From Fire to LEDs: The Evolution of Lighting and Its Environmental Footprint

Introduction

From the moment early humans discovered fire, light has been one of the most transformative forces in civilisation. It is more than a practical necessity; it is a tool that has redefined how we live, work, and perceive the world. Light extended the human day beyond sunset, enabling stories to be told around campfires, crafts to be practised after dark, and communities to gather safely in the night. Over millennia, it evolved from the flicker of torches and oil lamps to the steady glow of electric bulbs and, most recently, the versatile brilliance of LEDs. At every stage, lighting technology has not only illuminated spaces but also reshaped society, industry, and culture.

Lighting is directly tied to human progress. Safer nights allowed cities to flourish, street lighting reduced crime, and brighter homes supported literacy and education. The industrial era was propelled by the electric light bulb, which made shift work and round-the-clock factories possible. Architecture, too, was revolutionised: buildings could rise taller and deeper when natural daylight was no longer the only reliable source of illumination. In modern times, lighting has become both functional and aesthetic—used to create ambience, power global nightlife, and even synchronise human circadian rhythms.

Yet the story of light is not just one of progress but also of challenges. Every technological leap—from whale oil lamps to fluorescent tubes—has carried hidden costs, whether in the form of resource exploitation, pollution, or energy consumption. Today, while LEDs promise enormous efficiency and reduced carbon emissions, they also raise concerns about electronic waste, blue-light exposure, and light pollution.

This article traces the remarkable journey of lighting technologies through history, explores their environmental impacts, and examines the urgent challenge of making modern illumination sustainable. By understanding this evolution, we can better appreciate both the brilliance and the burden of artificial light in our world.

Early Lighting: Fire, Oil, and Candles

The story of artificial lighting begins with humanity’s mastery of fire. Archaeological evidence suggests that controlled fire was used as early as a million years ago, not only for warmth and cooking but also for illumination. In caves and open settlements, flames extended human activity beyond daylight hours. The first “lamps” were nothing more than torches—sticks wrapped with resinous wood or dipped in pitch—that provided mobile light but burned quickly and unevenly. Campfires served a dual role: they warded off predators and provided communal light for storytelling, rituals, and tool-making. This early mastery of fire marked a turning point, transforming night from a time of vulnerability into one of productivity and shared culture.

By around 4500 years ago, more sophisticated oil lamps emerged. Ancient Egyptians, Mesopotamians, Greeks, and Romans all developed versions of simple containers made of clay, stone, or bronze, filled with combustible oil and fitted with a wick. Olive oil was particularly prized in the Mediterranean, while other regions used fish oil, animal fats, or sesame oil. Roman terra-cotta lamps, often decorated with motifs of gods or animals, were mass-produced and widely used in households and temples. These oil lamps were more controllable and longer-lasting than open flames, but they still produced limited light—only a faint glow sufficient for small rooms. They also generated smoke, odour, and soot, contributing to indoor air pollution long before modern industrial emissions.

Candles represented another milestone in lighting’s evolution. The earliest true candles, appearing around 500 BCE, were made from tallow (rendered animal fat). While cheap and accessible, tallow candles smoked heavily, produced unpleasant odours, and attracted insects. Wealthier households and religious institutions favoured beeswax candles, which burned cleaner and brighter but were costly. By the Middle Ages, candle-making had become a guild-regulated craft in Europe, with churches and monarchies consuming vast quantities of beeswax for ceremonies and illumination. Later, in the 18th century, spermaceti candles—derived from the oil of sperm whales—became highly sought after. They produced a whiter, more reliable flame than either tallow or beeswax, but their use drove demand for whaling, contributing to ecological exploitation and the near collapse of whale populations.

Measured in terms of modern efficiency, these early lighting methods were extremely poor. A typical open flame or oil lamp emitted only a fraction of a lumen per watt of energy consumed, compared to 10–15 lm/W for incandescent bulbs and over 100 lm/W for modern LEDs. In practical terms, lighting a single small room might require several smoking lamps or candles, all consuming scarce resources. This inefficiency meant that artificial light was a luxury: nights in most pre-industrial societies remained dim and brief, with work and social life largely constrained to daylight hours.

Despite these drawbacks, flame-based lighting carried immense cultural and symbolic significance. Fire and light were often linked to divinity, knowledge, and protection. Lamps burned in temples and shrines, symbolising the presence of gods or the eternal flame of truth. Candles became central to religious ceremonies across cultures—from Christian masses to Buddhist festivals—where light symbolised purity, enlightenment, and hope. In practical terms, lamps and torches guided travellers at night, lit ships at sea, and allowed scholars and scribes to work by lamplight. The symbolism of light as a triumph over darkness grew from these very practical experiences of survival and community.

In sum, the era of fire, oil lamps, and candles marked humanity’s first efforts to conquer the night. Though technically inefficient and often polluting, these sources of illumination shaped social life, religious practice, and the rhythm of daily activity for thousands of years. They laid the foundation upon which later revolutions in lighting—gas, electricity, and eventually LEDs—would build, each step extending human control over darkness.

The Age of Gas and Kerosene

By the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, societies were searching for more powerful and reliable light than what oil lamps and candles could provide. The answer came in the form of gas lighting, a technology that would transform cities and industry. The Scottish engineer William Murdoch first demonstrated the potential of coal-gas lighting in the 1790s by illuminating his own house and workshop with gas distilled from coal. Around the same time, in London, entrepreneur Frederick Winsor championed the idea of gas-lit streets and public buildings. By 1807, Pall Mall in London became the first street in the world to be lit by gas, a spectacle that amazed residents and visitors alike. Within a few decades, Paris, New York, and other major cities followed suit, installing gas mains and lamp posts that bathed boulevards and squares in a steady glow.

Gas lighting represented a huge leap over candles and oil lamps. For the first time, cities could extend commercial activity late into the evening with consistent and relatively bright streetlights. Factories and theatres also benefited, as gas provided illumination strong enough for mass gatherings and industrial work. However, early gas flames were still relatively dim and yellow. This changed in 1882 with Carl Auer von Welsbach’s invention of the gas mantle—a fabric mesh impregnated with rare-earth oxides (thorium and cerium). When heated by a gas flame, the mantle glowed intensely, producing a much whiter and brighter light than bare combustion. The gas mantle extended the life of gas lighting well into the early twentieth century, even after electric bulbs began to appear, and was especially popular in Europe.

At the same time, in rural areas and developing regions, kerosene emerged as the dominant household fuel for lamps. Refined from petroleum, kerosene became widely available after the mid-nineteenth century, spurred by the expansion of the oil industry. It was inexpensive, portable, and burned more cleanly than tallow or whale oil. Kerosene lamps—simple glass containers with wicks—brought affordable light to millions of households far from urban gas grids. For farmers, traders, and students, the kerosene lamp was often the first practical source of reliable night-time illumination, and its spread paralleled the growth of global trade in petroleum products.

Despite their advantages, both gas and kerosene lighting came with significant hazards. Gas pipes were prone to leaks, leading to fires or deadly explosions. In enclosed spaces, incomplete combustion produced carbon monoxide, a silent and often lethal threat. Gas flames also generated soot, which blackened walls and ceilings. Kerosene lamps, while simpler, posed their own risks: overturned lamps could ignite homes, and poor-quality fuel sometimes caused toxic smoke. These dangers made lighting not only a source of comfort but also a constant cause of accidents and health problems.

Still, the Age of Gas and Kerosene marked a pivotal transition in lighting history. Cities were illuminated on a scale never seen before, fostering nightlife, commerce, and urban expansion. Gaslight became a symbol of modernity—so much so that “gaslit streets” became a common motif in the literature of the period. Meanwhile, kerosene democratized access to artificial light, breaking the dependence on expensive candles or scarce whale oil. This period represented both a technological triumph and a set of new social challenges, as communities weighed the benefits of brighter nights against the risks of fire, pollution, and dependence on fossil fuels.

Ultimately, gas and kerosene lighting were stepping stones. They filled the gap between flame-based tradition and the electrified future. By the late nineteenth century, as Edison’s incandescent bulb gained traction, the writing was on the wall: electricity would soon eclipse both gas and kerosene as the dominant force in lighting. But without these transitional fuels, the world might not have been prepared—socially or technologically—for the coming revolution of electric light.

The Electric Lighting Revolution

The nineteenth century closed with one of the most transformative shifts in human history: the harnessing of electricity for light. Where flames, gas, and kerosene had offered limited illumination and carried significant hazards, electricity promised brilliance, cleanliness, and an entirely new relationship with night. Two distinct technologies—arc lamps and incandescent bulbs—paved the way for electric lighting, reshaping not only homes and cities but also the rhythms of modern life.

Arc Lamps: Lighting the Public Sphere

The first practical electric lights were arc lamps, developed in the early 1800s by Sir Humphry Davy. By creating an electrical current across two carbon electrodes, Davy produced a dazzlingly bright, bluish-white light. These lamps were far too intense for domestic use—their harsh glare and hissing noise made them uncomfortable indoors—but they proved invaluable for outdoor and industrial settings. By the mid-nineteenth century, arc lamps illuminated public squares, train stations, and lighthouses. They provided unprecedented brightness, rivalling daylight itself, and became a hallmark of urban modernity. Paris, for instance, earned the nickname “City of Light” not only for its cultural radiance but also for its adoption of arc lighting in its boulevards.

Arc lamps, however, had drawbacks. They consumed large amounts of electricity, required constant adjustment as the carbon rods burned down, and produced ultraviolet radiation that could damage eyes with prolonged exposure. Their brilliance was revolutionary, but they were ultimately a transitional technology, paving the way for a gentler and more practical form of electric light.

Incandescent Bulbs: Edison, Swan, and the Household Revolution

The true breakthrough came with the invention of the incandescent lamp. While many inventors had experimented with glowing filaments, it was Thomas Edison in the United States and Joseph Swan in Britain who, almost simultaneously in 1879–1880, produced practical, long-lasting bulbs. Their design used a filament—originally carbonised bamboo—enclosed in a vacuum-sealed glass bulb. When electricity passed through, the filament glowed, producing a warm, steady light that was far more suitable for homes and workplaces than the blinding arc lamp.

The incandescent bulb’s early versions lasted only a few dozen hours, but improvements quickly followed. By the early twentieth century, tungsten filaments replaced carbon, dramatically extending lifespan and brightness. Tungsten’s high melting point allowed filaments to burn hotter and brighter without evaporating as quickly, making bulbs more efficient and durable. With these advances, the incandescent bulb became a global icon, symbolising both innovation and the promise of modernity.

The Rise of Electric Grids

To make electric lighting viable, widespread infrastructure was essential. In 1882, Edison’s Pearl Street Station in New York became the first commercial central power plant, generating electricity for hundreds of customers in Lower Manhattan. This marked the birth of the electric grid. Within decades, cities across Europe and North America developed centralised power networks, enabling mass adoption of electric lights. The distribution of electricity soon became a fiercely contested field, epitomised by the “War of Currents” between Edison’s direct current (DC) systems and Nikola Tesla and George Westinghouse’s alternating current (AC), which eventually prevailed due to its ability to transmit power over long distances.

Electric grids did more than power lightbulbs: they laid the foundation for the electrification of entire societies. Factories, homes, and urban infrastructure began to run on electricity, with lighting serving as the most visible and immediate demonstration of this new energy era.

Advantages Over Gas and Flame

Compared to gaslight and kerosene, electric lighting was a revelation. It was cleaner—no soot, smoke, or toxic fumes. It was safer—no open flames to ignite curtains or clothing. It was more convenient—no trimming of wicks, refilling of fuel, or constant maintenance. Bulbs lasted for weeks or months before replacement, providing a reliability that earlier technologies could not match. Moreover, electric lighting could be controlled instantly with a switch, a feature that fundamentally changed the human relationship with darkness.

Social Transformation: Nightlife, Work, and Architecture

The widespread adoption of electric light transformed society in profound ways. Workdays were no longer constrained by natural daylight; factories could operate around the clock, fueling industrial growth and reshaping labour patterns. Cities became brighter and safer at night, encouraging nightlife, commerce, and cultural activity. Streets once dimly lit by flickering gas lamps now glowed with steady electric light, fostering a new sense of urban vibrancy.

In homes, electric bulbs allowed evening reading, study, and social gatherings without the smoke or odour of kerosene lamps. Architecture also evolved: buildings could rise taller and deeper without reliance on natural light, as interior spaces could now be illuminated artificially. The modern metropolis, with its skyscrapers and glowing skylines, was made possible by electric lighting.

Limitations and Inefficiencies

Despite its triumphs, incandescent lighting was far from perfect. Its efficiency was notoriously poor: only about 5% of the electricity consumed was converted into visible light, while the remaining 95% was wasted as heat. This inefficiency translated into high energy demand, particularly as electric lighting spread globally. Early bulbs also had relatively short lifespans, requiring frequent replacement and generating waste. Moreover, the rapid growth of electric grids demanded massive investments in coal-powered generation, linking the success of electric light to rising carbon emissions in the twentieth century.

A Lasting Legacy

Even with its inefficiencies, the incandescent bulb became one of the most recognisable symbols of human ingenuity. For more than a century, it was the standard for households and workplaces worldwide. Its warm glow shaped the aesthetics of modern life, while its ubiquity made it an everyday miracle. Though later technologies—fluorescents and LEDs—would surpass it in efficiency, the incandescent bulb’s impact on society was unmatched. It marked the moment when humanity truly conquered the night, turning darkness from a natural limit into a controllable condition of modern life.

Fluorescent and High-Intensity Discharge Lamps

While the incandescent bulb dominated much of the twentieth century, its inefficiency spurred inventors to search for better alternatives. By the 1930s, a breakthrough emerged in the form of fluorescent lighting, offering far greater efficiency and lifespan. Soon after, high-intensity discharge (HID) lamps extended this progress, powering the illumination of factories, streets, and sports arenas. Together, these technologies represented a decisive leap toward modern lighting, even though they introduced new complications of their own.

Fluorescent Tubes: Harnessing Mercury Vapour

Fluorescent lighting was first commercialized by General Electric in the late 1930s. Its working principle was fundamentally different from incandescent bulbs. Instead of heating a filament, fluorescent tubes contained a small amount of mercury vapour. When electrified, the mercury atoms emitted ultraviolet (UV) radiation. This invisible UV light struck a phosphor coating on the inside of the glass tube, which re-emitted the energy as visible light. The result was a much cooler and more efficient glow.

Fluorescent tubes quickly became popular in offices, schools, and factories. They offered an efficiency of around 50–100 lumens per watt, roughly four to six times greater than incandescents. They also lasted far longer, often tens of thousands of hours, which reduced replacement costs. For institutions managing large spaces, the savings in energy and maintenance were enormous.

However, fluorescent lights were not without drawbacks. Their characteristic flicker—caused by alternating current cycles—was sometimes associated with eye strain and headaches. Their colour quality, especially in early versions, was harsh and cold, often casting an unflattering pallor on skin tones and interiors. Despite these issues, their sheer efficiency cemented their role in commercial and industrial settings throughout the mid- to late twentieth century.

The Rise of Compact Fluorescents (CFLs)

By the late twentieth century, concern about rising energy consumption and climate change created pressure to move away from incandescent bulbs. The compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), introduced commercially in the 1980s, was designed to fit into the same sockets as incandescent bulbs. CFLs used the same mercury vapour and phosphor principle as fluorescent tubes, but miniaturised into a spiral or folded design.

CFLs consumed about 70–80% less electricity than incandescent bulbs while delivering similar brightness, and they lasted up to ten times longer. Governments and energy agencies worldwide promoted CFLs as an energy-saving alternative, and in the 2000s, they became a common fixture in households. However, their limitations remained: CFLs often required a “warm-up” period to reach full brightness, their light quality was sometimes cold or inconsistent, and their upfront cost was higher.

Most significantly, CFLs contained mercury—a neurotoxic element—posing environmental and health risks if broken or improperly disposed of. Recycling programs were established in many countries, but compliance was uneven, and millions of CFLs ended up in landfills. Despite their flaws, CFLs served as an important transitional technology, preparing households for the eventual leap to LEDs.

High-Intensity Discharge (HID) Lamps

While fluorescents dominated indoor spaces, HID lamps became the workhorses of outdoor and industrial lighting from the mid-twentieth century onward. These lamps—including high-pressure sodium (HPS), metal halide, and mercury vapour types—operated by passing an electric arc through a pressurised gas mixture. HPS lamps produced a distinctive golden-orange glow, while metal halide lamps emitted a whiter, more daylight-like spectrum.

HID lamps were extremely efficient, often achieving 80–150 lumens per watt, making them ideal for lighting highways, parking lots, stadiums, and factories. Their intense brightness and long life reduced maintenance costs for municipalities and industries, making them a cornerstone of large-scale illumination.

Yet, they too had downsides. Mercury vapour lamps suffered from poor colour rendering, while sodium lamps distorted colours with their monochromatic orange tint. Metal halide lamps offered better quality light but were prone to gradual dimming and shifts in colour over time. Like fluorescents, HID lamps also relied on toxic materials, particularly mercury, raising concerns about disposal and environmental contamination.

Efficiency Gains and Lasting Challenges

Together, fluorescent and HID lighting marked a major leap in efficiency over incandescents, saving billions of kilowatt-hours of electricity worldwide. They enabled brightly lit offices, illuminated highways, and 24-hour industrial operations at a scale that would have been unthinkable with older technologies. At the same time, they introduced new challenges: the cold, impersonal quality of their light, the hazards of mercury waste, and the health concerns associated with prolonged exposure to artificial brightness.

By the late twentieth century, the limitations of fluorescents and HIDs were clear. They were far superior to incandescent bulbs in efficiency but imperfect solutions in terms of sustainability and user experience. This set the stage for the twenty-first century’s most transformative innovation in lighting: the rise of the light-emitting diode, or LED.

The LED Era

The twenty-first century has been defined by one of the most revolutionary advances in lighting history: the rise of the light-emitting diode (LED). More than just another step in efficiency, LEDs have redefined the very concept of artificial light, offering extraordinary versatility, unprecedented longevity, and the potential to drastically cut global energy use. Yet, as with every lighting revolution, the benefits come with new challenges that societies are still learning to manage.

Early Development: From Red Glows to Blue Breakthroughs

LED technology emerged from the field of solid-state physics in the mid-twentieth century. The first practical LED was created in 1962 by Nick Holonyak Jr. at General Electric, producing a faint red glow. For decades, LEDs remained confined to niche uses such as indicator lights on electronics, calculators, and digital watches. Green and yellow LEDs followed, but without blue light, producing full-spectrum white LEDs remained impossible.

The turning point came in the 1990s when Japanese researchers Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano, and Shuji Nakamura developed the first efficient blue LED using gallium nitride (GaN). This breakthrough earned them the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physics, as it enabled the creation of white light LEDs by combining blue diodes with phosphor coatings. The phosphor absorbed part of the blue light and re-emitted it as yellow, which, when mixed with the remaining blue, produced white light suitable for general illumination. This innovation transformed LEDs from specialist components into viable competitors to traditional bulbs.

The Emergence of White LEDs and Mass Adoption

Once white LEDs became practical, their adoption accelerated rapidly. They were vastly more efficient than incandescent bulbs, using only a fraction of the energy to produce the same brightness. By the 2010s, governments around the world began phasing out inefficient incandescents, promoting LEDs as the future of household lighting. For instance, the European Union banned most incandescent sales starting in 2009, while the United States enacted similar efficiency standards that effectively pushed LEDs into mainstream use.

LEDs boasted not only efficiency but also extraordinary longevity. A typical bulb could last 25,000 to 50,000 hours, compared to around 1,000 hours for incandescent bulbs and 8,000–10,000 for fluorescents. Their compact size, robustness, and ability to emit light in various colours without filters opened entirely new applications, from automotive headlights to architectural displays.

Efficiency: A Quantum Leap

The efficiency leap provided by LEDs is dramatic. Incandescent bulbs convert only about 5% of electricity into visible light, achieving around 10–15 lumens per watt (lm/W). Fluorescents improve this to 50–100 lm/W. By contrast, modern LEDs regularly reach 100–200 lm/W, with laboratory prototypes exceeding 300 lm/W. This means LEDs can deliver the same brightness as an incandescent bulb while consuming up to 85% less energy.

The global impact is immense. Lighting accounts for roughly 15–20% of global electricity consumption. A worldwide switch to LEDs has the potential to save hundreds of terawatt-hours annually, preventing millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions. For countries heavily reliant on fossil fuels, LED adoption also reduces strain on energy grids and improves energy security.

Applications: From Homes to Smart Cities

LEDs are not just replacements for traditional bulbs—they have enabled entirely new ways of using light. In homes and offices, LEDs power everything from ceiling fixtures to desk lamps, offering customizable brightness and colour temperature. In vehicles, they provide powerful, energy-efficient headlights and increasingly dominate automotive design.

Municipalities have rapidly adopted LEDs for street lighting, citing not only energy savings but also reduced maintenance costs due to their longevity. Entire cities, such as Los Angeles and Milan, have converted to LED streetlights, cutting energy bills by millions of dollars annually.

LEDs are also at the core of the “smart lighting” revolution. Integrated with sensors, Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth, LED systems can be dimmed, colour-shifted, or scheduled through smartphones and smart home platforms. In commercial settings, IoT-connected LEDs are used for adaptive lighting systems that adjust brightness based on daylight, occupancy, or energy pricing. Beyond illumination, LEDs are also used in horticulture (optimised light for plant growth), medical therapy, and entertainment displays.

Benefits: The Promise of LED Technology

The advantages of LEDs are undeniable:

Energy Efficiency: Massive reductions in electricity demand.
Longevity: Tens of thousands of hours of use before replacement.
Durability: Solid-state construction resists shock and vibration.
Design Versatility: From tiny indicator lights to massive stadium floodlights.
Environmental Gains: Lower carbon footprint compared to previous technologies.

For individuals, LEDs translate into lower electricity bills and fewer bulb replacements. For governments and businesses, they mean major cost savings and progress toward climate goals.

New Challenges in the LED Era

Despite their advantages, LEDs introduce new challenges.

E-Waste and Resource Use: LEDs rely on rare and precious materials, including gallium, indium, and rare-earth phosphors. Their recycling rates remain low, raising concerns about electronic waste as billions of units reach end-of-life.
Over-Illumination: Their low operating cost encourages excessive use, leading to brighter cities and increasing light pollution. What was once a scarce resource is now often over-deployed.
Blue Light Risks: LEDs emit more blue light than previous technologies, which disrupts circadian rhythms, suppresses melatonin, and is linked to sleep disorders. Wildlife, especially nocturnal species, is also affected by the shift in spectral output.
Quality Variation: Not all LEDs are created equal. Poorly manufactured products may flicker, fail prematurely, or produce unbalanced light spectra.

A Double-Edged Revolution

The LED era has clearly delivered on its promise of efficiency, versatility, and reduced environmental footprint compared to incandescent and fluorescent predecessors. But it has also highlighted the paradox of progress: every solution introduces new problems. LEDs have solved the wastefulness of earlier bulbs, but now challenge societies to address e-waste, light pollution, and human health impacts.

Ultimately, LEDs represent both a technological triumph and an ongoing responsibility. They illuminate the twenty-first century with unparalleled brilliance, but their long-term sustainability depends on smarter usage, improved recycling, and a cultural rethinking of how much light is truly necessary.

Environmental Impacts of Lighting

Artificial light has been both a blessing and a burden. While it has enabled social progress, productivity, and safety, it has also carried a series of environmental costs across history. Each era of lighting—from whale oil to LEDs—has been tied to resource use, pollution, or unintended ecological consequences. In the twenty-first century, the challenge is no longer just about providing enough light, but about ensuring that light itself is sustainable and responsible.

7.1 Energy Consumption and CO₂ Emissions

For most of human history, lighting consumed relatively little energy because sources like candles, oil lamps, and gaslight were inefficient and expensive, limiting widespread use. The real surge in energy demand began with the electrification of cities in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. By the mid-twentieth century, lighting accounted for a substantial share of global electricity consumption, fueled primarily by coal and other fossil energy sources.

Today, lighting is estimated to account for around 15–20% of global electricity use and roughly 6% of global CO₂ emissions. This makes it one of the largest single end-uses of electricity, with direct links to climate change. The inefficiency of incandescent bulbs was particularly problematic: they converted only about 5% of consumed energy into light, with the rest wasted as heat.

The advent of compact fluorescents and, more recently, LEDs has dramatically improved this picture. A switch from incandescent bulbs to LEDs can reduce electricity use for lighting by up to 85%, representing one of the simplest and most effective measures for reducing emissions worldwide. Case studies highlight the potential:

The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that widespread LED adoption could save 348 terawatt-hours of electricity per year by 2027, equivalent to the annual output of 44 large power plants.
In Europe, the EU’s phase-out of incandescent bulbs is projected to save over 39 terawatt-hours annually, cutting CO₂ emissions by around 15 million tons.

These reductions demonstrate that efficiency in lighting is not just a matter of personal utility bills but a key strategy in mitigating global climate change.

7.2 Material and Disposal Issues

Energy is only part of the environmental story. The materials used in lighting technologies have also left significant ecological footprints.

In the early modern era, demand for lighting fuel drove entire industries. Spermaceti candles, made from sperm whale oil, were prized for their bright, smokeless flame. By the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, whaling had become a global enterprise, pushing some whale species toward the brink of extinction. Lighting in this period illustrates how human demand for brightness could devastate ecosystems.

The fluorescent age brought a different problem: mercury. Fluorescent tubes and compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) rely on small amounts of mercury vapour to function. While the amount per bulb is modest, the scale of production created a significant environmental hazard. Studies estimate that up to 75% of fluorescent lamps are improperly disposed of, often ending up in landfills where mercury can leach into soil and groundwater. Mercury exposure poses serious health risks, including neurological damage, particularly in children.

LEDs, while hailed as environmentally superior in terms of energy use, are not without material challenges. They depend on rare and precious elements such as gallium, indium, and rare-earth phosphors. Mining and refining these materials can cause environmental degradation, pollution, and geopolitical supply chain concerns. As billions of LEDs are now being manufactured annually, the potential for massive electronic waste looms large. Unlike traditional bulbs, LEDs are complex electronic devices with circuit boards, drivers, and heat sinks, making recycling more difficult. Current recycling infrastructure for LEDs remains limited, and most end-of-life products end up in general waste streams.

Thus, while LEDs reduce carbon emissions, their long-term sustainability depends on addressing resource extraction and developing efficient recycling systems to recover valuable materials.

7.3 Light Pollution

Perhaps the most underestimated environmental impact of lighting is not what it consumes, but what it produces: excessive artificial brightness. Light pollution has become a defining feature of modern urban life, with profound consequences for ecosystems, human health, and cultural heritage.

Urban Brightening and Loss of the Night Sky

Satellite imagery shows that artificial light emissions have been steadily increasing worldwide, spreading outward from cities and illuminating the night sky. Astronomers estimate that about 80% of the world’s population now lives under light-polluted skies, with the Milky Way invisible to one-third of humanity. This represents a cultural loss, severing the connection between people and the cosmos that guided navigation, myth, and science for millennia.

Human Health Impacts

Light pollution also disrupts human biology. Exposure to artificial light at night, especially the blue-rich spectrum of LEDs, interferes with circadian rhythms. Blue light suppresses the production of melatonin, a hormone essential for regulating sleep cycles. Chronic disruption has been linked to insomnia, depression, metabolic disorders, and even increased risk of certain cancers. The problem is especially acute with LED streetlights and digital screens, which often emit high levels of blue light.

Wildlife Effects

For wildlife, the effects are even more dramatic. Many species rely on natural light cues for navigation, reproduction, and feeding. Artificial lighting confuses migratory birds, causing them to collide with buildings or circle endlessly around illuminated structures. Sea turtle hatchlings, which instinctively move toward the brightest horizon, often crawl inland toward streetlights instead of the moonlit ocean, leading to fatal outcomes. Insects, which are drawn to artificial light, experience massive mortality around lamps, disrupting ecosystems and reducing pollination. Even nocturnal predators and pollinators—bats, moths, and fireflies—are in decline due in part to artificial light.

LED-Specific Concerns

The LED revolution, while saving energy, has unintentionally intensified light pollution. Because LEDs are cheap to run and long-lasting, they encourage over-illumination—cities install more lights, keep them on longer, and increase brightness levels. Moreover, many LEDs emit a bluish-white light with a high colour temperature, which scatters more in the atmosphere than warmer tones, worsening skyglow. While warmer “amber” or “soft white” LEDs can reduce this impact, adoption varies by region.

The Dual Legacy of Artificial Light

The environmental story of lighting is one of paradox. On one hand, technological advances like LEDs have made lighting more efficient than ever before, slashing energy demand and emissions. On the other hand, the material, waste, and pollution consequences continue to grow, shifting the burden from one dimension to another. From whale oil exploitation to mercury waste, from coal-powered incandescents to blue-rich LEDs, every stage of lighting history reveals that progress brings new responsibilities.

The challenge for the twenty-first century is not only to make light more efficient but also more sustainable, mindful of ecosystems, and respectful of the natural night.

Toward Sustainable Lighting Futures

As the world confronts climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource scarcity, the future of lighting must be both efficient and ecologically responsible. The challenge is not simply to produce brighter or cheaper light, but to create systems that respect human health, conserve energy, and protect the natural night. Emerging technologies, design strategies, and policies are shaping a new vision of sustainable illumination.

Innovations in Smart Lighting

One of the most promising developments is the rise of smart lighting systems. Equipped with sensors, timers, and adaptive controls, these systems ensure light is provided only when and where it is needed. Occupancy sensors can switch off lights in empty rooms, while daylight harvesting adjusts brightness in response to natural sunlight. On city streets, adaptive streetlights can dim during low traffic hours and brighten only when pedestrians or vehicles pass by, cutting energy use without sacrificing safety.

Health- and Nature-Friendly Design

The quality of light matters as much as its quantity. New generations of warmer-spectrum LEDs are designed to minimise blue-light emissions at night, reducing circadian disruption for humans and mitigating harm to wildlife. Architects and engineers are also experimenting with circadian-friendly lighting, systems that shift colour temperature throughout the day to align with natural rhythms—bright and cool in the morning, warm and dim in the evening. Such approaches not only save energy but also improve well-being and productivity.

Policy and Regulation

Governments play a critical role in steering lighting toward sustainability. Efficiency standards and bans on wasteful incandescent bulbs have already accelerated LED adoption worldwide. Beyond efficiency, dark-sky initiatives are gaining momentum, encouraging communities to shield outdoor fixtures, reduce unnecessary brightness, and preserve natural darkness. Cities like Tucson, Arizona, and Flagstaff—the first International Dark Sky City—demonstrate that urban areas can thrive while still respecting the night sky.

Recycling and Circular Design

Finally, the long-term sustainability of LEDs depends on addressing material use. Current recycling infrastructure lags behind production, leaving rare elements like gallium and indium at risk of being lost to landfills. “Design for disassembly” is an emerging principle, encouraging manufacturers to create bulbs that can be easily dismantled for material recovery. Pilot programs in Europe and Asia are exploring dedicated LED recycling streams, pointing toward a more circular lighting economy.

Balancing Brilliance with Responsibility

Lighting has always been a double-edged tool—enabling progress while creating new environmental burdens. The next era must focus not on ever-brighter nights, but on smarter, healthier, and more sustainable illumination. By combining technological innovation, ecological awareness, and strong policy frameworks, societies can ensure that the benefits of artificial light are maximised while its risks are minimised. The future of lighting, in other words, must be not just brilliant, but wise.

Conclusion

The story of artificial lighting is, at its core, the story of human progress. From the first sparks of fire around prehistoric campfires to the precision-engineered brilliance of modern LEDs, light has continuously expanded the boundaries of what humanity can achieve. Each technological leap—oil lamps, candles, gaslights, electric bulbs, fluorescents, and LEDs—extended the human day, enhanced safety, and fueled social and economic growth.

Yet this journey has also revealed a recurring pattern: every advance solved old problems but created new ones. Whale oil replaced smoky tallow candles but nearly drove marine species to extinction. Gaslight illuminated cities, yet introduced explosions and toxic fumes. The incandescent bulb brought safety and convenience but wasted staggering amounts of energy. Fluorescents improved efficiency while leaving a legacy of mercury pollution. Today, LEDs promise extraordinary energy savings but raise new concerns about rare-material use, e-waste, circadian disruption, and light pollution.

The challenge before us is to recognise that lighting is not just about brightness or efficiency—it is about balance. The future of illumination lies in harmonising three urgent priorities: energy efficiency to combat climate change, sustainability in material use and waste management, and ecological responsibility to protect both human health and the natural world.

This calls for a cultural shift as much as a technological one. Smarter lighting systems, warmer-spectrum LEDs, and dark-sky initiatives all point the way forward, but they require widespread adoption and collective awareness. Just as past generations adapted to new sources of light, today’s societies must learn to use illumination more thoughtfully—providing enough for safety and productivity, while preserving the profound value of darkness.

If the history of lighting teaches anything, it is that progress is not guaranteed to be harmless. The night sky, once a universal human heritage, now reminds us that responsible use of light is as vital as light itself.

References & Sources

. . .

Discus