Balochistan, Pakistan's largest and most resource-rich province, has long remained at the center of a deep-rooted internal conflict. While the broader India-Pakistan rivalry often dominates headlines, the turmoil in Balochistan reveals a parallel struggle, one not driven by cross-border antagonism but by internal dissent, historical grievances, and the complex question of identity and autonomy. Today, Balochistan has emerged as a flashpoint in South Asia’s geopolitical drama, grabbing headlines across Pakistan, India, and beyond.

How was Balochistan Formed?

Before the partition of British India in 1947, Balochistan was a politically fragmented region including Kalat, Makran, Las Bela, and Kharan. The most significant entity was the "Khanate of Kalat", a princely state with deep historical roots, governed by the “Khan of Kalat”. Kalat maintained a degree of autonomy through treaties with the British, while neighboring regions like Lasbela, Kharan, and Makran were semi-independent but linked to Kalat. Meanwhile, parts of Balochistan, including Quetta, were administered directly by the British for military and geopolitical purposes. Their main purpose was to station soldiers at the border of Iran and Afghanistan to defend the frontiers of British India.

As British rule ended, princely states were given a choice to either accede to India or Pakistan or remain independent. The Khan of Kalat declared independence on August 15, 1947. However, Pakistan saw Balochistan as vital to its geopolitical and territorial interests. By March 27, 1948, under mounting pressure, its ruler, Ahmad Yar Khan, agreed to accede to Pakistan, becoming the last of the rulers to do so. This was a move widely contested by Baloch nationalists. Soon after, Prince Abdul Karim, Ahmad Yar Khan's brother, launched the First Balochistan Conflict in 1948, marking the first in a series of insurgencies that continue today. Balochistan was officially integrated as a province in 1970, but the legacy of its contested accession remains.

Why Does Balochistan Want Independence?

The demand for Balochistan’s independence is rooted in decades of unresolved grievances and a deep sense of historical betrayal. For many Baloch, the province's forced accession to Pakistan in 1948, after initially seeking independence as the sovereign Khanate of Kalat, marks the beginning of a long struggle for autonomy and recognition. What they view as an annexation, not a voluntary union, still fuels nationalist sentiments.

Despite being Pakistan’s largest and most resource-rich province, Balochistan remains its poorest. The wealth generated from its natural gas, minerals, and strategic coastline rarely benefits local communities. Instead, the Baloch see their resources extracted and exported while their schools, hospitals, and roads remain underdeveloped. Economic deprivation, coupled with political exclusion, has created a strong sense of alienation.

The situation is further worsened by alleged human rights violations. Reports of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and the suppression of dissent are widespread. Activists, students, and journalists often face intimidation or violence, making many Baloch feel like outsiders in their land. Cultural marginalization, such as the sidelining of the Balochi language and traditions, adds to their resentment.

Moreover, large-scale projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which runs through key Baloch areas, have intensified these frustrations. While advertised as a symbol of development, many Baloch view CPEC as yet another instance of outsiders exploiting their land without consulting or benefiting them.

In this context, independence is seen by many not just as a political goal, but as a path to reclaiming identity, justice, and control over their future. The movement is not solely militant; it’s also cultural, political, and increasingly youth-led, reflecting a growing consensus that change from within may no longer be enough.

What Makes Balochistan Crucial to Pakistan?

Balochistan holds immense geopolitical and economic value. Geographically, it borders Iran and Afghanistan, and its 770-kilometer coastline includes the strategically significant Gwadar Port. This location gives it a pivotal role in regional trade and energy corridors.

Economically, Balochistan is rich in natural resources. It is home to substantial deposits of natural gas, coal, gold, copper, and other minerals. According to the Geological Survey of Pakistan, an estimated 1.6 billion tons of gold reserves were found in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Despite this, Balochistan is considered Pakistan's least developed province due to factors like high poverty and illiteracy rates, limited access to basic infrastructure, and the local population sees little benefit from these resources, fueling accusations of exploitation by the central government. Balochistan’s strategic and economic assets make it a focal point for both national policy and international interest, particularly with projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

The Baloch Nationalist Movement

The Baloch nationalist movement is a long-standing struggle for autonomy or independence by the Baloch people in Pakistan, rooted in a distinct ethnic identity and deep grievances over political marginalization, resource exploitation, and cultural suppression.

The origins of the movement date back to 1929, when reformist leaders Yousaf Aziz Magsi and Abdul Aziz Kurd founded the Anjuman-e-Ittehad-e-Balochan-wa-Balochistan. They aimed to unify Balochistan, end tribal dominance, and promote social reforms. In 1937, the Kalat State National Party emerged, defending Baloch autonomy under the princely state of Kalat.

Following the 1947 partition, the Khan of Kalat sought independence but was compelled to accede to Pakistan in 1948. Major insurgencies occurred in 1958, 1962, and most notably in 1973, when thousands of Baloch fighters clashed with the Pakistani military over demands for greater control of local resources and political rights. Each conflict ended in military suppression, deepening resentment.

The movement evolved politically in the 1980s and 1990s with the rise of parties like the Baloch National Movement (BNM), which emphasized peaceful advocacy and self-determination. However, from the early 2000s, armed groups like the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), Baloch Liberation Front (BLF), and Baloch Nationalist Army (BNA) emerged, launching attacks on Pakistani security forces and infrastructure, particularly those tied to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Today, the movement comprises both political activists and armed insurgents. Their key demands include justice for human rights violations, resource control, and recognition of Baloch identity. International attention has grown, with diaspora communities and human rights groups raising awareness, although the Pakistani state continues to view the movement through a security lens and accuses foreign actors, particularly India, of fueling the unrest.

Despite internal divisions, the Baloch nationalist movement remains a powerful force reflecting longstanding discontent and the unresolved question of Balochistan’s place within the Pakistani federation.

The Rise of the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA)

The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) emerged in the early 2000s as an armed guerrilla group fighting for the independence of Balochistan from Pakistan. Born out of decades of perceived political neglect, economic exploitation, and cultural suppression, the BLA began with small-scale hit-and-run attacks targeting Pakistani military checkpoints, government installations, and infrastructure projects. Their primary goal has been to challenge the Pakistani state’s authority in Balochistan and to bring international attention to the province’s grievances.

As the group gained momentum, it evolved from loosely coordinated insurgent actions into a more organized militant outfit. The BLA became known for increasingly sophisticated and high-profile attacks, including assaults on military convoys, bombings of gas pipelines in resource-rich areas, and targeted killings of security personnel and government officials. These operations have often focused on disrupting key economic projects, particularly those linked to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which many Baloch activists view as exploitative and detrimental to local interests.

The BLA follows a nationalist ideology, positioning itself as a defender of Baloch rights against the colonial domination by the Pakistani state. Its objectives are to have full independence, the protection of Baloch culture, and control over the region’s natural resources. The group is considered a terrorist organization by Pakistan, the UK, and the US.

Major Attacks by the BLA on the Pakistani Government

The Baloch Liberation Army has been responsible for numerous attacks designed to destabilize the Pakistani state and draw attention to their cause.

• 2004 – Bombing of Gas Pipelines in Dera Bugti: The BLA targeted vital gas pipelines in the Sui region of Dera Bugti, disrupting energy supply to large parts of Pakistan. The attack marked the intensification of Baloch militancy and was followed by a strong military crackdown.
• 2006 – Assassination of Nawab Akbar Bugti: Though controversial in attribution, Nawab Akbar Bugti, a leading Baloch nationalist figure, was killed during a military operation in the Kohlu district. His death triggered widespread protests and escalated tensions between Baloch tribes and the central government.
• 2018 – Attack on the Chinese Consulate in Karachi: BLA militants stormed the consulate in Karachi, killing several police officers and security personnel. The attack was intended to send a message against Chinese involvement in Balochistan through CPEC projects, which the BLA views as exploitative.
• 2019 – Pearl Continental Hotel Attack in Gwadar: A group of BLA militants launched a deadly assault on the luxury hotel frequented by foreign investors and dignitaries. The assault resulted in multiple casualties and was seen as a direct warning against economic development seen as excluding the Baloch population.
• 2022 – University of Karachi Suicide Bombing: A female BLA suicide bomber attacked a van carrying Chinese faculty members, killing four people. This attack marked a significant evolution in BLA tactics and demonstrated the depth of anti-China sentiment among nationalist factions.
• 2025 – Hijacking of a Passenger Train in Balochistan: In an unprecedented move, the BLA hijacked a passenger train within Balochistan, targeting civilian infrastructure to apply pressure on the Pakistani government. This bold operation demonstrated the group’s growing operational capabilities and underscored ongoing instability in the region.

These attacks serve both symbolic and strategic purposes, targeting infrastructure, foreign interests, and political figures to disrupt state control and international collaboration. In response, the Pakistani state has intensified its military presence in Balochistan, leading to mass arrests, enforced disappearances, and counter-insurgency operations. Critics argue these tactics further alienate the Baloch population and deepen the cycle of violence.

How Does CPEC Affect Balochistan?

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a massive infrastructure and development project valued at over $60 billion. It is a key component of China's global Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), designed to improve trade connectivity between Asia, Europe, and Africa. CPEC spans a network of roads, railways, energy pipelines, and special economic zones, linking China's western Xinjiang province to Pakistan's Gwadar Port in Balochistan.

For China, CPEC holds immense strategic and economic value. It offers Beijing direct access to the Arabian Sea, significantly reducing the distance and time required for its energy imports and exports, which would otherwise have to pass through the vulnerable Strait of Malacca. Gwadar Port, located in Balochistan, is pivotal in this equation, providing China with a crucial maritime outlet.

Pakistan sees CPEC as a game-changer for its struggling economy. The corridor promises to modernize infrastructure, generate employment, and address energy shortages through power projects. Gwadar, in particular, is envisioned as a major commercial hub, boosting Pakistan’s regional trade potential.

However, for many Baloch people, CPEC represents yet another instance of economic exploitation. Locals argue that the development is being carried out without their consultation or consent and that the promised benefits largely bypass the indigenous population. Reports indicate that a significant portion of the labor force is imported from other parts of Pakistan or China, leaving local communities unemployed and disenfranchised.

In response, Baloch nationalist groups, including the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), have actively opposed CPEC. They view it as a tool of demographic change, aimed at marginalizing the Baloch people while enriching outsiders. This opposition has led to targeted attacks on Chinese engineers, infrastructure, and security forces guarding CPEC assets. Groups have vowed to disrupt the project until local demands for autonomy, rights, and equitable resource distribution are addressed.

Despite heavy militarization and government assurances of security, resistance to CPEC in Balochistan continues. Many Baloch activists claim the project is intensifying repression, land dispossession, and environmental degradation, further alienating the region from the Pakistani state.

The Role of India

India's involvement in Balochistan remains a contentious issue in South Asian geopolitics. Pakistan has long accused India of supporting separatist movements within Balochistan, particularly the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), to destabilize Pakistan. These allegations intensified following the capture of Indian national Kulbhushan Jadhav in 2016, whom Pakistan claims was a RAW agent operating in Balochistan. India, however, denies these accusations, asserting that Jadhav was a retired naval officer kidnapped from Iran.

In recent years, the BLA has escalated its insurgent activities. In May 2025, the group launched 'Operation Herof 2.0', involving 78 coordinated attacks across 58 locations in Balochistan, targeting military and security positions. These actions signify a sustained resistance against Pakistan's authority in the region. Amid these developments, Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch declared Balochistan's independence, emphasizing the region's distinct identity and seeking international support, particularly from India.

The BLA has openly appealed to India for support, drawing parallels to India's role in Bangladesh's independence in 1971. They argue that Balochistan deserves similar backing against what they perceive as Pakistani occupation. While India officially denies any involvement, the BLA's calls for assistance highlight the geopolitical complexities surrounding the Balochistan conflict.

Is a New Generation Leading the Baloch Cause?

In recent years, youth activism in Balochistan has surged, driven by a new generation demanding justice for human rights abuses and economic marginalization. A key figure is Mahrang Baloch, who began protesting after the abduction and death of her father by security forces. She became a leading voice for student activism, notably opposing policies that threatened educational quotas for Baloch students. Her efforts have gained international support.

Groups like the Baloch Youth Action Committee focus on empowering young people through education and community support in remote areas. Social media and online campaigns have become vital tools for activists to raise awareness globally, despite risks of censorship and arrests.

This growing youth movement marks a significant shift in Balochistan’s socio-political landscape, reflecting resilience and a strong desire for accountability and inclusion.

International Perspectives on Balochistan

The conflict in Balochistan, though rooted in Pakistan’s internal dynamics, has increasingly attracted international attention. Human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and the United Nations have repeatedly expressed concern over reports of enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and suppression of dissent in the region. These concerns have highlighted the need for accountability and greater transparency in Pakistan’s security operations.

China’s growing economic presence in Balochistan, mainly through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), has added another layer to the international interest in the region. CPEC is strategically vital for China’s global trade routes, but repeated attacks on Chinese personnel and infrastructure by Baloch insurgents have raised concerns in Beijing about long-term security and viability.

Western nations, including the United States and European Union members, have taken a more cautious approach. While they acknowledge the human rights issues, most avoid direct involvement due to the geopolitical sensitivities surrounding China, Pakistan, and India. As a result, international engagement largely centers on diplomatic statements urging restraint, dialogue, and respect for human rights.

Current Situation

Balochistan continues to face severe socio-political and economic challenges, making it Pakistan’s most troubled and underdeveloped province. Despite being rich in natural resources, the benefits rarely reach the local population. The literacy rate lingers around 58.7%, far below the national average, and youth unemployment has surpassed 37%, leaving a generation disillusioned and vulnerable.

Human rights abuses remain a critical issue. In March 2025 alone, over 150 enforced disappearances and 80 extrajudicial killings were reported by independent rights organizations. Security in the province has significantly deteriorated. A dramatic example came in March 2025, when the Baloch Liberation Army hijacked the Jaffar Express, resulting in the deaths of 26 civilians and several security personnel. This incident not only exposed lapses in national security but also demonstrated the growing boldness of separatist groups.

The people of Balochistan have long endured political exclusion, economic neglect, and human rights violations. Their demand for independence reflects a deeper call for justice, dignity, and the right to self-determination. This is not merely a regional struggle, but a broader pursuit of equity and recognition. As Pakistan looks to the future with major development projects and global partnerships, the voices of Balochistan must be heard, respected, and included. Only a political solution that acknowledges past grievances and offers genuine autonomy and representation can ensure lasting peace and stability in the region.

.    .    .