Flowing into the Future: Evaluating India’s Preparedness for Water Sustainability and Climate Justice by 2030

Introduction: Linking Water Crisis, Climate Justice, and SDG

Water has always been central to human survival, economic progress, and ecological balance, but in the twenty-first century, its importance has become even more pronounced. In India, home to more than 1.4 billion people, the growing scarcity and uneven distribution of water

have emerged as one of the most pressing challenges to sustainable development. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 — “Clean Water and Sanitation for All” — underscores that safe and equitable access to water is both a fundamental human right and a prerequisite for achieving the broader 2030 Agenda. Yet, India’s present trajectory exposes structural flaws in water governance, intensifying climate pressures, and widening inequalities in access.

This crisis is no longer a looming threat but an ongoing reality. According to reports by NITI Aayog (2018, 2021), India is grappling with the “worst water crisis in its history,” with nearly 600 million citizens experiencing high to severe water stress. The country’s per capita water availability has plunged from 5,177 cubic meters in 1951 to less than 1,500 cubic meters by 2021 — a level that already categorizes India as “water-stressed” under international norms.

Rising urbanization, industrial expansion, and population growth have only deepened the demand-supply imbalance, pushing many urban centers toward “Day Zero” situations, such as the 2019 water crisis in Chennai, when reservoirs virtually ran dry.

The challenge extends beyond scarcity to questions of justice. Climate change has intensified hydrological extremes — erratic monsoon patterns, prolonged droughts, devastating floods, and glacial retreat — with the heaviest toll borne by the most vulnerable. Rain-fed farmers, women who shoulder the burden of water collection, and urban poor communities lacking piped connections face disproportionate hardships. These inequities highlight the moral and political dimensions of the crisis, demanding that climate justice be embedded into adaptation strategies and water governance policies.

Assessing India’s readiness for 2030, therefore, requires a dual approach: first, measuring the nation’s progress toward achieving SDG 6 and allied goals, and second, evaluating whether its institutions, policies, and technologies are capable of ensuring fairness and resilience for those most at risk. The water crisis is far more than a technical issue of balancing supply and demand; it is also an ethical and socio-political challenge that calls into question India’s developmental priorities and its institutional commitment to equity and justice.

This article examines India’s water crisis through the lens of climate justice within the framework of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. It assesses the state of water resources, the influence of climate change, the role of policy and law, the equity dimensions of access, the impact of technological and community innovations, lessons from international practices, existing barriers, and possible pathways forward. In doing so, it asks whether India is truly on track to secure water sustainability and justice for its people by the end of this decade.

India’s Water Crisis: Current Status and Projections for 2030 India’s water crisis is complex and multidimensional, encompassing physical shortages, economic barriers, institutional inefficiencies, and environmental degradation. At its root lies the widening gap between rising demand and diminishing supply, compounded by over-extraction, misuse, and fragile governance systems. Recognizing the scale and trajectory of this crisis is critical for evaluating India’s preparedness to achieve Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.

Groundwater Depletion: The Silent Emergency

Groundwater, which meets nearly 85% of India’s drinking water and 60% of its irrigation needs, is being depleted at an unsustainable pace. Data from the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) shows that more than 1,000 administrative blocks are “over-exploited,” with withdrawals exceeding natural recharge. Agricultural states such as Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan face severe declines, in some places by more than a meter each year. This trend threatens national food security, as the Green Revolution model of water-intensive wheat and paddy cultivation has proven ecologically unviable.

Urban Water Stress and ‘Day Zero’ Cities Urban areas, projected to house nearly 500 million people by 2030, face growing water insecurity. NITI Aayog’s Composite Water Management Index (2018) warned that 21 major cities—including Delhi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Chennai—could soon face acute shortages, affecting around 100 million people. The crisis in Chennai during 2019, when reservoirs ran dry and the city was forced to depend on costly imports and tanker supplies, epitomizes the consequences of poor planning, over-dependence on distant water sources, and neglect of traditional water-harvesting systems.

Declining Per Capita Availability

India’s finite renewable water resources are under immense strain. Per capita annual availability has fallen from over 5,000 cubic meters in 1951 to just 1,486 cubic meters in 2021, placing the country in the “water-stressed” category (below 1,700 cubic meters).

Projections from the Ministry of Jal Shakti warn that by 2050, this figure could drop below 1,000 cubic meters—effectively pushing India into the “water-scarce” category.

Inequalities in Access and Distribution

Water stress in India is not evenly distributed; it is marked by sharp inequities. Rural
households often depend on distant or unsafe sources, with women and girls carrying the responsibility of fetching water.
In urban slums, irregular piped supply forces dependence on costly private vendors, while wealthier neighborhoods enjoy uninterrupted access.
These disparities highlight how water scarcity intersects with social and economic inequalities, making it not only an environmental problem but also a justice issue.

Water Quality and Pollution

Quantity concerns are compounded by deteriorating quality. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) reports that more than half of India’s rivers are polluted, largely due to untreated sewage and industrial waste. Groundwater contamination with arsenic (in West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh) and fluoride (in Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh) affects millions, creating serious health risks. Meeting SDG-6’s mandate of safe and affordable drinking water is thus challenged by both scarcity and pollution.

Projections for 2030

Looking ahead, the scenario is deeply concerning. NITI Aayog estimates that water demand will exceed supply by 2030, potentially causing a six percent loss in GDP. While agriculture will continue to dominate demand, rapid urbanization and industrialization will intensify competition. Climate change is expected to worsen this stress, with more frequent droughts, intense floods, and unpredictable monsoons. Without urgent reforms, India risks falling short of SDG-6 and facing severe socio-economic and political fallout.

Climate Justice and Water Inequality in India

The concept of climate justice reframes water scarcity not only as an ecological challenge but also as an issue of fairness, rights, and equity. In India, water shortages do not affect all groups equally; some communities and regions bear disproportionate burdens. This inequality underscores the need to treat access to water as a socio-economic entitlement rather than merely a natural resource.

Urban–Rural Divide

While cities often enjoy relatively reliable (though uneven) piped supply, rural areas— particularly semi-arid regions such as Bundelkhand, Marathwada, and parts of Rajasthan— struggle with recurring droughts and heavy dependence on rainfall. Here, water shortages directly translate into crop failures, agrarian distress, and migration.

Gendered Dimensions

Women bear a disproportionate share of the crisis. In drought-prone districts of Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand, women frequently walk several kilometers daily to collect water, with significant costs to their health, education, and livelihood opportunities.

The water crisis thus entrenches gender inequality, linking environmental stress with broader justice concerns of equality and empowerment.

Marginalized Communities and Environmental Injustice Dalits, Adivasis, and economically weaker sections face layered disadvantages: poor infrastructure, systemic discrimination, and exclusion from water sources. Caste-based denial

Access to community wells persists despite legal protections, while tribal communities displaced by large dams and hydropower projects—such as those in the Narmada Valley— lose both land and traditional water rights. These cases illustrate how development often benefits the urban-industrial elite while deepening vulnerabilities among marginalized groups.

Inter-State Inequities and Conflicts

Disputes between states over river-sharing, such as the Cauvery conflict between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu or the Krishna dispute, highlight distributive injustice at the federal scale.

Upstream states frequently exploit their geographical advantage, leaving downstream populations at risk. Weak mechanisms for equitable sharing have turned rivers into contested political boundaries rather than shared ecological lifelines.

Towards a Rights-Based Approach

Addressing these inequalities requires adopting a rights-based approach to water governance.

The United Nations General Assembly (2010) recognized water and sanitation as human rights, and as a signatory, India is obligated to uphold these commitments. Judicial precedents, such as Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar (1991), which affirmed that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to clean water, are vital in embedding climate justice into law and policy.

India’s Policy and Legal Framework on Water and Climate Policy and Legal Framework of Water Governance in India. Assessing India’s readiness for achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals requires a close look at its constitutional, legal, institutional, and judicial framework on water governance. A blend of constitutional mandates, statutory provisions, national missions, and judicial pronouncements has gradually shaped the scaffolding of India’s approach to water management.

Constitutional Foundations

Under the Constitution, water primarily falls within the jurisdiction of states, as specified in Entry 17 of List II (State List) in the Seventh Schedule. However, its placement also in the Union List, particularly with respect to inter-state rivers and related disputes, creates overlapping jurisdictions that often complicate governance. Further guidance emerges from the Directive Principles of State Policy. Articles 39, 47, and 48A direct the state to pursue equitable distribution of resources, promote public health, and safeguard the environment.

Although not enforceable in a strict legal sense, these provisions lay down the normative principles underpinning water governance in India.

Statutory Provisions

India’s water legislation is supported by a series of key laws, though their effectiveness has been uneven. The River Boards Act, 1956, was designed to facilitate cooperative management of the inter-state river basins, yet it has remained largely dormant in practice. Similarly, the Inter-

State Water Disputes Act, 1956, provides a mechanism for the establishment of tribunals to resolve disputes among states, but experiences with conflicts such as those involving the Cauvery, Krishna, and Ravi-Beas rivers illustrate that the resolution process is often prolonged, politically contentious, and unsatisfactory.

In terms of water quality regulation, the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, created the Central and State Pollution Control Boards to monitor and enforce standards. The scope of regulation was expanded under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which vested the central government with wide-ranging powers to address environmental concerns, including those linked to water. Despite this, enforcement remains weak. The Central Pollution Control Board continues to identify more than 300 stretches of polluted rivers, highlighting the persistent disjunction between statutory intent and actual compliance.

National Policies and Missions

To align governance with the SDGs, a range of national programs and policies have been adopted. The National Water Policy of 2012 underscored the need for integrated water resources management, prioritization of drinking water, efficiency in use, and rational pricing to prevent over-extraction. Under the broader framework of the National Action Plan on Climate Change, the National Water Mission has set a target of enhancing water-use efficiency by 20 percent by 2030—an explicit link between climate resilience and water governance.

Parallel flagship initiatives have been launched to ensure access and sustainability. The Jal Jeevan Mission (2019) seeks to provide functional household tap connections to all rural households by 2024, directly contributing to SDG 6 on clean water and sanitation. Likewise, the Atal Bhujal Yojana (2019), with World Bank assistance, promotes sustainable groundwater management in critical regions through community involvement and scientific assessment. Together, these policies reflect a multi-dimensional strategy to address India’s water challenges, although their ultimate success depends on strong enforcement, institutional coordination, and sustained political will.

Judicial Interventions

The judiciary has played an active role in plugging governance gaps. In MC Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997), the Supreme Court articulated the “public trust doctrine,” affirming that natural resources such as water are held by the state in trust for the people and cannot be diverted for private benefit. Similarly, the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal decision (2007) emphasized the principle of equitable distribution of inter-state waters, balancing competing claims within the river basin.

Despite these interventions, challenges remain. India lacks a comprehensive national water law, inter-state cooperation continues to be fragile, and enforcement of pollution control is inadequate. Moreover, the climate dimension—Page | 7shifts in rainfall, glacier retreat, and extreme hydrological events—has yet to be systematically integrated into water policy. Without bridging these gaps, India’s water governance framework risks falling short of the transformative goals envisioned for 2030.

Regional Disparities and Case Studies

Regional Variations in India’s Water Crises India’s preparedness for the 2030 SDGs on water cannot be assessed without factoring in the profound regional disparities in water availability and governance. The country’s varied climatic and ecological zones produce unique challenges—ranging from droughts to floods— that complicate policy uniformity.

Case Study 1: Bundelkhand (Uttar Pradesh & Madhya Pradesh)

Bundelkhand exemplifies drought-prone vulnerability. Erratic rainfall, depleted reservoirs, and inadequate irrigation infrastructure have triggered recurring agrarian crises. Crop failures push farmers into debt and distress migration, a cycle poorly addressed by episodic relief packages. Structural interventions in decentralized water harvesting, watershed management, and crop diversification remain limited, revealing a policy gap between short-term relief and long-term resilience.

Case Study 2: Marathwada (Maharashtra)

Marathwada illustrates the political economy of water mismanagement. Despite being drought-prone, sugarcane—a water-intensive crop—dominates the agricultural landscape, sustained by entrenched political patronage. This entrenched cropping pattern deepens water scarcity, while summer tanker mafias exploit shortages for profit. The persistence of such practices underscores failures in agricultural policy reform and the regulation of groundwater extraction.

Case Study 3: Rajasthan and Desert Ecology

Rajasthan’s water history demonstrates both resilience and neglect. Traditional systems— stepwells (baolis), johads, and community-based rainwater harvesting—enabled survival in arid conditions. However, these indigenous methods have been sidelined by groundwater over-extraction and poorly designed modern interventions. Revival attempts like the Mukhya Mantri Jal Swavlamban Abhiyan mark progress but face questions of scalability and sustainability in the face of climate stress.

Case Study 4: Kerala Floods (2018, 2019)

Kerala’s catastrophic floods highlight the risks of water excess. Poor land-use planning, unregulated sand mining, and encroachment on floodplains exacerbated natural vulnerabilities. Dam management failures—particularly uncoordinated water releases— magnified the crisis. The disaster demonstrates how climate-induced extreme rainfall interacts with governance lapses to transform natural hazards into human catastrophes.

Case Study 5: Himalayan States (Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh)

The fragile Himalayan ecosystem faces a dual challenge of glacial retreat and extreme rainfall. The Chamoli disaster (2021), triggered by a glacial burst, destroyed hydropower projects and villages, exposing the risks of over-reliance on infrastructure in ecologically sensitive zones. These recurring disasters highlight a governance dilemma: balancing clean energy goals through hydropower with the imperative of protecting fragile mountain environments.

India’s Current Preparedness for 2030 SDGs – Achievements and Gaps
India’s Commitment to the SDG Agenda 2030
India was among the earliest supporters of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable

Development, pledging to advance all 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Within this framework, SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation) and SDG 13 (climate action) hold particular importance for India, given its reliance on monsoon-driven agriculture and its vulnerability to both droughts and extreme climatic events.

To monitor progress, the NITI Aayog SDG India Index has emerged as a benchmark tool, ranking states on their performance across multiple goals and fostering cooperative federalism. This index not only highlights disparities but also encourages state-level accountability in areas such as water management, sanitation, and environmental protection.

Policy Interventions on Water Sustainability (SDG-6)

In recent years, the Government of India has rolled out ambitious initiatives aimed at securing water access and sustainability:

Atal Bhujal Yojana (2019): Focuses on participatory groundwater management in water-stressed regions through decentralized, community-led strategies.
Jal Jeevan Mission (2019): Aims to provide functional household tap-water connections to all rural households by 2024, marking a transformative step toward universal water access.

Integrating Broader Sustainability Goals

India’s SDG alignment extends beyond water-focused programs. Flagship schemes such as the National Solar Mission, National Electric Mobility Mission, and the Green Hydrogen Mission reflect an integrated approach to reducing carbon dependency and advancing the national pledge of achieving net-zero emissions by 2070.

Global Lessons for India: Water Sustainability and Climate Justice. Climate change and water scarcity are pressing global challenges, but the way countries respond differs widely. India, given its scale, diversity, and growing vulnerabilities, can learn much from international experiences. The cases of Israel, Singapore, and South Africa offer contrasting yet complementary lessons in resilience, innovation, and governance.

Israel: Mastering Water Efficiency

Israel, a semi-arid nation with scarce freshwater and highly irregular rainfall, has built a reputation as a pioneer in water management. Confronted with natural limitations, it developed cutting-edge technologies that transformed water use. The most notable of these is drip irrigation, which conserves up to 70% more water than traditional flood irrigation while enhancing crop yields. Equally impressive is its record in wastewater recycling—about 90% of treated wastewater is reused, mainly for agriculture, making Israel the global leader in this field. Moreover, large desalination plants today supply over 60% of domestic needs, while mechanisms such as dynamic pricing and real-time leak detection ensure efficiency.

For India, these approaches are particularly relevant. Regions like Punjab and Haryana, where aquifers are depleting rapidly, could adopt micro-irrigation at scale, while urban centers such as Chennai or Bengaluru could integrate desalination and wastewater reuse into their water systems. The broader lesson is that science, technology, and economic incentives must be woven together to achieve sustainable outcomes.

Singapore: Integrated Water Governance

Singapore’s experience highlights how long-term planning can turn vulnerability into resilience. Despite abundant rainfall, the country once faced severe water insecurity due to reliance on imported water from Malaysia. To overcome this, it introduced the Four National Taps Strategy, which diversified supply through local catchments, imported water, desalination, and reclaimed water. Rainfall harvesting is extensive—almost the entire island functions as a rainwater collection system through drains, canals, and reservoirs. The NEWater initiative, producing high-purity reclaimed water, now meets around 40% of national demand, while desalination plants strengthen resilience further. Crucially, public engagement initiatives such as the popular “Water Wally” campaign helped make water conservation a cultural norm. For India, this integrated governance approach offers a clear message: cities must move beyond fragmented utilities and adopt a whole-cycle management model, combining infrastructure, regulation, and public participation.

South Africa: Lessons from Cape Town’s ‘Day Zero’

South Africa provides a stark reminder of what delayed action can cost. In 2018, Cape Town came close to “Day Zero”, when municipal taps were projected to run dry after years of drought coupled with governance failures. Emergency measures capped individual use at 50 liters per day and introduced strict monitoring. Alongside this, authorities launched efficiency drives such as leak detection, pressure control, and infrastructure upgrades, while partnerships with communities and businesses reinforced conservation. Public mobilization was crucial—citizens drastically reduced water consumption, helping avert catastrophe. Post-crisis, investments in groundwater, desalination, and reuse have been prioritized to build resilience. For India, the 2019 Chennai water crisis reflected similar vulnerabilities, underlining the urgency of preventive action. Cape Town shows that while crises can spark reform, waiting until the brink of collapse is far too risky.

Global Climate Justice Dimensions

These cases also bring to light the often-overlooked dimension of climate justice in water governance. Israel has tried to strike a balance between agricultural needs and ecological sustainability, ensuring farmers are not disadvantaged. Singapore’s pricing policies reflect water’s scarcity value but are paired with subsidies for poorer households, making access equitable. By contrast, Cape Town’s rationing exposed deep social inequities, as poorer communities were hit hardest by shortages. For India, where vulnerable groups such as small farmers, slum dwellers, and marginalized rural communities already bear the brunt of water stress, justice must be central to climate adaptation. This means that reforms should not only focus on efficiency and technology but also on equity, participation, and fairness in access.

Community Participation and Grassroots Movements in Water Justice. While legal frameworks and policy reforms provide the structural foundation for water governance in India, meaningful transformation has often begun at the grassroots.

Community-led movements have historically taken the lead in protecting rivers, forests, and aquifers, stepping in where state interventions proved inadequate. These struggles embody the idea of “climate justice from below,” ensuring that marginalized voices influence debates on sustainability.

Water, by its very nature, is a local resource shaped by geography, culture, and livelihoods.

Centralized, top-down management—such as the construction of large dams—has frequently led to displacement, ecological damage, and unequal access. By contrast, community participation fosters accountability, inclusiveness, and resilience. Practices such as traditional harvesting, cooperative irrigation, and social audits demonstrate that sustainability built at the micro-level can, in turn, strengthen broader climate action.

India’s grassroots mobilizations have consistently tied ecological conservation to water security and social justice. The Chipko Movement of the 1970s, though focused on saving forests, highlighted how tree cover sustains soil health and water cycles. Women, in particular, played a central role by hugging trees to prevent their felling, asserting the right to safeguard resources essential for survival. Similarly, the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) challenged large dams on the Narmada River, with Medha Patkar and others exposing how such projects displaced communities, eroded traditional water-sharing practices, and privileged a few at the expense of many.

The struggle for water justice continued with the Jal Satyagraha in Madhya Pradesh in 2012, where villagers staged a unique protest by standing for days in rising dam waters to oppose submergence without rehabilitation. This act of non-violent defiance reinforced the inseparable connection between water rights, human dignity, and justice. Earlier, in the 1970s, the Pani Panchayats of Maharashtra—initiated by Vilasrao Salunkhe—set a precedent for equitable irrigation by distributing water according to land size rather than wealth, preventing domination by richer farmers.

Equally transformative was the revival movement in Rajasthan’s Alwar district during the 1980s, led by Rajendra Singh, later known as the “Waterman of India.” Through the restoration of johads (traditional earthen ponds), communities regenerated groundwater, revitalized agriculture, and turned degraded lands productive once again. This experiment demonstrated that decentralized, community-driven conservation often outperforms centralized, state-led schemes. Taken together, such movements have consistently reframed water not merely as a resource but as a question of justice, equity, and ecological balance. Women’s role in these struggles has been particularly significant. In rural India, where women bear the responsibility of securing household water, they are often the most affected by scarcity. Their leadership in Chipko, Jal Satyagraha, and everyday negotiations over water-sharing underscores the importance of gender-sensitive policies. Recognizing women as custodians of water commons is essential for advancing climate justice.

This legacy of grassroots innovation continues today. In Uttarakhand, the Swajal initiative has emerged as a participatory governance model, with village committees managing drinking water supply systems. Such decentralization promotes efficiency, accountability, and long-term sustainability. Maharashtra’s centuries-old Phad irrigation system, still in operation, exemplifies cooperative management by distributing canal water equitably among farmers. Meanwhile, in cities such as Bengaluru and Chennai, citizen groups have mobilized to protect lakes from encroachment, protest against river pollution, and resist unchecked groundwater extraction. These urban movements reveal that water crises extend far beyond rural areas, increasingly shaping the lives of urban populations as well.

Towards a Framework for Climate and Water Justice in India - Conclusion & Way Forward

This article has attempted to trace the evolution of climate justice and water struggles in India by exploring landmark movements such as the Narmada Bachao Andolan and the Jal Satyagraha, alongside judicial interventions, shifting policies, and global comparisons. What emerges clearly is that water in India is far more than a physical resource—it is a contested space where state authority collides with citizen rights, where aspirations for development clash with ecological concerns, and where market logics often undermine community ownership. In essence, the story of water is also a story of power, resistance, and justice.

India now finds itself confronting one of the gravest water crises in its history. Per capita water availability has plummeted dramatically—from nearly 5,000 cubic meters in 1950 to under 1,500 cubic meters today. This structural scarcity is being aggravated by climate stressors such as erratic rainfall, recurrent floods, and long spells of drought. Rising competition among agriculture, industry, and urban households has deepened the problem further. The central dilemma is how to reconcile the twin imperatives of economic growth— through infrastructure, irrigation, and energy projects—with the equally urgent demands of ecological sustainability and distributive justice.

Addressing this crisis requires a multi-layered framework for water and climate justice. First, the legal foundation must be reinforced by formally recognizing the right to water as a fundamental right under the Constitution, drawing on global practices in countries like South Africa and Bolivia. India’s water laws need to be recalibrated to privilege equity and ecological balance over narrow commercial gains. Second, governance structures must be decentralized, with Gram Sabhas, Panchayats, and urban local bodies given real powers in water decision-making, supported by participatory institutions such as Water User Associations. Third, adaptation measures must be fully integrated into water policy.

Initiatives like rainwater harvesting, watershed restoration, groundwater recharge, and climate-resilient agriculture should form the backbone of resilience strategies. Fourth, while private actors may have a supplementary role, regulation must ensure that water remains affordable and universally accessible. Public–community partnerships offer a more democratic alternative than profit-driven privatization. Finally, accountability needs to be sharpened by strengthening institutions such as the National Green Tribunal, river basin authorities, and human rights bodies, while encouraging courts to adopt a rights-based perspective instead of restricting themselves to technical disputes.

One of the enduring lessons from struggles such as the Narmada Bachao Andolan and the Jal Satyagraha is that community resistance holds both moral weight and political efficacy.

These movements underline the principle that democratizing water governance is impossible without giving center stage to Adivasis, farmers, fisherfolk, and women. True climate justice cannot be realized only through legal or institutional reforms—it also requires recognition of local agency, turning fragmented protests into broader struggles for dignity, survival, and justice.

At the same time, India’s experience highlights a persistent gap between policy promises and lived realities. Even progressive laws and schemes frequently falter in practice due to bureaucratic inertia, weak enforcement, and inadequate accountability. Bridging this gap requires transparent monitoring, effective grievance redress mechanisms, and active participation of civil society in holding institutions responsible. Unless laws translate into meaningful practice, the aspiration of water justice will remain rhetorical.

Given its size and vulnerability, India’s choices on water management also carry global significance. How the country manages its rivers, aquifers, and climate adaptation strategies will have repercussions far beyond its borders. By embracing water justice at home, India can also position itself as a global advocate for treating water as a shared commons, influencing international debates on climate justice and sustainability.

Yet, the struggle for water justice in India is far from settled. The experience of the Narmada valley and the Jal Satyagraha has already shown that communities will not remain silent when their survival is imperilled. For courts, governments, and civil society alike, the principle is clear: in the realm of water, justice delayed is justice denied, because ecological degradation and scarcity do not wait for sluggish institutional responses.

Mahatma Gandhi’s observation remains profoundly relevant: “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s needs, but not every man’s greed.” India’s challenge in the coming decades is to decide whether water will be reduced to a commodity traded for profit or reclaimed as a vital commons that sustains life itself. That choice will not only determine the health of India’s rivers but will also shape the resilience of its democracy, its ecological stability, and its climate future.

. . .

References:

Discus