+ Follow
image by pexels.com

In the winter of 2026, Telangana had to deal with a painful truth. The killing of hundreds of stray dogs in several districts revealed a deeper failure in governance, accountability, and empathy. This was not a singular act of cruelty. What took place over a few weeks in January was not merely a response to concerns about public safety, but an alarming illustration of how political expediency can override laws, ethics, and humane policy.

In the villages and towns of Telangana, stray dogs have long been a visible and contested presence. Dog bites, nighttime barking, and attacks on poultry or livestock are common complaints from locals. Public apprehension has also been fueled by health officials’ warnings about rising rabies risks. During the 2025 Gram Panchayat elections, these worries became a significant campaign issue, with several candidates promising swift action to eliminate the so-called “dog menace.”

However, once elected, some sarpanches pursued illegal and inhumane paths. Rather than coordinating with municipal authorities or veterinary departments to implement Animal Birth Control programmes—the only method permitted by Indian law—they allegedly authorised the covert elimination of stray dogs. In several instances, individuals from outside the state were reportedly hired to carry out these killings. Dogs were poisoned or injected with lethal substances, often during early morning hours, to avoid witnesses.

Police investigations later revealed that these killings were not random. They followed a consistent pattern across districts such as Kamareddy, Hanamkonda, Jagtial, and parts of Medak. Estimates suggest that over 500 dogs may have been killed within a short span of time. Carcasses were buried on farmland, dumped near water bodies, or abandoned on village outskirts.

One of the most extensively documented cases occurred in Kamareddy district. After burial sites containing dozens of dog bodies were discovered in villages such as Bhavanipet and Faridpet, animal welfare volunteers alerted authorities. District officials ordered post-mortem examinations, which confirmed poisoning and chemical injections as causes of death. FIRs were subsequently filed against several sarpanches, village secretaries, and unidentified contractors.

The situation in Hanamkonda district was even more disturbing. Between January 6 and 8, more than 120 stray dogs were reportedly killed in Shayampet and Arepally mandals. Videos circulated on social media showing dogs being injected and collapsing within moments. The footage sparked public outrage and led to swift police action, with multiple elected representatives and accomplices booked under animal cruelty laws.

Legally, these actions were indefensible. The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act criminalises unnecessary harm or killing of animals. The Animal Birth Control Rules, updated in 2023, mandate sterilisation, vaccination, and release as the only lawful methods for managing stray dog populations. The Telangana High Court has repeatedly restrained authorities from capturing or relocating sterilised dogs without due process.

Animal welfare organisations described the killings as a systemic failure rather than isolated misconduct. Many villages involved had never implemented sustained sterilisation drives, relying instead on short-term, politically driven measures. Experts warn that indiscriminate culling disrupts stable dog populations, increases aggression, and heightens rabies risk.

Beyond legality and policy lies a deeper ethical concern. The Indian Constitution places a duty on both citizens and the state to show compassion towards living creatures. When elected leaders authorise cruelty in secrecy, it erodes public trust and undermines humane governance. The Telangana dog killings serve as a stark reminder of the consequences of replacing evidence-based policy with political haste.

References

.    .    .

Discus