India’s exploding health crisis is no longer about individual lifestyle choices—it is a systemic failure. As the country earns the grim title of the “Diabetes Capital of the World,” public discourse continues to misplace blame on traditional sweets like jalebis and laddus. While these indulgences play a role, they are not the primary drivers of today’s epidemic.

The real danger lies elsewhere: hidden sugar, often embedded deep within modern, ultra-processed foods, which are aggressively marketed as “healthy,” “essential,” or even “medicinal.” This invisible sugar has quietly infiltrated the Indian pantry—and regulators are looking the other way.

The “Health Halo” Trap:

Walk through any supermarket aisle and you’ll see products claiming to be Digestive, High-Fiber, Fat-Free, or Energy-Boosting. These labels trigger what psychologists call a “Health Halo”—a cognitive bias where one positive claim distracts consumers from the overall nutritional reality. The truth is far less wholesome.

When manufacturers remove fat to appeal to health-conscious buyers, they often replace it with sugar to preserve taste and texture. The result? Foods that appear healthy on the surface but spike blood glucose levels just as aggressively as desserts.

Consider this:

A single serving of a popular “health drink” marketed to growing children can contain 15–20 grams of sugar—nearly the entire recommended daily limit for a child, consumed in one glass before school. Parents aren’t being careless. They’re being misled.

The Labelling Deception:

This crisis is magnified by deliberately complex food labelling. Sugar doesn’t always appear as “sugar.” In fact, manufacturers use over 50 different names—including maltodextrin, glucose solids, corn syrup, dextrose, fructose, and invert syrup—to fragment and disguise the true quantity.

Even nutrition labels fail consumers. Sugar quantities are often listed per serving, not per package, allowing brands to shrink serving sizes to appear compliant while consumers unknowingly consume far more. But the most contentious battleground is Front-of-Pack Labelling (FoPL).

Stars vs. Red Warnings: A Dangerous Compromise:

Public health experts across the world support clear, front-facing “Red Warning” labels—simple symbols that alert consumers when a product is high in sugar, salt, or unhealthy fats.

India, however, has leaned toward a star-rating system, similar to customer reviews. This approach is deeply flawed. A sugary breakfast cereal can still earn a relatively high star rating if it is fortified with vitamins or contains fiber—creating the illusion of balance while downplaying metabolic harm. Consumers interpret stars as endorsement, not caution.

In contrast, red warning labels are unambiguous. They do not invite interpretation. They inform, quickly and clearly. So why the resistance?

Regulatory Capture and the FSSAI Question:

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) sits at the center of this debate. While tasked with protecting public health, its prolonged indecision and preference for industry-friendly labelling systems raise uncomfortable questions. Is this about consumer education—or corporate convenience?

The longer clear warnings are delayed, the longer ultra-processed food companies can continue marketing sugar-laden products as everyday staples. The cost of this delay is not abstract. It shows up in clinics, hospitals, and household medical bills.

The Biological “Silent” Threat: TOFI India

India’s metabolic crisis does not look like the Western stereotype of obesity. A large segment of Indians suffer from TOFI—Thin Outside, Fat Inside. Despite appearing lean, they carry dangerous levels of visceral fat, stored around vital organs like the liver and pancreas.

High sugar consumption accelerates this process, leading to: Insulin resistance, Early-onset Type 2 diabetes, Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in teenagers and young adults. NAFLD, once rare outside alcohol abuse, is now increasingly diagnosed in school-aged children—often with no outward signs of obesity. This is a silent metabolic disaster, fueled by sugar and masked by misleading labels.

The Economic Time Bomb:

Beyond health, this crisis is an economic drain. Middle-class families are pushed into lifelong dependency on: Daily medications, Frequent diagnostic tests, Specialist consultations. What appears cheap at the grocery store becomes enormously expensive over decades of chronic disease management. Productivity drops. Healthcare costs rise. Preventable illnesses become normalized. This is not a coincidence—it is the predictable outcome of regulatory failure.

Moving Beyond “Personal Responsibility”:

For years, the narrative has blamed individuals: eat less, exercise more, and show willpower. But personal responsibility collapses when information itself is distorted. You cannot make an informed choice when: Sugar is hidden behind scientific names. “Healthy” claims contradict metabolic reality. Warning labels are replaced with marketing-friendly stars. The solution does not lie in guilt or discipline alone.

A Quiet Diagnosis at the Kirana Store:

On a humid July evening in Pune, 34-year-old Ankit Sharma stopped by his neighbourhood kirana store after work. Like many young professionals, Ankit believed he was “careful” about food. He didn’t drink soft drinks, rarely ate mithai, and had recently switched to products marketed as digestive, high-fibre, and low-fat.

He picked up his usual items: A “4-Star Rated” breakfast cereal labelled Heart Healthy, A children’s malt-based health drink for his 6-year-old daughter, endorsed by a cricket star, and a fat-free flavored yogurt with added probiotics.

The packaging reassured him. The stars were prominent. No red warnings. No alarm. Two weeks later, during a routine office health checkup, Ankit was stunned. HbA1c: Prediabetic range, Triglycerides: High, Ultrasound: Early fatty liver. “But I’m not overweight,” he protested. His BMI was normal. He jogged on weekends. The doctor asked him to bring photos of the foods he ate daily.

At the follow-up, the doctor pulled out a calculator. The “healthy” cereal: 12 g added sugar per serving, The health drink (one glass): 18 g sugar, The yoghurt: 10 g sugar, listed as maltodextrin and fruit solids.

By lunch, Ankit was unknowingly consuming more sugar than a gulab jamun, without ever tasting sweetness. “What about the stars?” Ankit asked. The doctor sighed. “Stars don’t warn. They average. Sugar hides well.”

Later that week, Ankit searched online and discovered that the same cereal had avoided a proposed red warning label because the system allowed manufacturers to offset sugar with added fibre and protein—earning stars while keeping sugar high. Meanwhile, the FSSAI’s Front-of-Pack Label debate dragged on. Industry groups argued that red warnings would “confuse consumers” and “hurt business.” The stars stayed. The sugar stayed hidden.

Ankit switched to plain oats and home-cooked food. His daughter cried when the chocolate health drink disappeared. Six months later, his numbers improved. But at the kirana store, the shelves looked the same. No red labels. Plenty of stars. And thousands of families like his, still trusting them.

The Way Forward: Transparency Over Tactics

India urgently needs: Mandatory red warning labels for high-sugar, high-salt, and high-fat foods, Simple, aggregated sugar disclosure (total sugar per pack), Strict limits on misleading health claims, especially in children’s products, and regulatory independence free from industry influence. This is not anti-industry. It is pro-health. Until transparency becomes non-negotiable, India’s sugar crisis will continue to grow—quietly, invisibly, and devastatingly.

The question is no longer whether Indians eat too much sugar.

The real question is: why are we still being kept in the dark?

References:

• https://www.reporters-collective.in
• https://fssai.gov.in
• https://www.indiatoday.in
• https://www.cseindia.org

.    .    .