Photo by Roberto Sorin on Unsplash

On May 20, India will see a rare event where more than 12 lakh chemists across the country will shut their shops for a day. This strike, called by the All India Organisation of Chemists and Druggists (AIOCD), is not just about business rivalry. It is about the future of healthcare access, patient safety, and the survival of small pharmacies in the face of fast-growing online platforms.

Why Are Chemists Striking?

The strike is rooted in concerns about illegal e-pharmacies and the way they operate. Traditional chemists argue that these online platforms are breaking rules and putting patients at risk.

  • Prescription misuse: Online pharmacies often allow the same prescription to be used multiple times. This makes it easy to buy antibiotics or habit-forming medicines without proper checks. The danger here is real, where misuse of antibiotics can lead to antimicrobial resistance, which makes infections harder to treat.
  • Fake prescriptions: Chemists warn that digital platforms can be misused to generate fake prescriptions, even with artificial intelligence tools. This undermines the trust and safety that physical chemists try to maintain.
  • Deep discounts: Corporate-backed e-pharmacies offer discounts of 20–60%. Small chemists cannot compete with such pricing. They argue that this is not healthy competition but a pricing war that could wipe out local shops.

For chemists, this is not just about losing customers. It is about losing the community role they have played for decades, being the first point of advice for patients, especially in rural and semi-urban areas.

The Regulatory Flashpoints

At the heart of the dispute are two government notifications:

  • G.S.R. 220(E): Introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic to make medicine access easier during lockdowns. Chemists say it weakens safeguards under Drug Rule 65, which ensures prescriptions are properly checked.
  • G.S.R. 817(E): Linked to e-pharmacy operations, this notification allows online platforms to bypass traditional compliance norms.

Chemists argue that these rules were meant for an emergency situation but are now being misused. They want both notifications scrapped, saying temporary relaxations should not become permanent loopholes.

Voices from Assam and Other States

In Assam, local chemist associations have strongly backed the strike. They argue that if small pharmacies shut down, rural communities will suffer first. Online services are not equally accessible everywhere, especially in areas with poor internet connectivity.

This reflects a larger anxiety of India’s pharmacy network that has always been local and community-based. Chemists often act as informal health advisors, guiding patients before they even see a doctor. Losing them would mean losing a trusted part of the healthcare system.

Karnataka’s Different Approach

Interestingly, not all states are fully supporting the strike. In Karnataka, the government has asked pharmacies to stay open to avoid disruption. Local trade bodies there plan to protest symbolically by wearing black ribbons while continuing to serve patients.

Their reasoning is practical bands have not changed laws in the past. They believe dialogue and legal amendments may be more effective than shutting shops. This shows that while chemists across India share the same concerns, their strategies differ.

What Will Be Open and Closed?

Reports suggest that on May 20:

  • Closed: Retail medical shops, independent pharmacies, and wholesale distributors in states like Gujarat, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Tripura.
  • Open: Government hospitals, emergency hospital pharmacies, Jan Aushadhi Kendras, and selected 24-hour emergency centres.

Patients with chronic conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure, thyroid issues, heart disease, and respiratory issues are advised to buy medicines in advance. For many families, this strike will be a reminder of how dependent they are on local chemists for daily healthcare needs.

The Bigger Picture: Tradition vs. Technology

This strike highlights a clash between tradition and technology.

  • Digital platforms: They offer convenience, home delivery, and lower prices. For elderly patients or those with mobility issues, this is a huge advantage.
  • Local chemists: They provide trust, immediate access, and personal guidance. In rural areas, where doctors are scarce, chemists often act as the first line of healthcare.

The challenge for policymakers is to balance innovation with regulation. Online pharmacies cannot be ignored, as they are part of the future. But neither can the role of small chemists, who form the backbone of India’s healthcare supply chain.

The May 20 strike is more than a one-day disruption. It is a symbolic battle for the future of medicine access in India. On one side are tech-driven platforms promising efficiency and affordability. On the other hand, community chemists safeguard patient trust and safety.

The government must act decisively:

  • Clarify regulations for online pharmacies, so they operate within clear boundaries.
  • Ensure fair competition so small chemists are not wiped out by predatory pricing.
  • Protect patient safety by enforcing strict prescription verification and preventing misuse.

If left unresolved, this conflict could reshape India’s healthcare landscape in ways that hurt both patients and providers. The strike is a wake-up call that India needs a balanced, transparent, and inclusive policy that embraces technology without abandoning tradition.

May 20 is not just about pharmacies shutting down for a day. It is about the future of healthcare in India, whether it will remain rooted in local trust or be dominated by digital giants.

Chemists are asking for fairness, safety, and recognition of their role in society. Patients, meanwhile, want convenience and affordability but also reliability. The government stands at the crossroads, tasked with finding a middle path that protects both innovation and tradition.

.    .    .

References: