Photo by Bernd Dittrich on Unsplash
The global economy along with food and energy security is becoming increasingly fragile due to growing pressures on critical maritime routes. This warning comes from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in its Review of Maritime Transport 2024.
Key Maritime Routes Under Strain
The report highlights several essential maritime chokepoints including the Panama Canal, the Suez Canal, the Red Sea, and the Black Sea, all of which are facing significant strain. These routes are crucial to global trade but geopolitical tensions, climate change and ongoing conflicts have caused disruptions that threaten the smooth functioning of supply chains. These disturbances highlight the vulnerability of the maritime routes that the global economy depends on.
Growth in Maritime Trade Amidst Uncertainty
Despite the challenges, global maritime trade saw a 2.4% growth in 2023, reaching a volume of 12,292 million tons. This growth signals a recovery after a contraction in 2022. However, the outlook for the future remains clouded with uncertainty. For 2024, the report predicts a modest growth rate of 2%, primarily driven by the demand for bulk commodities like iron ore, coal, and grain as well as containerized goods. Yet, this seemingly positive growth conceals deeper issues within the supply chains that need to be addressed.
Container Trade and Capacity Imbalance
The report also touches on container trade which grew by a mere 0.3% in 2023. While there is an expectation for a rebound to 3.5% growth in 2024, long-term success will largely depend on how the shipping industry adapts to ongoing disruptions. These include the war in Ukraine and increasing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, both of which continue to affect global trade flows. On the other hand, the supply of container ship capacity expanded by 8.2% in 2023 that was leading to concerns about the potential imbalance between supply and demand.
Challenges at Maritime Chokepoints and Overcapacity Risk
One consequence of the disruptions at key chokepoints has been the temporary increase in demand for ships as longer shipping routes were required. This has helped mitigate the problem of overcapacity in the short term. However, if normal shipping routes are restored then the imbalance between the number of ships and the demand for their services may re-emerge, where they were leading to a potential overcapacity issue in the container vessel market. While global maritime trade is showing signs of recovery then the future remains uncertain due to the complex interplay of geopolitical risks, environmental challenges, and the shifting dynamics of supply and demand within the shipping industry.
Global Shipping Disruptions: The Impact on Capacity, Costs, and Emissions
Recent disruptions in key maritime routes have played a significant role in reshaping global shipping dynamics. These interruptions while causing challenges have also temporarily improved the issue of overcapacity in the shipping industry. However, there are concerns that if conditions return to normal then the imbalance between the supply of ships and the demand for cargo transportation may lead to a surplus of unused container vessels.
Maritime Chokepoints and Their Importance
The global shipping network relies heavily on several key maritime chokepoints—narrow, strategic routes that are essential for the smooth flow of goods worldwide. Among these are the Panama and Suez Canals which serve as critical passageways for global trade. A recent report highlights that disruptions in these routes have significantly impacted global shipping, creating delays, rerouting ships and driving up costs.
Factors Behind the Decline in Shipping Through Critical Routes
The report reveals that traffic through the Panama and Suez Canal dropped sharply—by over 50%—in mid-2024 when compared to their peak usage. Two major factors were responsible for this decline. First, the Panama Canal faced climate-induced low water levels which restricted the size and number of vessels able to pass through. Second, conflict in the Red Sea region led to heightened security concerns and reduced the flow of ships through the Suez Canal. These issues caused a significant reduction in the size of ships that pass through these routes with the Gulf of Aden and Suez Canal seeing a drop of 76% and 70%, respectively, compared to late 2023.
The Cape of Good Hope as an Alternative Route
With the Panama and Suez Canal facing disruptions, many shipping companies have turned to an alternative, although a longer route around the Cape of Good Hope will be located at the southern tip of Africa. The report notes that ship arrivals through this route surged by 89%. While this alternative route keeps goods moving, it also brings additional costs and delays. Ships travelling this way need more time to reach their destinations which increases operational costs and fuel consumption.
Economic and Environmental Implications
One of the most significant concerns highlighted in the report is the environmental impact of these changes. Ships rerouting around Africa face longer journeys which result in higher carbon emissions. The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) is now adding further costs to this. For instance, a large container ship carrying between 20,000 and 24,000 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) on the Far East-Europe route incurs an extra $400,000 in emissions costs for each voyage around Africa instead of using the Suez Canal. This added financial burden is a major factor shipping companies must now account for, on top of already rising fuel and operational costs.
While rerouting ships through alternative passages has provided temporary relief to the global shipping system, it has also exposed the vulnerabilities of over-reliance on certain routes. The disruptions in key maritime chokepoints have emphasized the need for a more resilient and adaptable global shipping network, one that can minimize costs and reduce environmental impact where one can ensure the smooth flow of goods even during times of crisis. However, once normalcy is restored in major routes then the approaching threat of overcapacity in container shipping may again become a pressing issue.
Global Trade Disruptions Intensify Amid Rising Demand and Rerouting Challenges
In 2023, global trade saw a 4.2% increase in ton-miles that was leading to higher transportation costs and increased carbon emissions. This rise in ton-miles reflects the distance cargo ships travel to deliver goods worldwide and the growth has put additional strain on both financial and environmental resources.
By the middle of 2024, disruptions in major shipping routes, particularly through the Red Sea and Panama Canal had further complicated the global shipping industry. The rerouting of vessels to avoid these areas caused a 3% rise in overall global vessel demand. Even more dramatically, demand for container ships surged by 12%, creating a bottleneck in supply chains where they were already struggling to keep up with global demand.
Port Hubs Face Increasing Pressure
As a result of these rerouting challenges, key port hubs such as Singapore and major Mediterranean ports are now feeling the pressure. These ports have seen a sharp rise in demand for transhipment services—where cargo is moved from one vessel to another to reach its final destination. This increased demand is leading to congestion, further complicating the global logistics landscape. The strain on these hubs is adding another layer of complexity to international transport and trade networks with delays and inefficiencies becoming more commonplace.
The disruptions in global shipping routes are creating ripple effects throughout the world’s economies with rising costs, environmental concerns, and logistical challenges that will likely continue to strain international trade networks. Port congestion and supply chain inefficiencies are only part of the problem as smaller and less developed nations struggle to cope with the disproportionate impact on their economies.
. . .
References: