Photo by Norbu GYACHUNG on Unsplash
China's growing presence on the world stage has extended to the dominion of human rights. They've signed key treaties joined the U.N. Human Rights Council and even launched economic initiatives like the Belt and Road initiative. This active participation coupled with China's global influence could have been a positive development. However, a closer look reveals a troubling reality.
There is a critical point that needs to be raised that China's engagement seems strategic and not sincere. While they play by the rules on paper, their actions suggest a desire to weaken the human rights system and not strengthen it. The leadership appears more concerned with deflecting criticism than upholding human rights principles.
Furthermore, China's economic blow and growing role in social media and academia raise concerns. They might leverage this influence to promote a development model that ignores human rights or even silence dissent. This is particularly worrisome for democracies where human rights are often protected but vulnerable to outside pressure. It is important to emphasise the importance of the international human rights system. It serves as a vital check on governments, especially in countries where domestic mechanisms for accountability are weak. When governments fail to protect their citizens' rights then this system offers a crucial lifeline.
In conclusion, China's involvement in human rights is a double-edged sword. While increased participation could be positive but the current approach appears more focused on manipulating the system than upholding its principles. This is a cause for concern, particularly for democracies that rely on international institutions to safeguard fundamental rights. We must remain vigilant and ensure that the human rights system continues to hold all governments accountable, regardless of their economic or political might.
China's Persecution of Human Rights Defenders' Families: A Weapon of Silence
A report was published that attempted to expose China's systematic targeting of the families of human rights defenders, particularly throughout 2023. The Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) sheds light on this disturbing trend with its report titled "If I Disobey, My Family Will Suffer."
Punishing “Dissent” through family hardship
The report highlights the Chinese authorities' use of punitive measures against the families of human rights defenders. These measures extend far beyond adults and tragically reach children including newborns. This tactic aims to silence dissent by inflicting emotional and psychological pain on loved ones. Renee Xia, director of CHRD, emphasizes the long-term trauma this inflicts on children who witness the persecution of their parents. Another tactic documented in the report is the denial of access to detained or jailed human rights defenders. This deliberate separation serves as a tool to coerce cooperation from the detainees.
The report further details how the children of these defenders including those of human rights lawyers suffer through "guilt by association." These punishments range from limitations on personal freedom – house arrest or arbitrary detention – to forced placement in adoptive homes. Their education is also obstructed which is adding another layer of hardship. The CHRD report asserts that these actions against families constitute a state policy of collective punishment.
A Global Call to Action
The report concludes with a call for the Chinese government to finish all forms of harassment and extra-legal detention of human rights defenders' families. This report adds to the growing international condemnation of China's human rights record.
The Human Rights Measurement Initiative (HRMI) recently ranked China as having the worst human rights record in the world. The international community including the US, the UK, and others have repeatedly condemned China's treatment of vulnerable groups and human rights defenders. Organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have documented alleged crimes against humanity including the mass detention of Uyghurs in "re-education camps." The CHRD report serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of China's approach to dissent. It urges the international community to maintain pressure on China to uphold basic human rights for all its citizens.
Children's Education used as a punishment by the State Restrictions
The recent case of Mr. Li and his family being barred from leaving China underlines a troubling pattern of using children's access to education as leverage to suppress dissent. This tactic unfortunately is not new in China's draconian playbook.
Back in 2013, activist Zhang Lin's daughter, Anni Zhang faced retaliation when authorities blocked her from attending school in Hefei City due to her father's human rights activism. Despite efforts by Zhang Lin and others to fight for Anni's right to education, they were met with arrest and imprisonment. Similarly, in 2015, lawyer Wang Yu's teenage son was prevented from studying abroad and the family faced harassment and imprisonment during a crackdown on human rights lawyers. These violations persisted into 2023 as evidenced by the trial of Mr. Li's family. Despite having valid passports, they were stopped from leaving the country under the appearance of "national security."
The consequences are terrible with children like Jiamei showing signs of anxiety and depression due to the relentless intimidation by authorities. Jiamei's plea to her mother not to leave her alone reflects the trauma inflicted on these innocent victims. Such egregious violations of children's rights to education must be condemned. The international community must pressure China to end these wrong strategies and uphold the fundamental rights of its citizens including the right to education without fear of punishment. The future of China's children depends on it.
Silencing “Dissent” from Separation: China's Weaponization of Family Communication
China's efforts to silence overseas activists go beyond direct threats or intimidation. A chilling effect approach has emerged wherein they are targeting the activists' families back home. This form of collective punishment is where authorities exploit communication channels to pressure activists into submission. The story of a Uyghur human rights defender exemplifies this practice. After bravely speaking out against China's crackdown on Uyghur culture, he was cut off from his family for four years. This wasn't a random act. Authorities pressured his family to sever ties likely through threats and intimidation.
The activist feared further communication could endanger his family, particularly after his sister's arrest. He remained silent due to fear for their safety. This is precisely the chilling effect China seeks. The story takes a disturbing turn when communication is "restored." The activist can only reach his father, through a monitored WeChat account. This allows authorities to control the account, silencing any critical messages.
The activist's father is essentially turned into a tool. Each critical post on social media triggers pressure on the father, further silencing the activist. This form of emotional manipulation demonstrates the lengths China goes to silence dissent even from overseas. The international community must condemn such strategies. Targeting families to silence activists is a gross violation of human rights. We must stand together to ensure individuals can speak freely without fear for the safety of their loved ones back home.
China's Challenge to Human Rights: A Shifting Global Landscape
For decades, China remained cautious in the international arena engaging only on critical issues. This has changed dramatically. China's leaders are now aggressively promoting their unique model of "socialism with Chinese characteristics," particularly in the realm of human rights. This poses a significant challenge. The international human rights system operates on principles fundamentally in balance with China's one-party rule. As China's economic power rises, it gains influence not just to defend its own system but to undermine the entire human rights framework. Practices like country-specific critiques, involvement of civil society, and independent monitoring mechanisms are under fire.
China proposes alternatives like "win-win cooperation" and a "community of common destiny." These seemingly benevolent terms mask a strategy to weaken established methods. Public censure of human rights abusers is seen as counterproductive replaced by "mutually beneficial" dialogue and technical assistance dictated by China.
The response from other nations is concerning. Some European states for reasons of self-interest or economic dependence are muting criticism of China's human rights record. Hungary exemplifies this trend, selectively aligning with human rights issues while abstaining from others or even recommending China's development-centric approach over traditional human rights concerns.
China's efforts to silence civil society, particularly human rights defenders haven't succeeded yet. However, the tide may be turning. Rising nationalism globally fuels resentment towards international rules perceived as a decline in national sovereignty. China stands ready to exploit this sentiment potentially weakening the global human rights framework further.
. . .
References: