+ Follow
image by pexels.com

For several decades, people have treated infertility as a health issue that directly affects only women. The struggle to conceive is often shown as a "woman’s journey" in advertising and popular culture and medical waiting rooms. The actual biological situation shows a completely different picture. Global data indicate that in approximately 50% of all infertility cases, a male factor is a contributing or primary cause.

The reproductive science field has achieved breakthroughs, which include high-resolution semen analysis and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), yet the field faces an ongoing hidden crisis. The situation exists because of cultural problems rather than medical limitations. Science currently faces defeat against "Status", which describes how society views masculine identity.

The Biological Decline: The Science of Sperm Count

The scientific community has issued repeated warnings about this issue for multiple years. The sperm counts of men from Western countries have experienced a 50% decline during the past 40 years, according to a major meta-analysis that Dr0 Shanna Swan directed as an environmental and reproductive epidemiologist. The current "Spermageddon" situation exists because modern stressors combine with plastic materials that contain endocrine-disrupting chemicals and people who lead sedentary lives and obesity and men who postpone their fatherhood duties.

Medical professionals consider male infertility to be a treatable medical condition. Men with low sperm count (oligozoospermia), poor motility (asthenozoospermia), or abnormal morphology (teratozoospermia) will benefit from lifestyle changes and hormone therapy and assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments. The science has developed solutions that the patient refuses to accept by entering the treatment area.

The Weight of "Status": The Stigma of the "Inert" Male

The ancient belief that procreation defines manhood creates an obstacle that prevents people from receiving treatment for male infertility. In various cultures, a man's "status" must be proved through his ability to demonstrate virility. People commonly perceive low sperm count as evidence of medical health problems, but they treat it as proof of a man failing to meet his masculine obligations.

People show communal sympathy toward women who experience infertility, but they react to male infertility through silence and mockery. The stigma creates a psychological "threat to the ego." The majority of men view semen analysis as a test which will determine their masculine identity. Men develop a pattern of avoiding tests while expecting their female partners to provide proof of their condition, which leads men to postpone treatment until the point where only advanced medical solutions remain.

Case Study: The Silent Struggle of "Mark"

The case study uses a combination of actual clinical experiences to create a composite which protects patient confidentiality.

Mark and Sarah, a married couple, had been trying to conceive for three years. Through blood work, ultrasound tests and a painful Hysterosalpingogram (HSG) test, Sarah had undergone multiple tests to check her fallopian tubes. All test results returned normal.

Mark refused to undergo his semen analysis test despite Sarah's insistence for eighteen months. He practiced marathon running as an amateur athlete, did not smoke, and he believed he was in total health. The suggestion that he might be the "problem" would insult him because he viewed his physical abilities and responsibilities as a husband. He linked his identity as a successful provider who maintained good health with his ability to achieve biological fatherhood.

He took the test after he reached the point of relationship breakdown with his partner. The test results delivered unexpected outcomes. He believed that his position as a competent provider who succeeded in life depended on his biological ability to have children.

He took the test after their relationship reached its most critical point. The test results showed that he had extremely low sperm production, which resulted from his grade III varicocele condition. The condition existed because he failed to treat his enlarged scrotal veins which caused him low-level pain that he believed was his duty to endure.

The scientific explanation showed that doctors could use a small surgical operation to solve the problem. The emotional consequences of the situation turned out to be difficult to handle. Mark entered a state of deep depression during which he thought of himself as "half a man." The process required six months of counselling until he achieved separation between self-worth and his sperm count. The couple needed to switch to IVF which required more money and medical procedures because they waited too long to treat Mark's health problems from two years earlier.

Why Science is Losing?

Three major factors cause science to lose against stigma according to research.

The Myth of the "Silent" Male

The medical system establishes social stigma through its various practices. Infertility clinics use feminine symbols to design their facilities, which causes many men to feel like they are "accessories". Men who face medical environments that do not understand their experience will become "silent" by choosing to watch the situation without active participation.

Lack of Education

Public health educational programs face a substantial shortage of available resources. Most men learn how to prevent pregnancy during their youth, but they never receive instruction on the delicate state of their reproductive health. Most men who learn about their sperm count will discover that their reproductive systems have already sustained serious damage from both their life choices and their untreated health issues.

The Virility-Fertility Fallacy

Society confuses sexual performance with reproductive health. A man may have a high libido and no issues with performance, leading him to believe his "status" as a fertile male is intact. The scientific community establishes erectile function and sperm production as distinct biological processes, while cultural beliefs maintain their linkage.

Bridging the Gap: The Path Forward

The scientific community requires us to remove the negative perception that exists about semen analysis testing.

Normalising Testing: Semanalysisthatshould become a common test which men of particular age groups require, just like they need cholesterol tests and blood pressure measurements.

The Rise of Home Testing: Modern science dismantles stigma by providing men with testing solutions that they can use in their own spaces. Companies like Legacy and Fellow offer at-home sperm testing kits, which enable men to avoid the perceived "shame" of the clinic while they test their samples in private.

Redefining Masculinity: True "status" should be redefined as taking responsibility for one's health. A man who proactively manages his fertility to support his partner and his future family is demonstrating a modern, more resilient form of masculinity.

The decline in global sperm counts is a scientific reality that requires urgent attention. However, people cannot obtain medical assistance for their biological issues because they have not yet developed the courage to request treatment. The medical field needs to treat sperm count as an essential health indicator which shows complete health instead of using it to measure a man's masculinity. The scientific process requires us to eliminate all forms of social discrimination that currently exist.

Reference 

.    .    .

Discus