image by pexels.com

There’s an awkward kind of loneliness in the world today, the type that hides behind screens and chats that never seem to end. We often communicate with our friends every day, but never really feel seen. We send voice notes, emojis, snaps, and “just checking on you” texts, yet something in us still feels… untouched. It’s the kind of emptiness that comes when connection becomes constant but not comforting.

Sometimes it feels like we are living in two versions of ourselves:

The one online, who is quick, witty, always present…

And the one offline, who longs for someone to truly sit with us, look at us, and understand the things we don’t post.

We have never been more reachable, yet somehow, being reached rarely feels the same as being held.

This is the quiet shift shaping modern friendships.

Not the loud drama or the big fallouts… but the slow fading of depth in a world where every conversation is typed, edited, filtered, or sent between tasks.

And maybe that’s why this topic matters.

Because part of growing up in this digital age is realizing that closeness needs more than constant notifications, it needs emotional courage, presence, and a kind of honesty that can’t be screenshot.

Over the last decades, friendships in general have changed in ways we can’t really explain. We are now more connected than ever, scrolling, liking, messaging, reacting. We know what friends had for breakfast, all from their latest post. And yet, even knowing this doesn’t mean we know them.

The problem can’t only be technology alone; it’s the expectation that it can replace presence. Screens give us the illusion of intimacy, but real intimacy takes vulnerability and attention,  things a mobile device fails to provide.

I’ve noticed it in my own life: conversations that once lasted hours now shrink to memes, voice notes, and quick replies.

The shift is slow but real: friendships are no longer measured by heart-to-heart talks, but by how often we’re “online” and available. We risk losing the emotional depth that makes us truly understood.

I’ve come to notice that there’s a massive difference between being connected and actually feeling real closeness to someone. We seem to be always available online, but presence doesn’t always equate to real intimacy.

It’s easy to send a message, react to a story, and believe we’re maintaining a friendship. But emotional closeness needs so much more than availability; it needs one’s apt listening, patience, and a willingness to sit with someone’s unfiltered self. It needs moments where no one is scrolling or multitasking.

We’re adapting, slowly, to the fact that genuine connection is very quiet. It’s checking in without expectation of what you’d get back in return. It’s more so like listening without being judged. In this digital age, that kind of closeness feels revolutionary. It makes us know that real friendship isn’t always about the constant updates, it’s more about depth, care, and being fully present, even when screens try to tell us opposite

MIT professor Sherry Turkle spent a long time studying the ways that technology seems to shape our relationships. Her research shows something that feels both thrilling and unsettling: the more we make use of screens to connect with others, the less meaningful conversations will be held amongst our friendships.

In her study, Turkle observed that most people especially teens and young adults, often picked social media over face-to-face interaction, even when they needed real connection. Screens often offer a sense of dominance which allows us to edit, or retreat. But in doing so, they tend to make it difficult for one to sit with the unpredictability of another person’s emotions, and respond authentically.

Turkle’s findings showed us a stunning paradox: that while technology promises connection, it often disrupts emotional closeness. It’s a reminder to us that intimacy isn’t about how often we message, it’s about being fully present and allowing silence to carry meaning in its own entirety.

This research of hers resonates deeply because it shows us what many of us feel in our friendships today: a distance between the ease of digital presence and the richness of true emotional closeness.

I’ve come to realize that in my own friendships: a paragraph of messages can feel comforting, but it doesn’t guarantee warmth. Sometimes, I scroll through notifications and it hits me that I’ve just been “talking” to friends without fully being with them.

There’s a beautiful thing in presence that screens often at times faill to replicate, shared silence, laughter that lingers, moments of understanding that doesn’t require an emoji. I now value conversations where we’re fully attentive. Those are the ones that leave a mark.

Digital communication is necessary, it’s nots bad. But we have to realize that closeness is cultivated, not just clicked. It requires showing up, list Friendship, in its truest form, is about quality over quantity, depth over constant availability.

In a world obsessed with being “always connected,” choosing emotional presence feels radical, but it’s the kind of radical we all need.

At the end of the day, digital connection can only carry us to an extent. What we’re all really crave is to feel seen, heard, and held uniquely. Maybe the future of friendship isn’t about more communication, but more meaningful moments. And that starts with choosing presence, one conversation at a time.

REFERENCES:

.    .    .

Discus