India has been labelled as one of the most dangerous countries for women by reflecting a deep-rooted issue that demands urgent attention. In 2021, Indian police registered approximately 31,677 rape cases, highlighting the brutality of the situation. This alarming figure highlights a society still rooted in patriarchy, where women frequently fall prey to those they know. A report from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) reveals a startling statistic: 96% of rapes in India are perpetrated by someone the victim is aware of.
The call for stringent laws is a common reaction, but it raises the question: what constitutes a tough law? The effectiveness of a law should not solely depend on its severity but on its ability to be enforced and deliver justice. Therefore, it's not just the laws that need to be robust; the efficiency of investigative and prosecuting agencies must also be enhanced. An effective legal framework, supported by diligent law enforcement, is crucial for ensuring the safety and justice that women in India deserve.
Understanding Rape Under Indian Law
Rape, according to Indian law, involves any form of sexual intercourse or penetration by a man on a woman without her consent. Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code lays out the specific actions that are considered rape. These include:
- A man inserting his penis or any object into a woman's vagina, mouth, urethra, or anus, or compelling her to do so with him or another person.
- A man manipulating any part of a woman's body to cause penetration into her vagina, urethra, anus, or any other part or forcing her to perform such acts with him or another person.
- A man applying his mouth to a woman's vagina, anus, or urethra, or making her do the same with him or another person.
The law makes it clear that the degree of penetration is irrelevant; even minimal penetration qualifies as rape.
The Injustice of Victim Blaming
Victim blaming is a prevalent issue where rape is frequently regarded as the victim’s fault. Instead of offering support, questions are directed at the victim by focusing on their clothing, location, and company, rather than addressing the perpetrator’s actions. This approach unfairly places the responsibility for the crime on the victim's behaviour and appearance by ignoring the mental state and liability of the attacker.
Evaluating victims based on their outfits and actions shifts the onus of protection onto their conduct. This societal tendency to blame the victim raises an environment where rape becomes more acceptable. Everyday sexism such as moral policing of women, discriminatory dress codes for girls in schools, and derogatory language, exacerbates the problem. In Indian society, rape victims often face harsher treatment than the perpetrators. Identifying survivors by name or other means can lead to mistreatment and abandonment by their families.
Victim blaming is displayed in various ways. It appears when a mother hesitates to report her daughter's rape for fear of losing her dignity. It is evident when officials delay filing reports, dismissing the victim’s account as emotional or questioning her presence out late. It happens when doctors fail to prioritize rape cases or include pertinent details in their reports.
Societal statements also reflect this blame by suggesting that men are provoked by women’s attire or that early marriage for girls can prevent sexual crimes. Essentially, anything but the rapist is held responsible for the crime. Misconduct by a girl is seen as bringing disgrace to her entire family, unlike when a boy misbehaves.
As a nation, we often mobilize protests for rape victims only after they have died yet fail to defend and support them while they are alive. This disparity highlights the urgent need for societal change to stop blaming victims and start holding perpetrators accountable.
Betrayal of Trust: Job Seeker Targeted in Alleged Rape
A disturbing incident has come to light in Mumbai by highlighting the vulnerability of those seeking employment. A 24-year-old woman, a resident of Thane was allegedly raped by a man posing as a potential job provider. The arrested accused identified as 50-year-old Joseph James has shaken the trust many job seekers place in professional connections.
The victim in her search for a job reached out to a male friend for assistance. This seemingly harmless act of seeking help from an acquaintance backfired tragically. The friend provided Joseph's contact by leading the victim to believe he could be a legitimate job prospect. This misplaced trust appears to be how James lured the woman into a vulnerable situation.
The friend's call requesting a meeting with Joseph in Khar further confirmed the fake opportunity of a professional setting. The victim who was eager for an opportunity, readily agreed. However, the evening took a sharp turn when the three people ended up at a hotel by consuming alcohol. This detail raises concerns about the friend's involvement and potential knowledge of James' intentions.
The late-night departure from the hotel highlights a further manipulative tactic. James allegedly offered to drop the victim home as a seemingly helpful gesture. However, his claim of unavailable trains and the suggestion of sleeping in his car paint a disturbing picture. The victim's account of being raped in the car after 3 am underlines the calculated nature of the crime.
The alleged threat by James to silence the victim further exposes the perpetrator's attempt to exploit the power imbalance. Thankfully, the victim revealed this to a lawyer friend by demonstrating remarkable courage in seeking justice. This act ultimately led to a police complaint and James' arrest.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the dangers faced by job seekers, particularly those relying on unofficial channels. It emphasizes the importance of caution when approaching unfamiliar individuals offering employment opportunities. The case also highlights the significance of a strong support system as the victim's lawyer friend played a crucial role in ensuring her safety and securing legal recourse.
. . .
References: