hello to the stranger in the coffee shop. Write the bad draft. Follow the weird curiosity.

Raise your sail. The wind is always blowing; you just have to be ready to catch it.

.    .    .