Trust as a Weapon: Faridabad Rape Case

What happened on December 16, 2025, did not begin in a hotel room. It began much earlier, in a system where trust is treated like currency and authority is rarely questioned. A seventeen-year-old competitive shooter, still a minor, walked into what she believed was another routine extension of her training life. Instead, she walked into a space where power, fear, and silence collided. By the time she spoke on January 1, 2026, two weeks had already passed, but those two weeks stretched into the longest days of her life.

The accused, Ankush Bharadwaj, is not an outsider to Indian shooting. He is a former pistol shooter, a Commonwealth Youth Games gold medalist, and a coach whose name carried institutional backing. After the Paris 2024 Olympics, he was among the coaches appointed by the Sports Authority of India on the recommendation of the National Rifle Association of India. He ran a shooting academy in Mohali. He was married to a well-known Olympian. These credentials mattered because they created a shield—one that made questioning him difficult and resisting him even harder.

On the morning of December 16, the girl competed at the Dr Karni Singh Shooting Range. Like many young athletes, she waited back at the range long after her event, a normal practice day stretching into fatigue. In the afternoon, she received a WhatsApp call from her coach asking her to come to a five-star hotel in Surajkund. The reason sounded professional, almost boring: she was asked to write a report of her performance. This is how grooming often works—not through dramatic threats, but through ordinary requests that feel too small to refuse.

Inside the hotel, the shift from professional to predatory was gradual. She was called to the lift area, then taken to a room on the third floor. While she sat writing, he touched her shoulders, telling her he could “crack her back,” presenting it as a recovery technique. For an athlete, especially a young one trained to obey coaches, such language does not immediately trigger danger. It sounds technical. It sounds normal. It sounds like expertise. When she refused, the situation escalated into force.

According to the FIR, she was pushed onto the bed and sexually assaulted. Afterwards, he dropped her near her vehicle, as if closing a routine session. That small detail matters. Predators often try to normalise violence after committing it, hoping the ordinary ending will blur the extraordinary harm.

What followed was not immediate outrage or disclosure. It was silent. And that silence has often been misunderstood by society. Why didn’t she speak immediately? Why did she wait fifteen days? The answer lies in trauma and fear. The FIR states that the coach threatened to ruin her career if she told anyone. For a young athlete, a career is not just a job—it is identity, years of discipline, family sacrifices, and dreams built shot by shot.

He allegedly went further. In the days after the assault, he reportedly called her parents and complained that she was “not listening” during training. This was not random. It was a pre-emptive strike. By planting seeds of doubt about her behaviour, he created an explanation in advance for her emotional withdrawal. This is gaslighting at its most calculated—using parental concern as a cover and authority as camouflage.

Her parents noticed the change anyway. Trauma does not stay hidden forever. On January 1, 2026, after repeated questions and visible distress, she broke down and told her mother what had happened. That moment—quiet, painful, private—was more revolutionary than it sounds. Speaking up did not undo the assault, but it ended the isolation. It shifted the burden from her shoulders to the system that failed her.

On January 6, an FIR was registered at the Women’s Police Station in Faridabad under Section 6 of the POCSO Act for aggravated penetrative sexual assault, along with criminal intimidation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. CCTV footage from the hotel and the shooting range is now being examined to verify the timeline. The NRAI suspended Bharadwaj immediately after receiving a copy of the FIR and issued a show-cause notice, stating he would not be associated with any coaching activity during the inquiry.

As of January 9, reports stated that he had not yet been arrested, though police teams were searching for him. This delay, too, raises uncomfortable questions about accountability when the accused holds a status.

This case is not just about one man or one crime. It exposes the dangerous imbalance in elite sports, where coaches often function as mentors, gatekeepers, and authority figures all at once. Young athletes are trained to trust blindly, to obey without question, and to accept discomfort as part of growth. That culture becomes fertile ground for abuse.

Hotel rooms are not classrooms. Recovery techniques require consent. Authority does not equal ownership. These lines should never be blurred, yet they often are—especially when medals and reputations are at stake. Too many institutions focus on success first and safety later, if at all.

The fifteen days between December 16 and January 1 are being judged by some as a delay. They should instead be understood as survival. Trauma does not follow deadlines. Courage does not arrive instantly. Sometimes, speaking up is not loud or public; it is a whisper to a mother in a closed room, after weeks of carrying the unbearable alone.

This case matters because it challenges the silence surrounding abuse in sports. It forces us to ask whether we value young athletes as human beings or merely as medal-producing machines. It reminds us that trust, when misused, becomes a weapon. And it proves that even against power, even against fear, truth can still find its voice.

December 16 was a tragedy. January 1 was a turning point. What happens next will decide whether the system learns or repeats itself.

Reference:

. . .

Discus