Recent news indicates a significant shift in India's approach to boosting railway connections with its northeastern states. It appears that India has decided to temporarily stop funding and construction work on railway projects in neighbouring Bangladesh, projects that together amount to nearly ₹5,000 crore. This decision comes as a result of concerns raised by Indian authorities regarding the ongoing "political turmoil" and the "safety of labour" within Bangladesh.
The Goal: Connecting India's Northeast
It's important to understand why these railway projects in Bangladesh were initiated in the first place. The primary aim was to improve how India's mainland connects with its seven northeastern states. Geographically, these states are somewhat isolated and using Bangladesh as a transit route that offered a more direct and efficient way to move goods and people. However, the current situation in Bangladesh has led to worries about the stability and security of the region. The term "political turmoil" suggests a period of unrest and uncertainty which naturally raises concerns about the safety of workers involved in these large-scale construction projects. Protecting the workforce is a top priority and the prevailing conditions seem to have made it difficult to ensure their well-being.
Projects Put on Hold
Several important railway projects have been affected by this decision. These include:
- The Akhaura–Agartala Cross-Border Rail Link: This project aimed to establish a direct rail connection between India and Bangladesh, specifically linking Akhaura in Bangladesh with Agartala in India.
- The Khulna–Mongla Port Rail Line: This line was crucial for improving connectivity to the Mongla Port in Bangladesh which would have facilitated trade and transportation for India's northeast.
- The Dhaka–Tongi–Joydebpur Rail Expansion: This project focused on expanding the existing rail network in Bangladesh around Dhaka to handle increased traffic.
In addition to these ongoing projects, surveys for five other proposed railway routes through Bangladesh have also been stopped for now.
Exploring Alternatives: Nepal and Bhutan
Faced with the current challenges in Bangladesh, India is now actively looking at alternative routes to connect with its northeastern states. Two neighbouring countries, Nepal and Bhutan, are being considered as potential transit corridors. India already has existing agreements with Nepal regarding railway connectivity and Bhutan's geographical location by bordering India's northeast, makes it another viable option. While these alternative routes might present their own logistical hurdles, they could offer a more dependable and secure way for India to maintain regional rail connections by reducing its reliance on Bangladesh.
Strengthening Internal Infrastructure: Focus on the "Chicken's Neck"
Alongside exploring external alternatives, India is also focusing on strengthening its internal infrastructure. A key area of attention is the strategically important Siliguri Corridor, often referred to as the "Chicken's Neck." This narrow strip of land connects India's northeast with the rest of the country. To improve connectivity through this crucial corridor, Indian railway authorities are speeding up efforts to double or even quadruple the existing rail lines in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. These states serve as important feeder regions for the Siliguri Corridor. Reports indicate that survey work for these expansion projects is already in progress.
India's Lifeline: Understanding the Strategic Importance of the Siliguri Corridor
Imagine a slender thread connecting a vibrant tapestry to its main body. This thread in the context of India is the Siliguri Corridor, a narrow strip of land situated in the state of West Bengal. This crucial passage serves as India's only land-based link to its eight northeastern states, a region full with cultural diversity and strategic significance. Often referred to as the 'Chicken's Neck' due to its shape on the map, this corridor is remarkably narrow by measuring just 22 kilometers at its most restricted point. For a long time, this geographical reality has presented a significant strategic vulnerability for India. Any disruption here could effectively sever the connection between the northeastern states – Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura – and the rest of the nation.
Geopolitical Significance: A Region Under Scrutiny
The geopolitical importance of the Siliguri Corridor cannot be overstated. Settled between Nepal and Bangladesh with Bhutan and China not far away, this small stretch of land is vital for the movement of both civilians and military supplies. The security of this corridor is paramount as any obstruction poses a direct threat to India's territorial integrity.
Recent remarks by Bangladesh's interim chief advisor, Muhammad Yunus, have brought renewed focus to this region. His description of India's northeastern states as "landlocked" and his assertion of Bangladesh as their "guardian of ocean access" have raised eyebrows and underscored the delicate geopolitical dynamics at play.
Furthermore, China's increasing military infrastructure in the vicinity of the India-Bhutan-China tri-junction has added another layer of complexity to the security considerations surrounding the Siliguri Corridor. The 2017 Doklam standoff served as a stark reminder of the region's vulnerability, prompting India to boost its defenses. The reliance on a single railway line as the primary supply route through the corridor also remains a strategic worry as it could become a target in the event of conflict.
India's Proactive Measures: Seeking Alternative Routes
Recognizing the inherent risks associated with over-dependence on the Siliguri Corridor, India has been actively pursuing alternative connectivity options. Leveraging the India-Bangladesh Trade Agreement of 1980, India has been exploring transit routes through Bangladesh to enhance connectivity with its northeastern states.
A significant step in this direction was taken in 1992 when India granted Bangladesh the use of the Tin Bigha corridor, facilitating access to the Dahagram-Angarpota enclave. More recently, India has been diligently developing a railway network through Bangladesh to improve the connection between the Northeast and the rest of the country.
A Shift in Strategy is required
India's decision to pause railway projects in Bangladesh reflects a cautious approach in the face of regional instability. While these projects held significant promise for enhancing connectivity, ensuring the safety of personnel and the smooth progress of work is paramount. By exploring alternative routes through Nepal and Bhutan, by strengthening its internal infrastructure, India is demonstrating a proactive strategy to secure reliable and resilient connectivity with its northeastern states in the long run. This situation highlights the complex interplay between infrastructure development and geopolitical realities in the region.
. . .
References: