Short-Term Political Gains Could Lead to Long-Term Economic Challenges

The Growing Role of Freebies in Indian Elections

Once merely a tool to attract voters during campaigns, political freebies have now become a fundamental strategy for winning elections in India. Political parties increasingly use these incentives often disguised as welfare schemes—to secure votes, a trend that is raising serious concerns about the long-term financial stability of states.

A recent report by Aequitas Investments sheds light on this growing dependency on freebies. It suggests that what started as mere campaign promises has now become a dominant political strategy with parties engaging in a competitive race to offer the most attractive benefits. This approach, while effective in swaying voters raises critical questions about its impact on the economy.

The Impact on State Finances

The report warns that the aggressive pursuit of short-term political gains through freebies could result in severe financial distress for states in the future. The 2024 general elections, as well as recent state elections have illustrated a worrying trend—political parties are locked in a battle to outdo one another, offering ever-expanding welfare schemes.

While these initiatives undoubtedly provide immediate relief to citizens, they come at a steep cost. As the financial burden on state governments increases, sustainability becomes a demanding issue. Without adequate revenue generation or long-term financial planning, these expenditures could weaken state economies and lead to fiscal instability.

Case Study: Karnataka’s Freebies Burden

Karnataka serves as a prime example of this trend. After securing victory in the state elections, the Congress party introduced several high-cost welfare schemes. Among them, the Gruha Lakshmi scheme which grants Rs 2,000 per month to women and the Gruha Jyoti scheme, which offers 200 units of free electricity has significantly increased government spending.

According to the report, these initiatives alone have resulted in an additional financial burden of approximately Rs 52,000 crore. While they provide short-term economic support to beneficiaries, the long-term consequences on state finances could be substantial. If such expenditures continue unchecked then they could lead to budget deficits, reduced public investments and potential economic downturns.

Balancing Welfare and Economic Stability

The challenge for policymakers is to strike a balance between welfare-driven initiatives and sustainable economic planning. While welfare schemes play a crucial role in uplifting underprivileged communities, an over-reliance on freebies as an electoral strategy may jeopardize the financial health of states.

Governments must ensure that welfare policies are backed by solid economic strategies such as boosting revenue generation, improving fiscal management and prioritizing long-term development goals. Without these measures, what appears to be a winning political formula today could turn into a financial crisis tomorrow.

The Burden of Welfare: Examining the Cost of Freebies in Indian States

Karnataka’s Expensive Welfare Schemes

Karnataka serves as a prime example of how state governments are implementing expensive welfare programs, often at the cost of financial stability. After the Congress party secured victory in the state elections, it introduced several ambitious welfare initiatives aimed at providing financial relief to citizens. Among them, the Gruha Lakshmi scheme offers Rs 2,000 per month to women while the Gruha Jyoti scheme provides 200 units of free electricity. Together, these initiatives have resulted in an expenditure of approximately Rs 52,000 crore.

This spending accounts for nearly 78 percent of Karnataka’s fiscal deficit for the 2023-24 financial year by raising serious concerns about the state’s economic health. In contrast, the BJP’s proposed welfare spending in Karnataka was significantly lower, amounting to only Rs 2,100 crore—just 3 percent of the state’s fiscal deficit.

The Rising Cost of Welfare: A Growing Burden on State Finances

The practice of introducing expensive welfare schemes is no longer limited to Karnataka. Many other states have followed a similar path, announcing large-scale programs that aim to provide financial relief to various sections of society. However, while these initiatives are designed to benefit citizens, they are also putting immense pressure on state economies.

Expensive Welfare Programs Across States

Several states have launched ambitious welfare schemes, each requiring a massive financial commitment:

Maharashtra has introduced multiple programs including the Ladli Behna Yojana, which supports women financially. The state has also abolished toll charges on its highways, waived farm loans and expanded free healthcare services. The total annual cost of these initiatives is estimated at Rs 44,000 crore.
Uttar Pradesh has pledged Rs 36,000 crore towards pensions for women and elderly citizens, aiming to provide social security to vulnerable groups.
Bihar has taken a different approach by implementing a 75 percent reservation policy in government jobs and educational institutions, significantly increasing the financial burden on the state.
Delhi has expanded its electricity subsidies by allowing 2.2 million households to receive zero electricity bills. Additionally, during the recently held elections, political parties promised monthly financial assistance of Rs 2,100-2,500 to all women above 18 years. This comes on top of the already existing free bus travel for women in the capital.

The Financial Strain on State Economies

While these welfare measures aim to support people, they also raise serious financial concerns. The cost of implementing such schemes has started to impact the financial stability of several states:

Delhi has requested a Rs 10,000 crore loan from the National Small Savings Fund (NSSF) for the 2024-25 fiscal year. What makes this request concerning is that it faces opposition from Delhi’s own finance department which has warned about the potential risks of excessive borrowing.
Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, and Karnataka are struggling to manage their financial obligations to the extent that they are finding it difficult to even pay salaries to government employees.

Lessons from Brazil’s Bolsa Familia Program

A similar situation was observed in Brazil, where the government launched the Bolsa Familia program in 2003 to provide financial aid to 3.6 million families. While the program successfully expanded to cover 14.1 million families by 2020 and played a crucial role in poverty reduction, it also contributed to economic difficulties for the country. This serves as an important example for Indian states, highlighting the need to balance welfare spending with fiscal responsibility.

The Challenge of Sustainable Welfare Policies

While welfare programs are essential for social development, their long-term impact on state finances must be carefully considered. Excessive spending without adequate financial planning could lead to severe economic challenges by affecting not just government operations but also future development projects. Policymakers must strike a balance between providing relief to citizens and maintaining fiscal stability, ensuring that welfare measures remain sustainable in the long run.

. . .

References:

Discus