Photo by Muhammad kamran on Unsplash

War has transformed. Once fought with swords, rifles, and tanks, battles today unfold in the virtual world through memes, manipulated videos, and international media headlines. This new battleground is not about territory but perception. It's about who gets to define the truth. Welcome to the age of 6th Generation Warfare, a model where narrative control is not just a strategy but a powerful weapon.

India and Pakistan have long engaged in military, political, and ideological conflicts. However, the recent Indo-Pak tensions, particularly following the Pahalgam attack and India’s Operation Sindoor, reveal a troubling truth: while India might win on the battlefield, Pakistan is winning the war of perception. This article delves into how Pakistan’s information warfare, led by its military-run media wing ISPR, has outpaced India in the battle for global narrative control — and why it matters more than ever.

A Story of Tactical Victory vs. Narrative Defeat

After the gruesome Pahalgam terrorist attack, India responded with precision and strength under Operation Sindoor. Satellite images, radar logs, and international diplomatic communication proved that Indian operations were real, restrained, and strategic.

But on the other side of the border, Pakistan’s narrative took a different turn, entirely detached from facts but far more successful in controlling the storyline. Their media outlets claimed dramatic victories: from destroying key Indian defense bases to capturing a “female pilot.” Yet, not a shred of verifiable evidence accompanied these statements.

Despite the lack of proof, the global media machine echoed Pakistan’s story. International news giants like Al Jazeera, BBC, and The New York Times highlighted unverified Pakistani claims, shaping the global discourse. This wasn't a failure of military operations — it was a diplomatic and narrative breakdown.

The Rise of ISPR: Pakistan’s Propaganda Powerhouse

At the heart of Pakistan’s narrative dominance is ISPR — Inter-Services Public Relations, the media and communications wing of the Pakistan Armed Forces. Established in 1949 and headquartered in Rawalpindi, ISPR is not just a media liaison. It is a sophisticated psychological warfare division designed to influence minds, manufacture consent, and demonize India both nationally and internationally. ISPR operates through three specialized wings: Management and Public Affairs Wing – Designs communication strategy for the armed forces. Production and Content Creation Division – Produces films, music videos, dramas, and more. Monitoring and Analysis Wing – Tracks public sentiment, runs cyber-ops, and deploys misinformation campaigns.

Their central objective is clear: to portray India as an existential threat, justify military dominance in Pakistan’s polity, and engineer favorable global opinion.

Tools of Narrative Warfare

ISPR’s arsenal is digital, psychological, and deeply cultural. It does not rely on tanks — it uses:

  • Magazines like Hilal regularly print anti-India propaganda under the guise of patriotic journalism.
  • TV Serials and Movies that depict the Indian army as barbaric, often framing Kashmir as a site of Indian military oppression. Music videos and national songs paint Pakistan as the eternal underdog, surrounded by hostile powers.
  • But most alarming is ISPR’s digital internship and youth mobilization program. Young Pakistanis are recruited, trained, and tasked with spreading anti-India content across platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok. Each month, ISPR runs contests, offering jobs at defense-linked institutions like the Fauji Foundation to those whose narratives go viral. These “keyboard warriors” are told: You are as valuable as any soldier.

Operational Techniques: Controlling the Narrative

ISPR has perfected two main operations in its digital war play: Targeted Campaigns Using Indian Handles: Fake resignation letters from Indian officers, false claims about internal military disputes, and fabricated apologies from Indian ministers are pushed through verified-looking accounts. Toolkit System: ISPR prepares and shares a pre-coordinated plan containing hashtags, slogans, videos, and memes to be deployed during key geopolitical events. These kits go viral within hours.

These tactics are then picked up by international news platforms, creating an illusion of authenticity. Repetition across platforms turns a lie into a believable narrative.

A Global Web: Alliances in Propaganda

Pakistan’s narrative war is not a solo mission. It has powerful allies who benefit from India’s global misrepresentation. Turkey created a “Troll Army” in 2015 and signed an Information Cooperation Pact with ISPR. Its outlets, like TRT World, regularly produce anti-India content, especially around Kashmir. China, in July 2023, announced a formal alliance with Pakistan on Rapid Response Information Exchange — a system designed to co-create, co-disseminate, and defend joint narratives, particularly against India. The US, while not openly aligned, remains complicit through silence. With growing Indian-Russian military cooperation, a pro-India narrative hurts America’s defense trade interests in South Asia. ISPR, through its global network, has secured media tie-ups with over 40 countries, giving it an unmatched advantage in shaping international opinion.

The Price of Losing the Narrative

Why does narrative control matter? Because perception translates into policy. If the world believes India is an aggressor, not a victim, it affects Bilateral diplomatic negotiations, Foreign investments, public opinion on Kashmir, and Global strategic partnerships.

In the contemporary world, a country’s reputation is as important as its military strength. India’s failure to counter propaganda means losing trust, influence, and diplomatic capital — even when its actions are justified and legally sound.

Psychological Warfare: Celebrating Imaginary Victories

Narrative warfare has deep psychological implications. Today, a majority of Pakistani citizens believe they won the Kargil War (1999) and even the Bangladesh Liberation War (1971), a conflict which they actually lost, leading to the creation of Bangladesh. These distorted memories aren’t accidental. They are a result of carefully manufactured propaganda, creating an alternate reality where Pakistan is always the brave victim and India the violent oppressor. The implications are dangerous: false confidence, militarized nationalism, and a population easy to mobilize during conflict escalation. Worse, these victories exist only on mobile screens, but they still drive real-world decisions.

India’s Response: Slow, Reactive, and Inadequate

Lt. Gen. MU Nair, India’s cybersecurity chief, recently admitted that Pakistan had outperformed India in information warfare. This rare acknowledgment shows a deeper problem: India lacks a coordinated, agile, creative narrative strategy. While India focuses on evidence, legality, and diplomacy, Pakistan builds emotion, spectacle, and speed. Indian stories, when they are told, come late — often after the damage is done. In this fast-paced attention economy, silence is often perceived as guilt. Facts matter less than frames.

The Way Forward: From Reaction to Resistance

The war is no longer just on borders, now it's in timelines, headlines, and WhatsApp forwards. So what should India do? Establish a National Narrative Strategy Division, integrating cyber experts, journalists, diplomats, and psychologists.

Empower youth influencers and student bodies with authentic, fact-checked content to counter propaganda in real-time. Invest in cultural storytelling — through cinema, music, and digital campaigns — that assert India’s story, not just defend it. Train diplomats in narrative warfare, not just traditional diplomacy. Counter AI-generated fake videos immediately with forensic evidence and credible media outreach.

In a world where truth competes with virality, being right is not enough — being heard is essential. Pakistan’s victory in 6th Generation Propaganda Warfare is not on battlefields but on screens, tweets, and narratives. India must rise to the occasion — not with louder slogans, but sharper strategies. Narrative warfare is real, and losing it affects everything from foreign policy to national unity. The time to act is now. Every Indian soldier, student, journalist, and diplomat must become a guardian of the national story. Only then can we reclaim the truth.

.    .    .

Discus