India's Parliament has taken a decisive step towards reshaping the country's insurance landscape. The Sabka Bima Sabki Raksha Bill passed both houses of Parliament the previous week, with the Rajya Sabha approving it on December 17, 2025, allowing foreign direct investment in insurance to increase from 74 percent to a full 100 percent. This legislative move represents more than just a numerical adjustment; it signals India's willingness to embrace global capital while attempting to extend insurance coverage to millions of underserved citizens.
The Promise of Full Foreign Investment
The reform could potentially inject between $10 billion and $20 billion into India's insurance sector over the next five years, according to industry estimates. This isn't merely about attracting money; it's about bringing in expertise, technology, and competitive practices that could fundamentally alter how insurance operates in India.
The bill amends three foundational pieces of legislation that include the Insurance Act of 1938, the Life Insurance Corporation Act of 1956, and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act of 1999. These amendments reflect an acknowledgement that India's insurance framework, built for a different era, needs modernisation to serve today's needs.
Consider the ground reality where India's insurance sector stands at just 4.2 percent of GDP, significantly below the global average of 7 percent, despite the sector growing by 15.2 percent in 2024-25. Even more striking is that only 37 percent of Indians have any form of insurance coverage. For a nation of 1.4 billion people, this represents an enormous protection gap that leaves families vulnerable to financial devastation from medical emergencies, accidents, or natural disasters.
The Human Dimension
The impact of inadequate insurance coverage isn't abstract. The document references a Delhi autorickshaw driver whose family was saved from debt by affordable health coverage and it was a reminder that behind every statistic are real people whose lives can be overturned by unforeseen circumstances. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman emphasised that full FDI would fuel innovation, potentially reducing premiums by 10 to 15 percent while extending policies to remote villages.
This vision of "Sabka Bima, Sabki Raksha", insurance for all, protection for all will resonate with India's inclusive development goals. The question is whether increased foreign participation will actually deliver on this promise or primarily benefit urban, affluent consumers while leaving rural India behind.
Regulatory Strengthening and Consumer Safeguards
To its credit, the legislation doesn't simply open without safeguards. The bill establishes a dedicated Policyholders' Education and Protection Fund to raise awareness about insurance products, and aligns data collection with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023. These provisions acknowledge legitimate concerns about consumer protection in an increasingly complex financial marketplace.
The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India receives enhanced powers, including the ability to recover wrongful gains from insurers and intermediaries. Additionally, foreign insurers must list 25 percent of their equity on Indian stock exchanges within five years, ensuring some level of local participation and transparency.
The bill also makes practical operational improvements. It allows one-time licensing of intermediaries, raises the threshold for regulatory approval of share transfers from 1 percent to 5 percent, and reduces the net owned fund requirement for foreign reinsurance branches from Rs 5,000 crore to Rs 1,000 crore. These changes should reduce bureaucratic friction and make it easier for companies to operate efficiently.
The Voices of Dissent
Not everyone celebrates this reform. The parliamentary debates revealed significant political divisions that reflect genuine concerns about economic nationalism and social equity. AIADMK's C. Robert Bruce warned that foreign firms might cherry-pick urban profits while ignoring rural India, describing the bill as risking the nationalisation of losses while privatising gains.
Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge, while acknowledging good intent, criticised the quick passage and lack of safeguards for micro, small, and medium enterprises, wherein it was a warning of potential job losses as foreign entities combine operations. The reflection of 50,000 job cuts haunts these debates, though government data suggests earlier FDI increases actually created employment. Even the Trinamool Congress, which supported the bill, had expressed reservations with Derek O'Brien suggesting caps on foreign voting rights and enforcement of rural quotas. These conditional endorsements highlight that even supporters doubt about whether market forces alone will serve public interest.
What Success Looks Like
For this reform to succeed on its own terms, several conditions must be met. First, premium reductions must materialise and reach ordinary consumers, not just corporate clients. Second, rural diffusion must genuinely increase, with insurers developing products suited to agricultural risks, informal sector workers, and low-income families. Third, job creation must exceed job displacement as the sector modernises.
Fourth, and perhaps most critically, regulatory oversight must be robust enough to prevent the mis-selling and predatory practices that have affected insurance markets globally. A 2025 survey found 62 percent of urban Indians worry about foreign companies handling their data, by suggesting trust still remains breakable. The announced Rs 5,000 crore Insurance Development Fund targeting districts with zero penetration shows awareness of these challenges. Whether it proves sufficient is another matter entirely.
A Measured Confidence
The Sabka Bima Sabki Raksha Bill represents a calculated chance wherein market forces, properly channelled through regulation, can deliver financial protection to India's vast uninsured population. History suggests such chances sometimes pay off handsomely and sometimes create new vulnerabilities while solving old problems. The legislation's success will ultimately be measured not by capital inflows or industry growth rates, but by whether a Delhi autorickshaw driver or a marginal farmer in a remote village can access affordable, reliable insurance that protects their family from financial ruin. That's the promise of "insurance for all, protection for all", and it's the standard against which this reform should be judged.
As implementation begins, with presidential assent expected by year's end and regulatory notifications to follow, the insurance sector stands at an inflection point. Whether this opening creates a more resilient, inclusive financial ecosystem or simply shifts ownership structures without transforming outcomes depends largely on how rigorously regulators enforce the bill's protective provisions and how creatively the industry serves underserved markets.
The door is now open. What walks through it and who it serves will shape India's financial security landscape for decades to come.
. . .
References: