Some professions speak loudly through outcomes, and there are those that remain quietly foundational. Teaching belongs to the latter. Its impact is visible in generations, yet its realities often remain undocumented. This account attempts to bridge that silence—not through emotional outpouring, but through observation, research, and reflective narration.
I began my teaching career in Delhi, where I spent seven formative years in a structured academic environment. Those years shaped not only my pedagogical approach but also my belief in education as a transformative force. My book, Poetic Alchemy of Teaching, emerged from that journey—an attempt to capture how classrooms become spaces of intellectual and emotional evolution.
Relocating to Jammu after marriage marked a personal transition, but it also became a point of professional contrast. I joined a well-known private institution, often described as “elite.” What followed was not abrupt disillusionment, but a gradual unfolding of systemic patterns—subtle, layered, and worth examining in depth.
Regulated Spaces, Restricted Voices
One of the earliest observations was the regulation of informal communication. Teachers were advised that they should not engage in conversations in corridors—even when discussions were academic in nature. This seemingly minor rule gradually reshaped the rhythm of the school day, where spontaneous academic discussions—once the backbone of collaborative teaching—became hesitant and fragmented.
Such restrictions also altered the emotional climate of the institution. When professionals are unable to exchange ideas freely, it creates an invisible boundary around intellectual engagement. Over time, silence begins to replace dialogue, and compliance takes precedence over curiosity. This subtle shift not only affects teachers but eventually reflects in classroom delivery as well.
According to Etienne Wenger’s Communities of Practice Theory:
“Learning is fundamentally a social participation process.” (Wenger, 1998)
In the absence of such participation, teaching risks becoming mechanical rather than reflective. The corridor, once a space of exchange, turns into a monitored passage.
The Architecture of Workload
The teaching schedule often required handling four consecutive periods without a break. While this may appear as efficient time utilisation on paper, its lived reality is far more demanding. Continuous teaching demands sustained cognitive engagement, emotional responsiveness, and physical presence—all without pause.
Over time, such scheduling begins to erode both energy and enthusiasm. Teachers are expected to transition seamlessly between classes, adapting to different subjects, student temperaments, and instructional needs, without the necessary intervals for mental recalibration.
The Attention Restoration Theory (Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989) states: “Directed attention fatigue over time and requires periodic restoration.”
Without these restorative intervals, fatigue accumulates silently. It does not immediately disrupt performance, but gradually diminishes the quality of engagement, making teaching an act of endurance rather than inspiration.
Compensation Without Security
Salary structures revealed inconsistencies that extended beyond numbers. Teachers were often informed verbally about potential increments after a probation period, yet these assurances lacked written confirmation. The absence of documentation created a space where expectations and outcomes rarely aligned.
This ambiguity also affected long-term financial planning. Without clarity on increments or benefits, teachers found themselves navigating uncertainty, where professional growth was implied but not formalised.
More significantly, statutory benefits such as Provident Fund contributions were reportedly not implemented. Under Indian labour frameworks, such provisions are designed to ensure financial security beyond immediate earnings.
The gap between policy and practice reflects a broader structural concern—where regulations exist, but their application remains inconsistent, leaving employees in a state of quiet vulnerability.
Leave Policies: Between Policy and Perception
Leave policies appeared stringent, with even minimal absences resulting in salary deductions. While attendance is essential in educational institutions, the rigidity of implementation often o the human aspect of work.
Teachers began to perceive leave not as a right, but as a risk—something to be avoided unless absolutely unavoidable. This shift in perception altered how individuals approached their own well-being.
A particularly sensitive dimension was the handling of menstrual leave. The World Health Organisation defines health as:
“A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being.”
This definition extends beyond visible illness. When natural biological processes are treated with skepticism or comparison, it reflects a gap between policy awareness and empathetic practice.
Over time, such responses contribute to an environment where individuals hesitate to prioritize health, reinforcing a culture of silent endurance rather than informed support.
Language, Power, and Professional Dignity
Language within institutions carries implicit authority. Instances of abrupt communication—phrases that diminish professional respect—may appear momentary, but their impact tends to linger. Words, once spoken, shape perception and influence workplace dynamics.
When such language becomes recurrent, it subtly redefines hierarchy—not as guidance, but as control. Teachers, who are otherwise facilitators of respectful dialogue in classrooms, find themselves navigating a contrasting communicative environment.
Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of Symbolic Power explains:
“Language is not only a means of communication but also an instrument of power.” (Bourdieu, 1991)
This dynamic creates an internal contradiction. Educators are expected to model respect and empathy for students, while simultaneously adapting to communication that may not reflect those very values.
Social Isolation in Shared Spaces
Over time, social interaction among teachers became noticeably restrained. Simple gestures—greeting a colleague, sharing a smile, or sitting together—were gradually minimized. These were not formally prohibited in all cases, yet the environment fostered hesitation.
This reduction in informal interaction had deeper implications. Workplaces are not merely functional spaces; they are also social ecosystems. When these ecosystems contract, individuals begin to internalize isolation.
Erving Goffman’s Presentation of Self Theory suggests:
“Individuals modify their behaviour based on social expectations and surveillance.” (Goffman, 1959)
In such conditions, authenticity gives way to cautious behaviour. The absence of collegial warmth transforms the workplace into a space of performance rather than connection.
Micro-Management and Institutional Control
Institutional control extended into minute aspects of daily functioning. Teachers were guided on where to sit, how to sit, and even how to conduct themselves during transit duties. Such detailed oversight created an atmosphere of constant regulation.
While structure is essential in maintaining order, excessive micro-management can signal a lack of trust. It shifts the focus from professional autonomy to procedural compliance.
Douglas McGregor’s Theory X posits:
“Employees must be closely supervised and controlled.”
When institutions operate predominantly within this framework, they risk overlooking the intrinsic motivation that drives educators. Teaching, by its nature, thrives on initiative, adaptability, and independent thought—qualities that rigid control may inadvertently suppress.
Time, Meetings, and Invisible Labour
Saturdays were characterized by extended meetings, often stretching across hours without sufficient breaks. Teachers frequently found themselves unable to eat lunch, carrying it back home untouched.
While meetings are intended to enhance coordination, their effectiveness depends on clarity and purpose. Repetitive discussions without actionable outcomes contribute to fatigue rather than productivity.
Research on workplace efficiency notes:
“Unstructured meetings reduce productivity and increase cognitive load.” (Allen et al., 2014)
This phenomenon adds to what may be termed “invisible labour”—effort that is expended but not acknowledged in measurable outputs. Over time, it contributes to a sense of depletion that extends beyond physical tiredness.
Attrition as an Indicator
A noticeable number of teachers chose to leave within a limited timeframe, often citing similar concerns. Attrition, in itself, is not unusual; however, consistent patterns tend to indicate underlying systemic issues.
Each departure carries with it a story—of expectations, adjustments, and eventual decisions. When multiple such stories align, they collectively form a narrative that institutions may need to reflect upon.
The International Labour Organization observes:
“High turnover rates are often linked to poor working conditions and lack of worker engagement.”
Attrition, therefore, becomes more than a statistic—it becomes a signal, pointing toward areas that may require structural attention.
Employment Without Permanence
Employment conditions reflected a lack of long-term stability. Teachers were not readily made permanent, and salary structures lacked continuity. Even designated vacation periods were not consistently compensated.
Such uncertainty affects not only financial planning but also professional identity. Teaching, ideally a long-term commitment, begins to feel temporary.
Stability plays a crucial role in educational continuity. When teachers operate under uncertain conditions, their ability to invest deeply in institutional growth becomes limited—not by choice, but by circumstance.
Financial Expectations Beyond Salary
Uniform policies introduced additional financial considerations. Teachers were required to purchase uniforms at specified rates, with an alternative option to procure fabric independently and purchase the institutional logo separately.
While uniformity contributes to institutional identity, its financial implications for employees warrant reflection. When professional roles extend into personal expenditure, the balance between expectation and support becomes significant.
Such practices, though operational in intent, influence how employees perceive institutional priorities—whether they are viewed primarily as contributors or as participants in a shared system.
Structural Context: Beyond One Institution
It is essential to recognize that these observations are not confined to a single institution. Studies across private educational systems in India reveal recurring patterns related to contractual ambiguity, wage disparities, and regulatory gaps.
These patterns highlight a broader structural landscape where policy frameworks exist, yet their implementation varies. Institutions operate within this space, often balancing administrative priorities with educational goals.
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, underscores the importance of quality education, which inherently depends on teacher well-being. Without addressing the latter, the former remains incomplete.
The Irony of Endurance
Despite these challenges, teachers continue to perform their roles with dedication. Lessons are delivered, students are guided, and classrooms remain functional. This continuity reflects a deep sense of professional commitment.
Yet, within this commitment lies an irony. The very individuals entrusted with shaping future generations often navigate systems that limit their own professional agency.
This coexistence of dedication and constraint defines much of the contemporary teaching experience—where resilience becomes both strength and necessity.
Documentation as Possibility
This narrative does not seek to generalize or assign blame. It presents one lived experience, supported by research and aligned with broader patterns observed in educational institutions.
Real stories, when articulated with clarity and balance, create space for reflection. They allow systems to be viewed not only through policy documents, but through lived realities.
In that reflection lies possibility—the possibility of aligning institutional practices with the values that education itself seeks to promote: dignity, fairness, and human connection.
. . .
References:
- Wenger, Etienne (1998). Communities of Practice.
- Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). Attention Restoration Theory.
- World Health Organization (2019). Definition of Health.
- Bourdieu, Pierre (1991). Language and Symbolic Power.
- Goffman, Erving (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
- McGregor, Douglas (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise.
- Allen, J.A. et al. (2014). Meeting Effectiveness Research.
- International Labour Organisation. Worker Conditions Report.
- Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.