Abstract: The primary aim of this paper targets to study in-depth about the two highly interdependent components but distinguishingly established agendas of 'Education for All' and 'Inclusive Education'. Inclusive education is founded on the context of providing an inclusive education accepting the different layers of society while having faith, respect, and fraternity for the diverse population. On the other hand, the aspirations of 'Education for All' tend to overlook some marginalized groups of children, in general, who fall under the category of having 'special educational needs'. The paper indicates a few factors which provide the need for inclusive education on a national level as well as accomplishing some international demands to deliver quality education for all children. And then, the paper ends in a way where a reconceptualization of building equilibrium between both of the modes is suggested through which education practitioners, policy makers, and trainers to develop a more sustainable education system.
Throughout the world, the schools have taken 'inclusion' as a procedure to accomplish placement to the students with disabilities in ordinary classrooms along with the normal students. Inclusive education has now turned into a very important component to conglomerate the normal education system with a transformative and improving education system to provide a supportive environment for all the students. According to Ainscow's study in 2000, inclusive education definitely stands out to become a process of increased participation for all the students in school, including those who are challenged or having disabilities. Inclusive education is a re-conceptualized framework for the betterment of the culture, values, policies, and practices in a school which promotes no discrimination on a humanitarian level as well as solidifies their approach of accepting a diversifying population. The furthest meaning of inclusive education can take you up to the point where education is unanxious, and cheerful and accomplishes all the learning needs of children, youth, and adults with the special attention for the vulnerable, marginalized, and differently-abled.
There are three inclusion perspectives in the Indian context. Physical Inclusion, Social Inclusion & Cognitive Inclusion. Physical inclusion is the kind of education which receives constant promotion, support and all kinds of advantages from the government. This is the most basic inclusion process where all the policies and amendments have processed education to be a free and compulsory aspect for all the children. Here no institution can deny the admission of a child on account of having disabilities. This kind of Elementary Education focuses on homogenization of enrollment, retention, and accomplishment of all the children.
Social inclusion happens only in the sections of the society. In this kind of education policy, the persons with disabilities (PWD) from the lower class of the society with low economic ability are invited largely to join the educational institutions with the approach of minimum fee expectations whereas the upper class or economically affluent class face high expectations. These efforts are getting placed into the institutional scenario to have attitudinal reformations in the society.
Cognitive inclusion on the other hand allows specially abled or children with disabilities to study in normal classrooms with non-disabled children. Cognitive inclusion is possible when the subject matter is divided into smaller parts as it becomes easily graspable for the disabled students. Also, a large share of the responsibility to make these students learn the lessons in micro units goes to the teachers. Such efforts are given priority for equal learning and opportunities to be provided among all students. This seeks a solid framework where each lesson is given at an appropriate time in an appropriate manner.
EFA is a framework which indicates the international commitment to providing education to every child and adult. This commitment is founded both on the human rights perspective and education as the main component for individual well-being and national development.
According to the Department of International Development in the UK, Education profits children, families, communities, and even the entire country. Education ensures people to live with dignity, develop their full capacities, participate fully in development, and improve the quality of their lives (UNESCO, 1990).
Although the primary agenda of EFA was based on a very broad outlook, it might have overlooked its own entitlement of 'all' for the issue of disability and then became unable to reach the poorest and most neglected children of the society, especially in those countries who haven't been able to achieve their second Millennium Development Goals ( MDG) by 2015. This paper focuses on the evidence of excluding disabled children from the international agenda and planning of providing EFA to all. According to Mittler in 2015, although not a homogenous group, disabled children are identified as a community of children who have been excluded in an imbalanced way from education. They have been often tagged with being the poorest and the most disadvantaged in their communities, and they have always been avoided from the 'mainstream' EFA aspects ( Savolainen, 2006; Rieser, 2005). The 'flagships' of EFA have been set up to accomplish a range of different problems and challenges, such as teacher education, HIV/AIDS, early childhood, etc. But the flagship of disability has been differently taken and more adopted as a responsibility for national EFA policies. This is how disability is taken on a different form and getting distanced from the mainstream agenda and becoming a subject of 'specialists' only.
The characteristics and frameworks of inclusive education follow :
As per the Indian context, 'inclusion' could be a wonderful thing that should be added. Let's follow the reasons below :
The above-mentioned points are the reasons for promoting inclusive education in India so that the future trainers are trained in a way where they will be able to teach students with disabilities along with the normal students in a general classroom set up.
To implement strategies which can benefit students by providing wider access to the regular curriculum, the teaching in inclusive classrooms should have the ability to have a problem-solving approach, to be skilled in examining the skills of a student for their growth, to use the internal motivation of a student for developing the required skills of them and to make appropriate expectations for each student, regardless of their capabilities.
This paper finds the differences addressed for EFA and IE. Inclusive education is required to be implemented in order to establish cognitive and procedural agendas in order to acquire integral professional development. Re-conceptualizing and implementing an inclusive classroom requires training teachers with the same kind of experience, transforming present training practices, and establishing the motto of this inclusive education. To be more specific, there should be more and wider research that is essential to make inclusive education a reality in practice on a much larger scale. To conclude the paper, including children with disabilities with the non-disabled is a very challenging task and it involves having appropriate responses from both students and teachers in order to amend learning needs in both formal and informal settings.
References: