Australia-the land of sun-baked deserts, colourful coastline, and cities, is a country known globally due to its magnificent landscape and wide-open spaces. However, what many are normally shocked to discover is that 95 per cent of Australian terrain is virtually uninhabited, as most of its 27 million people are clustered on the edges of the continent. This situation, partially overdramatised in popular literature, has its deep roots in two concepts: Geography and British colonial settlement patterns. But why does such a rich and vast country have few people over most of its lands? The solution is in the harsh soul of the Australian continent and decisions made in its colonial history.
The Geographical Puzzle: Nature's Harsh Hand Australia is ranked as the sixth largest country in size, covering an enormous 7.7 million square kilometres, yet it has one of the lowest population densities in the world, accounting for an approximate 3.4 - 3.5 persons per square kilometre. To give some idea of that, India has a population density of over 480 people per square kilometre, and even the United States, with its own vast deserts, has something like 36.
The Outback is in the middle of Australia; the name brings to mind pictures of red earth, empty skies, and arid beauty. The Australian interior is dominated by the Outback, with large areas of arid and semi-arid land, that is, it is not suitable for any kind of agriculture, habitation, or large-scale development as a whole. Indeed, much of the Australian continent is in the arid or semi-arid zones (approximately 70 - 80 percent), where some of the most extreme environments in the world can be found:
The temperature of these lands may reach over 40 °C, with little to no rain and a lack of water sources. Having very few sources of fertile ground and a stable water supply, the practice of maintaining large human populations here has been nearly impossible. Most areas of Australia have no reliable source of freshwater, in contrast to river-based civilisations such as the Nile Valley or the Indo-Gangetic Plain. The largest lake is Lake Eyre, found on the continent, which is generally a dry salt basin. Even key rivers such as the Murray-Darling Basin, which acts as the core water source of farming, are located in the southeast. Understandably, mass populations amongst the Australians have favoured the shorelines as the climatic conditions are more favourable, resources are most abundant, and through the accessibility of global business lines, an economy can grow.
The British Colonial Blueprint
Geography preconditioned the situation, but history and colonial choices were equally important in the development of the modern demographic map in Australia. In 1788, the British settlers first established their colony in Sydney, New South Wales. As expected, they preferred the coast because of its easy access, fertile land, and the location was near the sea. As it turned out, more colonies emerged on the shores over time - Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, and eventually Hobart in Tasmania. The raw,
unfamiliar interior was mostly deserted by the European settlers famished for the expertise, technology, along resources to take advantage of. Venturing into the Heartland backfired more times than not, like the ill-fated Burke and Wills, in the 1860s expedition, further emphasising how hostile the Outback was. Several decades later, we have ended up in the modern world, where Australia is one of the most urbanised nations around the globe:
Indigenous Australians had lived on the continent long before the British came, lasting at least 65,000 years, adapting to a variety of environments, including sections of the Outback. But with the advent of colonial expansion, these communities were evicted, thus further centralising the Australian population in the cities.
A Modern Perspective: Opportunity or Challenge?
Though the biggest part of Australia lies untouched, it is not of no use. The large interior is home to great mineral reserves, such as:
Indeed, the prosperity of the Australian economy is based on much of its resource wealth.
Kalgoorlie and Coober Pedy, among other small towns that are the centres of remote mining, are critical parts of the global supply chain of resources. There is an unwanted side of the emptiness, though, that of environmental conservation. Uniqueness of ecosystems, biodiversity hot spots, and protecting regions is what Australia has to offer regarding scientific research, tourism, and conservation to the world. More Australians could, theoretically, live inland through technological improvement, renewable energy projects, and improved infrastructure. Solar plantations, mining projects, and even purely hypothetical projects such as climate-controlled urban areas have been argued. But it is still expensive to prevail against the ruthless hand of nature, and having so much suited, sought-after land along the shores, people do not have much motivation to achieve such a radical demographic shift.
Conclusion
The barrenness of the Australian expansive landscape is also the effect of the decisions of history rather than just the challenge of nature. Geography determined the place where it was most convenient to survive, and the British patterns of colonisation entrenched the coastal orientation. The two have made a country whose fringes are busy and its core unexplored. This peculiar demographic situation offers as many opportunities as challenges, such as the necessity to develop resources and preserve the environment, a desire to engage with Indigenous peoples, who have lived on the so-called empty land long before it got its name, respectfully and under the terms of sustainable development. In its journey through the 21st century, the interior expanses of Australia can serve both as a reminder of the continuing might of geography as well as historical processes.