India has taken a transformative step in its energy policy with President Droupadi Murmu's assent to the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill. This legislative milestone represents more than just administrative reform, and it signals a reimagining of how India will power its future while balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability.
Breaking Down Decades-Old Barriers
For over six decades, India's nuclear sector operated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1962, a law drafted in an era when the world looked vastly different. That framework, along with the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010, created a regulatory environment that unintentionally stifled growth in civil nuclear energy. The 2010 liability law, in particular, became infamous among industry observers as a warning to both domestic and international investment, making potential participants cautious of the legal and financial risks involved.
The SHANTI Act emphasises these outdated regulations by combining India's entire civil nuclear legal framework into a single, modern statute. This isn't merely administrative housekeeping, and it's a recognition that India's energy needs have evolved dramatically since independence, and its laws must evolve accordingly.
Opening the Door to Private Enterprise
Perhaps the most significant shift brought by SHANTI is the invitation extended to private companies and joint ventures. For the first time in India's history, private entities can now build, own, operate, and eventually decommission nuclear power plants, though only under government license and a strict regulatory regime.
This measured opening reflects a practical approach to modernisation. India recognises that achieving its ambitious energy targets requires mobilising resources and expertise beyond what government entities alone can provide. Private sector participation brings capital, technological innovation, and operational efficiency that can accelerate the expansion of nuclear capacity.
However, this isn't a wholesale privatization. The government has drawn clear boundaries around what remains exclusively in public hands. Sensitive activities include uranium and thorium mining, enrichment processes, isotopic separation, reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel, management of high-level radioactive waste, and heavy water production, will continue to be the sole domain of the central government or government-owned entities. This dual approach demonstrates knowledge connecting private sector dynamism while maintaining state control over activities with the highest security and environmental implications.
Strengthening the Regulatory Architecture
A crucial element often overlooked in discussions about SHANTI is its institutional strengthening of nuclear regulation. The Act grants statutory recognition to the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, elevating it from its previous administrative status to a body with clear legal authority and independence.
This matters immensely for public confidence and international cooperation. Nuclear energy, despite its potential, carries risks that demand a rigorous and clear understanding. By establishing the regulatory board on securer legal footing, India signals its commitment to maintaining the highest safety standards even as it expands capacity. This regulatory clarity also makes India a more attractive partner for international nuclear cooperation, as foreign entities can now engage with a well-defined, authoritative regulatory framework.
The Clean Energy Imperative
SHANTI arrives at a critical stage in India's development trajectory. The country faces a dual challenge of meeting the energy demands of a growing economy while honouring commitments to reduce carbon emissions. Nuclear energy offers a solution to this apparent contradiction by providing large-scale, reliable baseload power without the greenhouse gas emissions associated with fossil fuels.
India's current nuclear capacity stands at 8.78 gigawatts, contributing modestly to the national electricity mix. The government projects this will be more than double to over 22 gigawatts by 2031-32, utilising both indigenous 700-megawatt reactors and larger 1000-megawatt reactors developed through international partnerships. Looking further ahead, the ultimate goal is achieving 100 gigawatts of nuclear capacity by 2047 which is a target that would position nuclear energy as a cornerstone of India's electricity generation.
These aren't merely aspirational numbers. They represent a strategic vision for energy security and environmental responsibility. As solar and wind power face essential challenges, nuclear energy provides the steady, round-the-clock generation necessary for industrial operations and urban centers.
A Measured Path Forward
What makes SHANTI particularly noteworthy is its balanced approach. Rather than listing toward either a complete state monopoly or unregulated privatisation, it charts a middle path. This reflects maturity in policymaking, acknowledging both the legitimate role of private enterprise in development and the non-negotiable need for states in sensitive sectors.
The Act also demonstrates India's willingness to learn from past mistakes. The previous liability framework created such uncertainty that it effectively blocked progress for years. SHANTI's repeal of that problematic legislation, while establishing clearer rules for private participation, shows practical adaptation based on experience.
The SHANTI Act represents more than legal reform; it embodies a vision for India's energy future that is both ambitious and realistic. By modernizing regulations, inviting private participation within defined boundaries and strengthening oversight mechanisms, India has created conditions for nuclear energy to finally realize its potential in the country's electricity combination.
As India directs the complex transition towards a cleaner energy future, nuclear power is supported by this new legislative framework that will play an increasingly vital role. The success of SHANTI will ultimately be measured not in its legal provisions but in gigawatts generated, carbon emissions avoided, and economic opportunities created while maintaining the highest standards of safety and security.
. . .
References: