The story from the "Rishabha-yoga" section of the Bhagavata Purana (Bhagavatam) Rishabha Deva, an avatar of Lord Vishnu, had one hundred sons. Each of these sons belonged to a different varna or caste, representing the diversity of human society. Here's a brief overview of this story:

Rishabha Deva also known as Rishabha, was a great sage and a divine incarnation who descended to guide humanity. He exemplified the ideal way of life and taught by example.

Rishabha Deva had one hundred sons, and each son was well-versed in various aspects of society and life. These sons represented different castes and professions, symbolizing the importance of each caste's role in society. Some of his sons became Brahmins, some Kshatriyas, some Vaishyas, and some Shudras, among others.

The story of Rishabhadeva's sons underscores the idea that the caste system, originally conceived as a division of labour based on aptitude and inclination, should promote harmony and cooperation among people of diverse skills and backgrounds. It teaches that all castes are essential for the proper functioning of society, and individuals should fulfill their respective roles with dedication and righteousness.

This story also emphasizes the importance of leading a virtuous and spiritually fulfilling life, as Rishabha Deva himself was an embodiment of dharma (righteousness) and devotion to God. His teachings and example were meant to guide people on the path of spiritual realization and liberation. In the Mahabharata, one of the two major Sanskrit epics of ancient India (not to be confused with the Bhagavad Gita, which is a smaller section within the Mahabharata), there is a discussion of the caste system based on one's occupation or work. The caste system, often referred to as the "varna system" in Hinduism, is a complex social structure that categorizes individuals into distinct groups or castes based on their roles and responsibilities in society. The varna system traditionally consists of four main varnas or castes, each associated with specific occupations.

Brahmins (Priests and Scholars): The Brahmins are considered the highest caste in the varna system. Their primary duty is to perform religious rituals, study and teach scriptures, and guide others in matters of spirituality. They are expected to lead a life of austerity and maintain purity.

Kshatriyas (Warriors and Rulers): Kshatriyas are responsible for protecting the kingdom and its people. They are associated with roles such as rulers, warriors, and administrators. Their duty includes upholding justice and maintaining law and order.

Vaishyas (Merchants Artisans): Vaishyas are involved in economic activities such as trade, agriculture, and craftsmanship. They play a crucial role in supporting the economic structure of society. Their responsibilities include producing and distributing goods and wealth.

Shudras (Laborers and Servants): Shudras are typically engaged in manual labor and service occupations. They provide essential services to society, such as farming, construction, and household work. Shudras serve the other three varnas and assist them in various ways.

It's important to note that the caste system described in the Mahabharata and other ancient texts was originally meant to be a division of labour based on one's aptitude and inclination rather than a rigid system of social hierarchy. Each caste had its own set of duties and responsibilities, and there was an understanding that all castes were interdependent and equally important for the functioning of society.

However, over time, the caste system became rigid, hierarchical, and associated with social discrimination and oppression, leading to the development of the untouchability concept and the formation of numerous subcastes. This rigid system was a subject of criticism and reform movements within Hinduism and Indian society, and efforts were made to promote social equality and eradicate discrimination, particularly during the modern era. In contemporary India, the caste system is officially prohibited by law, and affirmative action measures have been implemented to promote social and economic opportunities for historically disadvantaged groups. Despite these efforts, caste-based discrimination and inequalities persist to some extent in various aspects of Indian society

A person's caste is not solely determined by birth but also by their actions and character. The message is more symbolic, emphasizing the importance of moral character and actions over one's birth or caste. The story reinforces the idea that one's caste should not be a determinant of their worth or righteousness in the eyes of the divine. The idea that caste is not determined by birth but by one's actions and character is a philosophical concept found in various Hindu scriptures and teachings. This concept challenges the traditional notion of caste as a rigid and hereditary system and instead emphasizes the importance of a person's qualities and deeds in defining their true identity and social standing. Here's a description of this concept

Merit-Based Caste System: In this perspective, one's caste is seen as a reflection of their qualities, skills, and actions rather than their birth into a particular family. This means that individuals are classified into different castes based on their inherent qualities, aptitudes, and the type of work they are naturally inclined to perform

Character and Virtue: The emphasis is placed on an individual's moral character and virtues. Those who display qualities such as honesty, integrity, compassion, and selflessness are considered to belong to a higher caste. Conversely, those who exhibit negative traits like greed, cruelty, and dishonesty are considered to be in a lower caste.

Actions and Duties: People are categorized into castes based on the duties and responsibilities they choose to undertake in society. Each caste is associated with specific roles and responsibilities, and individuals are classified according to the type of work they willingly engage in

Karma and Dharma: The concept of karma (the law of cause and effect) and dharma (duty or righteousness) plays a significant role in this perspective. It is believed that individuals create their destiny through their actions (karma), and by fulfilling their duties and responsibilities (dharma), they can elevate themselves spiritually and socially

Social Mobility: This concept allows for social mobility, meaning that individuals can change their caste or social status based on their personal growth and transformation. If someone from a lower caste demonstrates virtuous qualities and skills, they can rise to a higher social position.

Spiritual evolution:

Ultimately, this perspective is tied to the idea of spiritual evolution. By cultivating positive qualities and adhering to their duties with dedication and integrity, individuals can progress on the spiritual path and ultimately attain liberation (moksha) from the cycle of birth and death. It's important to note that while this philosophy exists within Hinduism, the practical application of the caste system has often been far more rigid and hierarchical throughout history. Social reformers and movements within Hinduism have advocated for a more egalitarian interpretation of caste, emphasizing the idea that a person's worth should not be determined solely by their birth but by their conduct and character, as described above.

In the advanced era we live in today, there is no need for categorizing individuals by their caste or social background, such as SC (Scheduled Caste) and ST (Scheduled Tribe). In an ideal society, caste and social background should not play a role in determining an individual's opportunities or privileges. They advocate for a more merit-based and equal society where people are judged based on their abilities and achievements rather than their caste or social identity.

The stance on this issue can vary significantly depending on cultural, social, and political factors, and opinions may differ widely. Ultimately, whether caste names like SC and ST are needed in this advanced era is a matter of ongoing debate, and it varies from one society to another. societal norms and policies will continue to evolve in response to changing attitudes and needs.

Categorizing individuals based on their financial position is a concept that aligns with the idea of socioeconomic status (SES) or economic background. In this present era, SES can be a more equitable and relevant way to address disparities and provide assistance compared to categorizing individuals by caste or social background. Here are some reasons why categorizing by financial position can be considered beneficial:

Economic Equity: Focusing on economic status allows for a more equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. It targets individuals who are economically disadvantaged, regardless of their caste or social identity.

Merit-Based: Categorizing by financial position emphasizes a merit-based system where assistance is provided based on actual needs rather than historical or social factors.

Reduced Stigmatization: It can help reduce stigmatization associated with caste and social categories. People may feel less marginalized when assistance is provided based on financial need rather than social identity.

Efficiency: Targeting individuals based on their economic status can lead to more efficient allocation of resources, as it directly addresses the root cause of many disparities.

Adaptability: Economic status is a dynamic factor that can change over time. Categorizing based on financial position allows for adjustments as individuals' circumstances change.

Targeted Assistance: Categorizing by poverty allows for the precise targeting of assistance to those who are most in need. It ensures that resources are directed towards individuals and communities facing economic hardships.

Data-Driven Policy: Poverty categorization relies on data and metrics to identify those in need, making it more objective and transparent compared to other categorization methods. It's important to implement poverty categorization systems with care, ensuring that they are accurate, fair, and sensitive to the unique circumstances of different communities. Additionally, efforts should be made to reduce the systemic factors that contribute to poverty and economic inequality.

The goal should always be to promote fairness, social justice, and equal opportunities for all members of society.

.    .    .