Introduction

India, the world’s largest democracy, conducts elections at three distinct levels: central, state, and local. The sheer size and diversity of India necessitate frequent elections, with some states going to the polls annually, in addition to the general elections for the Lok Sabha every five years. This constant election cycle keeps the country in perpetual “election mode,” which some argue hampers governance, policy implementation, and effective decision-making. The proposal of “One Nation, One Election” has emerged as a possible solution, advocating for the simultaneous conduct of elections to the Lok Sabha, state legislative assemblies, and local bodies to streamline the process.

This essay will critically examine the concept of simultaneous elections by analyzing its historical context, benefits, and challenges, with a particular focus on the dangers posed to India’s federal structure. Through a balanced analysis, this essay aims to provide recommendations for navigating the introcacies of implementing simultaneous elections, while preserving the core principles of Indian federalism.

Historical Context and Evolution of the Idea

The notion of simultaneous elections is not new. In fact, from 1951 to 1967, elections to both the Lok Sabha and state assemblies were held together. However, this practice was disrupted in 1968-69 due to the premature dissolution of certain state assemblies and the Lok Sabha. Since then, elections have been held separately, resulting in a constant cycle of elections across the country.

The idea of returning to simultaneous elections was first formally proposed by the Law Commission of India in 1999, chaired by Justice B.P. Jeevan Reddy. The Commission suggested reintroducing synchronized elections as a way to reduce costs and improve governance. In 2003, Deputy Prime Minister L.K. Advani highlighted the challenges posed by staggered elections and supported the idea of simultaneous polls.

In recent years, the concept has gained traction. The 79th Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee (2015) favored the idea, and a 2017 NITI Aayog paper, co-authored by Vivek Debroy and Kishore Desai, outlined the potential benefits of simultaneous elections in terms of economic savings and policy continuity. In 2018, the Law Commission sought public feedback on the matter. Most recently, in 2023, a panel led by former President Ram Nath Kovind was established by the government to evaluate the feasibility of holding simultaneous elections.

Potential Benefits of Simultaneous Elections

1. Cost Reduction

One of the most significant arguments in favor of simultaneous elections is the reduction of financial costs. Conducting elections is a costly affair, involving large-scale logistical arrangements, deployment of security forces, and significant spending by political parties.

Simultaneous elections could streamline this process, significantly reducing the expenditure on electoral logistics and security. A single electoral cycle would also reduce the campaign expenses of political parties, which spend huge sums on rallies, advertisements, and promotions.

2. Continuity in Governance and Policy

Frequent elections often distract governments from long-term policymaking. Governments in continuous election mode tend to prioritize short-term, populist policies aimed at securing votes, rather than focusing on development-oriented governance. With simultaneous elections, both central and state governments would have uninterrupted tenures of five years, allowing them to focus on governance without the pressure of impending elections. This would foster an environment conducive to long-term planning and policymaking, ultimately benefiting the public.

3. Efficient Use of Administrative Resources

Simultaneous elections would streamline the use of administrative and security resources. The Election Commission of India, as well as state election commissions, require vast numbers of personnel to manage the electoral process. By conducting elections together, this administrative burden could be eased, freeing up resources for other developmental and governance-related tasks.

4. Increased Voter Turnout

Simultaneous elections could also enhance voter turnout, as citizens would be able to vote for all three levels of government—central, state, and local—on a single occasion. This could lead to a more engaged electorate, as voters are more likely to participate in a combined election process rather than multiple separate elections over the course of several years. This is evident from states like Bihar and Odisha, where different political parties have historically won at the state and central levels, demonstrating an engaged and politically aware electorate.

Challenges and Concerns

While the benefits of simultaneous elections are evident, they must be weighed against the potential challenges—particularly the dangers posed to India’s federal structure.

1. Constitutional Amendments and Legal Challenges

Implementing simultaneous elections would require significant constitutional amendments.

Articles 83, 85, 172, and 174 of the Indian Constitution, which deal with the tenure of the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, would need to be altered. These amendments would necessitate either extending or shortening the terms of some legislatures, raising concerns about the fairness of depriving elected representatives of their full terms or prolonging their tenures without fresh mandates from the people.

Additionally, changes to the Representation of the People Act, 1951, would be required to align the timelines for national and state elections. This complex legal restructuring would require broad political consensus, which may be difficult to achieve given the varied political interests across the country.

2. Logistical Feasibility

The scale of organizing simultaneous elections across the country is immense. India’s population of over 1.4 billion people requires a large number of electronic voting machines (EVMs), polling stations, and personnel to oversee the voting process. Holding elections for the Lok Sabha, state assemblies, and local bodies all at once would require the Election Commission to manage unprecedented logistical challenges, potentially overwhelming the electoral machinery.

3. Danger to Federalism

The most significant concern with simultaneous elections is the threat it poses to India’s federal structure. India’s federal system is designed to ensure that both central and state governments operate independently, addressing the unique issues faced by their respective jurisdictions. Holding elections at the state and central levels simultaneously could diminish the importance of regional issues and local governance, as national parties and national issues might overshadow state-level concerns.

Simultaneous elections could also reduce the accountability of state governments to their citizens. Staggered elections allow citizens to hold state governments accountable at regular intervals, ensuring that their concerns are addressed promptly. In contrast, simultaneous elections held every five years might lead to complacency, as governments would no longer face the pressure of mid-term elections.

4. Different Electoral Outcomes

Historically, voters in India have demonstrated the ability to differentiate between national and state elections. In states like Delhi, Odisha, and Bihar, voters have chosen different parties for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. Simultaneous elections might blur this distinction, leading to outcomes where national issues dominate, leaving little room for regional parties and local concerns to find expression. This could disrupt the political balance and lead to the weakening of regional parties, which play a crucial role in India’s federal structure.

5. Diminished Accountability

Frequent elections ensure that governments remain responsive to the needs of the electorate. Staggered elections provide citizens with the opportunity to express their dissatisfaction with governance at the state level, even if the central government remains in power. By concentrating all elections into a single event, this system of accountability could be weakened, as governments would only be answerable to voters every five years, potentially leading to a decline in the quality of governance.

Navigating the Challenges

Given the challenges posed by simultaneous elections, especially the threat to federalism, it is essential to explore strategies that could mitigate these risks while still reaping the benefits of synchronized elections.

1. Synchronizing Elections Gradually

Rather than attempting to implement simultaneous elections across all levels of government in one go, India could opt for a phased approach. For instance, the first step could be to synchronize elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies, while leaving local body elections to be held separately. This would ensure that regional concerns remain a priority and that the central and state elections do not overshadow local governance.

2. Ensuring Adequate Representation for Regional Concerns

To preserve federalism, it is vital that regional parties and local issues receive sufficient representation during election campaigns. Political parties could be required to allocate a certain portion of their campaign platforms to addressing regional concerns, thus ensuring that state issues are not entirely overshadowed by national ones.

3. Constitutional Safeguards for Federalism

Amendments to the Constitution should include safeguards that protect the autonomy of state governments. For example, certain legislative powers could be reserved exclusively for states, ensuring that simultaneous elections do not lead to an undue concentration of power at the central level.

4. Public Awareness Campaigns

Educating voters about the distinctions between national, state, and local elections is crucial to preserving the integrity of federalism in a simultaneous election system. Public awareness campaigns can help voters make informed choices, ensuring that local concerns are not lost in the larger national debate.

Conclusion

The idea of "One Nation, One Election" holds the promise of streamlining India’s electoral process, reducing costs, and improving governance. However, the challenges—particularly the risks to federalism—are significant and cannot be overlooked. Any move toward simultaneous elections must be accompanied by careful planning, phased implementation, and constitutional safeguards that ensure the preservation of India’s federal structure. With these precautions in place, simultaneous elections could help India achieve a more efficient and focused governance system while upholding the democratic principles that are the cornerstone of its political system.

.    .    .