India’s Oil Crisis – Between Russia and the United States

Introduction – Oil, Power, and Politics

Oil has never been just a fuel. It powers cars, factories, and aeroplanes, but above all, it fuels nations’ ambitions and shapes global diplomacy. Whoever controls oil supply has leverage not only over economies but also over political decisions. History—from the Gulf Wars to OPEC embargoes—shows that oil has long been wielded as both an economic lifeline and a political weapon. In today’s world, this reality is once again playing out, and India finds itself at the centre of it.

The Russia–Ukraine war dramatically reshaped global oil politics. Western nations, led by the United States and Europe, sought to punish Russia through sweeping sanctions, cutting Moscow off from much of the global financial system and discouraging oil trade with it. Yet oil is not an ordinary commodity that can be easily replaced. Europe, once heavily reliant on Russian energy, scrambled for alternatives. Prices surged, and nations across Asia, Africa, and Latin America were left grappling with higher import bills.

Amid this turbulence, India emerged as a crucial player. With over 85% of its crude oil needs met through imports, India is one of the most vulnerable major economies to global energy shocks. Its population of 1.4 billion, expanding middle class, and rapidly industrialising economy mean that energy security is not optional—it is existential. Rising fuel prices directly affect inflation, household budgets, transportation costs, and even election outcomes. For New Delhi, securing affordable oil is a matter of both economic stability and political survival.

This dependency explains why India turned towards discounted Russian crude when Western sanctions left Moscow with limited buyers. By 2024–25, Russia had become India’s largest oil supplier, surpassing even long-time partners in the Middle East. This move allowed India to keep fuel prices relatively stable at home, but it also invited criticism and retaliation from Washington. The United States has imposed fresh tariffs on Indian exports and repeatedly urged New Delhi to reduce its reliance on Moscow, framing the choice as one between being a global ally of the West or a customer of Russia.

This brings us to the central question: Can India balance cheap Russian oil with growing U.S. pressure? The answer is not straightforward. For India, it is not just about economics, but about asserting strategic autonomy in a multipolar world where no country can dictate its energy choices. Oil, once again, is not just a barrel of crude—it is the currency of power.

India’s Energy Dependence – The Background

India is the world’s third-largest consumer of oil, after the United States and China. Unlike the U.S., which has significant domestic production, or Russia, which is a major exporter, India relies overwhelmingly on imports to fuel its economy. More than 85% of India’s crude oil needs come from overseas, making it one of the most energy-dependent large economies on the planet. This dependence is not just a number—it shapes foreign policy, trade strategy, and even domestic politics.

Sources of India’s Oil Imports

Traditionally, the Middle East has been India’s primary supplier, with countries like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) dominating the list. In 2019–20, Iraq supplied nearly 20% of India’s crude needs, while Saudi Arabia accounted for around 16%. Africa, particularly Nigeria and Angola, provided an additional share, while the United States gradually entered the Indian oil market as a supplier of shale oil and liquefied natural gas.

Russia, until recently, played only a marginal role. In 2019–20, Russian oil accounted for less than 2% of India’s total imports, largely because of higher shipping costs and refinery compatibility issues. For decades, Moscow was more important to India as a defence partner than as an energy provider.

Why India Needs Affordable Oil

For India, cheap oil is more than an economic advantage—it is a necessity. Rising crude prices feed directly into inflation. Diesel and petrol prices influence everything from transport costs to vegetable prices in local markets. A jump in global crude costs can quickly make food, fuel, and household essentials more expensive, creating social and political tensions.

India also subsidises fuel and fertiliser to protect its farmers and the poor. When oil prices are high, these subsidies balloon, straining government finances. For an economy still recovering from the shocks of the pandemic and grappling with youth unemployment, cheap oil acts as a cushion. Without it, growth slows, deficits widen, and social unrest risks increase.

India–Russia Energy Cooperation: A Historical Note

India and Russia’s energy cooperation is not entirely new. During the Soviet era, Moscow supported India’s development of heavy industries and provided oil on favourable terms. In recent decades, Indian companies like ONGC Videsh have invested in Russian oilfields, including in Sakhalin. However, the oil trade remained modest compared to defence and nuclear cooperation, primarily because Middle Eastern oil was cheaper and geographically closer.

The Ukraine war in 2022 changed everything. Western sanctions forced Russia to sell crude at steep discounts to find new buyers. India, seeing an opportunity, stepped in.

The Post-2022 Shift

From a negligible share of under 2% in 2021, Russian oil skyrocketed to over 35% of India’s total imports by 2024–25. Russia became India’s largest oil supplier, overtaking Iraq and Saudi Arabia. This dramatic shift wasn’t just about politics—it was about survival. With discounted Russian crude, India saved billions of dollars on its import bill, helping keep domestic fuel prices stable at a time when global inflation was hurting other countries.

Refinery Adaptability and Logistics

One often-overlooked factor is refinery adaptability. Not all crude oil is the same—some types are lighter, some heavier, some with higher sulfur content. Indian refineries are highly flexible, capable of processing a wide variety of crude blends. This gave India an advantage: its refineries could absorb Russian Urals crude more easily than many Western facilities.

Logistics also played a role. Though Russia is geographically distant, traders found creative ways to route oil through intermediary ports and “dark fleet” tankers, ensuring a steady flow. Discounts of $8–10 per barrel compared to Middle Eastern crude made the extra shipping costs worthwhile.

In short, India’s energy dependence is the foundation of its current oil dilemma. It cannot afford to ignore discounted Russian crude without risking inflation, fiscal strain, and political backlash. Yet, leaning so heavily on Moscow puts it at odds with Washington and exposes it to trade retaliation. The tightrope India is walking begins here: an economy built on imported oil, and a global order that wants to decide from whom it should buy.

The U.S. Angle – Tariffs, Sanctions, and Pressure

The United States has made its position clear: nations buying Russian oil are indirectly funding Moscow’s war in Ukraine and undermining Western sanctions. Washington has sought to diplomatically and economically isolate Russia, cutting it off from the global financial system, banning high-tech exports, and placing a price cap on Russian crude. The aim is simple—choke Moscow’s revenue streams to weaken its ability to sustain the war.

India’s decision to increase imports of discounted Russian oil, therefore, directly challenges U.S. strategy. For Washington, this is not merely about economics but about maintaining the credibility of sanctions. If large economies like India continue trading freely with Russia, the impact of Western sanctions is diluted, and the unity of the anti-Russia coalition is questioned.

Trump’s Tariff Escalation

The current standoff escalated sharply under the Trump administration. In early 2025, Washington announced steep tariffs on Indian exports, beginning at 25% and scheduled to rise to 50% by August 2025. Officially, these were justified as part of a trade dispute, but the subtext was clear: they were linked to India’s refusal to scale down Russian oil purchases.

The tariffs hit India’s key exports—textiles, pharmaceuticals, steel, and IT services. For a country that counts the U.S. as its largest trading partner (bilateral trade exceeding $190 billion), these penalties are not minor irritants but potential shocks to jobs and growth. Exporters in hubs like Tiruppur (garments), Pune (auto components), and Hyderabad (pharma) have already voiced fears of losing competitiveness in global markets.

Nikki Haley’s Intervention

Adding to the pressure, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and influential Republican leader Nikki Haley publicly stated that India must “take America’s concerns seriously” on the Russian oil issue. She argued that President Trump and Prime Minister Modi should speak directly, “the sooner, the better,” to iron out differences.

Her remarks highlight the strategic paradox: while Washington wants India as a partner to counterbalance China, it is also punishing India for its Russia ties. Haley’s framing—urging cooperation while warning of consequences—captures the tension in U.S. policy.

Risks of Secondary Sanctions

Beyond tariffs, Indian refiners and traders face the risk of secondary sanctions. Under U.S. law, foreign companies doing business with sanctioned Russian entities can themselves be blacklisted from the American financial system. For Indian firms that rely on dollar transactions, access to U.S. technology, and global capital markets, this is a serious threat.

Banks, insurers, and shipping firms have grown more cautious, forcing Indian refiners to demand written assurances from Russian suppliers that cargoes are “sanctions compliant.” This increases transaction costs and creates uncertainty, even if the oil itself remains cheap.

Stalled Trade Talks and Economic Repercussions

The tension has spilt into broader trade relations. A planned U.S. trade delegation to India was abruptly cancelled, and negotiations on a comprehensive economic deal have stalled. American tariffs not only hurt India’s export earnings but also discourage foreign investors who see rising geopolitical risk.

For a government positioning India as a global manufacturing hub—an alternative to China—such uncertainty could undermine investor confidence. The timing is particularly difficult, as India seeks to attract supply chains shifting out of East Asia.

The Double Standards Debate

Indian policymakers have also been quick to call out what they see as Western hypocrisy. Europe, despite its strong rhetoric against Russia, continued importing Russian natural gas through 2022 and 2023. China, meanwhile, remains one of Moscow’s largest energy buyers but faces far less U.S. pressure compared to India.

As External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar bluntly put it: “If you don’t like it, don’t buy it.” His statement reflects growing frustration in New Delhi over what it perceives as selective enforcement of sanctions. For India, being singled out despite not being the biggest buyer of Russian oil feels like unfair treatment.

In essence, the U.S. response combines economic sticks (tariffs, sanctions threats) with diplomatic appeals (Haley’s call for dialogue). But the underlying dilemma remains: Washington needs India as a strategic partner, yet it also demands compliance with its Russia policy. For India, this raises a larger question—should its energy security and national interest be dictated by another capital, even if that capital is Washington?

India’s Defiance – Jaishankar’s “Don’t Buy if You Don’t Like It” Stand

At the heart of India’s foreign policy lies the doctrine of strategic autonomy—the belief that India must act according to its own national interests rather than align blindly with any global bloc. This principle dates back to the days of the Non-Aligned Movement, when India tried to chart an independent course during the Cold War. In today’s multipolar world, strategic autonomy has been reimagined: India engages with the U.S., Russia, Europe, and China simultaneously, but refuses to let any single partner dictate its choices.

This philosophy has been most clearly articulated by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who has become the face of India’s unapologetic stance on Russian oil. His now-famous retort—“If you don’t like it, don’t buy it”—was directed at critics in the U.S. and Europe who questioned why India continued to import Russian crude despite sanctions pressure. The bluntness of the remark resonated widely within India, reflecting a growing confidence that New Delhi need not justify its economic decisions to the West.

India’s Red Lines

Jaishankar has repeatedly emphasised that India has “red lines” in trade and energy policy—areas where it cannot and will not compromise. Oil is one such area. With over 85% of its crude imported and millions of households directly affected by fuel prices, New Delhi views affordable energy as non-negotiable. In his speeches, Jaishankar frames the debate not as a choice between Russia and the U.S., but as a matter of protecting India’s national interest.

This stance also pushes back against what India sees as a Western-centric worldview. Why, New Delhi asks, should Indian consumers and industries bear the cost of a war in Europe? For Indian policymakers, it is illogical for farmers in Punjab or taxi drivers in Mumbai to suffer higher fuel costs because of decisions made in Brussels or Washington.

Domestic Political Appeal

Jaishankar’s boldness has a strong domestic appeal. In a political climate where self-reliance (“Atmanirbhar Bharat”) and national pride are recurring themes, standing up to Western pressure strengthens the government’s narrative. The message that India is no longer a passive player but a confident power resonates with both the political class and ordinary citizens. Television debates, social media posts, and editorials have praised Jaishankar for “speaking truth to power” and defending Indian sovereignty.

This assertiveness also plays into nationalist politics. At a time when global alliances are shifting, showcasing India as a country that will not bend to foreign pressure bolsters the government’s image ahead of elections. It portrays India as strong, independent, and unwilling to let others dictate terms—a narrative that appeals across party lines.

The Global South Argument

India also situates its position within a broader Global South perspective. New Delhi has argued that Western sanctions disproportionately hurt developing countries, which rely on affordable energy and food imports. By continuing to buy Russian oil, India claims it is ensuring stability not just for itself but for other economies linked to its growth.

Jaishankar has repeatedly pointed out the hypocrisy of wealthy nations that lecture others while quietly protecting their own interests. Europe, for example, continued importing Russian gas long after the war began, while demanding that Asian nations cut back on oil. For India, this inconsistency justifies its stance: the Global South should not be forced to pay the price for Western wars.

India’s defiance, therefore, is not reckless bravado—it is a calculated assertion of sovereignty. By rejecting U.S. diktats and defending its right to buy Russian oil, New Delhi signals that it is no longer willing to play by rules set elsewhere. For a rising power, this marks an important shift: from being reactive to shaping its own destiny, one barrel of oil at a time.

Domestic Factors – Why India Can’t Easily Quit Russian Oil

While India’s oil diplomacy often makes global headlines, the real drivers of its decisions lie at home. For New Delhi, the choice to continue importing Russian oil is not just about geopolitics—it is about keeping its economy afloat, stabilising household budgets, and protecting political capital. Several domestic factors make it nearly impossible for India to walk away from discounted Russian crude.

Fuel Price Stability for the Middle Class and Farmers

In a country of 1.4 billion people, fuel prices are not just an economic indicator—they are a daily concern. Middle-class families rely on affordable petrol and diesel for commuting, while farmers depend heavily on diesel to run tractors, irrigation pumps, and transport vehicles. A sudden surge in oil prices ripples across the economy, making food, transport, and essential goods costlier. By sourcing discounted Russian crude, India has been able to keep domestic fuel prices relatively stable, shielding millions of households from inflationary shocks.

Subsidy Burden and Fiscal Stress

India’s government already spends billions on subsidies for food, fertilizers, and welfare schemes. Oil subsidies, if triggered by high global prices, could quickly balloon into a fiscal crisis. By purchasing cheaper Russian oil, India eases its subsidy burden and protects public finances. In 2022–23, analysts estimated that India saved over $5 billion in import costs thanks to Russian discounts—money that would otherwise have increased fiscal deficits or forced cuts in welfare spending. For a government managing competing priorities—from infrastructure projects to poverty alleviation—every dollar saved on oil imports matters.

Industrial Demand – Oil as the Backbone of Growth

India’s industrial expansion depends on reliable, affordable energy. Oil is not just for cars—it fuels manufacturing plants, aviation, shipping, and power generation. As India positions itself as a global manufacturing hub under the “Make in India” campaign, energy costs play a decisive role in competitiveness. Expensive oil would not only push up input costs for industries but also make Indian exports less attractive in global markets. Russian crude, often refined in India and re-exported as petroleum products, has become a quiet advantage for the country’s industrial and trade strategy.

Political Sensitivity of Rising Fuel Prices

Few issues are as politically sensitive in India as rising petrol and diesel prices. In the past, sudden fuel price hikes have triggered mass protests, dented ruling parties’ popularity, and influenced election outcomes. For a government preparing for national and state-level elections, ensuring fuel price stability is a political imperative. Leaders across parties understand that angry consumers at petrol pumps can translate into angry voters at ballot boxes. Russian oil, therefore, is not just an economic cushion but also a political safeguard.

Public Perception – “Why Should Indians Suffer for Europe’s War?”

Perhaps the most intangible but powerful factor is public sentiment. Many Indians see the Russia–Ukraine conflict as a European war, distant from their daily lives. On social media and in public debates, a common refrain is: “Why should Indians pay higher prices because of sanctions over a war we didn’t start?” This perception strengthens the government’s hand in resisting Western pressure. By framing the issue as one of national interest versus Western double standards, policymakers have built strong domestic support for continuing Russian oil purchases.

For India, then, Russian oil is not a luxury but a necessity. It keeps inflation in check, eases fiscal stress, powers industries, protects political stability, and aligns with public sentiment. Any sudden retreat from Moscow’s crude would not only hurt the economy but also risk social unrest and political backlash. Simply put, India cannot afford to quit Russian oil—at least not yet.

Trade War Fallout – Tariffs and Economic Pain

The oil question is not isolated—it is tied to a much larger economic battlefield. India’s decision to continue buying Russian oil has already begun to spill over into trade relations with the United States. Rising tariffs, threats of secondary sanctions, and the suspension of trade talks have all contributed to what looks like the early stages of a mini trade war. For India, the consequences are not limited to diplomacy; they reach directly into industries, jobs, and the livelihoods of millions.

Impact of U.S. Tariffs on Key Sectors

The United States remains one of India’s largest export markets, particularly for IT services, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and steel. However, escalating tariffs—moving from 25% to as high as 50% on certain goods—are hitting India’s competitiveness. For IT companies, this means higher costs in servicing U.S. clients. For textile and garment exporters, the price-sensitive American market could shift orders to cheaper suppliers like Bangladesh or Vietnam. Similarly, Indian steelmakers now face an uneven playing field, while pharmaceutical firms fear tighter regulatory hurdles disguised as “sanctions compliance.”

Export Competitiveness and Supply Chain Shifts

India has positioned itself as a key player in global supply chains, especially as companies look to reduce reliance on China. However, punitive tariffs and political tensions with the U.S. threaten to undermine this strategy. If American buyers hesitate to place long-term orders due to fears of sanctions or higher costs, India could lose its competitive edge. This is particularly critical in sectors like semiconductors, renewable energy components, and chemicals, where India is seeking to scale up its role. Trade wars rarely stay confined to one sector; their ripple effects disrupt entire supply networks.

Job Losses and Slower Growth

The social cost of tariffs can be devastating. Export-driven industries in India employ millions of workers, many from semi-skilled or low-income backgrounds. If orders shrink, layoffs and wage cuts follow. For example, a slowdown in textile exports can directly impact workers in hubs like Tiruppur (Tamil Nadu) and Surat (Gujarat), where entire communities depend on export earnings. In IT, while top firms may weather the storm, smaller players and start-ups catering to American clients could struggle. Overall, reduced export revenues risk dragging down India’s already fragile growth trajectory, affecting both urban employment and rural income indirectly.

Diversifying Trade Partners – Africa, Middle East, BRICS

In response, India is accelerating efforts to diversify trade relations. Growing ties with Africa, the Middle East, and BRICS partners offer partial relief. For instance, India has expanded its energy and infrastructure cooperation with Gulf countries, while also boosting trade with Russia, Brazil, and South Africa. However, these markets cannot fully substitute for the U.S., which remains a premium export destination with high-value demand. Diversification provides resilience but does not entirely cushion the immediate blow of American tariffs.

Small Producers and Farmers at the Frontline

Trade wars do not only affect corporations—they hurt small producers and farmers as well. Many Indian farmers depend on agricultural exports like rice, spices, tea, and cotton to sustain incomes. Tariffs or sanctions can directly reduce demand for these products, squeezing already thin margins. Similarly, small-scale textile weavers, handicraft makers, and local exporters find themselves unable to compete in tariff-heavy markets. For them, geopolitical friction translates into fewer orders, lower earnings, and a struggle for survival.

In short, the U.S.–India oil and tariff clash is more than a diplomatic standoff—it is an economic conflict that risks weakening India’s export engine, shrinking jobs, and stunting growth. While New Delhi can seek new partners, the pain of losing access to a vital market like the U.S. will be deeply felt across industries and communities.

Global Geopolitical Chessboard

India’s oil strategy is not just about economics—it is deeply entangled in the shifting currents of global geopolitics. The Russia–Ukraine war, U.S. sanctions, and China’s rise have created a multipolar chessboard where New Delhi must play a careful balancing game. Every move carries consequences not just for India’s energy security but also for its diplomatic credibility and global standing.

Russia’s Need for India as a Customer

With Western sanctions cutting Russia off from traditional energy markets in Europe, India and China have emerged as Moscow’s lifelines. For Russia, India’s vast appetite for oil provides a steady revenue stream to sustain its war economy and prevent collapse. Discounts on Russian crude, sometimes as high as $15–20 per barrel, have made India a top buyer. This relationship gives India leverage—it can negotiate favourable terms, shipping routes, and long-term supply contracts. At the same time, Russia needs India politically: Indian purchases counter the Western narrative of Russia’s isolation, offering Moscow both money and legitimacy.

U.S. Need for India as a Partner Against China

For Washington, however, the equation is different. The U.S. views India as a strategic partner in the Indo-Pacific, critical to counterbalancing China’s growing assertiveness. From defence pacts to technology transfers, America has invested heavily in deepening ties with India. Yet, India’s oil trade with Russia creates friction, testing the limits of this partnership. The U.S. cannot afford to alienate India entirely, but it also does not want to appear weak on sanctions enforcement. This creates a paradox: the more Washington pressures India, the more it risks pushing New Delhi closer to Moscow and Beijing—an outcome it desperately wants to avoid.

The China Factor – Avoiding Isolation

China looms large in India’s calculations. If India were to bow to U.S. pressure and halt Russian oil imports, Beijing would become Moscow’s unquestioned primary buyer, tightening the Russia–China strategic axis. This would leave India isolated, losing both cheap energy and geopolitical bargaining power. India’s refusal to give up Russian oil, therefore, is not just about economics—it is a hedge against Chinese dominance. By keeping Moscow engaged, New Delhi ensures it has a counterweight in its long-standing border rivalry with Beijing.

The EU Hypocrisy Debate

India has also been vocal about what it sees as Western double standards. European Union nations purchased billions of dollars’ worth of Russian gas in the early stages of the Ukraine war, even as they urged India to stop buying Russian oil. Indian officials, including External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, have pointedly asked: “If Europe’s energy security is legitimate, why not India’s?” This argument resonates strongly at home and across the Global South, where countries resent being lectured by wealthier nations that once prioritised their own interests.

Balancing BRICS, SCO, and Quad

India’s true challenge lies in maintaining its role in multiple—and sometimes contradictory—alliances. On one hand, it is a member of BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), where Russia and China are key players. On the other, it is central to the Quad (U.S., Japan, Australia, India), which is effectively designed to contain China. Navigating both spaces requires extraordinary diplomatic agility. By refusing to bend on oil, India signals that it will not be a junior partner in either bloc, but rather an independent pole in a multipolar world.

In essence, India’s Russian oil policy reflects its ambition to act not just as a balancing power, but as a shaper of global order. On this chessboard, every move is about more than barrels of crude—it is about positioning India as a sovereign actor that neither Washington nor Moscow can afford to ignore.

Real Stories – Impact on Ordinary People & Businesses

Behind the grand debates of geopolitics, sanctions, and diplomacy lies a simple truth: oil prices directly shape the daily lives of millions of Indians. The Russia–U.S.–India oil dispute is not just a matter of foreign policy—it filters down to truck drivers, farmers, small exporters, and refinery managers who deal with its consequences every day.

A Refinery Manager’s Perspective – Gujarat

At a major refinery in Gujarat, a senior manager explains why Russian oil is indispensable. Russian crude comes at a discount of $10–15 per barrel compared to Middle Eastern supplies. Our refineries are adaptable, and this cheaper feedstock helps us keep production costs lower. If we shift to costlier oil, petrol and diesel prices will rise, and industries will face higher input costs. It’s that simple.” For him, the debate is less about ideology and more about arithmetic—Russian oil makes India’s refining business viable and competitive.

Exporters Under Pressure – Tiruppur and Pune

In Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu—India’s textile hub—exporters already feel the heat of U.S. tariff escalations. A mid-sized garment manufacturer laments: “Our margins are razor-thin. With tariffs going up in the U.S., our biggest market, we are struggling. If we also face higher fuel and logistics costs because of restrictions on Russian oil, many factories here will simply shut down.”

In Pune, a small auto-parts supplier echoes the same concern. His shipments to American buyers are down 20% in just a few months. “We are being squeezed between global politics and domestic costs. The worker on the shop floor has no control over whether India buys Russian oil or not, but he pays the price when orders vanish.”

A Truck Driver’s View – Stability Matters

On India’s highways, fuel price stability is literally a matter of survival. A truck driver transporting goods from Delhi to Mumbai explains: “Diesel is our lifeline. If prices go up suddenly, my earnings shrink. In the last two years, at least prices have stayed stable because the government bought cheaper Russian oil. If that stops, people like me will be the first to suffer.” His story highlights why affordable fuel is not a luxury but a necessity for India’s massive logistics sector.

A Farmer’s Dilemma – Diesel and Fertilisers

For a farmer in Punjab, the price of diesel and fertilisers determines whether his crop brings profit or loss. “The cost of running tractors and irrigation pumps is huge. Fertiliser is another burden. When oil is cheaper, fertiliser imports are cheaper too. If oil prices rise, farming becomes unviable.” His words underline why energy security is not just about cities and industries but about India’s food security itself.

Through these stories, it becomes clear that the debate over Russian oil is not only about diplomacy or strategy. It is about the everyday lives of ordinary Indians who depend on affordable energy for their livelihoods. For them, geopolitics is not distant—it is deeply personal.

Possible Pathways Ahead

India now finds itself standing at a crucial intersection where every decision has both economic and geopolitical costs. How New Delhi manages its oil diplomacy in the coming years will decide not just fuel prices but also India’s global standing. Broadly, three scenarios appear possible.

Scenario 1: Cutting Russian Oil Imports

If India chooses to reduce dependence on Russian crude under U.S. pressure, the immediate consequence will be economic pain. Russian oil has been 20–30% cheaper than Middle Eastern supplies. Losing that advantage would push petrol, diesel, and LPG prices upward, adding to inflation. This would hurt the middle class, farmers, and transporters alike. Politically, any fuel price surge is highly sensitive, making this path domestically risky even if it improves ties with Washington.

Scenario 2: Continued Defiance

On the other hand, if India keeps buying Russian oil in large volumes, it will secure cheaper fuel and stable domestic prices. But the cost could come in the form of intensified U.S. pressure—secondary sanctions on refiners, cancellation of trade talks, or higher tariffs on Indian exports. This may erode India’s competitiveness in sectors like textiles, IT services, and pharma. Diplomatically, India could face increasing friction with its Western allies, even though countries like the EU quietly import Russian gas themselves.

Scenario 3: The Middle Path

The most realistic option may be a calibrated compromise. India could gradually diversify its oil basket—purchasing from the Middle East, Africa, and the U.S.—while still taking advantage of discounted Russian crude whenever possible. This approach would soften Western criticism without throwing away the economic benefits of cheap imports. It would also strengthen India’s image as a pragmatic, independent actor in global geopolitics rather than a camp follower.

Long-Term Solutions

Beyond these short-term choices lies a bigger question: how can India reduce its 85% import dependency on oil altogether? The only real solution is a long-term transition. Expanding renewable energy (solar, wind, green hydrogen), investing in domestic oil exploration, and building larger strategic petroleum reserves can gradually shield India from external shocks. This energy transition will take decades, but steps taken now will shape India’s resilience in the 2040s and beyond.

In short, India faces no easy choices. Each path carries risks. The challenge will be to protect economic stability at home while maintaining strategic autonomy abroad—walking the tightrope between Washington, Moscow, and the needs of ordinary Indians.

Conclusion – Oil as the New Test of India’s Global Role

Oil is more than a fuel for India—it is the lifeline of its economy, the trigger for political debates, and a decisive factor in shaping its foreign policy. The Russia–Ukraine conflict and the resulting sanctions regime have transformed oil into a symbol of power politics. For India, which imports 85% of its crude, the challenge has never been greater: how to secure affordable energy without being caught in the crossfire of global rivalries.

By defying Western pressure and insisting on buying discounted Russian oil, India has signalled that its national interest comes first. This defiance has won applause at home, where stable fuel prices protect farmers, workers, and the middle class, but it has also invited friction with the U.S.—a vital partner for India’s economic and strategic future. The dilemma is stark: stay firm with Russia and risk American tariffs, or bend toward Washington and risk domestic backlash.

At the same time, India positions itself as the “voice of the Global South,” arguing that developing nations should not be forced to bear the costs of conflicts they did not create. This moral stance enhances India’s credibility among emerging economies, but it also comes with responsibility. If India wishes to lead, it must propose alternatives: collective bargaining for fairer energy pricing, joint investments in renewable technologies, and stronger South–South cooperation.

Looking forward, this crisis can be more than just a test—it can be an opportunity. If India uses this moment to accelerate its energy diversification, expand renewable capacity, and build long-term resilience, it could emerge not just as a consumer but as a shaper of the global energy order. In a world moving towards multipolarity, energy independence and leadership will define true power.

Oil, therefore, is no longer just an economic issue for India—it is the arena where its global role is being tested. Whether New Delhi can walk the fine line between Washington and Moscow, while championing the cause of affordable energy for billions in the Global South, will decide if India remains a balancing power or rises as a transformative leader.

References

. . .

Discus