In the heart of our homes, where love and trust should flourish, a dark and chilling reality lurks—spousal murders driven by betrayal and premeditation. The recent cases of horrific violence, such as the brutal murder of Merchant Navy officer Saurabh Rajput by his wife and her lover, reveal a disturbing trend that threatens not only individual lives but also the very fabric of our society. These acts of calculated cruelty send ripples of fear through communities, eroding the bonds of trust and safety that families depend on. As we grapple with the implications of such heinous crimes, we must confront the unsettling truth: if left unchecked, this cycle of violence could devastate future generations, leaving behind a legacy of trauma and shattered relationships.

In the shadowy recesses of domestic life, betrayal often festers unnoticed. But when it erupts into violence, the results can be horrifying. The gruesome murder of Saurabh Rajput, a Merchant Navy officer, by his wife, Muskaan Rastogi and her lover, Sahil Shukla, unveils a disturbing trend of calculated spousal killings that is shaking India, particularly Uttar Pradesh.

The chilling details of the Meerut murder case unravel a macabre tale of betrayal and brutality. On March 4, Muskaan Rastogi and her lover, Sahil Shukla, drugged and stabbed Saurabh Rajput to death in his own home. In a desperate attempt to conceal their crime, they dismembered his body into 15 pieces, sealed it inside a cement-filled drum, and left it in the house. Their audacity extended further—they embarked on a vacation to Himachal Pradesh while sending misleading messages from Saurabh’s phone to his family. However, their plan unraveled when a foul smell from the drum alerted laborers, who reported it to the police, leading to their arrest.

Case Study: The Murder of Saurabh Rajput

Saurabh Rajput returned to Meerut from London on February 24, 2025, intending to surprise his wife, Muskan, for her birthday. Unbeknownst to him, Muskan and Sahil had been plotting his murder. Eight days prior to the crime, Muskan purchased two knives for ₹800 and rehearsed stabbing techniques, indicating meticulous planning. On March 4, they allegedly drugged Saurabh by mixing sedatives into his food. Once he was unconscious, Sahil stabbed him to death while Muskan assisted. They then dismembered his body into approximately 15 pieces, placed the remains in a large plastic drum, filled it with cement, and sealed it shut. The drum was stored in their home, and they attempted to maintain normalcy to avoid suspicion. However, when Saurabh's family reported him missing, the police investigation led to the discovery of the drum containing his remains. Both Muskan and Sahil confessed to the crime upon interrogation.

Patterns of Premeditation in Recent Crimes

This case is not isolated in its demonstration of premeditated intent. Several recent incidents in India reveal similar patterns:​

• The Burari Deaths (2018): Eleven members of the Chundawat family were found dead in their home in Delhi. Investigations suggested a ritualistic mass suicide, with detailed notes indicating months of planning based on spiritual beliefs.​
• Sheena Bora Murder Case (2012): Indrani Mukerjea, along with accomplices, was accused of murdering her daughter, Sheena Bora. The crime involved careful planning, including the procurement of a car and the selection of a secluded location for the act.​
• Nithari Killings (2005-2006): Surinder Koli and Moninder Singh Pandher were implicated in the serial murders of multiple children and women in Noida. The crimes involved luring victims, meticulous execution, and disposal of bodies, indicating deliberate planning.

The Mindset Behind Premeditated Spousal Murders

The alarming rise in premeditated spousal murders in India reflects complex psychological and sociocultural dynamics. These cases, including the recent one in Uttar Pradesh, where Ankit Kumar orchestrated his wife’s death to marry her sister, reveal a disturbing interplay of emotional detachment, societal pressures, and personal desires.

Key Psychological Factors:

• Emotional Alienation and Desire for Control: In the Bijnor case, Ankit Kumar’s five-year childless marriage led to emotional estrangement from his wife, Kiran. His desire to marry her sister-in-law became an obsessive goal, driving him to plan her murder with the help of a friend. This reflects a mindset where personal desires overshadow moral and ethical considerations, with murder seen as a means to regain control over life circumstances.
• Premeditation as a Coping Mechanism: The calculated nature of these crimes often stems from a need to assert dominance or escape perceived constraints. For example, Muskaan Rastogi’s meticulous planning in the Meerut case—purchasing knives and practicing stabbing—demonstrates how perpetrators rationalize violence as a solution to their problems. This premeditation indicates not impulsive rage but a cold, calculated mindset focused on achieving specific outcomes.
• Cultural and Patriarchal Influences: Deeply rooted patriarchal norms often exacerbate such behaviors. Studies show that societal expectations of male dominance and control can normalize violence within relationships. In some cases, like Ankit Kumar’s, the absence of children—a culturally significant factor—becomes a trigger for drastic actions.
• Psychological Justifications: Perpetrators often justify their actions through distorted reasoning. In family annihilation cases or spousal murders, motives such as jealousy, abandonment fears, or perceived betrayal can lead to extreme measures. The "Medea complex," where offenders adopt an "if I cannot have them, no one can" mentality, is frequently observed in such crimes.

Financial Motivation: A Disturbing Catalyst in Spousal Murders

The Auraiya district case involving Pragati Yadav highlights the role of financial incentives in premeditated spousal murders. Pragati, a newlywed, conspired with her lover Anurag to murder her husband, Dilip Yadav, just 15 days after their marriage. The couple paid Rs 2 lakh to contract killer Ramji Chaudhary, using over Rs 1 lakh from the cash received as shagun during her wedding.

Analysis of Financial Motivation:

• Utilization of Wedding Funds for Murder: Pragati’s use of shagun money to finance her husband’s murder reflects a chilling manipulation of resources meant to symbolize marital blessings. This act underscores how financial availability can facilitate premeditated crimes, turning traditional practices into tools for violence.
• Economic Accessibility to Contract Killers: The payment of Rs 2 lakh demonstrates how financial resources enable access to professional killers, lowering the barriers for individuals to execute violent plans. In this case, the funds provided Pragati and Anurag with the means to carry out their deadly scheme.
• Premeditation Rooted in Romantic and Economic Interests: Pragati’s romantic involvement with Anurag and her dissatisfaction with an arranged marriage were key motivators. However, the ability to mobilize funds quickly amplified their capacity to act on these emotions. This highlights how financial factors can intersect with personal grievances to escalate violence.
• Pattern Across Similar Cases: The Auraiya incident mirrors other cases, such as the Meerut murder, where perpetrators used available resources—whether physical tools or financial means—to meticulously plan and execute crimes against spouses. These cases underline a broader trend where economic considerations play a significant role in enabling such acts.

Sociological Factors Contributing to Premeditated Spousal Murders in India

The rising trend of premeditated spousal murders in India, including cases like the Meerut and Auraiya incidents, is deeply rooted in sociological issues. These crimes are not isolated events but rather the result of entrenched cultural, societal, and economic factors that create fertile ground for such violence.

1. Patriarchal Norms and Gender Inequality

• Cultural Expectations of Male Dominance: Patriarchal beliefs normalize male dominance and control over women, often justifying violence as a means to assert authority. For example, societal norms often endorse violence against women for deviating from traditional gender roles or expectations, such as failing to fulfill domestic duties or resisting control.
• Stigma Around Divorce: The cultural stigma associated with divorce or separation traps individuals in unhappy marriages. This can lead to extreme measures like murder as a perceived solution to marital dissatisfaction.

2. Dowry System and Economic Pressures

• Dowry-Related Violence: The practice of dowry remains a significant driver of domestic violence and homicides. Dissatisfaction with dowry payments often leads to abuse or even murder, as seen in numerous "dowry deaths" reported across India. Between 2011 and 2015, approximately 40,000 dowry-related murders were documented.
• Economic Strain: Financial pressures within marriages—whether due to dowry demands or economic instability—can exacerbate conflicts, sometimes culminating in violent outcomes.

3. Arranged Marriages and Lack of Consent

• Forced Unions: The prevalence of arranged marriages without the consent of partners can create resentment and dissatisfaction. In cases like Auraiya, where Pragati Yadav conspired to murder her husband just 15 days after marriage, the lack of emotional connection contributed to the crime.
• Family as a Social Unit: In India, marriage is often seen as a union of families rather than individuals. This dynamic can amplify conflicts when family expectations clash with personal desires.

4. Community-Level Factors

• Lack of Support Systems: Limited access to formal and informal resources for addressing domestic violence leaves individuals without recourse, increasing the likelihood of conflicts escalating into violence.
• Social Isolation: Joint family systems and community structures can sometimes perpetuate abuse by normalizing violent behavior or discouraging intervention.

5. Urbanization and Changing Social Dynamics

• Modernization vs. Traditional Values: Urbanization has led to shifting social roles and expectations, often creating tensions between traditional norms and modern aspirations. These tensions can manifest in violent outcomes when individuals feel trapped between societal expectations and personal desires.

The sociological roots of premeditated spousal murders lie in deeply entrenched cultural practices, patriarchal norms, economic pressures, and inadequate support systems. Addressing these issues requires systemic reforms, including stricter enforcement of anti-dowry laws, promoting gender equality through education, and creating accessible support networks for victims of domestic violence. Without tackling these underlying factors, such crimes will likely continue to proliferate across India.

Legal Response: Evaluating Law Enforcement and Legal Frameworks in Spousal Murder Cases

The increasing incidence of premeditated spousal murders in India, such as the recent cases in Meerut and Auraiya, raises critical questions about how law enforcement is addressing these crimes and whether existing legal frameworks are adequate to deter such violence.

Current Law Enforcement Practices

• Ineffectiveness of Existing Laws: The Dowry Prohibition Act, along with Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), aims to address domestic violence and marital murders. However, these laws have been criticized for their ineffectiveness. Section 498A, which prohibits cruelty to wives, is often enforced only when linked to dowry demands, limiting its applicability to broader domestic abuse scenarios. Consequently, many cases of spousal murder do not receive the attention they warrant unless directly associated with dowry issues.
• Challenges in Implementation: Law enforcement agencies frequently face challenges in investigating and prosecuting domestic violence cases. Reports indicate that police often require corroborative evidence related to dowry demands before taking complaints seriously, leading to low conviction rates for spousal murders. Additionally, there are instances where victims withdraw complaints due to societal pressure or fear of retaliation, further complicating law enforcement efforts.
• Judicial System Limitations: The judicial system has also shown inconsistencies in handling domestic violence cases. High-profile acquittals in seemingly clear-cut cases highlight a lack of accountability within the judicial process. For example, husbands have been acquitted even when evidence pointed towards their guilt, reflecting a systemic issue where courts may not adequately recognize or prioritize domestic violence as a serious crime.

Sufficiency of Legal Frameworks

• Need for Comprehensive Legislation: Current legal frameworks do not adequately address the complexities surrounding spousal murders. While laws exist to combat dowry-related violence and marital murder, they often fail to encompass the broader spectrum of domestic abuse that can lead to such extreme outcomes. There is a pressing need for comprehensive legislation that addresses all forms of domestic violence without the constraints of dowry-related stipulations.
• Lack of Specific Laws for Honor Killings: Although honor killings are a form of spousal murder, there is no specific legislation addressing this issue in India. Instead, these cases fall under general murder laws, which may not adequately reflect the social dynamics involved. The absence of targeted legal measures can lead to leniency in punishment and insufficient deterrence against such crimes.

Recommendations for Reform: 

• Strengthening Enforcement Mechanisms: Enhancing training for law enforcement officers on handling domestic violence cases sensitively and effectively could improve response rates and victim support.
• Judicial Accountability: Implementing stricter oversight mechanisms for judicial proceedings related to domestic violence can ensure that cases are handled with the seriousness they deserve.
• Public Awareness Campaigns: Raising awareness about legal rights and available resources for victims can empower individuals to seek help and report abuses without fear.

The current legal frameworks and law enforcement responses to spousal murders in India reveal significant gaps that undermine efforts to combat domestic violence effectively. A multifaceted approach involving legislative reform, enhanced law enforcement training, and public awareness initiatives is essential to address these issues comprehensively and reduce the incidence of such horrific crimes. Without these changes, the cycle of violence is likely to persist, leaving many vulnerable individuals at risk.

Prevention Strategies for Spousal Murders: Warning Signs, Intervention Opportunities, and Awareness Campaigns

The rising trend of premeditated spousal murders in India necessitates proactive prevention strategies that encompass recognizing warning signs, identifying intervention opportunities, and launching effective awareness campaigns.

Warning Signs of Domestic Violence

Recognizing early warning signs can be crucial in preventing domestic violence from escalating to murder. Key indicators include:

• Isolation: The partner attempts to cut off contact with family and friends, making the victim more dependent.
• Controlling Behavior: Excessive monitoring of whereabouts, restricting access to money, or making all decisions for the victim.
• Emotional Manipulation: Consistent criticism, put-downs, or emotional games that erode the victim's self-esteem.
• Jealousy and Accusations: Unfounded accusations of infidelity or possessiveness that lead to controlling behaviors.
• Threats of Violence: Direct threats to harm the victim, their children, or pets. Statements like "If I can't have you, no one will" are particularly concerning.
• Sudden Mood Swings: Abrupt changes from affection to anger can indicate underlying volatility.
• Physical Signs: Unexplained injuries or frequent illnesses may suggest abuse.

Recognizing these signs early can empower victims and their support networks to take action before situations escalate into violence.

Intervention Opportunities

Support Networks:

• Encourage victims to maintain connections with friends and family who can provide emotional support and help them recognize abusive patterns.
• Establish community support groups where individuals can share experiences and strategies for coping with abusive relationships.

Counseling Services:

• Promote access to counseling for both victims and perpetrators. Therapeutic interventions can address underlying issues contributing to abusive behavior and provide victims with coping strategies.
• Implement programs that focus on anger management and conflict resolution for potential abusers.

Legal Resources:

• Educate victims about their legal rights and available resources, such as restraining orders or shelters. Providing information on how to navigate the legal system can empower victims to seek protection.
• Encourage law enforcement agencies to take domestic violence reports seriously and ensure that officers receive training on handling such cases sensitively.

Awareness Campaigns

Public Education Initiatives:

• Launch campaigns aimed at educating the public about the signs of domestic violence and the importance of intervention. This could involve workshops, seminars, and social media outreach.
• Use testimonials from survivors to highlight the realities of domestic violence and encourage others to seek help.

School Programs:

• Incorporate educational programs in schools that teach young people about healthy relationships, consent, and recognizing abusive behaviors. Early education can foster a culture of respect and awareness among future generations.

Community Engagement:

• Collaborate with local organizations to host community events focused on domestic violence prevention. These events can provide resources, support services, and a platform for open discussions about abuse.
• Engage men as allies in the fight against domestic violence by promoting positive masculinity and encouraging them to speak out against abusive behaviors.

Implementing comprehensive prevention strategies that include recognizing warning signs, creating intervention opportunities, and launching awareness campaigns is essential in combating the rising trend of spousal murders in India. By fostering a supportive environment where victims feel empowered to seek help and where communities actively engage in prevention efforts, it is possible to reduce the incidence of domestic violence and save lives.

Conclusion

The disturbing trend of premeditated spousal murders in India, as exemplified by recent cases in Meerut and Auraiya, underscores the urgent need for a multifaceted approach to prevention and intervention. By recognizing warning signs, strengthening legal frameworks, and fostering community awareness, society can create a safer environment for vulnerable individuals. It is imperative that we collectively challenge the cultural norms that perpetuate violence and empower victims to seek help. Only through concerted efforts can we hope to break the cycle of abuse and build a future where love and respect prevail over betrayal and violence.

Together, let us stand against domestic violence and pave the way for a society rooted in compassion, understanding, and safety for all.

.    .    .