In our human society, it only takes moments to spread a rumour. Within a short span of time, it roars like a mighty wildfire. But what does it take for the real news to reach everyone’s ears? That is where the press and media grab the spotlight. An entire nation relies on its words to discover the truth and to stay informed. Through their fearless voices, they shape young minds and empower the weak. For a layman, the press opens the door to the world. Hence, their truthfulness and reliability are highly looked upon by everyone. That is where the real concern arises.
Does the media exercise its freedom in its fullest form? Well, it is supposed to, but the recent press freedom rankings prove it otherwise. One of the largest democratic nations, like India’s ranking, turns ironic this time. The country that ranked 151st out of 180 countries last year, now slips to 157th position in 2026.
The ranks released by the Reporters Without Borders (RSF) indicate that Indian media or journalism continues to be in a critical condition in terms of legal and political intervention and the safety of journalists.
The 2026 rankings declared that more than half of the countries come under the "difficult" or "very serious" categories for press freedom. This is the first time the report states so. Other notable countries in this list, apart from India, include Egypt, Israel, and Georgia. When compared closely, India stands behind several of its neighbouring countries. Pakistan is at 153rd position, and Bhutan at 150, performs slightly better than India. Sri Lanka is ranked at 134 and Bangladesh at 152. Nepal made an impressive ranking, standing at 87th place. Overall, India, a densely populated developing nation, claiming to be the world's most liberal democratic nation, stands at an alarming position. For a little amount of satisfaction, India’s most notable neighbour, China, was, however, behind India at 178th position. Altogether, Norway continues its impactful performance by topping the rankings. At the same time, Eritrea ranked last.
The government, however, rejected these rankings. According to the government, the rankings were purely propaganda-driven. It said that the methodology itself was biased and lacked credibility. Hence, a nation’s press freedom cannot be analysed based on these rankings. They argue that these methodologies fail to view India’s diverse reality of media.
According to the RSF, the legal frameworks of our country, which are originally meant to protect our citizens and provide them with a better life, are being misused to silence the newsroom. It hinders the very process of journalism and providing true information to people. Online content and social media have become a major source of news recently. But the government owns the right to censor online content. Though this prevents the circulation of fake news, it also deeply violates press freedom if mishandled.
The rankings are mainly based on 5 factors - economic, legal, political, social, and security conditions. Of these, the legal factor is the worst hit this time, as stated in the report. It also stated that "the criminalisation of journalism... is proving to be a global phenomenon."
Apart from the legal harassment, another distressing concern of journalism is its ownership and influence. Certain media houses that are financially or politically influenced fall under this category. In such cases, the same incident will be portrayed in several perspectives, depending on the influence. This can pass wrong information to the public and can shape their opinion without facts. Corporate decisions sometimes depend on political actions. At those times, the media is forced to act accordingly.
The political influence of the media is visible most during times of elections and election campaigns. Before the reign of social media, the only source for candidates to reach an audience was through newspapers. But now, with a wider audience, especially the youth, campaigns are growing seamlessly, along with the so-called promises. Now, rivalry has reached as far as Indian households as the social media culture continues to mould thoughts and eliminate practical and non-biased thinking. This puts the country’s future itself at stake. When young minds lose their ability to decide and get easily influenced, it not only affects them but the nation itself, where democracy is to be maintained.
As far as freelance and independent journalists are concerned, not only their career, but also their very life is under threat. Violence against journalists is a very common concept as far as India is concerned. Any attempt to resist the silencing of highly sensitive content will also silence the journalist forever. Among them, the most affected are investigative journalists. They face such threats in their day-to-day lives and are often threatened to alter their investigation findings. Such a situation, if not ended, would eliminate the concept of investigative journalism itself by instilling fear in the minds of passionate individuals.
Silencing media houses and journalists in the name of national security and curbing the spread of misinformation leaves the citizens in a perplexed state. Which one is true and which one is not, no one will know. This ranking concerns regional to national level journalism and reveals the deeper nuances of political and other structures of the nation.
References: