In one of the most controversial acts of his presidency, Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders restricting travelers and immigrants from 12 countries, mostly Muslim-majority nations. Masked as national security measures, these bans were nothing more than performative politics — a foolish, divisive stunt that hurt innocent families, trampled America’s reputation, and made absolutely no one safer. No matter how one dresses it up, the travel ban was not a smart or necessary move — it was a cruel, baseless, and frankly stupid decision that stained the idea of American fairness.

Let’s not forget how this all started. Just one week into office, Trump signed Executive Order 13769, banning citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the United States for 90 days. Refugee admissions were halted for 120 days. Syrian refugees? Banned indefinitely. The reasoning? Trump claimed these countries posed terrorist threats. But here's the problem: there was no evidence to support this blanket judgment. None of the major terror attacks in the U.S. had been carried out by nationals from these countries. The logic didn’t hold water, and everyone knew it.

The truth is, the travel ban wasn’t based on any real intelligence or security data. It was based on fear — or more accurately, the weaponization of fear. It was designed to appeal to a political base that had been fed misinformation about immigrants, refugees, and Muslims being dangerous or foreign to “American values.” But what values was Trump really protecting when he barred a war-traumatized Syrian child from reaching safety, or when he separated Yemeni families for months and years on end?

Even when the initial ban faced legal challenges and was struck down by courts, the administration didn’t back off. Instead, they revised it with Executive Order 13780, dropping Iraq from the list but keeping the others. And still, the courts weren’t convinced. It was obvious that the motivation wasn’t about national vetting systems or intelligence sharing. It was about keeping certain people out, specifically people from poorer, darker, non-Western nations. Trump never even tried to hide it. Remember the “shithole countries” comment? That wasn’t a slip. It was a peek behind the curtain.

To make things appear more “balanced,” the Trump administration issued Presidential Proclamation 9645, adding North Korea and Venezuela to the list. But the inclusion of these countries was a transparent move. Venezuela’s ban applied only to certain government officials, not everyday travelers. And North Korea? Hardly anyone from North Korea was immigrating to the U.S. in the first place. It was a political fig leaf, not a meaningful change. The list still targeted Muslims, refugees, and Africans more than anyone else.

Then in 2020, Proclamation 9983 extended the ban to six more countries: Nigeria, Myanmar, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Sudan (again), and Tanzania. Once again, these weren’t countries tied to terrorism or threats to the U.S. They were just easy targets — mostly poor, mostly non-white, mostly unlikely to have the power or influence to challenge the decision.

Let’s be honest: this wasn’t about safety. This was about image — Trump playing the strongman, showing his base that he was “doing something” about immigration. But it wasn’t something smart. It was something small, petty, and xenophobic. And it had real, devastating consequences.

Families were ripped apart. Students couldn’t finish their studies. People missed weddings, funerals, births, and job opportunities. Refugees fleeing war and persecution were turned away. People who had followed the rules, filed their paperwork, and waited patiently, were denied because of the country on their passports. It was heartless, and more than that, it was stupid. It punished people who posed no threat, while doing absolutely nothing to stop actual dangers.

If Trump truly cared about national security, his administration could have improved intelligence-sharing, refined vetting procedures, and worked with international partners to strengthen screening processes. But he didn’t. Instead, he chose the bluntest, laziest possible tool — a blanket ban — and justified it with empty rhetoric and racist dog whistles.

Even the Supreme Court, in a tight 5–4 ruling, upheld the ban, not because it was just, but because it fell within the scope of presidential power. But legality is not morality. And even if it was “legal,” it was deeply, fundamentally wrong.

Trump’s broader immigration agenda followed the same cruel logic. Cut refugee admissions to historic lows. Try to eliminate DACA. Separate families at the border. Strip Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from people fleeing war and disaster. Penalize immigrants for being poor. All of it screamed the same message: if you’re not rich, white, or Western, you’re not welcome.

Supporters of the ban claimed it was about safety. But real safety doesn’t come from building walls or banning nations. It comes from smart, thoughtful policy. It comes from treating people with dignity, not suspicion. What kind of safety is built on scapegoating? On discrimination? On telling entire groups of people they’re not wanted?

The travel ban wasn’t just unnecessary — it was counterproductive. It alienated allies. It made the U.S. look paranoid and cruel on the global stage. It fed anti-American sentiment. It helped extremists claim that the U.S. was at war with Islam. It made it harder for America to recruit global talent, to lead on humanitarian issues, to be the beacon of hope it always claimed to be.

When Joe Biden repealed the travel bans on his very first day in office, it was more than just a political move — it was a moral correction. But even now, the damage lingers. Thousands of people missed their chance to come. Families are still recovering. And the precedent remains — that a president can, with the stroke of a pen, slam the door shut on entire nations.

In the end, Trump’s travel bans weren’t just bad policy — they were a declaration of ignorance and cruelty. They were a failure of leadership, a failure of compassion, and a failure of logic. They didn’t make America stronger. They made it smaller, meaner, and more divided. They weren’t about protecting people — they were about punishing them.

And for all that pain, what did we gain? Nothing. Not a safer country. Not a stronger one. Just a shameful legacy of discrimination dressed up as patriotism.

And just when we thought we had learned something from that shameful chapter of American history, Trump did it again. On June 4, 2025, in what felt like déjà vu dipped in cruelty, Trump reinstated and even expanded the travel ban, this time targeting a total of 19 countries. Twelve nations — mostly poor, Muslim-majority or Black-majority countries — were slapped with full bans, while seven more faced partial restrictions. The reasoning? A vague mention of a terror attack by someone from a country not even on the list. It’s like banning oranges because an apple hit you in the head. The justifications were flimsy — “passport fraud,” “overstay rates,” “information sharing” — all dressed up in bureaucratic language to sound reasonable. But we’ve seen this play before. The faces may change, but the intent stays the same: to use fear, racism, and political theater to divide and distract. Instead of building bridges, Trump’s doing what he’s always done — building walls, closing doors, and pretending that makes him strong. It doesn’t. It just makes America smaller, meaner, and more alone in a world that needs compassion now more than ever.

A travel ban built on fear and prejudice is not a sign of strength. It’s a sign of weakness — and that’s exactly what Trump was. A cowardly, stupid decision that history will remember for what it truly was: a stain on America’s conscience.

.    .    .