In a world increasingly focused on diversity and inclusion, one crucial dimension often remains misunderstood: the diversity of how human brains process information, interact with the world, and make sense of their experiences. Neurodiversity, a concept that recognises neurological differences as natural variations rather than deficits, challenges us to reconsider fundamental assumptions about what constitutes &#x201C normal&#x201D brain function. At the heart of this paradigm shift lies autism spectrum disorder, a neurodevelopmental condition that affects millions of individuals worldwide and offers profound insights into the rich tapestry of human cognition.

This case study explores the multifaceted nature of autism through the lens of neurodiversity, examining how autistic individuals experience the world differently, the challenges they face in environments designed primarily for neurotypical minds, and the unique strengths they bring to communities and workplaces. Rather than viewing autism solely through a medical or deficit-focused framework, this analysis adopts an affirming perspective that recognises both the genuine difficulties autistic people encounter and the valuable contributions they make when provided with appropriate support and understanding.

Understanding Autism: Beyond the Operating System Metaphor

To understand autism, many people find it helpful to use the analogy of different computer operating systems. If most neurotypical brains operate like Windows, an autistic brain might function more like macOS or Linux. Neither system is inherently broken or inferior; they simply process information and interact with their environment using different rules and protocols. This metaphor, while simplified, captures an essential truth: autism represents a fundamental difference in how the brain is wired, not a damaged version of typical neurology.

Autism spectrum disorder is characterised by differences in social communication, sensory processing, and patterns of behaviour and interests. The word “ spectrum” is critical here, as autism manifests differently in each individual. Current research suggests that autism affects approximately one in fifty-four children in the United States, though diagnostic practices and awareness continue to evolve. The condition is increasingly understood as a lifelong neurodevelopmental difference rather than a childhood disorder that can be “ cured” or “ outgrown.”

Recent scientific advances have revealed that autism involves complex interactions between genetic factors, brain development, and environmental influences. Large-scale genetic studies have identified numerous genes associated with autism, while neuroimaging research has documented differences in brain structure and connectivity patterns. However, these biological findings do not diminish the neurodiversity perspective; rather, they confirm that autism represents a naturally occurring variation in human neurology, much like left-handedness or different personality types.

The Sensory Experience: Living with Different Volume Controls

One of the most profound yet often invisible aspects of autism involves sensory processing differences. The neurotypical brain continuously filters incoming sensory information, automatically dampening irrelevant stimuli while highlighting important signals. This filter operates largely outside conscious awareness, allowing most people to focus on conversations in noisy restaurants, ignore the feeling of their clothing, or tune out background sounds.

For many autistic individuals, this filtering system works differently. Sensory information may arrive with the volume turned up, creating what clinicians call sensory hypersensitivity. A humming refrigerator that most people barely notice might sound like a jet engine to someone with auditory hypersensitivity. The gentle scratch of a clothing tag could feel like sandpaper against skin. Fluorescent lighting might create a painful visual strobe effect invisible to others. These aren’t exaggerations or complaints; they reflect genuine differences in how the nervous system processes sensory data.

Research into sensory processing in autism has documented these differences across all sensory modalities. Studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging have shown that autistic brains may process sensory information more intensely and with less inhibition than neurotypical brains. This heightened perception can be overwhelming, particularly in environments with multiple competing stimuli. A typical office environment, with its fluorescent lights, background conversations, keyboard clicks, and air conditioning hum, might bombard an autistic person with a level of sensory input that becomes genuinely painful and exhausting.

Conversely, some autistic individuals experience sensory hyposensitivity, where they require more intense stimulation to register sensory input. These individuals might seek out strong sensations through activities like spinning, jumping, or applying deep pressure. They might not notice when they’ re hungry or need to use the bathroom, because their internal sensory signals are muted. Understanding this dimension of sensory processing helps explain behaviours like stimming, repetitive movements that many autistic people use to regulate their sensory experience.

The workplace implications of these sensory differences are significant. Traditional office environments, designed without consideration for sensory diversity, can inadvertently create barriers to productivity and well-being for autistic employees. However, when employers understand these needs and provide appropriate accommodations, autistic workers often thrive. Simple adjustments like allowing noise-cancelling headphones, providing quiet workspaces away from fluorescent lighting, or permitting remote work can transform an overwhelming environment into one where autistic individuals can focus their considerable talents.

Navigating the Social World: Manual Translation of Unwritten Rules

Social interaction involves a complex dance of unspoken rules, subtle cues, and rapid interpretation of facial expressions, body language, and tone of voice. For most neurotypical people, these skills develop naturally and operate largely on autopilot. A raised eyebrow communicates scepticism, a slight shift in tone signals sarcasm, and the appropriate amount of eye contact varies by culture and context. These rules, though never explicitly taught, feel intuitive to those whose brains are wired to process social information in typical ways.

Autistic individuals often experience social communication very differently. Rather than absorbing these unwritten rules through osmosis, they must consciously learn and apply them, much like learning a foreign language or studying for an exam. This process, sometimes called “ social translation,” requires significant cognitive effort

and mental energy. An autistic person might need to consciously remind themselves to make eye contact, explicitly analyze whether someone’s tone indicates sarcasm, or manually calculate the appropriate duration for a handshake.

Current research into autism and social cognition has moved beyond outdated theories suggesting that autistic people lack empathy or don’t understand emotions. Instead, evidence points to differences in how social information is processed. The double empathy problem, a concept gaining traction in autism research, suggests that communication difficulties arise not from deficits in autistic individuals but from mismatches between neurotypical and autistic communication styles. When two autistic people interact, they often report excellent communication and mutual understanding. The challenges emerge primarily in mixed neurotype interactions where different social processing styles collide.

This perspective shift has profound implications. Rather than viewing social difficulties as solely the autistic person’s problem to fix, the neurodiversity framework recognises that neurotypical people also need to develop skills in communicating with neurodivergent individuals. This might involve being more direct and explicit, avoiding reliance on subtle hints or sarcasm, and appreciating different communication preferences.

Many autistic people value directness and honesty in communication, preferring clear, explicit statements over the social niceties and &#x201C white lies&#x201D that lubricate many neurotypical interactions. This directness can be misinterpreted as rudeness, when it actually reflects a genuine preference for transparent communication. Understanding this difference can prevent misunderstandings and create more effective communication channels in both personal and professional settings.

The effort required for constant social translation creates what many autistic people describe as a depleting &#x201C social battery.” After hours of manually processing social cues, making conscious decisions about eye contact, and translating neurotypical communication patterns, many autistic individuals experience profound exhaustion. This fatigue is not laziness or antisocial behavior; it’s the natural consequence of performing complex cognitive work that happens automatically for neurotypical brains. Recognising this reality, progressive workplaces are beginning to accommodate these needs by allowing flexible schedules, providing quiet spaces for recovery, and respecting when autistic employees need to step back from socially intensive activities.

Finding Safety in Routine and Predictability

In a world that can feel chaotic and overwhelming, many autistic individuals find comfort and stability in routine and predictability. This preference for sameness is not mere stubbornness or rigidity; it represents a genuine need for structure in an often unpredictable environment. When sensory input is intense and social rules are complex and exhausting to navigate, having predictable patterns provides a foundation of security and reduces cognitive load.

Research has explored the relationship between routine preferences in autism and anxiety levels. Studies suggest that insistence on sameness may function as a coping mechanism, helping autistic individuals manage the uncertainty and sensory complexity of daily life. When unexpected changes occur, they don’t just represent inconveniences; they can trigger genuine distress as established coping strategies suddenly become inadequate.

This need for predictability has practical implications across all life domains. In educational settings, providing clear schedules, advance notice of changes, and structured transitions between activities can dramatically improve autistic students&#x2019 ability to engage with learning. In workplaces, communicating changes well in advance, maintaining consistent meeting times, and providing clear expectations can help autistic employees feel secure and perform at their best.

However, the neurodiversity perspective also encourages us to question whose needs are being centred when we design systems and environments. If an organisation values innovation and claims to appreciate diverse thinking, yet demands constant flexibility and spontaneity without structure, it may inadvertently exclude neurodivergent contributors. Building in appropriate structure and predictability benefits not just autistic individuals but also often enhances productivity and reduces stress for everyone.

Special Interests: Windows into Extraordinary Focus and Expertise

One of the most distinctive and often misunderstood features of autism involves the development of intense, focused interests in specific topics or activities. Commonly called “ special interests,” these passionate engagements can range from mainstream topics like trains, computers, or animals to more unusual subjects like elevator mechanics, weather patterns, or historical architecture. What distinguishes these interests from typical hobbies is their intensity, duration, and the depth of knowledge acquired.

Research on special interests in autism has found that approximately seventy-five to ninety-five per cent of autistic individuals develop at least one special interest during their lifetime. These interests typically emerge between one and four years of age, though they can develop at any point, including adulthood. Unlike fads, special interests often persist for years or even decades, with individuals accumulating expert-level knowledge in their chosen domains.

The ability to hyperfocus represents a significant strength when properly channelled. When engaged with their special interest, autistic individuals often demonstrate remarkable concentration, attention to detail, and intrinsic motivation. Hours can pass unnoticed as they immerse themselves in learning, creating, or engaging with their passion. This capacity for sustained attention and deep engagement, when aligned with career opportunities, can lead to extraordinary contributions in fields ranging from technology and science to arts and humanities.

Historically, educational and therapeutic approaches often viewed special interests as problematic distractions that needed to be limited or redirected. Interventions sometimes restricted access to special interests, using them only as rewards for completing other tasks. However, current neurodiversity-affirming practice increasingly recognises special interests as valuable assets that can be leveraged for learning, social connection, and career development.

Progressive educational programs now incorporate special interests into curriculum design, using students&#x2019 passionate engagement with specific topics as bridges to broader learning objectives. A child fascinated by dinosaurs can learn mathematics through calculating dinosaur sizes, develop writing skills by creating dinosaur fact sheets, and practice social skills by sharing their expertise with classmates. This approach honors the child’s natural interests while building essential competencies.

In workplace contexts, aligning job responsibilities with autistic employees&#x2019 special interests can yield remarkable results. When individuals work in fields connected to their passions, their natural capacity for deep focus and expertise becomes a tremendous asset. Technology companies, research institutions, and creative industries are increasingly recognising this potential, developing hiring programs specifically designed to recruit and support autistic employees whose intense interests align with organisational needs.

The Autism Spectrum: A Multidimensional Profile

The concept of the autism “spectrum” is frequently misunderstood as a linear continuum from “mild” to “severe” or “low functioning” to “high-functioning.” This oversimplified model fails to capture the true complexity and variability of autism. A more accurate representation views the spectrum as multidimensional, with different individuals showing varying profiles across multiple domains, including communication abilities, sensory sensitivities, motor skills, intellectual capacity, and support needs.

An individual might be a brilliant software engineer with exceptional coding abilities while simultaneously experiencing significant challenges with sensory processing that make grocery shopping overwhelming. Another person might be nonspeaking yet have profound insights to share through alternative communication methods. These diverse profiles resist simple categorisation and demand individualised understanding and support.

Recent research has begun identifying subgroups within the autism spectrum based on biological markers, behavioural patterns, and developmental trajectories. Large-scale studies using artificial intelligence and machine learning have identified distinct autism subtypes with different genetic backgrounds, brain characteristics, and associated medical conditions. This work moves the field toward more precise, personalised approaches to support and intervention.

The rejection of functioning labels represents an important shift in autism advocacy and research. Terms like “high-functioning” and “ low functioning” fail to capture the fluctuating nature of autism-related challenges across contexts and over time. An individual might appear “ high functioning” in written communication but struggle significantly with verbal conversation. Support needs may vary dramatically depending on environmental factors, stress levels, and available accommodations. Furthermore, these labels can deny support to those deemed “high-functioning” while denying agency and potential to those labelled “low-functioning.” Instead, current best practice focuses on identifying specific support needs and strengths in different domains. This approach recognises that the same individual might need substantial support in some areas while demonstrating exceptional ability in others. It moves away from global judgments about capability toward a nuanced, person-centred understanding that honours both genuine challenges and real strengths.

Employment: Untapped Potential and Persistent Barriers

The employment landscape for autistic adults reveals both tremendous untapped potential and persistent systemic barriers. Despite possessing valuable skills and often exceptional abilities in areas like pattern recognition, attention to detail, logical analysis, and sustained focus, autistic adults face unemployment and underemployment rates far exceeding those of the general population. Recent statistics indicate that only fourteen to sixteen per cent of autistic adults work in full-time paid employment, translating to an estimated eighty-five per cent unemployment or underemployment rate.

These sobering statistics reflect multiple interconnected factors. Traditional hiring processes often disadvantage autistic candidates, with heavy emphasis on social performance during interviews that may not reflect job-relevant abilities. The candidate who struggles with eye contact or processes questions more slowly might be screened out despite possessing superior technical skills for the position. Workplace environments designed without consideration for sensory differences can be genuinely hostile to autistic workers, creating barriers to productivity and wellbeing. Lack of understanding among managers and coworkers can lead to misinterpretations of behaviour, communication breakdowns, and ultimately job loss.

Social bias and discrimination also play significant roles. Research has documented that neurotypical observers form negative first impressions of autistic individuals within seconds based on differences in nonverbal communication, a phenomenon called &#x201C thin slice judgments.” These snap judgments can affect hiring decisions, workplace relationships, and career advancement opportunities. Autistic individuals are aware of this bias and report experiencing significant stress related to managing social interactions and attempting to mask or hide their autistic traits to fit neurotypical expectations.

However, growing evidence demonstrates that when provided with appropriate accommodations and supportive environments, autistic employees often excel. Studies comparing autistic and neurotypical employees have found that autistic workers demonstrate equal or superior productivity, higher accuracy rates, better attention to detail, and lower turnover rates. Australian research found that employers reported positive experiences hiring autistic adults, citing qualities of reliability, integrity, and dedication.

Progressive companies are recognising this potential through dedicated neurodiversity hiring initiatives. Organisations like Microsoft, SAP, JP Morgan Chase, and Google have established programs specifically designed to recruit and support autistic employees. These initiatives modify traditional hiring processes to focus on actual job skills rather than social performance, provide clear communication and structure, offer workplace accommodations, and train neurotypical employees about neurodiversity.

The accommodations that enable autistic employees to thrive are often simple and cost-effective. Providing noise-cancelling headphones, allowing flexible schedules or remote work, using written rather than verbal instructions, creating quiet workspaces, and communicating changes in advance can dramatically improve working conditions. More fundamentally, fostering workplace cultures that value direct communication, respect different working styles, and measure performance based on results rather than conformity to neurotypical norms benefits neurodivergent and neurotypical employees alike.

Success stories from neurodiversity hiring programs demonstrate the business case for inclusion. Companies report that their autistic employees bring valuable perspectives, identify problems others miss, excel in quality assurance and pattern recognition tasks, and contribute to innovation through their different ways of thinking. The turnover rate for autistic employees in supportive programs is dramatically lower than general workforce averages, reducing recruitment and training costs while building institutional knowledge.

The Neurodiversity Paradigm: Shifting from Deficit to Difference

The neurodiversity movement represents a fundamental shift in how we understand autism and other neurological variations. Rather than viewing autism through a purely medical lens as a disorder requiring cure or normalisation, the neurodiversity paradigm recognises neurological differences as natural variations in human neurology, comparable to biodiversity in ecosystems. This perspective doesn’t deny that autism can involve genuine challenges and disabilities; rather, it recognises that many difficulties autistic people experience result from environments and social systems designed exclusively for neurotypical brains.

This paradigm shift has profound implications for research, intervention, education, and policy. Neurodiversity-affirming research prioritises questions identified by autistic individuals themselves, involves autistic people as collaborators throughout the research process, and focuses on improving quality of life rather than eliminating autism. It recognises that research conducted without meaningful autistic involvement often addresses questions important to researchers or clinicians but irrelevant or even harmful from an autistic perspective.

In educational and clinical practice, neurodiversity-affirming approaches focus on building strengths, modifying environments, and supporting authentic self-expression rather than training autistic individuals to appear more neurotypical through masking behaviours. Historical interventions often emphasised making autistic children “ indistinguishable from their peers,” requiring them to suppress natural behaviours like stimming, forcing eye contact, and teaching scripts for social interaction. Emerging evidence suggests that such approaches, particularly when intensive, can contribute to anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress in autistic individuals.

Neurodiversity-affirming practice instead asks: What does this person need to thrive as their authentic self? How can we modify the environment to reduce barriers? How can we build on existing strengths and interests? What accommodations would reduce stress and increase well-being? This shift doesn’t mean ignoring genuine skill-building needs; rather, it means approaching intervention collaboratively, respecting the individual’s autonomy and perspective, and prioritising quality of life over neurotypical appearance.

The concept has faced some criticism and misunderstanding. Some worry that emphasising neurodiversity minimises the real challenges and support needs of autistic individuals, particularly those with significant intellectual disabilities or who are nonspeaking. However, most neurodiversity advocates strongly reject this interpretation. The neurodiversity framework can accommodate the full spectrum of support needs while challenging systems that devalue, marginalise, or seek to eliminate autistic people. It can simultaneously advocate for better support services and oppose interventions aimed primarily at making autistic people seem less autistic.

Recent research has begun empirically examining neurodiversity-affirming approaches. Studies of autistic adults engaged with mental health services found that neurodiversity affirming care focuses on accepting autistic behaviors, supporting authentic self-expression, addressing environmental barriers, and centering the individual’s own goals and priorities. Participants in these studies reported that such approaches led to better outcomes, improved mental health, and greater life satisfaction compared to traditional deficit-focused interventions.

Looking Forward: Building Truly Inclusive Societies

Understanding and embracing neurodiversity requires fundamental changes in how we design physical spaces, social systems, educational programs, and workplaces. It demands that we question assumptions about what constitutes &#x201C normal&#x201D or &#x201C appropriate” behavior and recognise that diversity in thinking, processing, and interacting enriches communities and drives innovation.

In educational settings, this means moving beyond one-size-fits-all curricula and classroom environments toward flexible, individualised approaches that accommodate diverse learning styles and sensory needs. It means recognising that a child who needs to move while learning or who processes information differently is not deficient but different. It means valuing different forms of intelligence and contribution rather than narrow definitions of academic success.

In workplace contexts, embracing neurodiversity means examining hiring processes, workplace cultures, and performance evaluation systems through the lens of inclusion. It means recognising that traditional markers of professionalism often reflect neurotypical norms rather than actual job requirements. An excellent programmer doesn’t need to maintain constant eye contact, an exceptional data analyst doesn’t need to excel at small talk, and a brilliant researcher doesn’t need to work best in open-plan offices.

More broadly, building inclusive societies means creating communities where autistic individuals can participate fully as their authentic selves rather than expending enormous energy masking to appear neurotypical. It means providing sensory-friendly options in public spaces, communicating clearly and directly, offering multiple modes of participation in community activities, and respecting different social preferences and communication styles.

Technology offers promising tools for increasing inclusion. Augmentative and alternative communication devices enable nonspeaking autistic individuals to express themselves. Virtual reality programs provide safe environments for practising social skills. Mobile applications can help with organisation, time management, and navigating sensory environments. Online communities connect autistic individuals across geographic boundaries, creating spaces for authentic connection and mutual support.

However, technology alone cannot create inclusion. Genuine progress requires attitude shifts, policy changes, and commitment to centring autistic voices in decisions affecting autistic lives. The principle &#x201C nothing about us without us&#x201D has become central to autism advocacy, demanding that autistic individuals be meaningfully involved in research, policy development, program design, and all decisions affecting the autistic community.

Research priorities are shifting to align with autistic community values. Rather than focusing primarily on identifying causes or developing interventions to reduce autism characteristics, emerging priorities include understanding and supporting mental health, reducing barriers to employment and education, improving healthcare access, addressing high suicide rates, and exploring how autistic adults can build satisfying lives. These priorities reflect what autistic people themselves identify as important, rather than what non-autistic researchers assume matters most.

Autism represents a fundamental difference in how brains process information, interact with the world, and make meaning from experience. Understanding autism through the neurodiversity lens means recognising these differences as natural variations rather than deficits requiring cure. It means acknowledging both the genuine challenges autistic individuals face, particularly in environments designed without consideration for neurodivergent needs, and the valuable strengths and perspectives they bring to communities, workplaces, and society.

The sensory differences that make typical environments overwhelming for many autistic people reflect genuine neurological variations, not character flaws or behavioural problems. The social communication challenges reflect different processing styles rather than a lack of empathy or social motivation. The preference for routine and predictability serves legitimate needs for structure in complex environments. The intense interests demonstrate capacity for extraordinary focus and expertise when properly supported.

Current employment statistics reveal massive untapped potential. When barriers are removed and appropriate supports provided, autistic individuals demonstrate exceptional capabilities across countless fields. Progressive companies implementing neurodiversity hiring initiatives are discovering that autistic employees bring valuable skills, perspectives, and dedication when workplace cultures embrace rather than merely tolerate neurodivergent ways of being.

Moving forward requires collective commitment to building genuinely inclusive societies. This means modifying environments rather than demanding individuals change fundamental aspects of how their brains work. It means questioning assumptions about what constitutes normal or appropriate behaviour. It means involving autistic people meaningfully in all decisions affecting the autistic community. It means recognising that human diversity extends beyond visible characteristics to encompass the beautiful variety of how minds process, think, and experience the world.

The neurodiversity paradigm offers a path toward societies that recognise and celebrate neurological differences as sources of strength and innovation rather than problems requiring solutions. In embracing neurodiversity, we don’t deny the real challenges associated with autism or other neurological differences. Rather, we commit to addressing those challenges through support, accommodation, and environmental modification rather than through attempts to make neurodivergent people indistinguishable from neurotypical peers.

We live in a world of different minds, each processing information and experiencing reality in unique ways. This diversity represents not a problem but an opportunity. By creating spaces, systems, and communities designed for neurological diversity rather than neurotypical homogeneity, we enable all minds to contribute their distinctive perspectives and capabilities. The journey toward true neurodiversity inclusion has begun, but substantial work remains. That work requires listening to autistic voices, questioning long-held assumptions, and committing to building a world where everyone can thrive as their authentic selves.

As awareness grows and understanding deepens, we move closer to recognising what the autistic community has long known: autism is not a tragedy to be mourned or a puzzle to be solved, but a different way of being human that deserves respect, accommodation, and celebration. In honouring neurodiversity, we honour the full spectrum of human potential and create richer, more innovative, and more compassionate communities for everyone.

references

• Singer, Judy, Why Can’t You Be Normal for Once in Your Life? (1998), origin of the term neurodiversity, framing neurological differences as natural human variation rather than pathology.
• American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR), definition and diagnostic criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder, emphasising its spectrum nature and lifelong neurodevelopmental profile.
• Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Data & Statistics, reporting prevalence estimates (e.g., ~1 in 54 children in the U.S.) and evolving diagnostic awareness.
• Lord, C., Elsabbagh, M., Baird, G., & Veenstra-VanderWeele, J., Autism Spectrum Disorder, The Lancet, comprehensive overview of autism’s genetics, brain development, and heterogeneity.
• Geschwind, D. H., & State, M. W., Gene Hunting in Autism Spectrum Disorder, Nature, large-scale genetic research identifying multiple genes and biological pathways associated with autism.
• Baron-Cohen, S., The Science of Evil and related works, early theories of social cognition in autism and subsequent refinements in understanding empathy and perspective-taking.
• Milton, D., On the Ontological Status of Autism: The “Double Empathy Problem”, Disability & Society, introducing the concept that communication difficulties arise from mismatched neurotypes rather than autistic deficits.
• Robertson, C. E., & Baron-Cohen, S., Sensory Perception in Autism, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, documenting hypersensitivity and hyposensitivity across sensory modalities.
• Marco, E. J. et al., Sensory Processing in Autism, Journal of Child Neurology, neuroimaging and behavioural evidence of altered sensory filtering and regulation.
• Kapp, S. K. et al., Deficit, Difference, or Both? Autism and the Neurodiversity Movement, Developmental Psychology, analysis of neurodiversity-affirming perspectives and their implications.
• Happé, F., & Frith, U., The Weak Coherence Account, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, research on detail-focused cognitive processing in autism.
• Murray, D., Lesser, M., & Lawson, W., Attention, Monotropism and the Diagnostic Criteria for Autism, Autism, theoretical foundation for intense focus and special interests.
• Grove, R. et al., Identification of Autism Subtypes Using Machine Learning, Nature Medicine, research identifying biologically and behaviorally distinct autism profiles.
• Bottema-Beutel, K. et al., Avoiding Ableist Language in Autism Research, Autism in Adulthood, critique of functioning labels and advocacy for needs-based descriptions.
• Roux, A. M. et al., National Autism Indicators Report: Transition into Young Adulthood, Drexel University, employment statistics showing high unemployment and underemployment among autistic adults.
• Hedley, D. et al., Employment Programs and Outcomes for Autistic Adults, Autism, evidence that workplace accommodations improve productivity and retention.
• Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P., Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Review, analysis of corporate neurodiversity hiring initiatives.
• Microsoft, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, and Google published reports and case studies on neurodiversity hiring programs, documenting improved performance and reduced turnover.
• Cage, E., & Troxell-Whitman, Z., Understanding Mental Health in Autistic Adults, Autism Research, examining anxiety, depression, masking, and well-being.
• Hull, L. et al., “Putting on My Best Normal”: Social Camouflaging in Autism, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, research on masking and its mental-health costs.
• Nicolaidis, C. et al., The AASPIRE Model, Autism, participatory research model centring autistic voices in research and healthcare.
• Pellicano, E., Dinsmore, A., & Charman, T., What Should Autism Research Focus On?, Autism, study showing mismatch between researcher priorities and autistic community priorities.
• Dawson, G., Early Behavioural Intervention, Brain Plasticity, and Autism, Development and Psychopathology, discussion of interventions and ethical considerations.
• Houting, J., Neurodiversity: An Insider’s Perspective, Autism, autistic-authored analysis of neurodiversity, identity, and inclusion.
• United Nations, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), an international framework supporting accommodation, dignity, and inclusion for neurodivergent individuals.

.    .    .