Photo by Lukasz Szmigiel on Unsplash/Representative Image
In a crucial move to safeguard the environment, the Telangana High Court has stepped in to prevent further destruction of trees on 400 acres of land at Kancha Gachibowli in Serilingampally mandal. The court directed Advocate General A. Sudarshan Reddy to ensure that no trees are felled. This decision comes amid an ongoing legal battle concerning the fate of this land.
Public Interest Litigations Challenge Government Order
The case was brought to the court through two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kalapala Babu Rao, a retired scientist, and the Vata Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to environmental conservation. The PIL bench, which included Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Renuka Yara, heard arguments from both sides but did not reach a conclusive decision.
Senior advocates L. Ravichander and S. Niranjan Reddy, representing the petitioners had strongly opposed Government Order (GO) 54 issued by the Revenue Department. This order proposed the auctioning of the 400-acre land through the Telangana Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TGIIC). The petitioners argued that this land should not be put up for commercial use due to its ecological significance.
Legal Battle Over Forest Classification
One of the key arguments made by the petitioners was that the land in question falls under the category of forest land according to the Forest Conservation Act, regardless of its ownership or title. They stressed that this area acts as a "lungs" for Hyderabad, helping to balance pollution levels in the city's financial district, which is surrounded by high-rise buildings.
Environmental Impact and Loss of Biodiversity
Senior advocate Ravichander had highlighted the lack of proper environmental assessment before proceeding with deforestation. He emphasized that the land was home to a rich and diverse ecosystem, including various species of mammals, birds, and four rare plant species. Additionally, he pointed out the presence of unique mushroom rock formations which are estimated to be over two billion years old.
Furthermore, the land encompasses three significant lakes—Peacock Lake, Buffalo Lake, and another unnamed water body—playing a crucial role in Hyderabad’s water system. These lakes act as major catchment areas for the reservoirs that supply drinking water to the city. The continued destruction of this forested land could severely impact Hyderabad’s water resources, making conservation efforts even more critical.
The case highlights a growing conflict between urban expansion and environmental conservation. While the Telangana government aims to utilize the land for industrial infrastructure, conservationists and legal experts argue that such development comes at the cost of irreplaceable natural resources. The Telangana High Court’s intervention offers a temporary reprieve for the trees and wildlife in the area, but the final verdict will determine the long-term fate of this crucial green space. For now, environmental activists and concerned citizens continue their fight to protect Kancha Gachibowli’s natural heritage.
The debate over land conservation has taken a significant turn with the Supreme Court's directive to identify lands that qualify as forest for the purpose of conservation. This directive has brought to light various viewpoints and concerns, particularly those raised by Niranjan Reddy and countered by Sudarshan Reddy, representing the State government.
The Need for an Expert Committee
Niranjan Reddy has emphasized the importance of forming an expert committee, as directed by the Supreme Court, to identify lands that fall under the category of forest. He pointed out the lack of clarity regarding the constitution of this committee, which is crucial for the effective conservation of forest lands.
One of the major concerns raised by Niranjan Reddy is the deployment of heavy machinery for deforestation on the said land. He questioned whether the authorities had obtained the necessary clearances for uprooting the trees. According to the WALTA Act, not a single tree can be cut without obtaining permission from the concerned authority. This raises significant concerns about the legality of the deforestation activities.
Government's Hasty Actions
Reddy criticized the government's hasty actions in uprooting trees while the matter is still subjudice before the Court. He argued that the government has proceeded without due consideration, thereby breaching the trust placed in it by the Court. This highlights the need for a stay on the government's actions in raising the forest.
On the other hand, Sudarshan Reddy, representing the State government, countered the petitioners' arguments by stating that the claim of the land being forest land was based solely on Google images. He argued that there were no official records classifying the 400 acres as forest land under the Forest Conservation Act. He emphasized that the land in question was never notified as forest land under any relevant enactment.
After hearing both sides, the High Court bench decided to adjourn the matter. The Court also directed that no further destruction or cutting of trees should take place until the next hearing. This interim decision provides a temporary reprieve and ensures that the matter is thoroughly examined before any further actions are taken.
The debate over the conservation of forest lands is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of various perspectives. The formation of an expert committee, adherence to legal requirements, and the need for a balanced approach are crucial in ensuring the effective conservation of our forest resources.
Allegations of Damage to Wildlife and Unique Ecosystem
According to the ministry’s letter, various news reports—both in print and social media—have accused the state government of causing significant harm to the local ecosystem. The reports claim that the clearing of vegetation has not only impacted the natural habitat of wildlife but has also posed a threat to the lakes and unique rock formations in the region. The ministry has acknowledged these allegations and is now addressing the concerns raised by environmentalists and the public.
Student Protests Highlight Environmental Concerns
The Telangana government's decision has triggered strong opposition, particularly from students of the University of Hyderabad. Many have taken to the streets to protest against the removal of green cover in the area. The protests underscore the growing anxiety among citizens regarding the unchecked destruction of natural landscapes in the name of urban development.
Government’s Plan for Land Auction and IT Park Development
The state government is reportedly looking to auction the land as part of its plan to establish Information Technology (IT) parks in the region. While this move is seen as a step towards economic growth, it has also sparked debates on whether urban expansion should come at the cost of environmental degradation.
Kancha Gachibowli’s green cover is a crucial ecological zone, supporting a diverse range of plant and animal species. A study conducted by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) during 2008-09 identified 455 different species of flora and fauna thriving in the area. This includes deer, reptiles, and various indigenous trees, all of which could be at risk if the land is cleared for commercial development.
. . .
References: