Photo by AMISH THAKKAR on Unsplash
Last month, I mourned a young bride who chose death because dowry stripped her of every last breath of dignity (Normalizing Death in the Name of Dowry: How an Entire Nation Commits Murder and Calls It Marriage). I thought that was the abyss. I thought we had already seen the lowest cruelty imaginable. I was wrong. In barely a month, another woman has been murdered DUE TO DOWRY — her death briefly mourned on social media, while countless others are quietly erased by the silence of dowry-fueled violence. Why does this keep happening?
This time, she didn’t surrender. She was executed. Not by strangers, not by criminals in the shadows — but by the very man who promised her a lifetime of love. Her husband tortured her, beat her, burned her alive. He didn’t just kill her — he staged her annihilation, with full confidence that society would look away, that police would arrive late, that neighbors would stay silent, that newspapers would soften the crime into “another dowry death.”
This is not marriage. This is sanctioned slaughter. This is a genocide of women happening inside middle-class homes, behind wedding decorations, under the suffocating veil of “family honor.”
Who gave men this license to kill? Which law signed their permission slip? Which culture blessed their brutality? None.
And yet, they walk free, puffed up with entitlement, armed with their families’ silence, protected by a society that would rather cover the blood than confront the truth.
Let us stop lying. These are not “cases.” These are not “domestic disputes.” These are public executions carried out with kerosene and fire, fueled by greed and sanctioned by cowardice. Every time a woman is set ablaze in the name of dowry, it is not just her husband who murdered her — it is the entire system, the entire community, the entire nation that prepared the pyre.
Marriage was never meant to be a death sentence. It was never meant to be a transaction of blood for cash. And yet, in today’s India, every wedding carries a coffin, and every dowry demand drives another nail into it.
If my last article was written with grief, this one is written with fury. Because we are no longer talking about suicides — we are talking about murders. And if this nation cannot rise to protect its daughters from being executed in their own homes, then every one of us is guilty of blood on our hands.
This article will not repeat grief — it will demand accountability. We cannot allow another woman’s body to become just another headline, another fleeting social media post, another number lost in statistics. What you will find here is not mourning but a weapon — knowledge sharpened into action.
I will expose how India’s laws against dowry are not myths on paper but real shields — if only people know how to use them. We will lay bare the helplines, the shelters, the women’s commissions, and the fast-track courts that claim to exist, and ask: where are they when the fire is lit?
This is not a collection of tragedies. It is a call to strategy. It is a map of survival. For every woman who feels trapped, every family suffocating under demands, every neighbor who witnesses but stays silent — this article is your evidence, your ammunition, your reason to act.
And finally, it will speak directly to women: Your life is not collateral. Your breath is not negotiable. Marriage is not ownership. If they demand dowry, they do not deserve you. If they raise hands, raise your voice louder. If they try to burn your body, let your survival burn their illusion of power.
Because the answer to dowry is not death. The answer is defiance.
In the heart of Greater Noida’s Sirsa village, a woman was not lost to despair—she was slaughtered. On August 21, 2025, 26-year-old Nikki Bhati was tortured, beaten, doused in a flammable liquid, and burned alive by her husband, Vipin Bhati—allegedly in front of their six-year-old son. She succumbed to her injuries at Delhi’s Safdarjung Hospital, her final breaths scorched away not by fate, but by cruelty.
Nikki’s story does not stand in isolation. Married in 2016 into the Bhati family, alongside her sister Kanchan, she had already surrendered more than society ever had the right to demand. An SUV, a motorcycle, gold, and cash had been given as dowry, but it was never enough. Greed escalated into madness. Reports confirm that Nikki’s in-laws demanded ₹36 lakh in cash and even a luxury car, transforming her life into an endless negotiation for survival.
The cruelty was not hidden—it was recorded. Videos surfaced of Vipin dragging Nikki by her hair, and another of her engulfed in flames, staggering down stairs before collapsing. These are not whispers of rumor but chilling evidence of a society that allows women to be mutilated in the name of “marriage.” The final testimony came from the lips of her own child: “Papa poured something, slapped Mumma, then lit her with a lighter.” No court of law could conjure a statement more damning - Brutality to the core!
The law did move—partly. Vipin, in a desperate attempt to flee, lost a leg while grappling for an officer’s gun. He now sits in custody, alongside his mother Daya, father Satyaveer, and brother Rohit, all charged under murder and cruelty laws. Yet, even amidst this, cracks appear. CCTV footage has raised questions about the timeline, forcing investigators to re-question Kanchan, Nikki’s sister, whose complaint originally ignited the case. The lines between truth and manipulation are already being blurred.
The National Commission for Women (NCW) has stepped in, demanding immediate arrests and accountability within three days. But outrage has not been limited to courtrooms. A mahapanchayat in Uttar Pradesh issued a chilling statement—“Give daughters pistols, not gold.” A line that exposes the grotesque normalization of violence: instead of dismantling dowry, society offers women weapons to defend themselves in homes that were supposed to protect them.
Nikki’s death is not just a statistic—it is a mirror held up to our nation’s complicity. When dowry turns into open execution, when fire replaces vows, and when even a child’s witness cannot shake us from indifference, the truth becomes unavoidable: this is no longer about tradition or custom—this is about a culture that grants men the license to kill, and then hides behind silence.
1.2.1 A Death Every 63 Minutes: When Marriage Becomes a Death Sentence
According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB, 2023), every 63 minutes, a woman in India dies due to dowry-related harassment. These are not natural deaths; they are legally recognized under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) as dowry deaths. Despite this, most such cases are treated socially as tragedies, not crimes, reducing systemic violence into an “unfortunate incident.”
1.2.2 6,900 Recorded Deaths, Countless Unseen
The official NCRB count of 6,900 dowry deaths in 2023 represents only a fraction of reality. Many more cases vanish into silence—disguised as kitchen fires, accidental burns, or unexplained suicides.
1.2.3 The Legal Black Hole: When Cruelty Escalates to Murder
Most dowry deaths are not sudden explosions of violence; they are the culmination of sustained abuse.
1.2.4 Beyond Numbers: Families Broken, Futures Erased
Behind every statistic is a destroyed ecosystem:
Dowry deaths are not just personal tragedies; they are structural crimes. Each statistic masks generations of suffering, cycles of poverty, and institutional betrayal.
Dowry harassment often begins quietly—with taunts, pressure, or emotional blackmail—but it can quickly escalate into threats, violence, or even death. In such moments, silence can cost lives. Every woman facing harassment, and every family witnessing it, must know that India has laws, helplines, and support systems designed for immediate rescue and justice. The key is not to wait. The law recognizes dowry harassment as a serious cognizable offense, and there are step-by-step ways to act without delay.
2.1.1 Dial 181 — The Women’s Helpline
The 181 Women’s Helpline operates 24x7 in most states and serves as a lifeline for women in distress. By dialing this number, a woman is connected to trained counselors who can provide instant guidance. These counselors are not only emotionally supportive, but they can also coordinate rescue operations, arrange transportation to safe shelters, and link survivors to medical and legal services. In states like Delhi, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh, this helpline has been integrated with district-level “One Stop Centres,” making it even more effective.
2.1.2 Dial 1091 — The Women Police Helpline
The 1091 helpline is run directly by the police and is meant for situations where immediate police intervention is required. If a woman is being physically attacked, locked inside her home, or thrown out, a call to 1091 triggers a fast response unit—often staffed with women police officers. The presence of female officers reduces fear and increases trust. Importantly, the call also creates a record of complaint, which can later support the woman legally if she chooses to pursue an FIR.
2.1.3 Dial 112 — Integrated Emergency Response
India’s 112 emergency number acts as an umbrella system, integrating police, ambulance, and fire services. This is crucial when dowry harassment escalates into life-threatening assaults, poisoning, or burn cases, which tragically are still reported in dowry deaths. A single call to 112 ensures that medical help and law enforcement arrive together—reducing delays that often cost precious lives.
2.1.4 Police Obligation Under Law
In Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P. (2013), the Supreme Court ruled that police must immediately register an FIR in all cognizable offenses, including cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. This judgment was a turning point, ensuring that women can no longer be turned away from police stations under the pretext of “family disputes.” Failure of police to register such complaints is itself a violation of law and can be challenged legally.
Taking the first step is often the hardest for survivors and their families. Yet, in the eyes of the law, an FIR (First Information Report) is the foundation of justice. Without it, the system cannot move. Survivors must remember: police are legally bound to register an FIR in cases of dowry harassment and cannot turn them away. This is not just paperwork; it is the beginning of legal recognition, protection, and accountability.
2.2.1 Section 498A IPC — Cruelty by Husband or Relatives
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code remains the strongest shield against cruelty linked to dowry demands. This provision explicitly criminalizes both physical abuse and mental harassment inflicted by the husband or his relatives. Importantly, cruelty is not limited to beatings—it includes verbal humiliation, psychological torture, and coercive demands for money or property.
What makes this section powerful is its non-bailable and cognizable nature. This means police cannot delay action or demand court approval—they must act immediately, arrest if necessary, and investigate without excuses. Women must insist on this provision being applied because it sets the tone for strict legal consequences.
2.2.2 Section 304B IPC — Dowry Death
When a woman dies within seven years of marriage under suspicious circumstances, the law presumes the possibility of dowry harassment. Section 304B IPC specifically addresses such tragedies as dowry deaths. The law states that if harassment for dowry occurred “soon before her death,” then the husband or his relatives are directly liable.
The punishment is severe: a minimum of seven years in prison, which may extend to life imprisonment. Families of victims should never allow such cases to be brushed aside as “suicides” or “kitchen accidents.” Every unnatural death within seven years of marriage must be investigated under this section. This law exists because too many women were being silenced and their deaths dismissed as misfortune.
2.2.3 Section 113B of Indian Evidence Act — Presumption of Dowry Death
The Indian Evidence Act provides an additional layer of protection. Section 113B shifts the burden of proof from the victim’s family to the accused. If it is shown that a woman faced dowry harassment shortly before her death, the court is empowered to presume that the husband or in-laws are responsible.
This is crucial, because in most cases, evidence is tampered with—letters destroyed, injuries hidden, witnesses silenced. Section 113B ensures that silence cannot erase the crime. Families must demand that this presumption be applied in every suspicious case.
In the midst of chaos, survivors need more than legal text—they need safe spaces. This is where One Stop Centres (OSCs), also known as Sakhi Centres, play a vital role. Established in every district by the government, these centres integrate medical, legal, and emotional support under one roof, ensuring survivors are not forced to shuttle between police stations, hospitals, and courts.
2.3.1 Comprehensive Support in One Place
At an OSC, survivors receive shelter, police assistance, medical help, counseling, and legal guidance in a single space. The purpose is simple: prevent secondary trauma. A woman who has just survived violence should not have to knock on ten different doors for help. OSCs coordinate all services seamlessly.
2.3.2 Free Legal and Medical Services
The government ensures that OSCs provide free doctors, free lawyers, and even video-conferencing facilities to record court statements. This means survivors can access justice without being intimidated by perpetrators in the courtroom. Medical records, often the most critical evidence in dowry harassment, are secured immediately and free of cost.
2.3.3 Psychological and Social Support
Dowry harassment not only wounds the body but also breaks the spirit. Trained psychologists at OSCs help women overcome trauma, rebuild self-confidence, and make decisions without fear. Social workers counsel families, ensuring survivors are not pressured into returning to abusive homes “for the sake of society.” These centres exist to remind women: you are not alone, and you are not helpless.
While the law provides the framework, enforcement often fails. This is where the National Commission for Women (NCW) steps in, acting as a watchdog and interventionist body for women in distress.
2.4.1 Complaint Redressal
The NCW accepts complaints both online and offline, and its intervention has reopened countless cases that local police had ignored. By directly writing to or calling the NCW, survivors can ensure their complaints do not disappear in bureaucratic silence.
2.4.2 Public Hearings and Investigations
For serious cases, the NCW can conduct fact-finding inquiries, summon officials, and hold public hearings. This makes state authorities accountable when they fail to act. Survivors and families should not hesitate to seek NCW involvement in cases where local institutions are compromised.
2.4.3 Counseling and Awareness
Beyond intervention, NCW also conducts awareness drives, training sessions for police, and counseling programmes for women. By addressing both survivors and enforcement agencies, NCW ensures that the fight against dowry harassment is systemic, not isolated.
Legal action is critical, but so is immediate safety. Women trapped in abusive households need urgent alternatives—safe housing, financial relief, and protective orders.
2.5.1 Shelter Homes and Temporary Protection
The government funds Swadhar Grehs and Short Stay Homes, which act as temporary refuges for women and their children. These shelters not only provide food and security but also offer vocational training so survivors can begin to rebuild independence.
2.5.2 Protection Orders Under Domestic Violence Act, 2005
The law empowers survivors to seek protection orders from a magistrate. These legally bar the husband or in-laws from contacting the woman, entering her home, or interfering with her workplace. Crucially, violating a protection order is itself a punishable crime, ensuring that survivors can live without constant fear.
2.5.3 Economic Relief and Compensation
The battle for survival often begins with financial independence. Under schemes funded by the Nirbhaya Fund and state compensation boards, survivors can access money for medical expenses, relocation, and livelihood support. This is not charity—it is recognition that women must be economically empowered to resist pressure and build new lives.
The Indian legal system has not remained silent in the face of dowry-related harassment, cruelty, and deaths. Over decades, lawmakers have built a framework of strong laws to punish abusers and protect women. But the truth is clear: laws written in statutes do not save lives unless women and families know their power, understand how to use them, and refuse to stay silent. This section explains the key provisions one by one, in a way every woman, parent, or bystander can understand.
This section is often described as the first line of defense for women trapped in abusive marriages. Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code makes any form of cruelty a punishable crime — whether it comes as physical assault, psychological torture, or endless harassment over dowry.
For a woman facing continuous harassment, invoking Section 498A can break the cycle before it ends in tragedy. Families should know that delay is dangerous. Every moment of hesitation strengthens the abuser’s hand. An FIR under this section is not just a complaint; it is a shield.
This provision was introduced because too many young brides were being declared dead in “kitchen accidents.” Section 304B IPC recognizes the reality: when a woman dies within seven years of marriage under unnatural circumstances like burning, hanging, or poisoning, and if evidence shows she was harassed for dowry “soon before her death,” the law automatically presumes it is a dowry death.
The punishment is severe: not less than seven years in prison, which can extend to life imprisonment.
Why is this critical? Because without such a section, families of victims would have no leverage against in-laws who claim, “It was suicide, not our fault.” With Section 304B, the law demands accountability. It tells society: no unnatural death of a young married woman is to be dismissed lightly.
Families must insist that investigations into such deaths are registered under 304B — not as routine accidental deaths.
This is the root law against dowry. The Act states clearly:
Yet, in practice, dowry has been disguised as “gifts,” “customary traditions,” or “family expectations.” This normalization weakens the law. Parents of brides often fear losing a marriage proposal if they resist, and brides themselves are pressured into silence.
The truth is, under this Act, no demand — whether it’s cash, cars, property, or even indirect pressure like “help us financially” — has to be tolerated. The law empowers parents and brides to say no. Every time someone complies “just to adjust,” it keeps the cycle alive for the next victim.
While the IPC provisions are powerful, they usually involve criminal cases that take time. The Domestic Violence Act (2005) was introduced to give women immediate protection and the right to live with dignity.
Under this Act, a woman can directly approach a magistrate for:
This law bridges the dangerous gap between abuse and justice. It ensures that women are not forced to return to violent homes while waiting for lengthy court battles. It gives them breathing space to survive, plan, and rebuild.
One of the hardest parts of dowry cases is evidence destruction. In many cases, families quickly erase traces of crime or intimidate witnesses into silence. To counter this, the law introduced Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act.
This section shifts the burden of proof. If a woman dies under unnatural circumstances within seven years of marriage and it is shown that she faced dowry harassment, the court is empowered to presume that the husband or his relatives are guilty.
This is crucial. Normally in criminal law, the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. But here, the presumption is reversed. It recognizes the power imbalance in dowry crimes and ensures perpetrators cannot escape easily.
India’s legal framework against dowry is robust on paper, but weak in practice when families prioritize “reputation” over justice. Police sometimes discourage complaints, communities shame survivors into silence, and victims are told to “adjust for family honor.”
But laws cannot work without voices of courage. Women must know:
Silence protects abusers. Speaking up activates the law. Every woman who uses these legal provisions not only saves her own life but also weakens the cycle for generations to come.
India has often been accused of having strong laws on paper but weak implementation in practice. This criticism holds true for dowry-related crimes as well. Yet, it is also true that over the past two decades, the government has built a series of schemes, services, and institutions meant to give survivors of harassment, assault, and dowry-linked abuse immediate protection. The tragedy is not that these systems don’t exist, but that most people do not know about them, or worse, do not demand them when they need them most.
A woman facing violence does not have to face it alone. She does not have to suffer in silence, or wait endlessly for someone to notice her pain. She can walk into a government-run center, dial a government-provided helpline, and seek relief from a government-mandated court. But for that to happen, awareness must replace ignorance, and silence must be broken.
The One Stop Centre (OSC) scheme, also known as Sakhi Centres, was launched in 2015 to provide comprehensive support under one roof. Today, there are over 700 operational OSCs across districts in India, each designed as a safe haven for women in distress.
At an OSC, a woman escaping dowry harassment can expect:
This model was built to reduce the exhaustion survivors face when forced to move from hospital to police station to courthouse, often being humiliated at every step. Instead, the OSC integrates all these services, sparing her the secondary trauma of bureaucracy.
The challenge? Many women still don’t know where their nearest OSC is located. State governments rarely publicize them. Families often hesitate to take their daughters there for fear of “public shame.” Until awareness spreads, these centers risk being underutilized, even though they could save countless lives.
The Nirbhaya Fund was created in 2013, after the brutal Delhi gang rape, to finance safety and justice mechanisms for women. It is meant to be the financial backbone of India’s response to gender-based violence.
For survivors of dowry-related violence, the Nirbhaya Fund can cover:
But here lies a harsh reality: year after year, reports show that large portions of the Nirbhaya Fund remain unspent. States often fail to use the money allocated to them. That means survivors are denied the relief that already exists in their name. Unless citizens demand accountability, this will remain yet another example of help existing in theory, not in practice.
For many women, walking into a police station is as frightening as facing their abuser. They fear being dismissed, mocked, or pressured into “settling” the matter quietly. Recognizing this, the government introduced two important measures:
Imagine a young woman being dragged back home after trying to report harassment, simply because no one in the police station took her seriously. Now imagine if, instead, a Mahila Police Volunteer sat beside her, ensuring her statement was recorded and acted upon. That is the difference these initiatives can make — but only if citizens demand that they function properly.
Every year, thousands of dowry-related cases get filed. But trials drag on for years, sometimes decades, by which time witnesses disappear, evidence weakens, and families lose hope. Justice delayed becomes justice denied.
To address this, the government has set up Fast-Track Special Courts (FTSCs) dedicated to crimes against women. These courts are expected to handle cases swiftly, minimize unnecessary adjournments, and ensure survivors and their families see justice within a reasonable time.
But the mere existence of these courts is not enough. Families must insist their cases be heard in a fast-track court. Civil society must track how many cases these courts actually dispose of. The government must be pressed to expand their numbers and resources. Without this, FTSCs will remain symbolic rather than transformative.
The uncomfortable truth is this: India does not lack schemes. It lacks willpower and awareness. OSCs exist but are under-publicized. The Nirbhaya Fund has money but remains underutilized. Mahila Police Volunteers are appointed but often inactive. Fast-track courts exist but continue to face delays.
That is why survivors and families must not only know about these services but also demand them. A helpline unanswered should lead to escalation. An inactive OSC should be reported to district authorities. An unused fund must be questioned in parliament.
Change will not come from passively waiting for systems to function. It will come from women and citizens insisting that the government’s promises turn into action.
For decades, dowry has been disguised as “custom,” “family arrangement,” or “social obligation.” But beneath these polite terms lies the ugliest truth: it is commercialized violence against women. Every time someone says “it’s tradition, we can’t break it”, they are defending a practice that has left countless women burnt, beaten, and driven to suicide.
No ritual, no ceremony, no marriage custom justifies the buying and selling of women through money, gold, or property. The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 criminalizes both the giving and demanding of dowry. Yet, society has normalized it as part of wedding expenses. Every time a family “adjusts” to demands, they are not only enabling abuse but also participating in an illegal act. The choice is clear: respect the law or perpetuate crime.
The most dangerous sentence in any Indian household is: “Let’s adjust, what will people say?” This silence kills. When families silence their daughters instead of supporting them, they create a cycle of fear that emboldens abusers. It is not “adjustment” — it is surrender to oppression. A woman’s right to dignity is non-negotiable, and it begins with her family’s refusal to trade her safety for society’s approval.
Walking away from dowry demands is not disobedience; it is an act of survival. Refusing to marry into a greedy household is not disrespectful; it is an act of self-respect. Filing a case under Section 498A IPC is not dishonor; it is demanding justice. Survival is the most powerful rebellion because it breaks the chain of silence that dowry thrives on.
Dowry thrives because society worships “what people will say” more than the lives of its women. But enough is enough.
If dowry weighs more than your life in their eyes, then give them neither your life nor your silence. Walk away from the marriage, walk into a police station, walk into a One Stop Centre — but do not walk into the fire of sacrifice.
Do not die for them. Live against them.
Because every woman who survives, who refuses to be silenced, who reclaims her dignity, becomes the loudest statement against dowry. The real revolution will not come from funerals or protests after death. It will come from women who survive, resist, and build lives of freedom — without shame, without fear, without dowry.
Under Indian law, dowry is not a custom to be tolerated but a crime to be punished. Section 498A of the IPC protects women from cruelty by their husband or relatives, Section 304B presumes guilt in cases of dowry deaths within seven years of marriage, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 criminalizes the very demand itself. Alongside these, the Domestic Violence Act provides immediate protection and relief, while the Evidence Act strengthens a woman’s case by shifting the burden of proof to the accused in dowry-related deaths. These laws, if invoked without hesitation and enforced without compromise, are powerful shields that can dismantle the culture of silence and impunity. The real fight against dowry is not in whispered compromises but in FIRs that are filed, prosecutions that are pursued, and verdicts that set examples. A woman’s life must never be reduced to bargaining currency — and it is only through the consistent, fearless use of law that we can ensure dowry claims end not in funerals, but in convictions.
REFERENCES: