The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has identified several irregularities in the process of granting loans against gold ornaments and jewellery by raising concerns about the current practices of some financial institutions. To address these issues, the RBI has called on all supervised entities to thoroughly review their gold loan policies, procedures and practices to identify gaps and make necessary improvements.
Key Issues in Gold Loan Practices
The RBI conducted a detailed review of loans secured against gold which included an on-site examination of select institutions. The findings from these reviews have revealed several concerning practices that need immediate attention. Some of the major issues include:
- Use of Third Parties for Loan Appraisals: It was found that some institutions were relying on third-party agents to source and appraise gold loans. This practice often led to inaccurate valuations and sometimes they were done without the customer's presence.
- Inadequate Customer Due Diligence: Institutions were found to be falling short in verifying the authenticity and financial background of customers before approving gold loans, leading to potential risks.
- Lack of Transparency in Gold Auctions: When customers defaulted on their loans, the process of auctioning pledged gold ornaments was often unclear and lacked transparency by raising concerns about fairness in these auctions.
- Improper Monitoring of Loan-to-Value Ratios (LTV): The review highlighted weaknesses in how institutions monitored the loan-to-value ratios which determine the amount of loan granted against the value of the pledged gold.
- Incorrect Risk-Weight Application: Some entities were also found to be incorrectly applying risk-weights to their gold loans which could result in inaccurate financial reporting and increased risk for the institution.
Governance and Transaction Monitoring Issues in Gold Loans
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has expressed concerns over weak governance and inadequate transaction monitoring in the gold loan sector. A major issue identified was the practice of granting multiple gold loans to the same individual within a single financial year, all using the same Permanent Account Number (PAN). Additionally, it was common for loans to be extended at the end of their terms with only partial repayments being made by the borrowers.
Cash Disbursements Beyond Legal Limits
The RBI further pointed out that some institutions were disbursing a large portion of these gold loans in cash that would often exceed the cash transaction limits established by the Income Tax Act of 1961. This raised alarms as it violated legal cash transaction guidelines, potentially enabling unregulated financial activities.
Mismanagement of Non-Performing Assets (NPAs)
Another critical concern was the failure of some entities to classify overdue gold loans as non-performing assets (NPAs). Rather than marking these overdue loans as NPAs, financial institutions were found rolling them over by either renewing the loans or issuing new ones in their place. According to the RBI, this practice reflected the true financial health of these loans by potentially hiding risks from stakeholders.
Lack of Oversight and Control
The RBI also highlighted a significant lack of oversight by senior management and boards of directors, who were not adequately monitoring the loan disbursement and repayment processes. Furthermore, there were weaknesses in the control measures over third-party entities involved in the lending process. This lack of supervision contributed to the ongoing issues in loan management by raising concerns about the overall governance within these institutions.
The RBI’s observations emphasized the need for stricter governance and better transaction monitoring within the gold loan sector, particularly in cash handling, loan categorization and oversight mechanisms.
Compliance and Regulatory Guidelines for Gold Loans: A Closer Look RBI’s Advisory to Lenders
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has called on lenders to conduct a thorough review of their policies and procedures concerning gold loans. This advisory aims to help lenders identify and address gaps in their systems, including any issues highlighted in the RBI’s guidelines. The RBI has urged lenders to take swift corrective actions to fix these shortcomings.
A key focus of the RBI's advice is for lenders to keep a close watch on their gold loan portfolios. This recommendation is particularly crucial given the substantial growth seen in some lending institutions offering gold loans. With this rapid expansion, ensuring that the lending processes remain robust and secure is vital. Additionally, the central bank has stressed the importance of properly managing outsourced tasks and third-party service providers involved in the gold loan process. This ensures that these external partners are held to the same high standards as the lenders themselves.
Governor’s Concern Over Mismanagement
RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das has also raised concerns over the practice of offering top-up loans on existing collateralised loans including gold loans. While these loans can provide additional liquidity to borrowers, some lenders are not strictly following the regulations concerning Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratios, risk weights, and the monitoring of how these funds are being used. The Governor cautioned that improper misunderstanding of these areas could result in loaned funds being diverted into unproductive or speculative ventures. Such misuse not only undermines the purpose of the loans but also exposes the financial system to unnecessary risks.
RBI's Response and Recommendations
In response to these findings, the RBI has advised all supervised entities to not only review their gold loan policies but to also take swift corrective measures. These steps should be completed within a specific time frame by ensuring that any gaps in the current processes are addressed.
The RBI emphasised the importance of closely monitoring the gold loan portfolio, especially given the recent significant growth in such loans at certain institutions. Additionally, it stressed the need for tighter controls over outsourced activities and third-party service providers involved in the loan appraisal process.
Consequences of Non-compliance
Entities are required to inform the Senior Supervisory Manager (SSM) at the RBI about the actions they have taken within three months. The RBI has warned that any failure to comply with the regulatory guidelines will be taken seriously, and may result in supervisory actions which could include penalties or other enforcement measures.
By taking these steps, the RBI aims to bring greater transparency and accountability to the process of granting loans against gold, ultimately ensuring that both institutions and customers are protected.
. . .
References: