Introduction

The status of sex work in India remains a deeply contested issue, situated at the crossroads of legal frameworks, constitutional principles, and societal values. While sex work is recognized globally as a profession, in India it operates within a complex web of laws that aim to curb its practice while simultaneously failing to provide adequate protection for those involved. This essay critically examines the legal status of sex work in India, focusing on the intersection of constitutional morality, human dignity, and the fundamental rights of sex workers. Through an analysis of existing laws, judicial precedents, and societal perspectives, the essay argues that while regulation and decriminalization may be debated, sex work fundamentally conflicts with the constitutional values of dignity, equality, and justice.

1. Defining Sex Work: Legal Ambiguities and Social Stigma

In India, sex work is defined under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act (ITPA), 1956, which seeks to regulate trafficking and exploitation associated with prostitution. According to Section 2 (f) of the ITPA, sex work (prostitution) is broadly understood as "the act of a female offering her body for promiscuous sexual intercourse for hire, whether in money or in kind." However, this legal statute does not explicitly criminalize the act of engaging in sex work itself. Instead, the law focuses on criminalizing associated activities such as brothel-keeping (Section 3), soliciting in public places (Section 7), and living off the earnings of prostitution (Section 4). This partial decriminalisation leads to a legal paradox as the sale of sexual services is not illegal, engaging in activities that support the practice such as running a brothel or soliciting clients is criminalised.

The ITPA thus creates a complex legal framework where sex workers are not explicitly protected, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation and legal persecution. The law has been criticised for its inability to distinguish between voluntary and coerced sex work, leading to ambiguity in enforcement and inconsistent judicial interpretations.

For instance, in Mathew v. State of Kerala (2022), the Kerala High Court extended the scope of Section 5 of the ITPA by holding that customers could be prosecuted for "procuring" sex workers for the purpose of commercial exploitation. In contrast, earlier rulings by the Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka High Courts in similar cases held that customers could not be criminally liable under the same provisions. These conflicting judicial interpretations underscore the inconsistency in the application of the law.

2. Historical and Cultural Context of Sex Work in India

The history of sex work in India reveals a significant shift in its social and legal treatment over centuries. In ancient India, sex work was sometimes institutionalised and linked with religious practices. The devadasi system, which existed during the Vedic period, involved women who dedicated themselves to temple services and often engaged in sexual acts as part of their religious duties. These women were trained in arts like music and dance and were respected members of society. However, as patriarchal structures gained prominence, the system began to be exploited, and devadasis were increasingly subjected to forced prostitution, particularly during the colonial period.

The colonial period, especially under British rule, saw the institutionalisation of sex work through the proliferation of brothels catering to the needs of colonial officials and soldiers. During this time, women, particularly from marginalised communities, were coerced into sex work as a survival strategy. The Criminal Tribes Act (1871), which categorised certain communities as "criminal," disproportionately affected women who were forced into prostitution under the guise of regulating morality and public order.

In independent India, the ITPA (1956) sought to address the exploitation of women in sex work, anyhow its provisions, which criminalise brothel-keeping and soliciting, do not fully address the systemic issues of poverty, gender inequality, and coercion that often drive individuals, particularly women, into sex work. The continued presence of red-light areas in cities like Mumbai and Kolkata, and the rise of digital sex work through online platforms, further complicate the legal landscape and reflect the ongoing cultural and socio-economic factors that sustain sex work.

3. Legal Framework: Constitutional Morality vs. Sex Work

India's Constitution guarantees fundamental rights under Part III, particularly Articles 14 (Right to Equality), 15 (Prohibition of Discrimination), and 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). These provisions promise dignity, equality, and protection against discrimination. However, the legal framework governing sex work remains inconsistent with these constitutional guarantees, particularly in the way sex workers are treated under the law.

While the ITPA focuses on criminalising the "immoral" aspects of sex work, judicial interventions have acknowledged the dignity of sex workers under Article 21. In Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal (2011), the Supreme Court recognized that sex work, while contentious, should not undermine the dignity of sex workers, affirming that they are entitled to the same constitutional rights as any other citizen. The Court held that the State must ensure the rehabilitation of sex workers, not just through legal protections, but by addressing the root causes of their exploitation.

However, the legal framework under the ITPA and other laws such as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), particularly Section 98 and Section 99 (previously Sections 372 and 373 of the Indian Penal Code), which criminalise the exploitation of children for prostitution, creates a significant challenge to the full recognition of sex work as a legitimate profession. These laws are primarily focused on trafficking and exploitation while failing to provide adequate protections or rights for voluntary adult sex workers. Although I, like any adherent of constitutional morality, fundamentally oppose the concept of sex work, it is imperative to acknowledge the legal vulnerabilities and the ambiguous lacunae that leave individuals engaged in this practice caught between the proverbial devil and the deep blue sea.

Judicial interpretations of these laws, such as in Gaurav Jain v. Union of India (1997), where the Supreme Court ordered that the government formulate a rehabilitation policy for sex workers, underscore the need for a comprehensive approach. While the Court affirmed the right of sex workers to live with dignity, it also pointed out that the law must address exploitation, trafficking, and coercion as part of any legitimate policy reform.

4. International Perspectives: Decriminalization vs. Abolitionism

Internationally, the debate over sex work is shaped by differing legal approaches. The Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others (1949), which advocates for the abolition of sex work, has been criticised for conflating voluntary and coerced sex work. In contrast, the Palermo Protocol (2003), which supplements the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, distinguishes between trafficking and consensual sex work, focusing on the protection of victims of trafficking.

Countries like New Zealand and Germany have adopted decriminalisation or regulation models that treat sex work as a legitimate form of labour under national labour laws. New Zealand's Prostitution Reform Act (2003) decriminalises adult consensual sex work and focuses on improving health and safety standards, while Germany’s model provides legal protections for sex workers within a regulated framework. These countries argue that regulation ensures better working conditions and protection for sex workers, reducing their vulnerability to violence and exploitation.

However, critics argue that regulation still fails to address the root causes of sex work, such as poverty, lack of education, and gender inequality. In Germany, despite the regulation of sex work, reports indicate that exploitation continues under the guise of legitimacy, highlighting the persistent challenges of fully eradicating exploitation in the sex trade.

In India, the debate is particularly challenging due to cultural norms, gender inequality, and societal stigma. While some advocate for decriminalisation to protect sex workers from legal persecution, others argue that such measures would legitimise the commodification of human bodies, particularly women, and perpetuate gender-based exploitation, which I find stand. As the Supreme Court emphasised in Budhadev Karmaskar (2011), India must balance protecting the dignity of sex workers with preventing the exploitation inherent in the sex industry.

5. The Threat to Constitutional Morality and Social Order

Sex work represents more than a legal or economic issue it raises profound questions about societal values and constitutional morality. The commodification of human bodies inherent in sex work conflicts with the constitutional values of human dignity, equality, and justice. The normalisation of sex work, especially when intertwined with trafficking, organised crime, and public health crises, poses a challenge to the moral fabric of society.

As highlighted in Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal (2011), while sex workers must be treated with dignity and respect, the state must also address the exploitation and coercion that often accompany sex work. The commodification of sex, particularly involving women and children, undermines the constitutional ethos of equality and justice.

Further, while some propose the regulation of sex work as a means to protect workers, it is important to recognise that such measures risk legitimising a system that perpetuates patriarchal norms and gender-based exploitation. Legalising or regulating sex work could shift focus away from addressing systemic inequalities such as poverty, caste discrimination, and lack of education that push marginalised individuals into sex work.

Conclusion

While sex work is a complex and deeply entrenched part of Indian society, its practice is fundamentally at odds with the constitutional values of dignity, equality, and justice. The current legal framework fails to adequately protect sex workers, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation and legal persecution. While some may argue for decriminalisation or regulation, such approaches risk legitimising the commodification of human bodies and perpetuating gender inequalities. Rather than recognising sex work as a legitimate profession, India must focus on comprehensive reforms that address the root causes of sex work poverty, inequality, and exploitation and prioritise the rehabilitation and reintegration of those involved. Only through a holistic approach that upholds human dignity and constitutional morality can India move toward a society where exploitation is eradicated and justice for all is realised.

.    .    .

References:

• Bhandari, Vineet - “Sex Work in India: Legal Ambiguity and Human Rights”, published in the Indian Journal of Legal Studies, 2021.
• “Sex Work, Stigma, and Law in India: A Socio-Legal Analysis”, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 2021.
• National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) - Report on Trafficking in Women and Children (2004).
• International Labour Organization (ILO) - “The Sex Sector: The Economic and Social Bases of Prostitution in Southeast Asia” (2000).
• The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (ITPA): The primary law governing sex work in India.
• Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
• Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal, (2011) 10 SCC 283
• Gaurav Jain v. Union of India, (1997) 8 SCC 114
• Mathew v. State of Kerala, 2022
• State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Usman Mohammed Hussain, AIR 1981 SC 1062