India finished fourth at the 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. The medal cabinet, however, tells a very different story this time.
India returned from Glasgow with 39 medals: 13 gold, 17 silver and nine bronze. The country climbed into fourth place on the final day after a remarkable 16-medal haul on Saturday, with boxing providing the biggest push. Ten Indian boxers reached the podium, including seven gold medallists and three silver medallists. Birmingham’s 61 medals make the number look smaller, but Glasgow was a completely different Games.
The 2026 edition was deliberately stripped down. Glasgow hosted only 10 sports compared with 19 at Birmingham in 2022. Organisers removed nine sports, including wrestling, badminton, table tennis, hockey, cricket, squash, triathlon, beach volleyball and rugby sevens. Several of these were India’s most dependable medal factories. Wrestling alone had produced 12 medals in Birmingham, while badminton contributed six, table tennis seven and hockey two. Together, six of the dropped sports accounted for 30 of India’s 61 medals in 2022.
So should India’s 39 medals be called a decline? In numbers, yes.
In performance, the answer is much more interesting.
The Glasgow campaign forced India to compete without many of the sports where it had traditionally built its Commonwealth success. Instead, the medal burden moved towards boxing, athletics, weightlifting and judo. Boxing became the star of the campaign, producing 10 medals. Weightlifting added eight, while athletics and para athletics together became another major source of podium finishes. The result was a smaller medal count with a noticeably different identity.
And then came the story that arguably mattered most: India’s para campaign.
Indian para athletes won seven medals in Glasgow, three gold, two silver and two bronze. That single Games matched the country’s combined para medal total from all previous Commonwealth Games. Six of the seven came from para athletics, which also ended a 20-year wait for India to win another Commonwealth Games medal in the discipline.
Behind those numbers were stories that deserve more attention than a medal tally can give.
Take Sharmila Dhankar, who won gold in the women’s F57 shot put. She began her athletics journey at 34 after surviving domestic abuse and raising two daughters. At 40, she became India’s first Commonwealth Games para-athletics champion and the first Indian woman to win a para-athletics medal at the Games. Her victory was personal, historic and deeply representative of what sport can offer when opportunity finally meets determination.
Dilip Mahadu Gavit created another landmark, winning the men’s 100m T47 gold in a Games-record 10.71 seconds. Jhandu Kumar, who had lived with polio since childhood and worked as an e-rickshaw driver and vegetable seller to support his training, won bronze in para powerlifting. These performances make the seven-medal para haul feel much larger than a statistic.
The athletics aspect of the campaign also included some firsts. Gulveer Singh secured a silver medal in the men's 10,000 metre event and a bronze in the 5,000 metre event, thus becoming the first Indian athlete to win two athletics medals at a single Commonwealth Games and the first Indian to win a Commonwealth medal in the men's 5,000 metre race. Tejaswin Shankar also won a bronze medal in the decathlon, demonstrating that India has athletic talent extending beyond just a small number of well-known athletes.
For Indian fans, this shift matters. Commonwealth sport has traditionally been one of the easiest places to see Indian athletes dominate disciplines such as wrestling, badminton and table tennis. Their absence meant fewer familiar stars, fewer predictable medals and fewer moments for younger fans to connect with those sports on a major stage.
Glasgow also provided something distinct—that is, visibility for athletes and sports which have a tendency to stay outside the mainstream. Para-sports in particular had the opportunity to be showcased. Such stories can inspire young people who seldom see themselves reflected in elite sport; for them the podium stood as a symbol of recognition, possibility and a future beyond limitation.
There is also a more general lesson for Indian sport. While a medal count can show us a country's position, it cannot indicate how extensive its sporting base has become. The example of Glasgow proves that India can still end up in fourth place even if some of its traditional strong points are left out of the programme. This is reassuring, but it also reveals a weakness. India's achievement in winning medals continues to depend on which sports are featured at the Games.
The next chapter begins immediately.
At the closing ceremony, Glasgow formally handed the Commonwealth Games flag to India as Ahmedabad prepares to host the 2030 edition, the centenary Games. India will return to the role of host two decades after the 2010 Delhi Games, and the event can be an opportunity to build a wider sporting ecosystem rather than simply chase medals.
That means better grassroots facilities, stronger support for para athletes, deeper investment in athletics and greater opportunities for children outside the traditional sporting centres. Hosting the Games should leave behind courts, tracks, coaches and pathways that continue working long after the closing ceremony.
Glasgow gave India 39 medals. It also gave the country something more valuable: a glimpse of what Indian sport can look like when the spotlight moves beyond its usual favourites.
Fourth place may look familiar.
India returning from Glasgow does not.
References: