In early January 2026, the Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation (KDMC) elections took an unprecedented and controversial turn. Twenty candidates from the ruling Mahayuti alliance were declared winners without a single vote being cast. What should have been a routine local body election instead became a political flashpoint, raising serious questions about democratic processes, administrative neutrality, and voter rights.
The reason for these unopposed victories was startling. By the final nomination withdrawal deadline of January 1, 2026, every rival candidate in these 20 wards—belonging to major opposition parties as well as independents—had either had their nomination papers rejected or had withdrawn from the race. With no one left to contest against them, Mahayuti candidates walked straight into office.
Out of the 122 seats in the KDMC, this meant that nearly 16% of the municipal corporation was decided without an election.
The political gains were clearly tilted in favour of the ruling alliance:
According to official withdrawal data, the opposition collapse was widespread:
These withdrawals effectively cleared the field for Mahayuti candidates in several key panels and wards across Kalyan and Dombivli.
Media reports from NDTV Marathi and The Times of India highlighted several prominent unopposed winners. Among them was Harshal More, son of sitting MLA Rajesh More, who won unchallenged in Ward 28A. In Ward 24, Shiv Sena candidates Ramesh Mhatre, Vishwanath Rane, and Vrushali Joshi secured a clean sweep.
The BJP saw early victories through Asavari Navare in Dombivli (Ward 26C) and Rekha Chaudhary in Kalyan (Ward 18A). One withdrawal that drew particular attention was that of Manoj Gharat, the MNS Dombivli City President. His sudden exit from the race reportedly paved the way for a straightforward BJP win.
While such unopposed victories are not unheard of in Indian elections, the sheer scale and speed at which opposition candidates vanished raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.
“Mandate or Manipulation?”
The opposition was quick to reject the idea that these wins reflected public support. Instead, they labelled the episode a “systemic scam.”
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut made the most explosive allegation, claiming that candidates were offered bribes of up to ₹5 crore to withdraw. He alleged that “bags of cash” were delivered to candidates’ homes and demanded an investigation into phone records to identify which ministers or officials contacted candidates in the final hours before withdrawals closed.
Other leaders echoed similar concerns. Samajwadi Party leader Abu Azmi alleged that money and pressure were openly used to force withdrawals, while Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Kedar Dighe questioned how candidates could be declared unopposed when Electronic Voting Machines still include a NOTA (None of the Above) option.
Beyond money, opposition parties accused the State Election Commission (SEC) of selective enforcement. They claimed that opposition nominations were rejected for minor clerical mistakes, while similar errors in Mahayuti papers were ignored—an allegation the SEC has not officially endorsed but has not dismissed either.
As public outrage grew, the matter moved to the courts. Social activist Shrinivas Ghanekar filed a petition in the Bombay High Court arguing that voters had been disenfranchised. His argument was simple: even if only one candidate remains, elections should still be held so voters can choose NOTA.
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) went a step further, proposing the idea of a “virtual candidate.” According to this demand, if NOTA were to receive more votes than the sole
References
The "Unopposed" Numbers (The Fact Sheet)
Key Quotes: What the Leaders Said
The Opposition (The Accusations)
The Ruling Alliance (The Defence)
Institutional & Legal References