Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash
The passage of the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Bill 2025 in the Lok Sabha on November 30, 2025, represents more than just technical tax legislation. It embodies the complex intersection of fiscal federalism, crisis governance, and the urgent need for administrative normalcy in a state torn by ethnic violence. As Parliament's Winter Session opened amid considerable political turbulence, this bill's approval, alongside substantial supplementary grants, offers a window into how democratic institutions function when states face existential challenges.
Legislating Under President's Rule: A Necessary Exception
Manipur has been under President's Rule since February 2025, a direct consequence of ethnic clashes that have beset the state since May 2023. When state governance collapses, the Constitution empowers the Union government to step in, but this also means that ordinary legislative processes are suspended. The use of emergency ordinances and executive orders that bypass normal parliamentary debate becomes necessary but raises important questions about democratic accountability.
This particular bill began life as an ordinance promulgated on October 7, 2025. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced it to Parliament to replace that ordinance and give it proper legislative sanction. This process matters because ordinances are temporary measures that must be converted into Acts within a limited timeframe. The fact that this is actually the second such amendment in 2025, following an earlier ordinance in June that lapsed, illustrates how Manipur's extended crisis has necessitated repeated interventions to keep even basic tax administration functioning.
What's at stake here goes beyond procedural propriety. Manipur's economy, modest at approximately five thousand crore rupees and heavily dependent on agriculture and handloom industries, desperately needs a functioning tax system. Without it, revenue collection stalls, essential services deteriorate further, and the already fragile recovery becomes even more uncertain.
Understanding the Technical Reforms
The amendments themselves serve multiple purposes, but their primary objective is harmonisation, bringing Manipur's state GST regime in line with national standards established by the 56th GST Council. Since India's GST system is cooperative with both central and state governments levying taxes on the same transactions, maintaining uniformity across states is essential for businesses operating across state boundaries.
The bill consolidates tax rates into a more rational structure, standard rates of five percent and eighteen percent for most goods and services, with luxury items attracting forty percent. This simplification reduces confusion for traders and should improve compliance. Small businesses in Manipur, already struggling with the fallout from ethnic violence, will benefit from clearer rules that don't require extensive tax expertise to direct.
Several technical provisions deserve attention. Section 11A addresses a practical problem that arises when businesses unknowingly violate tax rules because they're following what seems like standard industry practice. The new provision allows authorities to waive recovery of state GST in such cases, a sensible approach that balances enforcement with practicality. Similarly, adding co-insurance and reinsurance activities to Schedule III exempts them from taxation, recognising their unique financial structure.
Section 74A introduces time-bound resolution mechanisms for tax defaults from the 2024-25 fiscal year onward. This matters particularly in Manipur's context, where businesses may have genuine difficulty meeting obligations due to the security situation. The provision applies retrospectively from November 1, 2024, and offers various relaxations on input tax credit claims for the years 2017-2021, along with waivers on interest and penalties for the period from July 2017 to March 2020.
These may sound like technicalities, but they translate into real relief for businesses trying to maintain operations during extraordinarily difficult circumstances. Reduced pre-deposit requirements for appeals means businesses can challenge tax assessments without first paying disputed amounts that might bankrupt them.
The Path Forward
As this bill awaits Rajya Sabha approval to become law, it's worth reflecting on what it represents. On one level, it's a necessary technical fix to keep tax administration functioning in a state under central control. On another level, it's a test of whether cooperative federalism can work even in the most challenging circumstances, whether national institutions can support a state in crisis without simply imposing solutions from Delhi.
The integration with national GST norms sends an important signal, Manipur remains part of India's economic union, and its eventual return to normalcy will be built on the same foundations as the rest of the country. That's both practically sensible and symbolically significant.
Yet we must also acknowledge the limits of what legislation can achieve. Behind the statistics about tax rates and supplementary grants are real people and families displaced by violence, businesses destroyed, and communities torn apart. Administrative efficiency matters, but so does justice, reconciliation, and the patient rebuilding of trust between groups that have suffered seriously.
The Manipur GST amendments are neither a silver bullet nor an empty gesture. They're part of a longer, more difficult process of reconstruction that will require sustained commitment, adequate resources, and most of all, a genuine resolution of the underlying conflicts. Tax reform may seem ordinary compared to the dramatic events that necessitated President's Rule, but in its own way, it's just as essential to Manipur's future. Good governance begins with the basics of functioning institutions, clear rules, and the resources to deliver services and this bill, however modest, contributes to that foundation.
The measure of its success will come not in parliamentary debates or technical compliance, but in whether businesses in Manipur find it easier to operate, whether revenue improves enough to fund better services, and whether, eventually, a restored state government can build on these foundations. That will take time, and much more than tax policy. But it's a necessary beginning.
. . .
References: