What if a country already struggling to fix broken roads, improve schools, and provide clean water decides to spend billions on two weeks of global attention? The Olympics sound glorious, but for India, it may be the costliest distraction from reality.

India’s aspirations to host the Olympic Games by 2036 have stirred national excitement. Many believe this could be a landmark moment, signaling India’s arrival as a global power. Yet, beneath the sheen of international glory lies a tough question: can a nation with pressing developmental needs afford to chase such a costly dream?

While the Olympics promise visibility and symbolic uplift, the hard truths from past host nations and India’s track record tell another story—one of fiscal stress, unfulfilled legacies, and missed priorities. This article unpacks why India should pause, reflect, and ultimately walk away from hosting the Olympics.

The Global Pattern: Olympic Dreams, Economic Nightmares

Across decades, countries have been dazzled by the Olympics, only to regret the price they paid. The 2004 Athens Olympics played a significant role in deepening Greece’s economic crisis, as billions in public funds were poured into grand stadiums and infrastructure that were left to decay soon after the games ended. Brazil’s 2016 experience was no better—cost overruns, corruption charges, and vacant stadiums followed the initial euphoria.

Even nations with stronger economies, such as Japan during the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, faced massive budget escalations, especially after COVID-19-related delays. Their final spending was over twice the projected figure. These stories are not exceptions. They are the norm.

For India, still climbing its way out of infrastructural gaps and economic inequality, walking this same path would be perilous.

The Price Tag India Can’t Afford

Olympic hosting is a financial black hole. From land acquisition to construction, transport upgrades to security arrangements—the bill runs into tens of billions of dollars. Initial projections are rarely accurate. Most Olympic cities have exceeded their budgets by huge margins.

India would need to spend from scratch on stadiums, athletes' villages, upgraded airports, highways, public transit, and high-tech security systems. But the real danger lies in what gets sidelined. Critical sectors, such as healthcare, education, clean drinking water, and poverty alleviation, would suffer due to budget reallocation.

With a population where a large portion still lacks access to essentials, such spending becomes hard to justify, morally and economically.

Delhi 2010: A Familiar Warning Sign

We don’t have to look far for a cautionary tale. The Commonwealth Games held in Delhi in 2010 were expected to be India’s global coming-of-age moment. Instead, they became a symbol of inefficiency, mismanagement, and widespread corruption.

The event’s costs ballooned to nearly ₹30,000 crore, multiple times over the original estimate. Many of the structures built for the games were underused afterward. Worse, the allegations of graft damaged India’s global image far more than the event ever enhanced it.

If the Commonwealth Games—a far smaller event than the Olympics—could spiral into controversy and chaos, what makes us think the Olympics would be any different?

Building for 16 Days, Paying for 50 Years

Olympic infrastructure is expensive not just to build, but also to maintain. The stadiums, villages, and facilities created for a few weeks of competition often end up as burdens. Without regular use and commercial viability, these venues become financial liabilities.

In countries like South Africa (FIFA 2010) and Brazil, the once-celebrated stadiums have turned into 'white elephants', abandoned, deteriorating, and draining millions each year in maintenance costs. India already struggles to maintain existing public infrastructure; adding more to the pile would only worsen the problem.

Corruption and Cronyism: Too Deep to Ignore

Large, fast-tracked projects attract not just attention but corruption. India’s record with large-scale public works is troubled—bureaucratic red tape, inflated contracts, and lack of transparency are frequent issues.

In such an environment, an event as massive as the Olympics could become a hotbed for scams. Political favoritism in awarding contracts, cost padding, and corner-cutting in construction are real risks. And once the event ends, these scandals stay, sometimes eroding public trust for decades.

Environmental Destruction in Disguise

The Olympics are marketed as celebrations of global unity and sustainability. But the truth is murkier. The construction demands vast tracts of land, often displacing people, razing forests, and altering ecosystems. Water bodies are rerouted, green spaces are cleared, and urban areas are “beautified” at the cost of communities.

India, where several cities are already gasping under pollution and water stress, cannot afford such ecological trade-offs. The price paid by the environment would far outlast the medals won.

Will It Boost Indian Sports? History Says No

Supporters claim that hosting the Olympics will revolutionize Indian sports. But history doesn’t support this view. Greece’s medal count didn’t improve after 2004. Brazil hosted the 2016 Olympics and barely moved the needle in athletic excellence.

What transforms sports ecosystems is long-term investment: in training centers, coaching quality, access to facilities, nutrition programs, and athlete support. India’s sports budget is already tight. A significant portion of it being diverted to flashy one-time infrastructure would leave grassroots development starved.

If we truly want Olympic medals, we need to start at the school level, not at the stadium level.

Tourism Hype: A Misleading Promise

Most host cities experience a decline in regular tourism during the Olympics due to skyrocketing prices, strict security measures, and overwhelming crowds. Once the event ends, visitor numbers typically return to pre-event levels, offering no lasting boost. For a country like India, with its rich tapestry of heritage, spirituality, festivals, and natural wonders, the Olympics are not essential for drawing global attention. Rather than pouring billions into a short-lived spectacle, investing in cleaner cities, safer streets, and better infrastructure would create a far more enduring and meaningful appeal for international tourists.

Safety and Crisis Management: A Capacity Question

Managing the Olympics requires flawless execution in crowd control, cybersecurity, emergency services, and health preparedness. With thousands of foreign visitors, athletes, media, and heads of state, the security challenge is enormous.

India’s experience with natural disasters, public protests, and civic disruptions highlights gaps in emergency management. Any failure on this scale could not only be embarrassing—it could be catastrophic.

Prestige at What Cost?

Billions of people watch the Olympic opening ceremony, making it a powerful boost to a nation’s international prestige. But what if that ceremony reveals crumbling infrastructure, delayed projects, or poorly handled logistics?

In the pursuit of global recognition, countries often end up revealing their weaknesses. India is already securing its place on the world stage through advancements in technology, diplomacy, space exploration, and a thriving start-up ecosystem. Hosting the Olympics isn’t essential to prove our progress or potential.

Smarter Alternatives Exist

India can still rise in global sports without hosting the Olympics. Hosting smaller, more manageable international events—like the Asian Games, World Cups in individual sports, or e-sports tournaments—can bring visibility without overwhelming costs.

At the same time, building athlete ecosystems, offering incentives, and involving private sponsors will create a genuine sporting culture that lasts. Countries like Kenya, Cuba, and Jamaica have earned Olympic glory without ever hosting the Games. India can do the same.

The Olympics are seductive. They promise respect, grandeur, and international attention. But for a country like India, with millions still living in poverty, lacking sanitation, education, or clean air, the cost is simply too high.

It’s not just about economics. It’s about choosing substance over spectacle, and long-term impact over momentary applause. India should continue to rise by building a nation that serves its people, not by showcasing a shiny event for the world.

We don't need to host the Olympics to prove our greatness. We need to become a country where every child can dream and have the support to chase it, with or without gold medals.

.    .    .